
This rare but severe flu complication can affect healthy children
There were an estimated 47 million to 82 million flu illnesses in the United States between October 2024 and May 2025, resulting in between 610,000 and 1.3 million hospitalizations, according to preliminary estimated ranges from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Most fatalities occur in older individuals, but children can also die from the flu. The CDC estimates that flu-related deaths in children have generally ranged from 37 to 199 deaths each flu season.
Now, a new study in JAMA has examined a rare but severe complication that can occur in children who contract the flu. This complication, called acute necrotizing encephalopathy, or ANE, carries a mortality rate of 27% despite intensive care and treatment, according to the new research.
I wanted to learn more about complications associated with the flu, specifically about ANE, what researchers learned about children with ANE, and how can ANE be prevented. And what should parents and families know ahead of the next flu season?
To help with these questions, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen. Wen is an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously was Baltimore's health commissioner.
CNN: What are complications associated with the flu? Who is most at risk?
Dr. Leana Wen: Most people who have the flu will recover without complications. They may go through days or even weeks having fever, runny nose, headache and fatigue, but these symptoms generally resolve without long-term consequences.
Some people, though, experience complications that could result in severe illness or even death. These complications include pneumonia, sinus and ear infections, brain and neurological conditions, and the worsening of existing medical problems such as heart and kidney disease.
People at higher risk for flu complications include individuals 65 years and older, children younger than 2 and pregnant women. In addition, there are a variety of chronic medical conditions that increase risk, including chronic lung disease, diabetes, heart disease, liver disorders, kidney dysfunction and any condition that makes you immunocompromised.
CNN: What exactly is ANE, and how common is it?
Wen: ANE is a rare but very serious condition that occurs as a result of influenza infection. It causes inflammation and swelling in the brain, and it can lead to seizures, impaired consciousness, coma, long-term brain damage and death.
It's not known precisely how common this condition is or whether the incidence has been changing in recent years. It can also occur after other viral illnesses, but it has been most closely associated with influenza, and most often in children.
CNN: What did researchers in this study find out about children with ANE?
Wen: They sought information from US pediatric hospitals and public health agencies regarding cases of pediatric ANE treated between October 2023 and May 2025. In total, they included 41 children with influenza-related ANE.
The median age of these children was 5, and about 3 out of 4 were previously healthy. Importantly, just 16% of those for whom vaccination history was available had received the flu vaccine that season.
All these patients became very ill, and all developed encephalopathy, or altered brain function. Sixty-eight percent had seizures. Most had abnormalities in their platelet count, liver enzymes and spinal fluid composition.
Most patients received a combination of therapies, including steroids and immunoglobulins. Out of 41 patients in the analysis, 11 died. The median period between symptom onset and death was just three days; most of the children who died had such severe brain swelling that the pressure forced the brain downward, crushing vital areas that control breathing and heart function. All but one of the children who died had not received the latest flu vaccine. Among the survivors included in the analysis, 63% had at least moderate disability.
The first takeaway for me is that ANE, while rare, is extremely serious, with high morbidity and mortality. It can be deadly within a short period of time, which means prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential. Second, most children with ANE were previously healthy. Third, while some vaccinated children also became ill, most of those with ANE and nearly all of those who died had not received the flu vaccine that season.
CNN: How can ANE be prevented?
Wen: It is not known why most people who contract flu never develop ANE, but some do. It's also not known whether there is anything that be done once someone contracts the flu to prevent ANE.
What is known is that getting the flu vaccine reduces the chance of contracting the flu and of becoming severely ill as a result. This JAMA study also suggests that vaccination reduces the likelihood of developing ANE and of dying from it. The article and an accompanying editorial emphasize the importance of everyone being up-to-date with the flu vaccine.
CNN: What else should parents and families know ahead of the next flu season?
Wen: Influenza is a common illness that can have serious complications, including in previously healthy individuals. Getting the flu vaccine is helpful both for reducing the chance of contracting the flu and for lowering the likelihood of developing complications. The CDC recommends the flu vaccine for virtually everyone 6 months and older. Parents should be sure that their children receive the flu vaccine in the fall and that they and others in the family are vaccinated, too.
Of course, flu is not the only contagious respiratory illness that can spread in fall and winter months. It's important for people who have fever and active respiratory symptoms to stay away from others, especially those most vulnerable to severe illness. Good hand hygiene can lower the risk of spreading contagious diseases, as can taking precautions like masking in indoor crowded settings.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Defying RFK Jr., pediatric group urges COVID shots for young kids
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The majority of what we've seen from the secretary has been a pretty clearly orchestrated strategy to sow distrust in vaccines,' said Sean O'Leary, a physician who heads the AAP's infectious-diseases committee. 'We make our recommendations based on what's in the best interest of the health of children.' Advertisement Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for Kennedy, said AAP, which has received funding from vaccine manufacturers, should 'strengthen conflict-of-interest safeguards and keep its publications free from financial influence.' 'By bypassing the CDC's advisory process and freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability, the AAP is putting commercial interests ahead of public health and politics above America's children,' Nixon said in a statement. Advertisement The country is in the midst of a summer uptick in coronavirus cases, and the future of vaccine access is uncertain. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not go as far as Kennedy directed and did not remove coronavirus vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule. Instead, the public health agency softened its recommendation for all children to receive an annual coronavirus shot. It now recommends parents consult a doctor to decide whether to vaccinate their children. The AAP took a similar approach for older children. Its new guide says healthy children ages 2 to 18 can receive a coronavirus vaccine if their parents or guardians want them to have that protection. Few parents do. The CDC estimates that 13 percent of all eligible children are up-to-date on coronavirus vaccines, as well as 4.5 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months. By issuing a broader coronavirus vaccine recommendation for young children, the AAP is trying to boost uptake and keep the shots free. Between October 2022 and April 2024, a little more than half of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months admitted to intensive care for COVID had no underlying conditions, a CDC study found. Still, the vast majority of children infected by coronavirus will have mild symptoms, and few will become hospitalized. Health officials say it has become difficult to measure the effectiveness of coronavirus vaccines in young children because the vaccination rates are so low. Limited data show the 2024-2025 coronavirus vaccines provided extra protection against severe illness in children and adults compared with people who did not receive a vaccine, according to CDC data presented in June. Advertisement But pediatric infectious-disease specialists have argued that regularly vaccinating children makes sense as a public health strategy because evidence has shown each year that protection in children is similar to that seen in adults. Federal officials have yet to approve or recommend an updated coronavirus vaccine, which usually debuts in late summer. The Food and Drug Administration has signaled it would not license upcoming coronavirus vaccines for otherwise healthy children. Kennedy recently fired all members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group of experts who decide who should receive FDA-approved or authorized vaccines. Four of the seven members Kennedy appointed as replacements have been publicly critical of the broad use of coronavirus vaccines. For the past three decades, the AAP and the CDC have been mostly aligned in their vaccine recommendations — until now. The AAP's schedule 'differs from recent recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC, which was overhauled this year and replaced with individuals who have a history of spreading vaccine misinformation,' the organization said in a statement. Under federal law, insurers must cover the cost of ACIP-recommended vaccinations. The AAP and other professional organizations have been holding discussions with insurance companies to continue covering the shots based on guidance from professional associations rather than the federal government. O'Leary said insurers 'are signaling that they are committed to covering our recommendations.' AHIP, the major insurance lobby, has said its members are committed to continue paying for respiratory virus vaccines this season. The new ACIP panel did not make any coronavirus recommendations when it met for the first time in late June. It may not even convene a special meeting to discuss the coronavirus vaccines until mid-September, according to industry employees and CDC officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share sensitive information. That timing has become more uncertain after the Aug. 8 shooting at the CDC that severely damaged several buildings and traumatized CDC staff. The ACIP is scheduled to hold a meeting in October. Advertisement The AAP's full vaccine guidance, published Tuesday in the organization's clinical guidebook for infectious-diseases prevention and treatment, represents formal recommendations for immunizations for infants, children, and adolescents against 18 diseases. Its recommendations for flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, are essentially the same as what federal health officials, including Kennedy, have recommended.


Medscape
9 minutes ago
- Medscape
Smartwatches Won't Fix the Burnout Crisis in Medicine
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Welcome to Impact Factor , your weekly dose of commentary on a new medical study. I'm Dr F. Perry Wilson from the Yale School of Medicine. Burnout is a huge problem across multiple professions in the United States. Grades K-12 teachers have about a 50% burnout rate. So do people in quality assurance. But I was unable to find a profession with a higher rate of burnout, or a higher potential for harm from burnout, than — you guessed it — physicians. A 2022 survey found that 63% of physicians had burnout, rates that have been among the highest of all US workers since 2011. And this is a huge problem. When docs are burned out, they are more likely to commit medical errors, be named in malpractice suits, and even exhibit racial biases. Administrators of health systems have taken notice. But their solutions have often been criticized as tone-deaf. 'Mandatory burnout workshops' are not helping anyone's burnout, I promise you. So I was a bit concerned by a study that came out this week that offered a relatively simple solution to what is a really complex problem. Can you actually cut burnout in half by giving physicians a smartwatch? Before we dig into the study, let's talk about burnout a little bit. I think there's sort of a Potter Stewart definition of burnout: 'I know it when I see it.' But the real description comes from Christina Maslach, who characterized it as a psychological syndrome brought about by chronic occupational stress characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization or cynicism, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment. Sound familiar? I know. It's not uncommon. And it goes without saying that depersonalization and cynicism are just terrible traits to have in a doctor. It's not just workload that leads to burnout, according to most psychologists; it's this combination of workload and a feeling that you don't have autonomy. That you are not the master of your fate or the captain of your soul. Big issues. So how is a smartwatch supposed to help? Well, the idea isn't crazy. Smartwatches are miniature biofeedback devices. They tell you about your heart rate, your step count, how much you slept. Those little data points can lead to some real behavior change. This is anecdotal, but multiple people have told me they've cut back on drinking alcohol because they noticed that their smartwatch-reported sleep quality is worse on nights that they drink. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic and University of Colorado thought that maybe giving smartwatches to physicians would lead them to make small lifestyle changes, like getting more sleep, that would reduce this problem of burnout. Here's how the trial worked, as reported in JAMA Network Open . One hundred and eighty-four physicians — about half attendings, half residents and fellows, and about 60% female — were randomized to two groups. One group got a smartwatch, specifically the Venu 2 Plus from Garmin, to wear for 6 months. The other group got nothing. Well, to be fair, they got a smartwatch as well — just after a 6-month wait so the team would have 6 months of high-quality comparison data. At the beginning of the study and several times over those 6 months, the participants took surveys about their mental health: a resilience survey, a quality-of-life survey, a depression survey, a stress survey, a sleep survey and, importantly, a burnout survey. At baseline, 50% of people in the intervention arm were burned out and 43% were burned out in the control arm. After 6 months, burnout dropped to 41% in the intervention arm and rose to 51% in the control arm. The difference here was not technically statistically significant, but after accounting for the fact that burnout was higher at baseline in the intervention group, the team concluded that the odds of burnout were about 50% lower after 6 months of the smartwatch intervention. I know statistics can get confusing in situations like this. I think sometimes it helps just to look at the graph and make your own judgment: Burnout down a bit with a smartwatch, up a bit without a smartwatch. Fine. There was also about a 20% improvement in resilience scores, while there were no differences in quality of life, depression, or stress scores. So… is that it? Have we solved this problem plaguing all of healthcare and multiple other industries across the United States? Smartwatches? My fear is that some C-suite execs will look at this study and think they can cut burnout rates in half by sending a bunch of smartwatches around. Maybe it seems obvious to you that it wouldn't actually work, but let's break down a bit how the results of this study may be somewhat skewed. The most important thing to note is that this study was not blinded. The people in the smartwatch group knew they were in the smartwatch group because… they were wearing the smartwatch. It's hard to imagine a way to blind this study, to be fair, although I suppose you could give everyone a smartwatch but half the people get fake data or something. But once you know that you are in the intervention group, biases in your answers creep in. Just imagine you're in the study. At baseline, you take these surveys, then they give you a smartwatch, and 6 months later you take a bunch of surveys again. Maybe you skew your answers a bit, even unconsciously, because you like the people running the study or science in general, or maybe even smartwatches. The authors acknowledge this but minimize it, suggesting that if this 'social desirability bias' was present, it should improve scores across all the surveys. I mean, okay, but to be honest, the score differences are pretty marginal across the board, so I don't find that argument very compelling. The real issue here is that this study puts the locus of control in the wrong place, as many burnout interventions do. It puts the responsibility for burnout on the shoulders of the burned-out physicians. It suggests we can tolerate our jobs better if we just change our outlook: Sleep more, meditate more, live in the moment, do tai chi, etc. But I would argue that the problem with burnout is not in the mind of the physician; the problem is the system in which we work. More than 75% of physicians in the United States today are employed by hospitals, health systems, or other corporate entities. The private-practice model is rapidly dying and the physician workforce is learning what it means to be labor instead of management. They are feeling what it is like to be exploited, for lack of a better word — pushed to see more patients in less time, pushed to generate more RVUs, pushed to work weekends and nights to increase margins. It's not what they signed up for. The problem of burnout is from the system. If you want to cut rates in half, you don't send docs a smartwatch. You give them more time to see fewer patients. You change the insurance system that leaves us on the phone arguing for prior authorization for hours at a time. And if that affects the bottom line of the health system, you look for cuts in the — and this is true — 10 administrators for each physician in the US. Look, I love my smartwatch. It helps me delete emails while I'm waiting for the elevator. But the solution to physician burnout is not here. It's out there.

Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
RFK Jr.'s Misguided War on mRNA
Covid vaccine mandates and a lack of transparency by public-health experts produced many unintended effects—or what scientists call 'off target' responses. One is a political turn against mRNA technology that could damage U.S. innovation and pandemic preparedness. The Health and Human Services Department recently scrapped 22 mRNA-related vaccine investments. 'These vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,' Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. 'We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.'