logo
Investors Are Sending a Warning to Congress. Will Washington Listen?

Investors Are Sending a Warning to Congress. Will Washington Listen?

Politico23-05-2025

As Republicans haggled this week over a tax bill that would add trillions to federal deficits, the long-term cost of financing the national debt surged.
That wasn't a coincidence — it was a warning.
And it was as gently as the bond market is going to warn the U.S. that the path of the national debt is a problem.
In conversations with investors this week, I heard a new level of focus on the sheer volume of debt that Washington is set to pump out and, in some cases, real concern about how it will play out in markets. It was a shift from the perennial elite conversation, where the consensus has generally been that the debt is a worry, but not an immediate one.
'For the first time in my professional life, we're seeing a shift, with investors looking askance at Treasury debt,' said John Velis, Americas macro strategist at BNY Mellon, a bank responsible for safekeeping $53 trillion in assets.
Congress is not known for heeding gentle warnings.
The proximate cause of the market response, beyond the congressional debate itself, was a downgrade by credit ratings firm Moody's of the U.S. government's status as a borrower — a move they warned was possible back in 2023.
It's not that the Moody's decision told bond investors something they didn't already know. But 'the downgrade focused minds,' Velis said.
Investors are absorbing the details about how much new debt the U.S. is going to be issuing — as well as considering the high volume of debt that's going to come from other governments across the world — and they're saying they need a more attractive return to lend to the U.S. Treasury.
That means a larger proportion of tax dollars will be swallowed by interest payments on federal debt rather than something more productive. Yields on 20-year and 30-year government bonds closed out Wednesday and Thursday above 5 percent.
That's high, but not frightening — yet.
Still, if lawmakers don't react to more benign signals, they likely won't act until something more painful happens — a more pronounced jump in yields, a default, a failed auction of U.S. debt, etc. When will that happen? Who knows? It could be months, or it could be decades.
But there might not be a big warning beforehand.
A lot of investors lose money when Congress abruptly changes course after a sell-off; nobody wants to sell low and then buy high. That leads to a weird game theory calculation that can have the effect of restraining a disapproving market reaction: If traders think lawmakers will respond to their negative reaction by reversing the policy, they might hold off — until there's a horrifying plunge.
Josh Frost, who oversaw debt management under President Joe Biden as assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets, called it an 'unstable equilibrium.'
'Markets have generally been burned by policy U-turns,' Frost told me, adding: 'It's awfully hard to sell out of a position only to buy it back a day later.'
At least a few important lawmakers in Washington are already watching this dynamic closely. Before the run-up in yields this week, House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) told me the bond market would be the ultimate arbiter of what is an acceptable tax-and-spend package.
'If the bond markets don't think we're serious,' he said, 'I'm not sure it will matter what we do, because they're going to dictate the terms.'
So far, it's unclear whether the market reaction this week will be enough to actually shift the trajectory of the 'big, beautiful bill.'
The legislation has cleared the House but now faces the Senate GOP gauntlet, where Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has called for steep cuts to return the U.S. to pre-pandemic levels of spending.
The hard-fought compromise among Republicans in the House was delicate enough that any changes could snarl the bill. Johnson told me at a recent POLITICO event that the initial response to his hawkish push was dismissive — Johnson summed it up as: 'That ship has sailed' — though he now says there are enough votes to block the bill absent more spending reductions.
Still, when in doubt, Congress typically chooses to tax less and spend more.
There are good reasons to stay calm about all this. Financial institutions hold U.S. government debt for all sorts of reasons, many of which are unlikely to change. The angst in the market this week is far from universally shared.
'There's a certain inertia behind the behavior of bond markets, in which 65 to 70 percent of holders can't really sell all that materially,' said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Capital Management. 'We can sit here and gnash our teeth about fiscal unsustainability, but none of us are doing anything about it.'
To put markets at ease, Washington would not need to start balancing the budget. Despite political rhetoric suggesting otherwise, the government's finances are not like a household's — unless your family happens to issue its own currency and that currency is treated as a global reserve asset.
Much of world trade is conducted in dollars, and companies and foreign governments have savings in the U.S. currency, so it is convenient for them to also own U.S. debt. Because demand for the dollar is strong, the U.S. federal government can run higher deficits than other countries.
The problem, economists say, is that the debt is growing faster than the economy, driven by mandatory spending programs like Social Security and Medicare. To put this in context, all of discretionary spending — the stuff Congress fights about in funding bills — was $1.8 trillion in fiscal year 2024. The size of the deficit? $1.8 trillion.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he would like to see a deficit-to-GDP ratio of 3 percent, down from its current rate above 6 percent, which is quite high by global standards.
Lazard CEO Peter Orszag, who previously led the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of Management and Budget, channeled the new mood of debt-focused dismay at the Milken Institute's Global Conference earlier this month.
Previously, Orszag said, he had tended to filter out 'all the Chicken Little, kind of, 'the sky is falling' fiscal stuff, because all of the dire predictions were not happening.'
'But if you compare where we are now to where we were a decade ago, it's a lot different. The deficit is twice as high. Interest rates are dramatically higher,' Orszag argued, adding: 'I think it's time to worry again about this trajectory.'
Few leaders in Washington are acting like they share that view.
Let's be clear: The debate about fiscal responsibility in Washington this week was about how much worse to make the situation, not how to make it better. By extending trillions of dollars in tax cuts, and adding on some more that are politically popular without also making politically painful spending cuts, Congress is starving itself of revenue that could help pay for the programs it continues to authorize.
In other words, they're giving us all back money they still want to spend.
And bond investors know this.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

E&E News

time9 minutes ago

  • E&E News

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.

Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star
Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star

E&E News

time9 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star

Business groups are urging Congress to resist Trump administration efforts to privatize Energy Star, the efficiency program for home appliances and building materials. 'Clear legislative authorization backs ENERGY STAR as a voluntary public-private partnership run by the federal government,' more than 30 trade groups said Wednesday in a letter to lawmakers. 'We respectfully request that ENERGY STAR not be supplanted by non-governmental efforts that could significantly alter and overly complicate the program.' Led by the Real Estate Roundtable, the letter was signed by the National Association of Manufacturers; American Chemistry Council; Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers; Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute; and other groups. Advertisement The letter went to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) and ranking member Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( and ranking member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky) and ranking member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.)

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ
Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are pushing for an investigation into top Justice Department official Ed Martin over his stated plans to "shame" political opponents of President Donald Trump who he's unable to charge criminally, as well as a host of other politically charged matters Martin has publicly pledged to pursue in his new position. "I write to express my grave concern about Ed Martin's stated intention to abuse his new roles as lead of the so-called 'Weaponization Working Group' you constituted at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and as DOJ's Pardon Attorney," Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter transmitted to the Justice Department, which was first obtained by ABC News. "Following his disgraceful tenure as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Martin apparently plans to continue his misconduct in his new roles at DOJ." The DOJ did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the letter. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons Martin's controversial tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., in the opening months of Trump's presidency thrust the office into turmoil and led several Senate Republicans to state publicly they wouldn't support his permanent confirmation in the role. But once the White House announced they were pulling Martin's nomination, Trump said Martin would instead be appointed to several top positions working out of DOJ's main headquarters -- serving as an associate deputy attorney general, the U.S. pardon attorney and director of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group." Martin celebrated the news on his X account, posting 'Eagle Unleashed,' and in various interviews celebrated what he described as a mandate from Trump directly to target the alleged 'weaponization' of the department under the Biden administration. 'It's classic Donald Trump, right? That somebody tries to block him and block his pick, and he decides to double down,' Martin told Breitbart News last month. 'This is probably the greatest job I could ever envision.' MORE: Trump US attorney nominee distances himself from antisemitic Jan. 6 rioter he once praised In a news conference announcing his departure from the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, Martin confirmed he planned to launch a probe of last-minute pardons issued by former President Joe Biden just before he left office -- and suggested that officials he's unable to charge would instead be publicly "shamed." "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people," Martin said. "And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them ... And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's how I believe the job operates." The approach would directly conflict with longstanding DOJ policy that prohibits prosecutors from naming or disparaging individuals who they don't intend to charge criminally. When asked about that policy by ABC News during the news conference, Martin said he would "have to look at what the provision you're referring to, to see -- we want to square ourselves with doing the things correctly." The letter from Senate Democrats said Martin's statements "are a brazen admission that Mr. Martin plans to systematically violate the Justice Manual's prohibition on extrajudicial statements by shaming uncharged parties for nakedly partisan reasons. Weaponizing DOJ in this manner will further undermine the public's trust in the department in irreparable ways." MORE: Bondi, as new AG, launches 'Weaponization Working Group' to review officials who investigated Trump In his early days as pardon attorney, Martin said he advised the president in his pardon of former Virginia county sheriff Scott Jenkins, who had been sentenced to ten years in prison for a federal bribery conviction. "No MAGA left behind," Martin posted on X in response to the pardon. Durbin's letter further cited reports Martin has "personally advocated" fast-tracking pardons for members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy stemming from their roles leading up to the attack on the Capitol, after President Trump initially opted to commute their sentences in his sweeping clemency action for the nearly 1600 individuals charged in connection with Jan. 6. Durbin's letter requests Bondi provide a host of records related to Martin's appointment and early days as head of the Weaponization Working Group and Pardon Attorney's Office. It's unclear whether DOJ will ultimately respond to Durbin's demands given Democrats' minority position on the committee. Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store