
Ron Insana: Private credit industry poses a familiar risk as investors chase returns
A crisis in the world of private credit may not unfold in the near term, but investors should think about what may happen when the next recession comes along. The Boston Federal Reserve recently published a paper exploring whether or not the surge of dollars into private credit will eventually pose systemic financial risk to the lending industry. While the paper didn't directly answer the question posed, it's important that it was asked at all. The private credit asset class has swelled to about $1.7 trillion . Firms in the industry provide loans to businesses in an environment where banks had pulled back from lending in the face of regulatory constraints. Recently, however, banks have begun providing financing to those same private credit firms in the form of lines of credit. Those lines of credit help smooth out the distribution of capital as private credit firms take time to draw down the investments made by their limited partners. "Our analysis of Federal Reserve and proprietary loan-level data indicates that the growth of private credit has been funded largely by bank loans and that banks have become a key source of liquidity, in the form of credit lines, for [private credit] lenders," the Boston Fed said in its report. "Banks' extensive links to the PC market could be a concern because those links indirectly expose banks to the traditionally higher risks associated with PC loans," the Boston Fed added. Rising risk in the event of delinquencies Banks may expose themselves to rising risk over time if private credit firms take on less secure loans than the banks would normally fund. Ultimately, this could have an adverse effect on the banks' balance sheets. Typically, this becomes more obvious when the economy slows or tips into recession, pushing up both delinquencies and defaults. There are additional questions not yet posed by the Boston Fed's study. For instance, are big banks using leverage to enhance the returns on the credit lines they are extending to private credit vehicles? A similar question can be asked of the private credit firms: Are they using additional leverage so that their investors will reap higher rates of return than would otherwise be available? If the answer is yes, we may be staring at a smaller version of the Global Financial Crisis one day in the future. A familiar story One seasoned lawyer I spoke with, who assists in structuring private credit deals, tells me that the collateral for the bank lines of credit being handed out are the very loans made by the private credit firms. Worse yet, many of these vehicles are so-called " covenant-lite loans " meaning that the lending terms are less stringent than those of more conventional loans. Stop me if you've heard this story before: Leverage on top of leverage, along with lax lending standards and the prospect of financial deregulation could end badly for both banks and investors. By extension, financial markets could also suffer under the very systemic risk the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston is questioning. That can be quite a toxic brew if private credit firms and banks are all doing the same thing at the same time. It would be similar to what financial firms did with collateralized debt obligations prior to the real estate and credit crisis of 2008. For now, there is one meaningful difference: Most private credit loans currently being made are at the top of the capital structure. In other words, these loans made by the private credit firms are collateralized by the hard assets of the borrower. That's known as senior secured debt. That mitigates risk as lenders can seize and sell assets to cover the credit they had extended to firms. With so much "dry powder" in the private credit space, eventually lenders will be reaching for yield by making loans to lower quality borrowers. Those are the loans that go bad quickly during a downturn. Rather than being a diversifier of risk, even if they are syndicated to a wide swath of investors, these loans turn into transmission wires of trouble and travel up the entire financial daisy chain. This is an area that will require constant scrutiny from regulators at the Fed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and other supervisory powers. The additional risk here is that those very supervisory functions so critical to the safety of the banking system and financial markets are being gutted. We've seen this movie before. Excess capital eventually chases too few deals. Lots of leverage to enhance returns enhances risk, especially as regulators fail to see Wall Street's excesses. This is my first discussion of risk in the private credit space, and the questions being posed will be deemed absurd by executives in the private credit world. Hold onto your wallets: Not everything is as secure as it may seem. —Ron Insana is a CNBC contributor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Traders Boost Bets on Just One 2025 Fed Cut Ahead of CPI Data
(Bloomberg) -- Traders are increasingly betting that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates only once this year amid signs of resilient growth and sticky inflation. Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Senator Calls for Closing Troubled ICE Detention Facility in New Mexico California Pitches Emergency Loans for LA, Local Transit Systems Wednesday brings US consumer-price data for May, which is forecast to show a pickup that may reinforce the Fed's wait-and-see stance toward further easing as it assesses the impact of tariffs. The central bank is widely projected to hold rates steady next week, and futures and options tracking expectations for its policy path show traders are moving to unwind the rate-cut premium built into the months ahead. Swaps traders now see about 0.45 percentage point of easing by year-end, the smallest degree of reductions they've priced in since before President Donald Trump rolled out steep tariffs in early April. The announcement roiled markets and at one point in the following weeks led traders to wager on as much as a full point of Fed cuts by the end of 2025. Stronger-than-forecast jobs data for May helped spur traders to exit easing bets. But the rate outlook had already been shifting in that direction, in part on hints of cooling trade tensions, which diminished further with talks between the US and China in London this week. In options linked to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, there has been a pickup in hedging activity targeting around just one or even no Fed policy moves this year. Monday's trading included heavy demand for hawkish protection via a range of structures looking to the end of this year and into early 2026, which Tuesday's open interest showed were new positions. These types of wagers rise in value as rate-cut pricing fades from the futures underlying the options. Here's a rundown of the latest positioning indicators across the rates market: JPMorgan Treasury Client Survey In the cash market, Tuesday's JPMorgan Chase & Co. Treasury client survey showed investors' net long position rose to the biggest since May 5. In the week to June 9, investors' shorts fell 2 percentage points and neutrals rose by that amount. Most Active SOFR Options For SOFR options across Jun25, Sep25 and Dec25 options there was a heavy amount of new risk in the Dec25 95.375 puts following big buying in the SFRZ5 95.625/95.375 put spread, targeting no Fed cuts this year. There was also a lot of activity seen in the 95.8125 strike over the past week due to more hawkish hedging via a buyer of the SFRZ5 95.8125/95.6875/95.5625 put fly. The past week has also seen new positioning in the 96.75 strike following trades such as SFRZ5 96.25/96.75 1x2 call spread which has been recently bought. SOFR Options Heatmap The 95.625 strike remains the most-populated position in tenors across Jun25, Sep25 and Dec25 options, mostly due to large positioning around the Jun25 puts via the SFRM5 95.75/95.625 put spread, which has recently traded. Recent flows in SOFR options since Friday's payrolls have included hawkish hedges as rate-cut premium continues to fade from the underlying futures contracts over the next 18 months. The downside structures have been targeting puts in the Dec25 and Mar26 tenors. Treasury Options Skew Traders are continuing to pay increasing premiums to hedge a selloff in the long-bond contracts on both an outright basis and relative to the front and belly of the curve. Long-bond skew, however, has been drifting closer to neutral over the past week as 30-year yields have run into resistance around the 5% level. The skew on the 10-year tenor trades around neutral, with some indication that CTA accounts may be entering fresh long positions in the TY contract. CFTC Futures Positioning Asset managers aggressively added to net duration long in Treasury futures across the strip in the week ended June 3, CFTC data show. This follows three weeks of de-leveraging via the liquidation of new long positions. The duration increase amounted to approximately 452,000 10-year note futures equivalents, the biggest weekly shift since April last year. Most of the net-long addition was in the ultra 10-year note futures, where around $11.3m/DV01 of net long risk was added. New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Everybody loses in trade wars, former Fed official says
Trade tensions are back in focus as US officials meet with Chinese counterparts in London. Princeton University professor of economics and public affairs and former Federal Reserve vice chair Alan Blinder joins Market Domination Overtime with Josh Lipton and Julie Hyman to explain why he believes "everybody's losing" in a trade war and share what he makes of Trump's tariff threats. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. US trade officials meeting their Chinese counterparts in London to continue trade talks. The trade policy uncertainty just one of the many layers of worries hanging overhead for the US economy. For more, we're bringing in Princeton University Professor Alan Blinder, former Fed Vice Chair, also served as a member of President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisors. Alan, it's always great to get your perspective. I know you also recently wrote about more broadly, some of the policies of the Trump administration. But I do want to get your take on trade, which of course you've also written about extensively. Um, and sort of where we are in the trade talks and whether we could come out the side, the other side better than when we started. What's your assessment of where we are so far? I'd give long odds against that. You can pray for it, but the odds are very much against it. Look, what I tell my students every year in teaching them economics 101 is trade wars have only losers. The little bit of truth in the Donald Trump dictum is that if you're the 800 pound gorilla on the block, you can probably make the other guy a bigger loser than you are. That is, we could lose a little and many other countries, Canada, Mexico, many, many others, including China, I think, could lose more. You want to call that winning, that's winning, but to me, everybody's losing. What do you make, Alan, of the basic argument that the Trump administration will put out there, which is, listen, they'll say, we want to reform the global trading system and put American companies on, on fairer, firmer ground. And when they talk about it, Alan, and I'm interested to get your take on this, they'll simply say, listen, as we sit here in June 2025, the global trading system as its engineered, just isn't fair anymore. It doesn't make sense anymore. It doesn't make sense that we impose a 2.5% tariff on auto imports from Europe, and they hit back with a, a 10% import duty on us. It doesn't make sense that we put up with material non-tariff barriers like China stealing our IP. Do you disagree with that premise? Do you disagree with the tactics? Do you disagree with both, Alan? I don't disagree with the premise, um, the way you put it. But it's easy to exaggerate it. I mean, we put, we have a protective tariff against EVs, for example. We have a high tariff on trucks compared to cars. We're not completely innocent. Now having said that, we're pretty good. We have led the world over decades in bringing tariff barriers down from where they used to be. It's kind of sad to see us leading the world up, and it's even sadder to see us saying, you know, our president saying one day he says there'll be a 50% tariff on this or that, the next day 25, the next day 75. I mean, who in the world knows what's going on? Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Traders Boost Bets on Just One 2025 Fed Cut Ahead of CPI Data
Traders are increasingly betting that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates only once this year amid signs of resilient growth and sticky inflation. Wednesday brings US consumer-price data for May, which is forecast to show a pickup that may reinforce the Fed's wait-and-see stance toward further easing as it assesses the impact of tariffs. The central bank is widely projected to hold rates steady next week, and futures and options tracking expectations for its policy path show traders are moving to unwind the rate-cut premium built into the months ahead.