Investors Are Sending a Warning to Congress. Will Washington Listen?
As Republicans haggled this week over a tax bill that would add trillions to federal deficits, the long-term cost of financing the national debt surged.
That wasn't a coincidence — it was a warning.
And it was as gently as the bond market is going to warn the U.S. that the path of the national debt is a problem.
In conversations with investors this week, I heard a new level of focus on the sheer volume of debt that Washington is set to pump out and, in some cases, real concern about how it will play out in markets. It was a shift from the perennial elite conversation, where the consensus has generally been that the debt is a worry, but not an immediate one.
'For the first time in my professional life, we're seeing a shift, with investors looking askance at Treasury debt,' said John Velis, Americas macro strategist at BNY Mellon, a bank responsible for safekeeping $53 trillion in assets.
Congress is not known for heeding gentle warnings.
The proximate cause of the market response, beyond the congressional debate itself, was a downgrade by credit ratings firm Moody's of the U.S. government's status as a borrower — a move they warned was possible back in 2023.
It's not that the Moody's decision told bond investors something they didn't already know. But 'the downgrade focused minds,' Velis said.
Investors are absorbing the details about how much new debt the U.S. is going to be issuing — as well as considering the high volume of debt that's going to come from other governments across the world — and they're saying they need a more attractive return to lend to the U.S. Treasury.
That means a larger proportion of tax dollars will be swallowed by interest payments on federal debt rather than something more productive. Yields on 20-year and 30-year government bonds closed out Wednesday and Thursday above 5 percent.
That's high, but not frightening — yet.
Still, if lawmakers don't react to more benign signals, they likely won't act until something more painful happens — a more pronounced jump in yields, a default, a failed auction of U.S. debt, etc. When will that happen? Who knows? It could be months, or it could be decades.
But there might not be a big warning beforehand.
A lot of investors lose money when Congress abruptly changes course after a sell-off; nobody wants to sell low and then buy high. That leads to a weird game theory calculation that can have the effect of restraining a disapproving market reaction: If traders think lawmakers will respond to their negative reaction by reversing the policy, they might hold off — until there's a horrifying plunge.
Josh Frost, who oversaw debt management under President Joe Biden as assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets, called it an 'unstable equilibrium.'
'Markets have generally been burned by policy U-turns,' Frost told me, adding: 'It's awfully hard to sell out of a position only to buy it back a day later.'
At least a few important lawmakers in Washington are already watching this dynamic closely. Before the run-up in yields this week, House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) told me the bond market would be the ultimate arbiter of what is an acceptable tax-and-spend package.
'If the bond markets don't think we're serious,' he said, 'I'm not sure it will matter what we do, because they're going to dictate the terms.'
So far, it's unclear whether the market reaction this week will be enough to actually shift the trajectory of the 'big, beautiful bill.'
The legislation has cleared the House but now faces the Senate GOP gauntlet, where Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has called for steep cuts to return the U.S. to pre-pandemic levels of spending.
The hard-fought compromise among Republicans in the House was delicate enough that any changes could snarl the bill. Johnson told me at a recent POLITICO event that the initial response to his hawkish push was dismissive — Johnson summed it up as: 'That ship has sailed' — though he now says there are enough votes to block the bill absent more spending reductions.
Still, when in doubt, Congress typically chooses to tax less and spend more.
There are good reasons to stay calm about all this. Financial institutions hold U.S. government debt for all sorts of reasons, many of which are unlikely to change. The angst in the market this week is far from universally shared.
'There's a certain inertia behind the behavior of bond markets, in which 65 to 70 percent of holders can't really sell all that materially,' said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Capital Management. 'We can sit here and gnash our teeth about fiscal unsustainability, but none of us are doing anything about it.'
To put markets at ease, Washington would not need to start balancing the budget. Despite political rhetoric suggesting otherwise, the government's finances are not like a household's — unless your family happens to issue its own currency and that currency is treated as a global reserve asset.
Much of world trade is conducted in dollars, and companies and foreign governments have savings in the U.S. currency, so it is convenient for them to also own U.S. debt. Because demand for the dollar is strong, the U.S. federal government can run higher deficits than other countries.
The problem, economists say, is that the debt is growing faster than the economy, driven by mandatory spending programs like Social Security and Medicare. To put this in context, all of discretionary spending — the stuff Congress fights about in funding bills — was $1.8 trillion in fiscal year 2024. The size of the deficit? $1.8 trillion.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he would like to see a deficit-to-GDP ratio of 3 percent, down from its current rate above 6 percent, which is quite high by global standards.
Lazard CEO Peter Orszag, who previously led the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of Management and Budget, channeled the new mood of debt-focused dismay at the Milken Institute's Global Conference earlier this month.
Previously, Orszag said, he had tended to filter out 'all the Chicken Little, kind of, 'the sky is falling' fiscal stuff, because all of the dire predictions were not happening.'
'But if you compare where we are now to where we were a decade ago, it's a lot different. The deficit is twice as high. Interest rates are dramatically higher,' Orszag argued, adding: 'I think it's time to worry again about this trajectory.'
Few leaders in Washington are acting like they share that view.
Let's be clear: The debate about fiscal responsibility in Washington this week was about how much worse to make the situation, not how to make it better. By extending trillions of dollars in tax cuts, and adding on some more that are politically popular without also making politically painful spending cuts, Congress is starving itself of revenue that could help pay for the programs it continues to authorize.
In other words, they're giving us all back money they still want to spend.
And bond investors know this.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P and Moody's Upgrade Emaar's Credit Ratings, Citing Strong Financial Performance and Robust Revenue Visibility
DUBAI, UAE, June 11, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Emaar Properties PJSC (DFM: EMAAR), one of the world's most valuable and respected real estate development companies, has announced that both S&P Global Ratings and Moody's Ratings have upgraded the company's long-term issuer credit ratings, reinforcing Emaar's position as a financially resilient and strategically agile market leader. S&P Global Ratings upgraded its long-term issuer credit rating to BBB+ from BBB, while Moody's upgraded Emaar's long-term issuer rating to Baa1 from Baa2, both with stable outlooks. These upgrades reflect Emaar's robust financial fundamentals, consistent performance, and sound strategic direction. The same S&P and Moody's rating upgrade has been applied to Emaar's senior unsecured debt. As of March 2025, Emaar reported a revenue backlog of approximately US$ 34.6 billion, providing strong revenue and cash flow visibility through 2028. The company's recurring income portfolio continues to expand, supported by disciplined execution, resilient operations, and diversified income streams. S&P's upgrade was driven by Emaar's record-high backlog of US$ 29.9 billion as of December 2024, and healthy presales in the UAE of US$ 17.8 billion during 2024, alongside a net cash position, low leverage, and strong adjusted EBITDA margins. Moody's highlighted significant reduction in adjusted debt of Emaar from 2020 to March 2025 and the drop in debt-to-equity ratio over the same period. Mohamed Alabbar, Founder of Emaar, said: "We are proud to receive this recognition from both S&P and Moody's, which underscores the strength of our strategy, the quality of our assets, and the discipline we maintain in financial management. These upgrades reflect not only our performance, but also the confidence in Dubai's economy and real estate market. We will continue to pursue sustainable growth, innovation, and value creation for our shareholders and stakeholders alike." Emaar reported an interest coverage ratio of approximately 24 times for the year ending March 2025 and holds US$ 6.9 billion in cash (excluding escrow balances), along with US$ 2 billion in undrawn committed credit facilities, providing ample liquidity and financial flexibility. S&P noted that Emaar's strong mall, hospitality, and entertainment operations, in addition to the resilience of its real estate development business, contributed to the rating action. Dubai Mall recorded over 111 million visitors in 2024, with overall mall portfolio occupancy of 98.5%. These dual upgrades reinforce Emaar's reputation as a leading player in the global real estate sector. View original content: SOURCE Emaar Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Reasons Bond Investors Are Worried — Should You Wait To Invest?
According to a report in MarketWatch, despite having the largest bond market with approximately $29 trillion outstanding in Treasurys, which indicates an IOU that the U.S. government will pay to creditors, bond investors have been concerned lately. As Congress continues to work on passing a massive tax-and-spending bill to help address the debt ceiling, many are worried about what may happen next. For You: Explore Next: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon warned that the bond market could crack in the future, potentially creating panic. While he wouldn't put a deadline on the possible outcome, he did share his concern due to the massive deficits and overspending. Below are a few reasons bond investors are worried and whether you should invest now or wait. Here are five reasons why bond investors are worried. Morris Pearl, chair of the Patriotic Millionaires and a former managing director on the BlackRock team that the Federal Reserve, Treasury and FDIC hired to structure and assess the cost of the Citibank bailout in 2008, noted that the bond market is showing signs of uncertainty. 'If actual bond prices in the U.S. Treasury market were to start jumping around, it would be a massive problem for money market funds, banks, investment banks, investors, the list goes on,' he added. This overall uncertainty has many worried about what could happen next. Read Next: According to Axios, there are signs that indicate global investors are starting to lose patience with the U.S. government, as there appears to be no intention of narrowing the deficit. In the MarketWatch piece, it's stressed that the government can't continue spending indefinitely, assuming that the world will continue buying bonds. While the U.S. has helped fund its deficit by selling Treasury bonds to investors domestically and internationally, this can't continue. Experts warned that the potential for a softer demand for Treasury bonds could send yields higher and make the cost of borrowing higher for governments, companies and Americans. While fears of unsustainable spending and debt levels aren't a new issue, there's a possibility that the bond market could capture the attention of policymakers. The MarketWatch piece explained that interest rates in the bond market have been partially influenced by tariffs lately, despite generally remaining within the trading range since the end of 2022. However, the interest rate or yield on the debt fluctuates based on how lenders see the country's creditworthiness. Pearl also pointed out how the tariff announcements are disrupting the economy, with constant market swings based on announcements and global challenges. Pearl said the idea that President Trump or someone appointed by him could set interest rates directly would terrify investors. 'If politicians are directly controlling interest rates in search of short-term happiness from stimulating the economy, we will lose the long-term stability which our nation has enjoyed for decades, forcing debilitating inflation that has damaged so many other countries,' he explained. Pearl emphasized that the U.S. has been the financial capital of the world because of a central bank that should be insulated from politics. The experts noted that the mere thought of Trump considering firing the Fed chairman sent financial markets into turmoil. While lowering interest rates could stimulate people to buy cars and get mortgages, it may not be ideal for bond investors. Julia Khandoshko, CEO of Mind Money, shared that nobody knows when the global rate cut cycle will begin, which is something that investors constantly consider. Below are a few key points to keep in mind when deciding if it makes sense to add bonds to your portfolio. James Finer, head of business development at Deep MM, said 2025 has been a strong year for bonds, driven by attractive yields (4.7% for broad bond indices) and diversification benefits amid equity market volatility. With higher interest rates, bonds have consistently provided investors with decent returns. While it's difficult to predict what the future holds, bonds have proven to be a reliable investment product. 'Now is a suitable time to buy bonds, given the backdrop of general economic uncertainty,' Khandoshko said. With yields around 4%, these are an attractive investment for those who are exhausted from the constant swings in the stock market. With constant market swings resulting from announcements of tariffs and other issues, those seeking stability may want to consider adding bonds to their portfolios. Khandoshko said to carefully select bonds, taking into account your risk profile and the time horizon of your investment portfolio. The general consensus among experts is that there is still a chance the U.S. may enter a recession. Finer warned that tariffs and potential tax cuts could push inflation to 3.9%, pressuring bond prices. 'Investors should proceed cautiously but confidently with diversified bond allocations. Tariffs could negatively impact GDP, raising recession risks. Diversify and seek professional advice to navigate these risks,' Finer added. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck The 5 Car Brands Named the Least Reliable of 2025 This article originally appeared on 5 Reasons Bond Investors Are Worried — Should You Wait To Invest? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republicans rediscover the one weird trick that actually cuts spending
Dominic Pino is the Thomas L. Rhodes journalism fellow at National Review Institute and host of the American Institute for Economic Research podcast 'Econception.' Well, this is awkward. After the relationship between President Donald Trump and businessman Elon Musk very publicly soured, Congress is considering action on the primary product of that relationship: spending cuts suggested by the U.S. DOGE Service.