324 contaminants found in drinking water systems across US: Research
The findings, from this year's update to the Environmental Working Group's (EWG) Tap Water Database, reveal that millions of people could be consuming water tainted with toxic chemicals, heavy metals and radioactive compounds, often at levels much higher than what scientists consider safe.
'This is a wake-up call,' Tasha Stoiber, a senior scientist at EWG, said in a statement. 'Outdated federal regulations continue to leave millions of people at risk of exposure to harmful substances.'
The massive database provides a ZIP code-level window into the specific contaminants affecting community drinking water supplies, compiled from water quality data collected between 2021 and 2023.
Upon entering a specific ZIP code into the search bar, users can scroll down to select the utility that serves their community. The database then specifies the concentrations of 'contaminants detected' alongside a comparison of EWG's health guidelines.
Alongside the results is a caveat that 'legal does not necessarily equal safe,' with a warning that in many cases, the 'legal limits for contaminants in tap water have not been updated in almost 20 years.'
Of particular concern to the researchers was the nationwide prevalence of cancer-causing 'forever chemicals,' which appeared in the drinking water of more than 143 million people.
There are thousands of types of these synthetic compounds, also known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are common ingredients in household items like waterproof apparel, nonstick pans and certain kinds of cosmetics.
While the Biden administration in 2024 set drinking water standards for six types of PFAS, scientists have shown that for the most notorious of these chemicals, there is no safe consumption level.
Another compound of concern was hexavalent chromium, or chromium-6, which came into the public eye through the work of environmental activist Erin Brockovich, in Hinkley, Calif. This carcinogenic form of chromium is present in the drinking water of more than 250 million Americans, and there is no federal limit on the substance.
Other pollutants that alarmed the EWG researchers were volatile organic compounds, like trichloroethylene (TCE), nitrates, heavy metals like arsenic and disinfection byproducts.
In Washington, D.C., some of the biggest offenders were nitrates, hexavalent chromium, radium and lead.
Los Angeles's drinking water contained the radioactive contaminant uranium, hexavalent chromium, lead and disinfection byproducts.
As for New York City, pollutants in the drinking water system included hexavalent chromium, chloroform and various disinfection byproducts.
'For too long, outdated federal standards have failed to reflect the latest science on drinking water, leaving millions exposed to harmful chemicals,' Melanie Benesh, vice president of government affairs at EWG, said in a statement.
Since the Trump administration took office, environmental activists have feared that certain existing standards could be rolled back and further complicate efforts to clean up American water supplies. It remains to be seen, however, what — if any — such action will be taken.
'Safe drinking water shouldn't be a political debate — it's a fundamental right,' Benesh said. 'A rollback of these hard-won protections would be a devastating setback.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
21 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
US pediatricians' new COVID-19 shot recommendations differ from CDC advice
NEW YORK — For the first time in 30 years, the American Academy of Pediatrics is substantially diverging from U.S. government vaccine recommendations. The group's new COVID-19 recommendations — released Tuesday — come amid a tumultuous year for public health, as vaccine skeptics have come into power in the new Trump administration and government guidance has become increasingly confusing. This isn't going to help, acknowledged Dr. James Campbell, vice chair of the AAP infectious diseases committee. 'It is going to be somewhat confusing. But our opinion is we need to make the right choices for children to protect them,' he added. The AAP is strongly recommending COVID-19 shots for children ages 6 months to 2 years. Shots also are advised for older children if parents want their kids vaccinated, the AAP said. That differs from guidance established under U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which doesn't recommend the shots for healthy children of any age but says kids may get the shots in consultation with physicians. Children ages 6 months to 2 years are at high risk for severe illness from COVID-19, and it was important that recommendations continue to emphasize the need for them to get vaccinated, said Campbell, a University of Maryland infectious diseases expert. Vaccinations also are recommended for older children who have chronic lung diseases or other conditions that put them at higher risk for severe disease, the AAP said. In a statement, Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said 'the AAP is undermining national immunization policymaking with baseless political attacks.' He accused the group of putting commercial interests ahead of public health, noting that vaccine manufacturers have been donors to the AAP's Friends of Children Fund. The fund is currently paying for projects on a range of topics, including health equity and prevention of injuries and deaths from firearms. The 95-year-old Itasca, Illinois-based organization has issued vaccination recommendations for children since the 1930s. In 1995, it synced its advice with recommendations made by the federal government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There have been a few small differences between AAP and CDC recommendations since then. For example, the AAP has advised that children get HPV vaccinations starting at age 9; the CDC says that's OK but has emphasized vaccinations at ages 11 and 12. But in 30 years, this is the first time the recommendations have differed 'in a significant or substantial way,' Campbell said. Until recently, the CDC — following recommendations by infectious disease experts — has been urging annual COVID-19 boosters for all Americans ages 6 months and older. But in May, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. A few days later, the CDC issued language that healthy children may get the shots, but that there was no longer a 'should' recommendation. The idea that healthy older kids may be able to skip COVID-19 boosters has been brewing for some time among public health experts. As the COVID-19 pandemic has waned, experts have increasingly discussed the possibility of focusing vaccination efforts on people 65 and older — who are among those most as risk for death and hospitalization. A CDC expert panel in June was set to make recommendations about the fall shots. Among the options the panel was considering was whether suggest shots for high-risk groups but still giving lower-risk people the choice to get vaccinated. But Kennedy bypassed the group, and also decided to dismiss the 17-member panel and appoint his own, smaller panel, that included vaccine skeptics. Kennedy also later excluded the AAP, the American Medical Association and other top medical organizations from working with the advisers to establish vaccination recommendations. Kennedy's new vaccine panel has yet to vote on COVID-19 shot recommendations. The panel did endorse continuing to recommend fall flu vaccinations, but also made a decision that led to another notable difference with the AAP. The new advisory panel voted that people should only get flu vaccines that are packaged as single doses and do not contain the preservative thimerosal. The AAP said there is no evidence of harm from the preservative, and recommended doctors use any licensed flu vaccine product that's appropriate for the patient.
Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
NIH plans heat up animal testing debate
WASHINGTON WATCH NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya elaborated on his strategic priorities for the National Institutes of Health on Friday — and drew criticism from some animal rights advocates. His strategy focuses on plans Bhattacharya and his boss, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have previously touted, like prioritizing nutrition research, advancing artificial intelligence, focusing on research reproducibility and shifting to solutions-based health disparities research. 'Taxpayer dollars are a finite resource, entrusted to NIH officials to invest in the nation's future,' Bhattacharya wrote in a statement published on NIH's website. 'By transparently establishing priorities and aligning our goals, we aim to demonstrate to the American public that we take this commitment seriously — and that we are doing all we can to honor their trust.' Falling short: But one priority area — moving away from animal testing in favor of alternative models and establishing an office to develop, validate and deploy those methods — was a sore point for animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. From PETA's vantage point, Bhattacharya's plan didn't go far enough. 'Dramatic change is essential, as we've seen how 'enhancing oversight' is a laugh-into-your-sleeve exercise, and 'considering non-animal methods' is a check box,' Kathy Guillermo, PETA's senior vice president of laboratory investigations, said in a statement. 'PETA urges him to remember that at the highest levels of the Trump administration, there are well-placed people rooting for NIH to break with career animal experimenters.' Animal testing state of play: In Congress, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has been a persistent critic of animal testing at the health agencies and co-sponsored 2022 legislation with Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) to permit drugmakers to use alternative methods to test their products. The health agencies have not shied away from the issue or from animal rights groups. Among the first policies that the NIH and the Food and Drug Administration announced this spring was a move away from animal testing for research and drug development. According to public calendar disclosures, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary met with PETA in July. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. The Pete & Bobby Challenge. HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth are challenging Americans to complete 50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups in under 10 minutes. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. EXAM ROOM Health insurance companies pay vastly different prices for health services from one another— even when they're performed at the same hospital. Aetna and UnitedHealthcare, two of the largest health insurers in the U.S., negotiated rates for six inpatient procedures that varied by an average ratio of 9.1 nationwide, according to a report by health data analytics firm Trilliant Health. Sticker shock: The median rate for a coronary bypass — with no catheterization or major complications — is $68,194. However, negotiated rates ranged from $27,683 to $247,902. Rates even varied within the same health system. For example, Aetna pays $166,288 for a patient with diabetes to have major heart bypass surgery using a minimally invasive technique at Jefferson Hospital in Philadelphia, while UnitedHealthcare pays about half that rate. The report also found no correlation between aggregate measures of cost and quality within a sample of 10 top-tier hospitals. Health systems that have similar quality in care might have wildly different negotiated rates for the same health services, according to the report. High-quality care? The data raises questions about whether insurers deliver the best value for patient care. 'It actually creates a fiduciary duty for the employers to be using this sort of information to make sure they're providing high-value health benefits to their employees,' said Allison Oakes, chief research officer at Trilliant Health, who worked on the report. She believes that this data could help reduce some price disparity. 'The hope is we start to see some of this variation in prices shrink, which, without changing quality or access, could actually reduce spending by quite a bit,' she said. Unintended effect: Ben Handel, professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, agrees that this kind of price transparency could lead to negotiated rates homogenizing. However, it might not necessarily bring down prices, he said. 'The other potential scenario is it raises prices,' he said. He notes that insurers' incentives vary by context. For example, when administrating a self-insured plan — where employers directly pay health costs and insurers provide only the network — they earn a percentage of each claim. 'Raising costs makes you more money,' said Handel.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marco Rubio Halts Gaza Visa Program Following Loomer's Explosive Revelations
The U.S. State Department, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has announced an immediate halt to Palestinian visas after conservative activist Laura Loomer posted videos on X showing Gazans arriving at U.S. airports. Over the weekend, Loomer shared clips from an organization called 'HEAL PALESTINE,' showing Palestinians entering the U.S. through the group's medical program. She argued the arrivals posed a national security risk, claiming Muslim-majority countries should take care of Gazans instead. 'Heal Palestine is more than welcome to send the GAZANS to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, or other Muslim countries for medical care. The issue is, these countries don't want them because they know the GAZANS have terrorist tendencies. Are we supposed to endanger American lives so we don't get called 'racist' by a Palestinian organization?' Loomer wrote in a post on X. Rubio confirmed the freeze during an interview on Face the Nation, saying, 'We are not going to be in partnership with groups that are friendly with Hamas. We're going to pause those visas … and we are going to pause this program and re-evaluate how those visas are being vetted and what relationship if any has there been by these organizations to the process of acquiring those visas.' Loomer later expressed frustration, writing on X: 'It should freak everyone out that it took a civilian blowing the whistle on GAZANS coming into our country with State Department-issued visas as opposed to a government employee or terrorism analyst at the CIA flagging this.' HEAL Palestine pushed back, stressing the initiative is a medical treatment program, not a refugee resettlement effort. 'Guided by human and American values, HEAL is committed to offering hope and healing to the few young lives we can reach,' the group said in a statement. Solve the daily Crossword
