When Nizam-era Hyderabad ensured pilgrimage parity
In 1934, the Hyderabad State used to grant six months of paid leave to employees of the Nizam's government to undertake pilgrimages to Islamic holy sites such as Mecca and Medina (in present-day Saudi Arabia), Mashhad (in Iran), and other significant places like Najaf, Karbala, and Baghdad (in present-day Iraq), as well as Jerusalem. This privilege was rooted in the Service Rules, which formally permitted such leave for religious duties.
The policy came under review when Ram Swaroop Tandon, a Hindu employee in the Nizam's administration, submitted a petition seeking similar leave for a pilgrimage. His request triggered internal deliberations across departments, raising important questions about the existing rules, the need for equitable treatment of employees from different faiths, the religious diversity of Hyderabad State and the geographical realities of pilgrimage in India.
A file preserved at the Telangana State Archives and Research Institute (TSARI) details how the petition was handled. It was first examined by the Law Department and later referred to the Finance Department. The latter noted that, according to the Service Rules, Muslim employees were explicitly permitted to avail leave for pilgrimages to Mecca for Haj, Medina for the Prophet's Mosque, and Shia holy sites such as Najaf, Karbala, and Baghdad, apart from Jerusalem.
'Given that Jerusalem was mentioned, it was noted that Christians and Jews in the Nizam's employ could also make use of this concession. When Tandon's request came, the government took up his case and decided to grant leave to Hindus on similar lines. It was noted that pilgrimage locations within India — Badrinath, Puri Jagannath, Rameshwaram, Dwarkanath, Prayag, Kashi and Gaya, were tough to reach,' Zareena Parveen of TSARI, who studied the file, said. The file shows that Gangotri and Yamunotri were also considered as pilgrimage sites.
The deliberations, recorded in the file, dwelt upon modes of transport, and connectivity by means of railways, to reach these pilgrimage sites. For, the railway line took one only up to Haridwar. At best, a person could walk 10 miles a day. This, from a total journey of around 835 miles, the file notes.
'The six-month leave was made available for all personnel of para military forces for a very long time,' Ms.Parveen says. 'However, the rule was not made available for other government servants in civilian roles. The time taken to walk over the difficult and hilly terrain was also spoken about in detail.'
At that time, the Prime Minister was Maharaja Kishen Pershad, a Punjabi Khatri. A council, including Pershad, convened and resolved to bring about the legislation which would allow Hindu employees to make yatras.
In July 1934, a firman was issued amending the Service Rules, officially granting Hindu employees six months of leave with advance salary to undertake religious yatras.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why did Donald Trump order a ban on travellers from 12 countries?
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order banning travel to the United States for citizens of a dozen countries and put partial restrictions on citizens of seven other nations. The executive order fully restricts and limits the entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Citizens of seven countries will have their entry partially restricted. The countries are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Donald Trump said he had signed the travel ban because of an attack on a Jewish protest in Colorado that authorities blamed on a man they say was in the country illegally. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted," Trump said in a video message. The White House also justified the restrictions put in place by Trump's executive order. The reasons cited by the administration include Afghanistan's Taliban control, Iran and Cuba's state-sponsored terrorism, and Haiti's influx of illegal migrants during the Joe Biden administration. Countries like Chad and Eritrea were flagged for disregarding US immigration laws. The former has a 49.54 percent B1/B2 visa overstay rate, while the latter's F/M/J visa overstay rate stands at 55.43 percent. Partial restrictions apply to Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, limiting immigrant and nonimmigrant visas (B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, J) due to high overstay rates or insufficient law enforcement collaboration. This is not the first time that Donald Trump has signed an executive order banning citizens of certain countries from entering the United States. During his first term in office from 2017, the Republican leader had announced a ban on travellers from seven majority-Muslim nations. That policy went through several iterations before it was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018. Democrat President Joe Biden, Trump's successor and also his predecessor for his second term, repealed the executive order after taking office in 2021. According to Biden, the ban was "a stain on our national conscience."
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump announces travel ban affecting dozen countries including Afghanistan and Iran
U.S. President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday (June 5, 2025) night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States. The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12.01 a.m. Monday (June 9, 2025), there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. 'I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,' Mr. Trump said in his proclamation. The list results from a Jan. 20 executive order Mr. Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Mr. Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.
India Gazette
39 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Operation Sindoor, actually, I thought was brilliantly chosen name": Congress MP Shashi Tharoor
Washington, DC [US], June 5 (ANI): Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who is leading the all-party delegation to the US, said Operation Sindoor was a 'brilliantly chosen name' and explained its significance. The delegation is visiting ley global capitals as part of the government's big diplomatic outreach to highlight its stand on terrorism following operation Sindoor. During an interaction session at the National Press Club in the US on Wednesday (local time), Tharoor noted that the colour of sindoor is not very different from the colour of blood and even used the Hindi expression 'khoon ka badla khoon' and said that here it was 'sindoor ka badla khoon', meaning blood in response to what the terrorists have done to the sindoor. When asked why India chose the name 'Operation Sindoor' for its counter-terrorism action, he responded, 'Operation Sindoor, actually, I thought was a brilliantly chosen name. Sindoor, in case some Americans obviously don't know about this, is a vermilion mark that is applied to the centre of the forehead of married women in the Hindu tradition. It's widely practised. Some non-Hindus do it too, but more for decorative purposes, but strictly speaking, the Sindoor is applied at the time of the marriage ceremony and is worn every day thereafter by married women. So, we were very conscious of these brutal terrorists who, by the way, shot men in front of their wives and children but spared the women and when one wife screamed out, Kill me too, she was told, no, you go back and tell them what we've done.' 'That was why the women were spared horrendous, horrendous act. That sindoor had essentially been wiped off the foreheads of 26 Indian women, 26 I was gonna say Hindu women, but one of them actually was a Christian, but the sindoor had been wiped off the rest by these terrorist actions, and so we wanted first of all, to avenge that act of wiping off the sindoor. But, secondly, it's no accident that the colour of the sindoor is bright vermilion red, which is not far from the colour of blood, and in many ways there is a Hindi expression that 'khoon ka badla khoon'; here it was 'sindoor ka badla khoon' hoga, that is, blood in response to what they have done to the sindoor,' he added. Shashi Tharoor said that none of the side involved in the conflict talks about the losses they faced, as the operational details are closely held with the senior military people. He talked about how Indian forces effectively struck 11 airfields of the Pakistani military, and Pakistan has publicly admitted that Indian strikes were so wide-ranging and effective that they struck from as far as Hyderabad in South Pakistan to Peshawar in the northwest. When asked how many aircraft India lost in the conflict with Pakistan, Shashi Tharoor said, 'We're not military folks, and our military are the only ones who really keep track of all of these things. But, I think the important message that came out was whatever may or may not have happened in the course of a conflict, neither side, by the way, talks about losses very much, and that's partially because you know very well that operational details are very closely held with the senior military people. But, I can tell you one thing, whatever may or may not have happened, look what happened on the last, what turned out to be the last night of the conflict, when India not only effectively struck 11 airfields of the Pakistani military, but there are commercially available, publicly available satellite pictures showing the extensive damage done. 'There's been craters on the runway, there have been operational command centers that have been busted by these Indian bombs, and just yesterday the Pakistanis publicly admitted that Indian strikes were so wide-ranging and effective they struck from as far as Hyderabad in South Pakistan to Peshawar in the northwest. So it looks very clear that whatever damage the Pakistanis believe they may have inflicted on India, it wasn't sufficient to prevent India from inflicting such extensive damage on Pakistan that they decided to request us to stop, which we very happy to do,' he added. The delegation led by Tharoor arrived in the US on Wednesday. The delegation includes Shambhavi Chaudhary (Lok Janshakti Party), Sarfaraz Ahmed (Jharkhand Mukti Morcha), G M Harish Balayogi (Telugu Desam Party), Shashank Mani Tripathi, Tejaswi Surya, Bhubaneswar Kalita (all from BJP), Mallikarjun Devda (Shiv Sena), former Indian Ambassador to the US Taranjit Singh Sandhu, and Shiv Sena MP Milind Deora. Earlier, the all-party met Bipartisan co-chairs Ro Khanna and Rich McCormick, as well as vice co-chairs Andy Barr and Marc Veasey, on Wednesday. During the meeting, the parliamentary delegation briefed the Caucus members on the cross-border terrorism faced by India and India's strong and resolute stance against terrorism. In a post on X, the Indian Embassy in the US stated, 'Bipartisan co-chairs @RoKhanna & @RepMcCormick and vice co-chairs @RepAndyBarr & @RepVeasey of India Caucus in the House of Representatives met with the visiting Parliamentary delegation led by @ShashiTharoor today.' 'The parliamentary delegation briefed the Caucus members on the cross-border terrorism faced by India and India's strong and resolute stance in the fight against terror. The Congressmen expressed unequivocal and bipartisan condemnation for the terror attack in Pahalgam. They expressed support for India's right to respond to terrorism in the spirit of zero tolerance against terrorism. The Caucus members also hailed the strong strategic partnership between India and USA,' it added. The delegation also held a meeting with the US House Foreign Affairs Committee leadership in Washington. DC. HFAC Chairman Brian Mast, Ranking Member of the committee, Gregory Meeks, South and Central Asia Subcommittee Chair Bill Huizenga, Ranking members - Sydney Kamlager-Dove and Ami Bera, Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific Chair, Young Kim. The Indian Embassy in the US stated, 'The all-party Parliamentary delegation led by @ShashiTharoor held candid & fruitful exchange with @HouseForeign Affairs Committee (HFAC) leadership. Chair @RepBrianMast, Ranking Member @RepGregoryMeeks, South and Central Asia Subcommittee Chair @RepHuizenga, Ranking Member @RepKamlagerDove, Ranking Member @RepBera and East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee @RepYoungKim greeted the delegation.' 'The Parliamentary delegation briefed the committee members on the success of Operation Sindoor in defining a new normal in India's fight against cross-border terrorism. The Committee Leadership condemned the Pahalgam attack unequivocally. India and USA stand together in their unwavering resolve and fight against terrorism in all its forms,' it added. The all-party delegation arrived in the US after concluding their visit to Brazil. The delegation aims to brief key stakeholders in the US on Operation Sindoor, India's diplomatic initiative launched to counter terrorism and disinformation following the recent terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. As many as 26 people were killed and several others were injured in a terrorist attack in Baisaran valley of Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22. Among the victims were 25 Indian nationals and one Nepali citizen. In response to the Pahalgam attack, the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor on May 7. The Indian Armed Forces targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of over 100 terrorists affiliated with groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. The Indian Armed Forces responded effectively to subsequent Pakistani aggression and pounded its airbases. India and Pakistan agreed for a cessation of hostilities on May 10. (ANI)
