logo
How the quorum break became a proxy war for the GOP US Senate primary

How the quorum break became a proxy war for the GOP US Senate primary

Yahoo2 days ago
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — It's a fight for who can hit Democrats the hardest.
Since Democrats broke quorum last week to stop the redrawing of congressional maps to benefit Republicans, GOP elected officials have made their own attempts to bring them home and punish them for their absence. And as the Republican primary for the Texas U.S. Senate race heats up between incumbent Sen. John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton, the quorum break appears to be a proxy war.
Cornyn finds himself in trouble entering the primary, with every poll showing him behind Paxton, in some cases by 20 points or more. This is despite the fact that Cornyn is the senior senator from the state, having served in this seat since 2003 and winning his elections handily each time.
Now, Paxton has used his authority as attorney general to go after House Democrats. He filed lawsuits to remove several Democrats from office, to prevent Beto O'Rourke's political action committee from paying Democrats' fines for quorum breaking and to make civil arrest warrants valid in states like California.
The process has not exactly been cohesive for the Texas GOP. Paxton's lawsuits came after attempts by Gov. Greg Abbott to do the same, and Paxton even seemed to correct the governor by arguing only the attorney general has the authority to take those actions. The dispute, while not ultimately consequential, drew Cornyn to go on the attack.
Cornyn filed an amicus letter with the Texas Supreme Court in support of Abbott's petition, arguing that the governor does indeed have the authority. One entire paragraph of the five paragraph letter is spent critiquing how Paxton went about filing.
'Governor Abbott filed this petition … after the Texas Attorney General delayed taking action to remove the absconding legislators. Initially, the Texas Attorney General filed a pleading in this Court seeking to undercut efforts to bring legislators back,' Cornyn wrote. 'The Attorney General again invites delay by suggesting this Court should give Democrats more time.'
Replying to Abbott's X post about the lawsuit he filed, Cornyn wrote Aug. 5, 'Guess the Attorney General was too busy doing who knows what overseas so the Governor had to use his own lawyers.' He also later posted the release from Paxton's office contesting Abbott's authority, seeming to question Paxton's commitment to stopping Democrats.
'Get off the golf course in Scotland and do your job,' he wrote that same day.
This would not be the last time Cornyn commented on Paxton's location. His campaign account released a 'missing' poster of Paxton, in the same style of those released by Abbott's team of the Democrats.
Cornyn sarcastically welcomed the attorney general home from Scotland Thursday, accusing him of 'neglecting' his duties. But he corrected himself the next day, saying Paxton decided to remain in Scotland and 'ignore his job.'
The senator also took steps to get involved himself, requesting the FBI's assistance in locating Democrats. He shared that the FBI had granted his request, and then criticized Paxton on X for questioning why the FBI should be involved in state business.
Texas Democrats face removal threats, FBI involvement as quorum break enters fourth day
In total, Cornyn has posted or reposted a total of 16 X posts criticizing or commenting on Paxton's actions since the quorum break began. This excludes a number of other posts where he praised Abbott or the FBI for their actions. Paxton posted or reposted 19 posts about Cornyn, though most of the posts were more general attacks on Cornyn and not specifically related to his actions during the quorum break.
Paxton took a shot back at Cornyn for going on the attack, pointing out a poll showing Paxton leading Cornyn by 13 points. 'I think I know why John Cornyn is obsessively posting about me,' he wrote.
Paxton jumped into the Senate primary because he said Cornyn is not sufficiently aligned with President Donald Trump. In the months since the campaign began, Cornyn has gone to clear lengths to show he is close to the president. His bio on X says he has a 99% voting record with Trump, and the pinned post to his account is a photo of he and the president during the 2024 campaign.
Cornyn has also hit back against Paxton, calling him out for his numerous scandals. Paxton was impeached by the Texas House in 2023, including by a majority of Republicans, for allegations that he abused his office. He also admitted to having an affair with his wife, State Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, who announced she had filed for divorce in July. Paxton has been under federal investigation in the past as well.
But so far, voters overall see both Cornyn and Paxton unfavorably. A Texas Politics Project Poll from June found that 29% of voters have a favorable view of Paxton, and just 23% have a favorable view of Cornyn. Only 11% and 7% have a 'very favorable' view of Paxton and Cornyn, respectively.
Democrats see a Paxton victory in the primary as their best shot to flip the Senate seat in Texas, given his scandals. Cornyn has cited these Democratic hopes as a reason primary voters should return him for another term. So far however, Cornyn's attacks on Paxton do not seem to have made a difference in the polling of the race, which consistently show the attorney general with a double digit lead.
So while the Republican response to the quorum break appears to come from a desire for new congressional maps and to pass other special session legislation, the role of the U.S. Senate race can not be ignored. Even months out from the March 3, 2026 primary, Texas politicians have the election at top of mind, making House Democrats the punching bag in a fight to win over voters.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'
Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'

New York City's Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani doubled down Thursday after releasing a viral campaign video highlighting a link between his opponent, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Mamdani pounced on the subject during a press conference in the Bronx, where he was asked if the video was intended to make Cuomo appear unlikable by pairing him with someone as disgraced as Epstein, an accused sex trafficker. 'I don't need to do much to make the governor appear extremely dislikable,' Mamdani said. 'The intent of that video was to shine a light on what journalists have uncovered over many months, which is the fact of what the former governor did after resigning in disgrace.' Related: 'We know that which has been reported, and yet we also know that there is likely more,' he continued. 'Because, as is the case with Andrew Cuomo, when you think you found out about all of his scandals — there seems to always be another one.' Cuomo slammed Mamdani last week for campaigning on more affordable housing in New York City while living in a rent-controlled apartment, only for Mamdani to share clippings from major media outlets who covered Cuomo's most recent scandals. Related: 'Finally in June, the New York Times covered that Cuomo had worked with his longtime friend Andrew Farkas on a luxury marina project in Puerto Rico,' Mamdani said in the video. 'Farka's previous partner on luxury marinas in the Caribbean? Jeffrey Epstein.' The paper reported at the time that Cuomo declined to share information about the clients and companies who paid him as a consultant after resigning in 2021, but noted the marina project and two other deals had already come to light — as Mamdani noted in his video. Mamdani on Cuomo: "I don't need to do much to make the governor appear extremely dislikable." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 14, 2025 'Cuomo advised a cryptocurrency exchange based in the Seychelles as it faced federal investigations,' he said in the clip. 'Then in May, Politico reported that Cuomo failed to disclose $2.6 million in stock options to the New York City Conflicts of Interest board.' Cuomo spoke ahead of Mamdani on Thursday and said New York City faces 'serious difficulty' in fighting unemployment. Mamdani, who has slammed President Donald Trump for his potential involvement in the mayoral race, leapt on the comment Thursday. 'To hear from a former governor about the difficulties of attracting additional jobs without the recognition of what the Trump administration has done to make it so difficult ...' said Mamdani, citing Trump's tariffs and the current 'business climate' hampering local tourism. Related: 'We're seeing estimates of about a $4 billion loss compared to other years in this city,' he said. 'That is something that has massive ramifications for the ability for our city to continue functioning as it has, and yet I cannot recall the last time the former governor even brought that up.' Related... Zohran Mamdani Slams Possible Trump Involvement In NYC Mayoral Race Meghan McCain Taunts Andrew Cuomo And Makes Stunning Prediction For NYC Mayor Race Washington Sues To Block Trump's Federal Takeover Of Its Police Department

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Solve the daily Crossword

The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands
The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands

All eyes were on Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin as they met for the first time in more than six years, the Russian president visiting the US for high-stakes talks that could reshape the war in Ukraine. The two leaders greeted each other with a handshake after stepping off their planes at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, Alaska - and a smiling Trump even applauded Putin as he approached him on a red carpet that had been laid out. It is exactly the moment Putin has craved, writes Moscow correspondent Ivor Bennett. The Russian leader has been welcomed on to US soil as an equal for a meeting of great powers. Trump-Putin summit - latest updates The red carpet, the handshake, the flypast - only North Korea would give an indicted war criminal a greeting like this. It marks the end of his isolation from the West in the most spectacular fashion. Instead of sanctions, Trump has rewarded the Russian president with the equivalent of a state visit. The pariah looks more like a partner. , reporting from the ground in Alaska, describes the meeting on the tarmac as "extraordinary". There was the red carpet and more for a man with blood on his hands, he writes. Putin - aggressor, pariah and wanted for war crimes. Quite the CV for a man who was applauded on to the airbase by his host, the US president. It couldn't have looked more cordial - a superpower moment with a smile and a shake between the men who hold peace in their hands. Read more: If that wasn't enough, there followed a military flypast to dress the spectacle. A smiling Putin seemed duly impressed, but what it says about the power dynamic in the relationship will trouble onlookers in Ukraine - and one moment they may have found particularly galling. Posing for photographs with Trump before waiting media, Putin was asked: "Will you stop killing civilians?" To which he smiled, and gave it a deaf ear

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store