
When Nizam-era Hyderabad ensured pilgrimage parity
The policy came under review when Ram Swaroop Tandon, a Hindu employee in the Nizam's administration, submitted a petition seeking similar leave for a pilgrimage. His request triggered internal deliberations across departments, raising important questions about the existing rules, the need for equitable treatment of employees from different faiths, the religious diversity of Hyderabad State and the geographical realities of pilgrimage in India.
A file preserved at the Telangana State Archives and Research Institute (TSARI) details how the petition was handled. It was first examined by the Law Department and later referred to the Finance Department. The latter noted that, according to the Service Rules, Muslim employees were explicitly permitted to avail leave for pilgrimages to Mecca for Haj, Medina for the Prophet's Mosque, and Shia holy sites such as Najaf, Karbala, and Baghdad, apart from Jerusalem.
'Given that Jerusalem was mentioned, it was noted that Christians and Jews in the Nizam's employ could also make use of this concession. When Tandon's request came, the government took up his case and decided to grant leave to Hindus on similar lines. It was noted that pilgrimage locations within India — Badrinath, Puri Jagannath, Rameshwaram, Dwarkanath, Prayag, Kashi and Gaya, were tough to reach,' Zareena Parveen of TSARI, who studied the file, said. The file shows that Gangotri and Yamunotri were also considered as pilgrimage sites.
The deliberations, recorded in the file, dwelt upon modes of transport, and connectivity by means of railways, to reach these pilgrimage sites. For, the railway line took one only up to Haridwar. At best, a person could walk 10 miles a day. This, from a total journey of around 835 miles, the file notes.
'The six-month leave was made available for all personnel of para military forces for a very long time,' Ms.Parveen says. 'However, the rule was not made available for other government servants in civilian roles. The time taken to walk over the difficult and hilly terrain was also spoken about in detail.'
At that time, the Prime Minister was Maharaja Kishen Pershad, a Punjabi Khatri. A council, including Pershad, convened and resolved to bring about the legislation which would allow Hindu employees to make yatras.
In July 1934, a firman was issued amending the Service Rules, officially granting Hindu employees six months of leave with advance salary to undertake religious yatras.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Muslim marriages can be dissolved through verbal consent, rules Gujarat HC
Last Updated: Ahmedabad, Aug 12 (PTI) The Gujarat High Court has ruled that a Muslim marriage can be dissolved through 'Mubaraat', a form of divorce wherein couples can end their marriage through verbal mutual consent without a written agreement in place. A bench of Justices AY Kogje and NS Sanjay Gowda made the observation while recently setting aside a Rajkot family court order which rejected a suit filed by a Muslim couple seeking dissolution of marriage by 'Mubaraat, a form of divorce by mutual consent. The bench sent the matter back to the family court and asked it to conclude the proceedings preferably within a period of three months. Disagreeing with the family court's stand that a written agreement is necessary to dissolve the wedlock, the HC, citing the Quran, Hadith and Muslim Personal Law, noted that such an agreement is not necessary if a Muslim couple seeks dissolution of marriage through mutual consent. Following a marital discord, a young Muslim couple from Rajkot had approached the family court for declaration of their marriage to have been dissolved by 'Mubaraat', which according to the couple, is recognized as a form of divorce by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. However, the family court rejected the suit holding the petition for declaration of dissolution of marriage by way of 'Mubaraat' is not maintainable in the present form, the HC order stated. The couple challenged the order in the HC, saying the lower court had committed 'an error in holding that Mubaraat Agreement is sine qua non (an essential condition) for entertaining such suit, whereas even as per Shariat, requirement of written agreement is not necessary at all". 'It is argued that the family court has erroneously considered that agreement to part has only to be in Written Form, whereas Shariat does recognize agreement which is not even in written form," the HC observed. Citing religious texts and Personal Law, the HC noted 'There is nothing to suggest that there has to be a written agreement of 'Mubaraat' nor there is a practice prevailing regarding maintaining of the register to record such agreement for mutually dissolved 'Nikah' (marriage)." For the purpose of 'Mubaraat', the expression of a mutual consent for dissolution of 'Nikah' is sufficient to dissolve the marriage in itself, the bench stated. The bench allowed the couple's petition and set aside the lower court's order and sent the matter back to it 'to consider the family suit treating it to be maintainable and to proceed on merits". 'With due regard to the age and future prospects of both the parties, the (high) court deems fit to direct the family court to conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order of this court," the bench said. PTI PJT PD RSY view comments First Published: August 12, 2025, 21:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Thailand accuses Cambodia of violating ceasefire, Thai army says soldiers injured in landmine blast
A Thai soldier was seriously injured by a landmine near the Cambodian border just days after both countries agreed to a fragile ceasefire Armoured personnel carriers are seen on a road near Thailand-Cambodia's border in Sisaket province, the day after the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand agreed to a ceasefire in a bid to bring an end to their deadliest conflict in more than a decade and ahead of military negotiations. File image/ Reuters The Thai army said that a landmine near the Cambodian border on Tuesday wounded a Thai soldier, only days after the neighbours in Southeast Asia reached a truce after a deadly five-day clash last month. The soldier's left ankle suffered severe damage after he walked on a mine while patrolling a normal border route near Ta Moan Thom temple in Thailand's Surin province, according to an army statement. According to the report, the soldier is receiving treatment in a hospital. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Thai army spokesperson Major-General Winthai Suvaree, the event is convincing proof that Cambodia violated both the ceasefire and international accords such as the Ottawa Convention against Landmines. Cambodia continues to covertly plant landmines, while the Thai army has consistently adhered to peaceful approaches and has not been the initiating party, the statement said. 'Should circumstances become compelling, it may be necessary to exercise the right of self-defence under international law principles to resolve situations that cause Thailand to continuously lose personnel due to violations of ceasefire agreements and sovereignty encroachments by Cambodian military forces,' the army said. Cambodia rejected the Thai charges. 'Cambodia, as a proud and responsible State Party to the Ottawa Convention, maintains an absolute and uncompromising position: we have never used, produced, or deployed new landmines under any circumstances, and we strictly and fully honour our obligations under international law,' the defence ministry spokesperson said in a post on social media. It was the fourth time in a few weeks that Thai soldiers have been injured by mines during patrols along the border. On Saturday, three soldiers were injured by a landmine in an area between Thailand's Sisaket and Cambodia's Preah Vihear provinces. Two earlier incidents led to the downgrading of diplomatic relations and triggered the clashes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bangkok has accused Cambodia of planting landmines on the Thai side of the disputed border that injured soldiers on July 16 and July 23. Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over undemarcated points along their 817-km (508-mile) land border, with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples Ta Moan Thom and the 11th-century Preah Vihear central to the disputes. The latest clashes that started on July 24 were the worst fighting between the countries in more than a decade, and involved exchanges of artillery fire and jet fighter sorties that killed at least 43 and left over 300,000 people displaced on both sides. The fragile ceasefire has been holding since Thailand and Cambodia agreed last week to allow observers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to inspect disputed border areas, ensuring that hostilities do not resume.


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Dharmasthala 'mass burial' case: BJP demands interim probe report
Raising the issue during Zero Hour in the Assembly, BJP's V Sunil Kumar said a prominent Hindu religious centre was being targeted on social media on the pretext of the investigation.