Don't throw away your old DSLR lenses! Here's how I use my Nikon lenses on my mirrorless Fujifilm
Whether you're looking for the best snapper for wildlife, a drone, or an instant camera, we've rounded up the best cameras to help make the purchasing decision easier for you! We've also ranked the best mirrorless cameras.
The good news, though, is that you can re-use your old lenses on your new camera. "But what if I have a Canon camera and a bunch of Sony lenses?" I hear you ask, you can still use those lenses on your camera, even though they're from rival brands.
"And what if I have a bunch of DSLR lenses and a mirrorless camera? Should I throw them away or sell them?" No, you don't have to. There's a quick and easy fix for using DSLR lenses with mirrorless camera bodies — all you need is the right lens adapter. If this is your first time hearing that term, don't worry, I've got you covered. Let me take you through what you need and how to use DSLR lenses with mirrorless camera bodies.
There isn't a lot you need to get started: two of the three things you need you probably already own (which why you're reading this article!). You'll need to buy a compatible lens adapter but fret not, these usually aren't very expensive.
Websites like K&F Concept have an array of lens adapters — just make sure you get the right one, and for that, you'll need to double-check your lens mount and camera mount. Skip to the next section for a rundown of what those terms mean.
So, in a nutshell, you need the following:
You can usually tell the camera mount type by looking at the area where a lens is mounted. More often than not, there are visual indications for quick identification. For instance, Fujifilm's X mount cameras have a red dot in the lens area, Canon's RF mount cameras have a small red stripe, Sony's E mount cameras have "E mount" engraved on the mount itself, and so on. You can see a few examples in the gallery above.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
This lens adapter is designed for Nikon G/F/AI/AIS/D/AF-S lenses to Fujifilm X mount cameras, and I found it extremely easy to use. There's a plethora of adapters out there so just make sure you get the right one.
Similarly, lenses will have a mount type too, so you'll need to either consult your user manual or search online to find out what exactly it is. Some lenses mention the mount type on the rear lens cap. As an example, a Fujinon XC or XF lens is compatible with Fujifilm X mount cameras.
Think of a lens adapter as a bridge. I'll give you an example of how I did it. My Fujifilm X-T50 is an X mount camera while my Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G is a Nikon F mount lens, so I bought a lens that could mount the Nikkor lens onto it and attach to my Fuji camera.
There are different types of lens adapters too, some which can electronically communicate with the camera and ensure the lens continues utilizing the camera's autofocus. Cheaper ones usually feature manual adjustments, so it really depends on your budget and shooting requirements.
Once you've got your lens adapter, lens and camera, it's time to assemble your weapon. First, remove your camera's lens cap or existing lens. Don't forget to screw on the rear cap onto the lens you've just removed to protect it from scratches and dust.
Next, attach your lens adapter to your camera by lining up the red dots (or other visual aid) and twisting it on. If done properly, you'll hear a click, indicating that it has been attached properly.
For the third and final step, align the red dot on the lens adapter with your lens and twist it. Again, if done properly, you'll hear a click. Yep, it's really that easy! Both the lens adapter and lens should mount easily but if they don't, double-check to ensure they're compatible.
Don't force it if it doesn't screw on smoothly as you don't want to risk damaging your camera mount or lens.
Once you have your lens mounted onto your camera via a lens adapter, there's one very important thing you need to do. Dig into your camera's settings and enable the Shoot Without Lens setting. For example, I did this on my Fujifilm X-T50 because the camera wasn't electronically communicating with the Nikkor lens as it does with first-party lenses.
While using old DSLR lenses with mirrorless cameras is great for beginners and enthusiasts, it does come with some limitations. After all, you're using two different systems and technology. You may experience a loss in resolution and image sharpness as the lens won't always be able to resolve the megapixel count.
Depending on the lens and the adapter, you may lose autofocus too, and you may need to rely solely on manual focus and aperture control — which, to be honest, might make you a better photographer! Some older DSLR lenses may be heavy for your mirrorless camera too, but that comes down to personal preference. I don't really mind the added weight of my Nikkor lens on my Fujifilm X-T50 as I have a lighter kit lens that I can carry everywhere and swap as needed.
Using a lens adapter is simple and easy to do, and you can use mirrorless lens on mirrorless cameras too — as I said, just make sure you've got the right adapter!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I review TVs for a living and these are affordable back-to-school TV deals I'd actually buy for my dorm room
When looking for back-to-school TVs, price means absolutely everything. You don't need to splurge on one of the best OLED TVs if you're not going to use it for more than four years, especially if most of your time will be spent (hopefully) studying, researching, or sitting in classrooms. Still, if you're here, you obviously want to find a TV with good-enough picture quality and not settle for the cheapest TV you can find. While the TV you take to college doesn't have to be a top-of-the-line set, one with a good amount of features and reliable picture performance should be your goal. As someone who tests TVs (and someone who's not too far out of college that I can't remember dorm life) I've tried to narrow the list of TVs down to fit most budgets. So, if you're heading back to school yourself, in search of a new TV for your child, or want a budget display for your off-campus apartment, these are the six TVs I recommend. This Roku display is the perfect back-to-school TV selection, especially if you're on a budget. You will have to make some compromises, like going with a non-4K TV, but that doesn't make the Roku Select any worse of an option. It's limited on specs but high on value, making itself a steal at under $200. Roku just updated its TV lineup, meaning the Select is totally revamped. I got to see the new Roku Select in action earlier this year and was blown away by how slim the design was. The great thing about Roku, too, is the wide selection of free content you have at your fingertips, so you don't even need to subscribe to any streaming services to get quality content. This Roku Select Series TV is one of the newest Roku TVs on the market. Its picture quality won't blow you away, but for a sensationally low price, you're getting access to one of the best streaming platforms on the market. This is a great opportunity to save money on a 65-inch smart TV with simple, easy-to-use features. Sony's commitment to designing some of the best TVs even extends to its budget models. You'd be right in equating Sony TVs with premium, but it also has some cheaper sets that could work well in a dorm room setting. One such model is the Sony Bravia 3 LED TV. Again, given the price range set under $600, you'll have to live with something other than an OLED, which is fine because the Bravia 3 has some pep in its step. It's not pushing out any record-breaking numbers by any means, but it does have some quality color coverage. In our testing, the Bravia 3 hit 95.88% of the UHDA-P3 gamut and sports a Delta-E of 3.5. The Delta-E score deals with color accuracy, with lower numbers being better. In this case, the Bravia 3 has some great color accuracy, as anything under a 4 is quite good. Brightness is another matter entirely. You're not going to see metrics that mirror a Hisense Mini-LED model here, but that's what you get at this price. At least the Bravia 3 does have an input latency of 9.2ms, so on the off chance you end up gaming in your spare time, this TV won't disappoint. The Bravia 3 isn't as impressive as the higher-end Bravia 7, but if you're in the market for a 75-inch TV for under $1,000, you can't go wrong with Sony's budget-friendly LED TV. It doesn't offer a robust set of gaming features, but the Bravia 3 comes with Google TV baked right into the software. We were also impressed with its implementation of Sony's excellent picture processing. So 1080p and bare-minimum LED TVs just aren't really for you? That's okay, because TVs are getting cheaper these days and both TCL and Hisense have some incredible picks for you in the lower-rungs of their lineups. Case in point is the TCL QM6K, a well-rounded, gaming-centric Mini-LED TV that does its best to eke out as much value as is possible on a sub-$500 sticker price. In our review of the TCL QM6K Mini-LED TV, we raved about its sleek design and picture performance. Again, this isn't a premium display, but it still ticks all the right boxes, netting you good color accuracy and tons of gaming features. It wrangles all of the HDR formats, too, making it particularly ideal for anyone with HDR streaming subscriptions. You can also expect to get somewhat middling audio out of this TV, but that's to be expected across the board with most displays. While it might say it's audio system is made by Onkyo, that doesn't quite mean it will have as bombastic an audio output as conventional Onkyo speakers. Need a TV that can also double as a computer monitor? One in particular that I really love on TCL TVs is its 240Hz mode, which lets you drop the TV to 1080p and play games in the higher refresh rate. It's a bit niche and works best when paired with one of the best gaming PCs... just don't let it distract you from your schoolwork. The QM6K represents one of the most affordable ways to land a Mini-LED TV that can double as a computer monitor. Google TV is available right out of the box, and the TV's relatively modest Mini-LED backlight keeps scenes visually appealing. Samsung's The Frame isn't the cheapest TV on the market, but you can find it at lower prices, especially in smaller configurations. It's great for college students who want their room to have some real personality. It comes with access to tons of artwork from galleries across the world, which will certainly make any art history majors out there very happy. It's obviously a good TV, with solid picture performance, but Samsung's The Frame also has incredible audio for a smaller display. You'd expect Samsung to put all of its effort into designing the look and aesthetic of the TV, but the speakers actually offer some kick unlike other options in its weight class. In our Samsung The Frame (2024) hands-on, we said the TV looks great in art mode and we also liked that the Samsung Art Store now offers a monthly curation of artwork users can display for free. The TV also features HDR10 Plus support, 120Hz refresh rate, built-in Amazon Alexa, Samsung's Tizen operating system, and four HDMI 2.1 ports. While it might sit at the bottom of Hisense's 2025 TV lineup, the U6QF still has some quality features and performance that makes it stand out. We don't have an official review of the TV just yet, but we went hands on with the Hisense U6QF Mini-LED TV several months ago and saw some promising results. At 144Hz, the U6QF makes a name for itself with some serious specs at a budget price. On top of its high refresh rate, the U6QF also boasts gaming features, like VRR and ALLM, plus two HDMI 2.1 ports. Hisense also has a special AI Smooth Motion technology, which should enhance motion clarity on the display. Finding a solid 65-inch TV for under $600 is tough, but the U6QF delivers. It's a brilliant TV for this price, but you might have to contend with some blooming and poor off-axis viewing, which is common for Mini-LED TVs at lower prices. This is the lowest price ever offered for the Hisense 55" Class U6 Series Mini-LED 4K UHD Smart Fire TV. It's a newer TV (a 2025 model, in fact), which means you'll have all the most current technology and features. Between the Native 144Hz, HDR10+ support, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and Amazon's stellar Fire TV OS, you have everything you need for a great entertainment experience. We've been singing the praises of the Panasonic W95A ever since the 75-inch variation hit an all-time low price of $797. One of its biggest drawbacks upon debut was the premium price, and now it's one of the cheapest Mini-LED TVs you can buy — even if it's a year old. Don't let its age fool you, though. I tested Panasonic W95A Mini-LED TV last year and was pleasantly surprised by its brightness, HDR performance, and anti-glare mitigation. Again, this TV won't quite match the same high brightness metrics available on Hisense models, but with just over 1,400 nits in both HDR and SDR, it's plenty bright for any dorm room. With its sticker price down to its lowest point, the W95A makes the perfect budget pick for any student looking to get exceptional picture performance without a hefty investment. Panasonic's fantastic Mini-LED TV has never been more affordable, so it's worth pouncing on this deal before it disappears. You're not just getting a great sale price with the W95A, you're also getting a superb, 55-inch Mini-LED TV loaded with extra features. We dug this TV when it was over a thousand bucks, and we really dig it now that it's below $500.
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Sony WH-1000XM6 3 months later: here's my honest verdict on how Sony's flagship cans hold up
Despite their ever-presence on best lists all over the internet, I wasn't actually all that much of a fan of the Sony WH-1000XM5. Don't get me wrong, I completely understood why so many users and reviewers were enamoured with Sony's flagship over-ears, but there were a number of reasons that they didn't hit right with me. Their extremely narrow headband that dug into my head, and I wasn't a fan of their weird, squishy protective case and their extremely plasticky build. It added up to a pair of headphones that didn't match up to the similarly priced competition. So when Sony announced the XM6, I was ready for a new pair of headphones that could take their place upon my melon. Their release specs were exciting. It looked like Sony had thought about all my issues and fixed the problems. A wider headband, a new sturdy case, a folding frame. And then I got them in my hands. The WH-1000XM6 are a good pair of headphones—they deserve their 4-star review, after all—but they're not the best headphones around. I've now had my hands on the XM6 to really make a solid opinion beyond the review of the cans — here's what I've found. Sony's headphones have always featured excellent ANC — I can't knock them for that. When you turn it on, the world seems to melt away into your music. Recent models have negated some of the pressure and claustrophobia that older versions created, and new features have been introduced to rank them amongst the best noise-canceling headphones you can buy. Perhaps we're now reaching peak noise canceling. The point where the only improvements firms can make are negligible, the top of the curve as it flattens itself out. Maybe the fact that the XM6 aren't all that much more effective at noise canceling than the previous headphones is down to some cosmic ANC limit that we've now reached. They are better than the XM5, and in my testing time, I've found that they are, indeed, very good. But I was hoping for more. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are undefeated. They still block out more noise than Sony's headphones, and they've been out for a full year by the time that Sony launched the XM6. To counteract, Sony created an algorithm that changes the ANC depending on where you are, measuring the noise of your environment to change the ANC on the fly. I understand this decision, but it also sounds a lot like ANC's chief purpose reworded for a specs list. I've stacked the XM6 up against their nearest rivals in a range of different environments and I've seen little difference in 'max ANC' in any of them. The feature, it would appear, doesn't make much sense. The ANC is very good, there's no doubt about that. But considering how good the Bose competition is at blocking noise, I was really hoping for more — and time hasn't done them any favors. One of my main complaints with the XM5 was just how flimsy they felt. Their all-over matte finish and plastic build made them feel cheaper than they actually were, and the squishing case was novel but ultimately too large and annoying. Then there was the headband — a thin, padded affair that pressed down in one spot on my head to make for an unfortunate pressure point. The XM6 have ironed out a whole bunch of these issues. The case, for example, is much sturdier and its magnetic clasp has grown on me in my time with the headphones. I'm still not entirely convinced as to this mechanism's longevity, but it feels secure and tactile as of right now. I miss the magnetic cable store door inside, but I appreciate the folding mechanism that means the case can be more compact. I've found it easy enough to port the headphones around as a result, as they take up less space in a backpack. That folding mechanism does raise a continued issue with the most recent XM designs, however. The XM5's plastic armatures were a key weakness and failure point, so to add a folding mechanism into what appear to be similarly sized points feels... interesting. Nothing has broken in Tom's Guides XM6s as yet, but it's something I know I'll be keeping an eye on as my testing continues. Over my time with the headphones, I've had mixed experiences with the new padded headband. It is much better than that found on the XM6, but it has to sit just right to not cause any comfort issues on your crown. Too far forward or too far back and the same problem persists. Even then, for longer periods of wear, the XM6 aren't as comfortable as the far better-padded Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 or QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. Overall build remains the bugbear. I still don't like the matte finishes that seem to conjure skin grease and fingerprints from thin air, or the overly simplistic style of the XM series. I particularly don't like how light and hollow the headphones feel — while the lightness makes them more comfortable, it also makes them feel much cheaper than their $449 price tag would suggest. That feeling has only been exacerbated over my extended use of the headphones. I want something expensive to feel expensive, and the fairly non-descript looking XM6 neither look or feel the part. They're not badly built, I should re-iterate. They just don't feel expensive. I'm not going to sit here and tell you that the XM6 sound bad. I can't. That wouldn't be true — the XM6 sound good. There's solid balance on display, as well as some top-notch vocal clarity that AV Managing Editor Nick noted in the review. But, when you compare them to some of their similarly priced and even cheaper competition, there are significant chinks in their sonic armor. Sony's typical overemphasis on the low-end is still very much present here. For most listeners, that's not going to be a problem, but it does mean they lose out when compared to the more controlled and tighter sound profile of the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3. There's more detail out of the Brits as well, and an all-around more complete audio experience. I've found the EQ helpful in my testing, but there's still a strange hollowness that I can sense no matter how much work I put into the sliders. It feels like "good sound by numbers" as opposed to a passionate team of audio engineers creating a unique sound profile. Most people aren't going to have a bad time with the XM6. They'll put them on and say, "Wow, those sound great!" and then go about their day. But put them side by side with their closest rivals price-wise, and things get trickier for Sony's flagship. If you put the XM5 next to the XM4, I think that most would be able to fairly quickly work out the differences between the two pairs of headphones. Do the same with the XM5 and the XM6, and things would go differently. Much like the minimal physical differences, the updates inside make the XM6 feel a bit like de ja vu. The battery life remains the same at 35 hours, and the touch controls and app features are pretty much identical. The color-matched cables from the old models are gone, and the ANC key is the same. Dive further in and the XM6 separate themselves out, but this still feels like less of an update than we might have hoped for. As a result, this is not a must-update for XM5 owners. I've found an experience that is almost entirely the same as the XM5 during my extended testing. If your XM5s are still going strong, don't upgrade — wait and see what the XM7 has in store for us in a few years. As for those looking to buy a new pair of flagship headphones, I think you should consider the competition. The XM6 don't sound as good as the PX7 S3 and don't block out as much noise as the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. I don't hate the XM6 by any means. They're a very good pair of headphones. But when the competition are 'excellent', 'very good' doesn't quite seem to match up.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Sony Reon Pocket Pro: Updated Personal Air Conditioner With More Advanced Features
Sony's latest version of personal temperature control has just gone on sale. Like the earlier Reon Pocket 5, the Reon Pocket Pro is a wearable thermal device to cool or warm your body where it touches it. Here's what's changed, and what hasn't, in the Pocket Pro. As before, it's a hands-free device that sits on the back of your neck and is held in place with a neckband that rests on your shoulders. A cooling plate rests on the back of your neck and a vent releases air at the top. Inside, a fan gently whirs. There are two vent sizes included: a smaller one that can sit under a T-shirt and a longer one so you wear a collared shirt but the warm air is still able to escape. What's new in the Pocket Pro is that it's noticeably bigger than the previous model, to allow for a cooling plate around twice the size of the Pocket 5 and longer-lasting battery inside. Additionally, the fan is much quieter than it was previously, and in a moderately noisy environment is hard to hear at all. The new, larger battery can last up to 15 hours in cooling mode, Sony says, which is twice the previous amount, Sony claims. Recharging around two hours. Another update is the inclusion of physical control buttons — for the Reon Pocket 5 controls lay in the Sony smartphone app. Now, you can adjust the temperature by pressing a button, defined enough to be found if you're pressing through a shirt, though it may need a little more dexterity in winter if you're using it to warm you up and you're wearing a jacket. More granular control will still need the app. Smart mode can switch between warm and cool modes automatically, as before, and you can customize the temperature at which the device crosses from one mode to the other. The Pocket Tag is a sensor which can monitor ambient temperature more accurately. It's included in the box and has a key ring so you can put it on your rucksack if you prefer. The price is £199 in the U.K. which is $270, though it's not yet available in the U.S. The Reon Pocket Pro is a hands-free alternative to a fan and offers significant upgrades compared both to a fan and the last Sony device.
