logo
Inside the 100-year fight to get a Black revolutionary pardoned

Inside the 100-year fight to get a Black revolutionary pardoned

The Guardian26-01-2025
In the days before President Joe Biden's final moments in office, Justin Hansford, a Howard University law professor, received a call from a White House staffer. They told Hansford that Marcus Garvey, the revolutionary Jamaican leader who pushed for the unity of Black people and a collective return to Africa, would soon be posthumously pardoned for mail fraud.
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
Hansford dialed in Garvey's son, Dr Julius Garvey, for a three-way call to break the news to him before it hit the newspaper circuit. As he thought of his nearly two decades of legal and advocacy work to help exonerate Garvey, Hansford remembered Garvey's wife Amy Jacques who began the efforts to pardon him in 1923.
'I just bore witness to the culmination of over 101 years of people trying to accomplish something,' Hansford, the founder and executive director of Howard's Thurgood Marshall civil rights center, told the Guardian. 'After working on this for all these years, it was a great honor for me to be able to be the person on the phone when [Garvey's son] got that news.'
Garvey's Black nationalist movement, anchored by the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), began in the 1910s and spread throughout the world after Garvey moved to the US. His organization advocated for the celebration of African history and culture and championed a back-to-Africa movement where the descendants of formerly enslaved Africans would return to their roots.
But in 1923, Garvey was convicted of one count of mail fraud and served nearly three years of a five-year sentence at the Atlanta federal penitentiary. He was deported from the US in 1927 and the UNIA soon lost momentum. Garvey's supporters, including Hansford, say that the trial was politically motivated and designed to quash the global movement. The conviction had far-reaching effects: it sullied Garvey's reputation during his lifetime and cast a lasting shadow over the movement.
Garvey's posthumous presidential pardon on 19 January followed over a century of legal teams poring over trial transcripts, volunteers gathering tens of thousands of petition signatures, and supporters sending several US presidents letters seeking Garvey's exoneration. Hansford's 2024 book, Jailing a Rainbow: The Unjust Trial and Conviction of Marcus Garvey, provided a legal analysis in support of his exoneration.
While the conviction did not define Garvey's legacy, Hansford said, the posthumous pardoning will help restore the dignity of his global movement: 'That idea of pride in your heritage, for African Americans, all of these ideas are what we vindicate when we vindicate Garvey.'
The son of a stonemason and a domestic servant, Garvey formed the UNIA in Jamaica in 1914 to achieve what he called Black self-reliance, the idea that economic and political independence could lead to liberation. In 1916, Garvey moved to Harlem, New York, to spread UNIA's message and soon set up the movement's headquarters there. Within four years, the movement flourished among working-class people, with nearly a thousand UNIA divisions cropping up throughout the US, Canada, Africa, Central America and the Caribbean.
After the first world war, Garvey saw an opportunity to unite the African diaspora in the non-colonized west African country Liberia. At a 1920 conference he organized in Manhattan called the International Conference for the Negro Peoples of the World, which was attended by African delegates and tens of thousands of his followers, the UNIA adopted a human rights document that detailed abuses towards Black people throughout the world and declared the need for unity. Along with his idea of Liberia becoming an empire for Black people in the Americas, Garvey created a shipping company called the Black Star Line that would trade between the continents and repatriate Black Americans to Africa. People could buy stocks in the Black Star Line for $5 a share.
'If you believe that the Negro has a soul, if you believe that the Negro is a man, if you believe the Negro was endowed with the senses commonly given to other men by the Creator, then you must acknowledge that what other men have done, Negroes can do. We want to build up cities, nations, governments, industries of our own in Africa, so that we will be able to have the chance to rise from the lowest to the highest positions in the African commonwealth,' Garvey said in a recorded July 1921 speech.
Even though the Black Star Line vessels transported people to Latin America, the ships never made it to Liberia. The Bureau of Investigation, a precursor to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), began investigating the fleet soon after it launched in 1919. The company quickly failed and lost up to an estimated $1.25m, laying the groundwork for Garvey's charge of using the mail to solicit company investments.
According to Hansford, Garvey was solely guilty of launching a business at an unfortunate time, at the beginning of the Great Depression when many businesses financially struggled. After the first world war, ships that were once used for warfare sat idle, so many people began entering the shipping business, Hansford said. 'If you try to open a business and suddenly everybody in the world has access to ships and they can open the same business as you can, it was really hard to be successful in the shipping industry.'
While gathering research for the pardon, Hansford learned from FBI documents that undercover federal agents had infiltrated the Black Star Line in order to sabotage it. The Bureau of Investigation's J Edgar Hoover 'had made it really clear in the documents that he wanted this to fail, so some of these agents were the same people in charge of operating some of these ships', Hansford said. 'So it's a number of things working against them. He had the Great Depression. He had this shipping industry. He's got infiltrators operating the company.'
Additionally, Black leaders, such as A Philip Randolph, who opposed Garvey's ideology began a 'Garvey Must Go' campaign to discredit him, and in 1923, wrote a letter to the attorney general encouraging the government to continue its prosecution of Garvey for mail fraud. Hansford said that he lamented the fact 'the policy debate around Black leadership was decided not on the merits, but it was decided by the fact that the government and J Edgar Hoover was able to intervene and convict and frame and deport one side of the debate'.
The trial led to Garvey's deportation in effect dismantled the UNIA movement and contributed to his death, Hansford said. After he survived a stroke in 1940, the media prematurely published obituaries for Garvey, many of which focused on the mail fraud conviction and caused Garvey distress. He suffered another stroke and died shortly thereafter. 'That false charge was the very thing that took his life,' Hansford said. It was 'a very, very difficult pill to swallow'.
Garvey's son Julius approached Hansford about 20 years ago after he discovered a paper that Hansford wrote about the trial. Soon after, Garvey asked him to join the legal team to help exonerate his father. Over the course of several years, Hansford pored over transcripts from the trial, visited Jamaica to view museum archives, and drafted an analysis of why Garvey deserved a pardon. When Hansford became a law professor at his alma mater, Howard University, he encouraged his students to read the trial transcripts to glean new angles, and hosted campus events to highlight the injustice of Garvey's conviction.
Goulda A Downer, an associate professor at Howard University's College of Medicine, also spent nearly a decade pushing for Garvey's pardon. As the then head of the Caribbean-American Political Action Committee, which politically advocates for Caribbean Americans in DC, Downer fell 50,000 short of gathering the 100,000 signatures needed to send a pardon petition to the White House in 2016.
She tried again six years later and successfully got the required signatures by working with advocates throughout the world, but said that she didn't hear back from the White House at that time. For several years thereafter, Downer helped organize Caribbean American community events to inform people of Garvey's legacy, and regularly met with attorneys, including Hansford, to brainstorm new ways to secure a posthumous pardon.
'We are the beneficiaries of Marcus Garvey's vision,' Downer said. 'Because he clarified for us the question of our identity, and I think that was something that we always wanted to make sure that the community knew: that we hadn't stopped. We were continuing to fight.'
Downer and Hansford are uncertain what made Biden pardon Garvey after a century of global efforts, but they saw it as a long time coming. For Hansford, it was symbolic that Garvey's pardon came on the eve of President Donald Trump's second inauguration. '[Garvey] had an outgrowth of activism that was fascinating and powerful and dynamic and energized, and those ideas are still relevant,' Hansford said. 'Those ideas could still empower resistance movements today.' He was thrilled to see videos circulating on social media of youth learning about Garvey after he received his presidential pardon.
Hansford said that advocates were planning a large celebration at Howard University in February, with global celebrations continuing into the summer.
For Downer, a posthumous presidential pardon served as a form of justice for Garvey and his family, and had the potential to restore his legacy. 'He really inspired us to take pride in ourselves,' Downer said. 'He changed the world.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lucy Connolly is no martyr, she's a racist. It's the truth that's being twisted
Lucy Connolly is no martyr, she's a racist. It's the truth that's being twisted

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Lucy Connolly is no martyr, she's a racist. It's the truth that's being twisted

Lucy Connolly's post wasn't just a tweet and wasn't a one off - the ex-Tory councillor's wife was exposed for sending more vile messages and posts before her hateful Southport statement First, the facts. Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty in court to writing a social media post intending to stir up racial hatred. ‌ She'd called for 'mass deportation now' in a social media post to her 10,000 followers on X on the day three children were killed in a knife attack in Southport. In the expletive-ridden message she said: 'set fire to all the f*****g hotels full of the b***** for all I care' concluding: 'if that makes me racist so be it'. The post was later deleted but police established it had been available for at least three and a half hours. ‌ So, in short, the wife of a Conservative councillor called for hotels housing asylum seekers to be set on fire. ‌ Judge Melbourne Inman KC said Connolly had been 'well aware of how volatile the situation was' at the time of the Southport attack, volatility that led to serious disorder in a number of areas. Your message was widely read – it was viewed 310,000 times with 940 reposts, 58 quotes and 113 bookmarks,' he said. It wasn't just a tweet. She'd broken the law. She accepted as much, which was why she pleaded guilty. It wasn't just a tweet. Connolly had had form for xenophobic, anti-Black and anti-migrant rhetoric on social media which a glance at her timeline would show up. It clearly wasn't a one off. ‌ In fact, the court was told that the day before she was arrested, Connolly had sent a WhatsApp message saying the 'raging tweet about burning down hotels has bit me on the arse lol'. She also said she'd 'play the mental health card' if arrested, and would deny responsibility for the post if asked. The full picture tells a different story to the one that the liars, racists and xenophobes would have you believe. And if Connolly truly believed in her innocence she would not have sought what she believed to be a lesser sentence. Nor does this have anything whatsoever to do with censorship. ‌ If Connolly wanted to write the same things again she'd be free to do so. Twitter would allow her post to remain, but the law of the land would find her guilty and she would likely go back to prison for a lot longer. Because contrary to what the thugs and bigots masquerading as people who simply care about their families won't tell you is that free speech does exist. You are free to say whatever you like. But you will also be free to accept the consequences. ‌ Free speech doesn't spare you from the consequences of shouting 'Fire' in a packed cinema when there isn't one, sparking panic and most likely serious injury. The likes of Nigel Farage, Richard Tice and the rest of Reform UK, with risible Tory leader Kemi Badenoch chasing the bandwagon, are throwing out any number of incendiary perspectives on this incident to whip up anger and division. Which is why it was so important for the Daily Mirror to take a stand on Thursday. The country is a tinderbox with a significant number of people in public life who should know better encouraging vigilante mobs, stoking fear and loathing and telling straight up lies. Now that she is out, the liars will use Connolly as a martyr. And the engagement-chasing sections of the media, happy to whip up division will indulge them. The liars will paint Connolly as a demure, childminder mum put through hell for a simple tweet. They won't mention her other tweets, among them one referring to Somalis with vomiting emojis, the one reacting to an anti-racism protest by suggesting those taking a stand should house: 'an illegal boat invader'. They won't let the truth get in the way of a carefully stage-managed bid to rehabilitate a woman whose prejudice is well documented. But we will.

Man, 24, held in Paris murder probe after four bodies pulled from the Seine
Man, 24, held in Paris murder probe after four bodies pulled from the Seine

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Man, 24, held in Paris murder probe after four bodies pulled from the Seine

A 24-year-old man is being held by French police after authorities found a number of bodies washed up in the River Seine last week, with some showing signs of a violent death A 24-year-old man is held by French police on suspicion of murder after four men were found dead in the River Seine last week. ‌ Police are questioning the 24-year-old after the first body found was identified as a 40-year-old man, according to prosecutors. The man had only been submerged in the water a short time before his body was discovered on Thursday August 14. ‌ The body was removed from the river when it was spotted by a passer-by near a bridge in Choisy-le-Roi in the south east of Paris. Police admitted "there's a lot of questions' after the initial discovery. ‌ Police then searched the river later that day and extracted three more bodies in the vicinity. One victim had died by strangulation, with another also showing signs of a violent encounter. The suspect is being held in Paris, however police have not revealed the extent of what he is suspected of. Although the first body discovered last week was 'relatively well-preserved', the three other victims were in 'a very advanced state of decomposition', prosecutors said. Authorities have found no clear link between the victims and it is possible they are unrelated crimes and the bodies were carried downstream by the current to the foot of the Choisy bridge. 'A man was taken into custody this morning on suspicion for multiple murders at the headquarters of the criminal brigade of the Paris judicial police,' the Créteil prosecutor's office told French outlet Le Monde. ‌ The first victim was identified as a man who lived in Val-de-Marne, east of Paris. The other three bodies are reportedly all adult men and forensic examinations are being conducted to determine their identities and the cause and dates of their deaths. All bodies that were recovered were found to be men. Three were found fully clothed while another was partially clothed. Three of the men were of African descent and a fourth was of North African descent and are believed to have been in the river for numerous days. Their bodies were later taken in order for autopsies to be carried out. A police source told BFMTV: "We're not used to this kind of incident. It's an act that raises a lot of questions. Was it criminal? Were these people drunk and didn't survive the heatwave? Did they go swimming or drown?" Should no link be established, it would be due to the flow of the river that could explain why they all appeared at the same location. The mayor's chief of staff Bertrand Guillerm said the bodies could have drifted under during a high flow.

Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore real tensions
Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore real tensions

The National

time7 hours ago

  • The National

Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore real tensions

That's not what I wrote. I gave very specific examples: four young Muslim men arrested for shouting homophobic abuse outside a Manchester gay club; the Rochdale grooming scandal, where imported values clashed with ours; and the Netherlands, where the party led by Geert Wilders surged after the murder of Theo van Gogh and years of tension over integration. These are concrete cases where imported cultural attitudes created flashpoints – they are not inventions. READ MORE: Fears over Perth hotel protest as far-right 'emboldened' Ron tries to say prejudice is purely homegrown. Nobody denies Britain has a history of homophobia and racism — I never said otherwise. But to pretend imported values never cause conflict is wilful blindness. The Manchester incident happened. Rochdale happened. The Dutch experience is real. We can debate their implications, but we can't erase them because they are uncomfortable. As for Tommy Robinson, Ron again twists my point. I never endorsed Robinson's message – I said dismissing it as 'pure racism' misses why his reach is growing. When Black men or LGBT people share his content, that does not make his message valid, but it proves his message is finding resonance in places liberals claim it shouldn't. That demands explanation, not denial. Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore genuine tensions and leave the field clear for them. READ MORE: Humza Yousaf issues 'firebombs' warning over anti-migrant rhetoric Ron says the true danger is 'homegrown' prejudice. Of course it is. But the question I raised – and he dodges – is what happens when imported prejudice and homegrown prejudice reinforce each other? When politicians deny cultural clashes on the ground, it creates exactly the conditions for people like Robinson to exploit. That's what I warned about. Ron dismisses the problem by calling it 'distortion'. But nothing I said was invented. If we can't face facts, we'll never defuse these tensions – and the losers will be both immigrant communities and the minorities caught in the crossfire. James Murphy Bute IN his diatribe against James Murphy (Letters, Aug 20), Ron Lumiere tells us: 'Far-right movements have long sought to co-opt grievances across identity groups. That does not legitimise their message, it shows how far-right narratives adapt to exploit fears.' Isn't that the very tactic adopted by the LGBTQI+ campaign identity he oft quotes himself? Isn't the addition of transgender an example of a cause piggy-backing onto the LGB group creating strange bedfellows, given LGB is a question of sexual attraction and transgender is in itself a conflated dichotomy between the absolute of physical sex characteristic and psychological interchangeable gender, both lumped under the 'T' label. But it doesn't stop there, as the co-option of 'Q', then 'I' expands the grievance community, and as if that is not sufficient, the catch-all '+' allows any group to be added to keep the grievance community pot boiling. READ MORE: African 'king and queen' evicted from Scottish Borders forest The fact is, this all a long way from the original LGB community group, who even now can find themselves at odds with those groups piggy-backing on to them. We've seen how lesbian women have been pilloried for seeking to protect women's rights to safe spaces, for example, and the erosion of their sex status by the gender fashionistas seeking access for male-bodied individuals to women's safe spaces. Perhaps what angers most is how the Ron Lumieres of our society rush to accuse 'white males' of having the temerity to disagree with the mantra they are promoting. It's all our fault, not those who are pushing the boundaries, not with persuasion but vociferous attack, thereby achieving little more than resentment and enhancing the amplification of difference and encouraging any discrimination claimed. The GRR bill should have been subject to a manifesto policy offer before an election. Rather it was a vociferous, tiny minority who grabbed control of the argument within the SNP and the Greens, and rode a coach and horses through political propriety, integrity and common sense. It sought to remove valid protections and encourage impressionable and vulnerable young people to a potentially disastrous and irreversible life-changing course of action. It was never balanced and well-considered legislation. Of course Sturgeon likely believed she was aiding a minority and that no-one would notice. She was wrong. The SNP polled 20 points lower in the election than support for independence currently does. Her party has suffered. Doesn't the hypocrisy of the trans lobby adopting the very co-option strategy for which Lumiere criticised James Murphy's argument beggar belief? Jim Taylor Scotland

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store