OPEC+ makes another large oil output hike in market share push
The move marks a full and early reversal of OPEC+'s largest tranche of output cuts plus a separate increase in output for the United Arab Emirates amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4 per cent of world demand.
Eight OPEC+ members held a brief virtual meeting, amid increasing US pressure on India to halt Russian oil purchases - part of Washington's efforts to bring Moscow to the negotiating table for a peace deal with Ukraine. President Donald Trump said he wants this by August 8.
In a statement following the meeting, OPEC+ cited a healthy economy and low stocks as reasons behind its decision.
Oil prices have remained elevated even as OPEC+ has raised output, with Brent crude closing near US$70 a barrel on Friday, up from a 2025 low of near US$58 in April, supported in part by rising seasonal demand.
"Given fairly strong oil prices at around US$70, it does give OPEC+ some confidence about market fundamentals," said Amrita Sen, co-founder of Energy Aspects, adding that the market structure was also indicating tight stocks.
The eight countries are scheduled to meet again on Sept. 7, when they may consider reinstating another layer of output cuts totalling around 1.65 million bpd, two OPEC+ sources said following Sunday's meeting. Those cuts are currently in place until the end of next year.
OPEC+ in full includes 10 non-OPEC oil producing countries, most notably Russia and Kazakhstan.
The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, had been curtailing production for several years to support oil prices. It reversed course this year in a bid to regain market share, spurred in part by calls from Trump for OPEC to ramp up production.
The eight began raising output in April with a modest hike of 138,000 bpd, followed by larger-than-planned hikes of 411,000 bpd in May, June and July, 548,000 bpd in August and now 547,000 bpd for September.
"So far the market has been able to absorb very well those additional barrels also due to stockpiliing activity in China," said Giovanni Staunovo of UBS. "All eyes will now shift on the Trump decision on Russia this Friday."
As well as the voluntary cut of about 1.65 million bpd from the eight members, OPEC+ still has a 2-million-bpd cut across all members, which also expires at the end of 2026.
"OPEC+ has passed the first test," said Jorge Leon of Rystad Energy and a former OPEC official, as it has fully reversed its largest cut without crashing prices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Two children among injured in Russia's overnight attack on Kharkiv region, Ukraine says
(Reuters) -Two children were among several people injured in Russia's largest air attack on the Ukrainian town of Lozova since the war began, the head of the local administration said on Tuesday. "Critical infrastructure, apartment buildings and private homes have been damaged," Serhiy Zelenskiy, the head of the city's council, said on the Telegram messaging app. "Lozova has endured the largest attack since the beginning of the war," he said, adding several people including two children were wounded in the town in the eastern Ukrainian region of Kharkiv. The scale of the attack on the town, which had a pre-war population of about 55,000, was not immediately clear. Reuters could not independently verify Zelenskiy's report. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The Kharkiv region, which lies near the border with Russia, has been the target of regular Russian drone and missile attacks since the start of the war. Parts of Lozova, a town in the southern parts of the Kharkiv region, were left without power and water supply, Zelenskiy said. "We will persevere!" he added. (Reporting by Lidia Kelly in Melbourne; Editing by Saad Sayeed)
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump scores major own goal with labour official firing
US President Donald Trump's decision to fire a top labour official following weak jobs data obviously sends ominous signals about political interference in independent institutions, but it is also a major strategic own goal. Trump has spent six months attacking the Federal Reserve, and Chair Jerome Powell in particular, for not cutting interest rates. The barbs culminated in Trump branding Powell a "stubborn MORON" in a social media post on Friday before the July jobs report was released. The numbers, especially the net downward revision of 258,000 for May and June payrolls growth, were much weaker than expected. In fact, this was "the largest two-month revision since 1968 outside of NBER-defined recessions (assuming the economy is not in recession now)," according to Goldman Sachs. This release sparked a dramatic reaction in financial markets. Fed rate cut expectations soared, the two-year Treasury yield had its steepest fall in a year, and the dollar tumbled. A quarter-point rate cut next month and another by December were suddenly nailed-on certainties, according to rate futures market pricing. This was a huge U-turn from only 48 hours before when Powell's hawkish steer in his post-FOMC meeting press conference raised the prospect of no easing at all this year. Trump's constant lambasting of "Too Late" Powell suddenly appeared to have a bit more substance behind it. The Fed chair's rate cut caution centres on the labour market, which now appears nowhere near as "solid" as he thought. Trump could have responded by saying: "I was right, and Powell was wrong." Instead, on Friday afternoon he said he was firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, for faking the jobs numbers. Trump provided no evidence of data manipulation. So rather than point out that markets were finally coming around to his way of thinking on the need for lower interest rates, Trump has united economists, analysts and investors in condemnation of what they say is brazen political interference typically associated with underdeveloped and unstable nations rather than the self-proclaimed 'leader of the free world'. "A dark day in, and for, the US," economist Phil Suttle wrote on Friday. "This is the sort of thing only the worst populists do in the worst emerging economies and, to use the style of President Trump, IT NEVER ENDS WELL." It's important to note that major – even historic – revisions to jobs growth figures are not necessarily indicative of underlying data collection flaws. As Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, argued on X over the weekend: "BLS's first-release estimates of nonfarm payroll employment have gotten more, not less, accurate over time." It should also be noted that the BLS compiles inflation as well as employment data, so, moving forward, significant doubt could surround the credibility of the two most important economic indicators for the US - and perhaps the world. Part of what constitutes "US exceptionalism" is the assumption that the experts leading the country's independent institutions are exactly that, independent, meaning their actions and output can be trusted, whatever the results. Baseless accusations from the US president that the BLS, the Fed and other agencies are making politically motivated decisions to undermine his administration only undermine trust in the US itself. "If doubts are sustained, it will lead investors to demand more of a risk premium to own US assets," says Rebecca Patterson, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. "While only one of many forces driving asset valuations, it will limit returns across markets." This furor comes as Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's resignation on Friday gives Trump the chance to put a third nominee on the seven-person Fed board, maybe a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place until Powell's term expires in May. Whoever that person is will likely be more of a policy dove than a hawk. Policy uncertainty, which had been gradually subsiding since the April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil, is now very much back on investors' radar.
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Govt backbencher, opposition MPs clash during Prime Minister's Question Time in Parliament
KUALA LUMPUR: Tensions flared in the Dewan Rakyat this morning when a government backbencher got into a shouting match with an opposition member of Parliament over Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's remarks on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). The exchange began when the opposition leader posed a question to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim regarding the 13MP, which was tabled last week. During a supplementary question, Hamzah said the 13MP lacked firmness in addressing the socioeconomic gap between Bumiputera and non-Bumiputera communities. "This isn't specifically about developing new Chinese villages. But when other MPs bring it up, what can I do?" he said. His remarks did not sit well with Mohd Sany Hamzan (PH–Hulu Langat), who interjected and asked the Larut MP, "Is this a debate?" He reminded the House that the session was Prime Minister's Question Time, not a debate. Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal (PN-Machang) then rose to defend Hamzah, questioning Sany's interruption. "Why are you interrupting the opposition leader? You keep interjecting. Just let him speak," he said. Sany shot back, reminding Hamzah and Wan Fayhsal that the session was meant for questions directed at the Prime Minister, not a debate. "Kau kenapa koyak? Koyak pula engkau." ("Why are you getting so worked up? You're the one losing it now.") The heated exchange was eventually diffused when Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul intervened, instructing all MPs to take their seats and allowing Hamzah to finish his remarks. Yesterday, tempers flared in the Dewan Rakyat after Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (PN-Pendang) warned the government about a possible repeat of the May 13, 1969 race riots. Awang had alleged this could happen because the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) "sidelined Bumiputera interests". The uproar began when Awang interjected during opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's debate speech on the 13MP, claiming the plan lacked development for Bumiputera while discussing Chinese new villages.
