Investors Are Sending a Warning to Congress. Will Washington Listen?
As Republicans haggled this week over a tax bill that would add trillions to federal deficits, the long-term cost of financing the national debt surged.
That wasn't a coincidence — it was a warning.
And it was as gently as the bond market is going to warn the U.S. that the path of the national debt is a problem.
In conversations with investors this week, I heard a new level of focus on the sheer volume of debt that Washington is set to pump out and, in some cases, real concern about how it will play out in markets. It was a shift from the perennial elite conversation, where the consensus has generally been that the debt is a worry, but not an immediate one.
'For the first time in my professional life, we're seeing a shift, with investors looking askance at Treasury debt,' said John Velis, Americas macro strategist at BNY Mellon, a bank responsible for safekeeping $53 trillion in assets.
Congress is not known for heeding gentle warnings.
The proximate cause of the market response, beyond the congressional debate itself, was a downgrade by credit ratings firm Moody's of the U.S. government's status as a borrower — a move they warned was possible back in 2023.
It's not that the Moody's decision told bond investors something they didn't already know. But 'the downgrade focused minds,' Velis said.
Investors are absorbing the details about how much new debt the U.S. is going to be issuing — as well as considering the high volume of debt that's going to come from other governments across the world — and they're saying they need a more attractive return to lend to the U.S. Treasury.
That means a larger proportion of tax dollars will be swallowed by interest payments on federal debt rather than something more productive. Yields on 20-year and 30-year government bonds closed out Wednesday and Thursday above 5 percent.
That's high, but not frightening — yet.
Still, if lawmakers don't react to more benign signals, they likely won't act until something more painful happens — a more pronounced jump in yields, a default, a failed auction of U.S. debt, etc. When will that happen? Who knows? It could be months, or it could be decades.
But there might not be a big warning beforehand.
A lot of investors lose money when Congress abruptly changes course after a sell-off; nobody wants to sell low and then buy high. That leads to a weird game theory calculation that can have the effect of restraining a disapproving market reaction: If traders think lawmakers will respond to their negative reaction by reversing the policy, they might hold off — until there's a horrifying plunge.
Josh Frost, who oversaw debt management under President Joe Biden as assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets, called it an 'unstable equilibrium.'
'Markets have generally been burned by policy U-turns,' Frost told me, adding: 'It's awfully hard to sell out of a position only to buy it back a day later.'
At least a few important lawmakers in Washington are already watching this dynamic closely. Before the run-up in yields this week, House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) told me the bond market would be the ultimate arbiter of what is an acceptable tax-and-spend package.
'If the bond markets don't think we're serious,' he said, 'I'm not sure it will matter what we do, because they're going to dictate the terms.'
So far, it's unclear whether the market reaction this week will be enough to actually shift the trajectory of the 'big, beautiful bill.'
The legislation has cleared the House but now faces the Senate GOP gauntlet, where Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has called for steep cuts to return the U.S. to pre-pandemic levels of spending.
The hard-fought compromise among Republicans in the House was delicate enough that any changes could snarl the bill. Johnson told me at a recent POLITICO event that the initial response to his hawkish push was dismissive — Johnson summed it up as: 'That ship has sailed' — though he now says there are enough votes to block the bill absent more spending reductions.
Still, when in doubt, Congress typically chooses to tax less and spend more.
There are good reasons to stay calm about all this. Financial institutions hold U.S. government debt for all sorts of reasons, many of which are unlikely to change. The angst in the market this week is far from universally shared.
'There's a certain inertia behind the behavior of bond markets, in which 65 to 70 percent of holders can't really sell all that materially,' said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Capital Management. 'We can sit here and gnash our teeth about fiscal unsustainability, but none of us are doing anything about it.'
To put markets at ease, Washington would not need to start balancing the budget. Despite political rhetoric suggesting otherwise, the government's finances are not like a household's — unless your family happens to issue its own currency and that currency is treated as a global reserve asset.
Much of world trade is conducted in dollars, and companies and foreign governments have savings in the U.S. currency, so it is convenient for them to also own U.S. debt. Because demand for the dollar is strong, the U.S. federal government can run higher deficits than other countries.
The problem, economists say, is that the debt is growing faster than the economy, driven by mandatory spending programs like Social Security and Medicare. To put this in context, all of discretionary spending — the stuff Congress fights about in funding bills — was $1.8 trillion in fiscal year 2024. The size of the deficit? $1.8 trillion.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he would like to see a deficit-to-GDP ratio of 3 percent, down from its current rate above 6 percent, which is quite high by global standards.
Lazard CEO Peter Orszag, who previously led the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of Management and Budget, channeled the new mood of debt-focused dismay at the Milken Institute's Global Conference earlier this month.
Previously, Orszag said, he had tended to filter out 'all the Chicken Little, kind of, 'the sky is falling' fiscal stuff, because all of the dire predictions were not happening.'
'But if you compare where we are now to where we were a decade ago, it's a lot different. The deficit is twice as high. Interest rates are dramatically higher,' Orszag argued, adding: 'I think it's time to worry again about this trajectory.'
Few leaders in Washington are acting like they share that view.
Let's be clear: The debate about fiscal responsibility in Washington this week was about how much worse to make the situation, not how to make it better. By extending trillions of dollars in tax cuts, and adding on some more that are politically popular without also making politically painful spending cuts, Congress is starving itself of revenue that could help pay for the programs it continues to authorize.
In other words, they're giving us all back money they still want to spend.
And bond investors know this.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

32 minutes ago
US Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted on federal charges from skirmish at New Jersey immigration center
TRENTON, N.J. -- U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver was indicted Tuesday on federal charges alleging she assaulted and interfered with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center while Newark's mayor was being arrested after he tried to join a congressional oversight visit at the facility. Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba announced the grand jury indictment in a post on X. 'While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve,' Habba said. In a statement, McIver said the charges amounted to the Trump administration trying to scare her. 'The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation,' she said. McIver, a Democrat, was charged in a complaint by Habba last month with two assault charges stemming from the May 9 visit to Newark's Delaney Hall — a 1,000-bed, privately owned facility that Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses as a detention center. The indictment includes three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials. Habba said two of the counts carry a maximum sentence of up to eight years in prison. A third has a maximum sentence of one year. McIver's lawyer, former U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Paul Fishman, said in a statement that they would challenge the allegations 'head-on' in court. 'The legal process will expose this prosecution for what it truly is -- political retaliation against a dedicated public servant who refuses to shy away from her oversight responsibilities,' Fishman said. The indictment is the latest development in a legal-political drama that has seen President Donald Trump's administration take Democratic officials from New Jersey's largest city to court, tapping into the president's immigration crackdown and Democrats' efforts to respond. The prosecution of McIver is a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress for allegations other than fraud or corruption. At the same visit that resulted in McIver's charges, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on a trespassing charge, which was later dropped. Baraka is suing Habba over what he said was a malicious prosecution. A nearly two-minute clip released by the Homeland Security Department shows McIver on the facility side of a chain-link fence just before the arrest of the mayor on the street side of the fence, where other people had been protesting. She and uniformed officials go through the gate, and she joins others shouting that they should circle the mayor. The video shows McIver in a tightly packed group of people and officers. At one point, her left elbow and then her right elbow push into an officer wearing a dark face covering and an olive green uniform emblazoned with the word 'Police' on it. It isn't clear from police bodycam video whether that contact was intentional, incidental or a result of jostling in the chaotic scene. The complaint says she 'slammed' her forearm into an agent then tried to restrain the agent by grabbing him. The indictment says she placed her arms around the mayor to block his arrest and repeats the charges that she slammed her forearm into an agent and grabbed the agent. New Jersey Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez had joined McIver at the detention center that day. They and other Democrats have criticized the arrest and disputed the charges as well. By law, members of Congress are authorized to go into federal immigration facilities as part of their oversight powers, even without notice. Congress passed a 2019 appropriations bill that spelled out the authority. McIver, 38, first came to Congress in September in a special election after the death of Rep. Donald Payne Jr. left a vacancy in the 10th District. She was then elected to a full term in November. A Newark native, she served as the president of the Newark City Council from 2022 to 2024 and worked in the city's public schools before that.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why ABC News Anchor Terry Moran Got Fired
Wondering why ABC News fired longtime correspondent Terry Moran? A recent social media post sparked controversy and led to swift action from the network. The situation drew reactions from political figures and raised questions about journalistic standards. Here's what led to Moran's firing and what ABC News said about the decision. ABC News fired Terry Moran after he posted a social media message criticizing Stephen Miller, President Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy. On June 10, 2025, ABC News confirmed it would not renew Moran's contract, stating his post was 'a clear violation of ABC News policies.' In a now-deleted June 8 post on X, Moran called Miller 'a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred' and described Trump as a 'world-class hater' who uses hatred for self-glorification. ABC News responded by suspending Moran and later announced his departure, citing a breach of its standards for 'objectivity, fairness and professionalism.' A spokesperson told USA TODAY, 'We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post… we have made the decision to not renew.' The network emphasized that its reporters must adhere to editorial guidelines that prohibit subjective personal attacks. The post sparked a backlash from senior Republicans. Vice President JD Vance called Moran's remarks 'an absolutely vile smear.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the post as 'unhinged and unacceptable' and said the White House had contacted ABC about the matter. According to The Washington Post, Moran was initially suspended 'pending further evaluation' of whether his post violated neutrality standards. ABC News insiders expressed frustration over Moran's actions. Some said his post harmed the network's credibility, especially after recent efforts to rebuild relations with the Trump administration. Moran, 65, joined ABC in 1997 and served as co-anchor of Nightline and senior national correspondent. He had recently interviewed Trump in April 2025. While he deleted the post, Moran has not issued a public statement since his dismissal. The post Why ABC News Anchor Terry Moran Got Fired appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Panel held to discuss possible cuts to Medicaid
(COLORADO SPRINGS) — Local health care workers and Democrats held a panel on Tuesday, June 10 discussing how Medicaid budget cuts could impact Colorado Springs. Data shows 19% of the 5th Congressional District, which covers most of El Paso County, are enrolled in Medicaid. Organizers of the panel said that number could drop if President Donald Trump signs his so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The bill adds restrictions to who would be eligible for Medicaid, which Republicans argue would cut down on fraud. However, those at the panel on Tuesday disagree, arguing these cuts will impact services across the board. They said the only way to make sure your voice is heard is to speak up to the lawmakers who represent you. 'Call your representatives. There is somebody, they ain't going to answer the phone, but there is somebody who can answer the phone. Get out. Speak your mind. Talk to your neighbor. Find out what goes on,' said Leeann Webster with CA Home Health Care. The senate is currently debating the controversial bill. Both Colorado Senators John Hickenlooper and Michael Bennett both indicated they will not vote in favor of the measure. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.