Dying Star's Strangled Jets Solve 50-Year-Old X-Ray Mystery
A new study of a star undergoing the throes of a supernova death has revealed that bursts of X-radiation known as fast-X-ray transients (FXTs) are the result of a failed gamma-ray burst (GRB) – the most energetic explosions our Universe can produce.
"Since the 1970s, astronomers have detected FXTs – blasts of X-rays from distant galaxies that can last from seconds to hours," says astronomer Jillian Rastinejad of Northwestern University in the US.
"But their sources have remained a long-standing mystery. Our work definitively shows that FXTs can originate from the explosive death of a massive star. It also supports a causal link between GRB-supernovae and FXT-supernovae, in which GRBs are produced by successful jets, and FXTs are produced by trapped weak jets."
Related:
A supernova is not one single, done-and-dusted affair; the eventual implosion of the stellar core, and outward expulsion of the material around it, are presaged by a long period of instability in which the star shucks its outer layers. When the star does eventually hit that supernova point, jets blast outward from the collapsing core, punching through the outer layers and out into interstellar space.
Those jets are what produce the GRBs, causing the material around the star to blaze with radiation as it is shocked by the powerful outflows.
The detection of an event on 8 January 2025 was fortuitous for our understanding of the way these energetic explosions can go wrong. An X-ray telescope on the Einstein Probe caught an FXT from 2.8 billion light-years across the Universe.
Scientists immediately rushed in to take advantage of the opportunity to learn more about these enigmatic flashes, using a suite of telescopes to record the event across multiple wavelengths.
"It's important to note that X-ray data alone cannot tell us what phenomena created an FXT," Rastinejad explains. "Rapid observations of the location of the FXT at optical and infrared wavelengths are key to identifying the aftermath of an FXT and assembling clues to its origin."
The FXT was named EP 250108a, and, as the evolving dataset revealed over the ensuing weeks, it was associated with a supernova event named SN 2025kg – affectionately nicknamed The Kangaroo.
The researchers found that the supernova was a particularly rare and energetic variety known as a Type Ic-BL supernova, originating in the core collapse of a massive star between 15 and 30 times the mass of the Sun.
The observations also revealed a high-speed outward explosion of ejecta, moving at almost 19,000 kilometers (11,800 miles) per second.
Such supernovae are usually the origin of GRBs, and so the researchers found.
"This FXT supernova is nearly a twin of past supernovae that followed GRBs," says astrophysicist Rob Eyles-Ferris of the University of Leicester in the UK. "Our observations of the early stages of EP 250108a's evolution show that the explosions of massive stars can produce both phenomena."
The team's analysis showed that, rather than punching through the layers of ejected star material as seen in a GRB, the jets that erupted from the core of this particular dying star remained trapped inside the shell of ejecta. This trapped jet still shocks and heats the cocoon around it, just not to GRB levels.
Although GRBs have been seen and studied in pretty intricate detail, we don't know much about how they can fail. The discovery of EP 250108a and SN 2025kg gave astronomers the evidence they needed to estimate that, actually, the GRB failure rate is higher than success.
"Through decades of scientific study, we know that jets can successfully plow through a dying star's outer layers, and we view them as GRBs," Rastinejad says. "In our study, we found this 'trapped' jet outcome is more common in massive star explosions than jets that successfully emerge from the star."
This is really exciting because it means that we have a new means of probing supernova explosions. Although we now know a little more than we did about FXTs, the minutiae about how they form, and what makes a star sputter out an FXT rather than a GRB still need to be figured out.
"This discovery heralds a broader understanding of the diversity in massive stars' deaths and a need for deeper investigations into the whole landscape of stellar evolution," Eyles-Ferris says.
The analyses have been detailed in two papers accepted into The Astrophysical Journal Letters and available on arXiv. They can be found here and here.
Alien World Discovered Provoking Its Own Hellish Apocalypse
Impact That Gave Us a Moon Could Explain Why Earth Now Has Life
Ice in Space Could Do Something We Thought Was Impossible
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WebMD
a minute ago
- WebMD
Fans Can Help in High Heat — but Only If You Use Them Right
Aug. 1, 2025 – In extreme heat, a fan can be your friend — or not. New research finds that electric fans might help cool you down even at higher temperatures than previously thought, if you use them the right way. The finding is the latest in a long quest to pinpoint exactly when it's too hot to use an electric fan. Since the 1990s, the CDC has cautioned against fan use above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The new study, published this week in JAMA Network Open, suggests that in certain conditions – particularly when fans are combined with skin wetting – they may help reduce heat strain and improve comfort, even in 100-degree heat. (The World Health Organization caps the threshold at 104 degrees, and other recent research is also in line with the higher limit.) 'When the air temperature becomes greater than our skin temperature, then we actually gain heat from the environment,' said Daniel Gagnon, PhD, an expert in thermal physiology and co-author of the new study. That's why fans can sometimes increase your body temperature, despite feeling cool. With climate change fueling longer, more dangerous heat waves, especially in urban areas, figuring out safe and effective ways to cool down is crucial, particularly for older adults and people with heart conditions, who are more susceptible to heat-related illness. Here's what the new research found. 1. There is a tipping point when it comes to using fans to stay cool. Why it matters: In the study, when people used fans for cooling in conditions of 100 degrees Fahrenheit and 60% humidity, the fans 'reduced the amount of work that the heart was doing and reduced internal body temperature a little bit,' said Gagnon, an associate professor of kinesiology at Université de Montréal in Canada. 'People felt better, and they had better sensations of comfort.' The study included people ages 65 and older — including some with heart disease — but its results can apply to people of all ages, Gagnon said. The takeaway: When people used fans in 104 degrees, the researchers saw signs that their bodies were heating up, putting them at risk for heat-related illnesses. If you're concerned, use air-conditioning or seek out air-conditioned public spaces. Dialing 211 can help you find one. 2. Fan use only works if you stay hydrated. Why it matters: Sweat cools the body by letting internal heat escape through evaporation. A fan speeds that process by boosting convective heat transfer — the same way a convection oven moves heat to a food's surface, helping it cook faster. But it only works if you're sweating enough to keep the cycle going. That's why you need to drink plenty of water. The takeaway: Aim for about 8 ounces of water per hour — that's how much people in the study drank. Don't wait until you're thirsty; carry water with you and sip constantly. 3. Skin wetting can help a fan cool you more effectively. Why it matters: Using multiple cooling techniques is a great approach to hot days, Gagnon said. If you have air conditioning and want to save energy, use it to cool the room slightly. Then turn on a fan and mist your skin. And when temperatures do rise to extremes, combining the fan with skin wetting may still help keep you cool. During experiments in 104-degree rooms, 'it reduced the amount of work that the heart does, it reduced sweating, and people felt a little bit better,' Gagnon said. The takeaway: For this strategy to work, you need to keep your skin constantly wet. In the experiments, people used a spray bottle, but it's OK to use other options like wet cloths. Make sure you're paying attention to the temperature of where you are — indoor air temperatures can be hotter than outdoors, especially in spaces with poor ventilation or no air conditioning. If you notice signs of heat exhaustion — like dizziness, nausea, headache, or blurred vision — get out of the heat right away, rest, and drink plenty of fluids. Someone with heat exhaustion should seek medical care if symptoms don't improve within an hour or immediately if they become confused or distressed, pass out, or can't keep fluids down.


CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Alligators are nesting in Fort Worth — and researchers are racing to track them
Spotting an alligator in North Texas once felt like a myth. Now, researchers say they're not only here — they're thriving. The Fort Worth Nature Center and Refuge is leading a growing effort to track, tag, and study local alligators, including nests and newly hatched babies. Staff say this is their busiest week of the year: alligator nesting season. Crews comb through more than 1,000 acres of wetlands by boat, ATV, foot, and drone, searching for new nests and the fiercely protective mothers guarding them. "These nests can have dozens of eggs inside," said Jared Wood, manager at the Nature Center. "We may not always get close enough to collect data, but we'll mark it with GPS and monitor with game cameras." Just three years ago, public awareness about local gators was nearly nonexistent — until a viral photo of a 10-foot alligator sunbathing at the refuge raised eyebrows. Many thought it was fake. Wood began volunteer research in 2021 and launched a full study by 2023. This sometimes includes capturing and releasing gators to track health, growth, and movement. "We'll measure them, check body girth, tail girth, and implant a chip," said David Reasoner, a natural resource technician. "If it's a recapture, we compare data to see how far they've moved." Genetic testing also helps identify population shifts and potential migration patterns. So far, researchers have identified eight active nests and estimate about 70 to 100 alligators live at the refuge. While most hatchlings don't survive due to predators like raccoons, researchers believe the population remains steady — not increasing. "Alligators are part of wetland ecosystems," Wood said. "If you have alligators, you have healthy wetlands, and that benefits everyone." The study is ongoing, and researchers hope to have enough data by 2027 to release findings to the public. In the meantime, the Nature Center encourages visitors to enjoy the trails and wildlife, but stay clear of gators and nests, and report any sightings to staff.


CBS News
34 minutes ago
- CBS News
California clean energy push exemplified by Stanford professor's zero net energy home
Clean, renewable energy is powering California to levels never seen before, and a Stanford professor's home is the blueprint for the near future. Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the Golden State had reached a historic milestone. According to the latest data, in 2023, the state was powered by two-thirds clean energy. A leading climate scientist not only believes the state is heading in the right direction, but he also practices what he preaches. Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, lives in a two-story, 3,200 square-foot home with large picture windows that to any passerby might appear prohibitively expensive to heat and cool. But, it's not. "To run it, it costs nothing. I have not paid an electric bill in eight years," Jacobson said. Jacobson built from scratch what's called a "zero net energy house." It's all-electric with no gas on the property. The home generates as much energy as it consumes, and all the energy generated is clean and renewable, with no polluting fossil fuels. "My whole goal of my career has been to understand and solve large-scale air pollution and climate problems through clean renewable energy systems," Jacobson said. The house is a light steel frame structure with airtight insulation. On the roof are solar panels. In the garage, he installed a home battery system. "I'm generating my electricity with solar on the roof, and that solar generates during the day, peaks at about noon, and there's a lot of excess," Jacobson said. "I mean, I use a lot less energy than I produce, and so that energy first gets stored in batteries. And then that excess beyond that gets sent to the grid." As for California's electric grid, it's undergoing a major transition to clean, renewable sources. According to California ISO, since 2021, about 25,000 megawatts of renewables have been added to the supply. That's enough to power nearly a quarter-million homes. Jacobson's research shows that, so far this year, California has run on 100% wind, water, and solar for 164 of 209 days and for an average of 4.8 hours a day. "So, wind, water and solar this year has supplied 57.4% of all of California's electricity," added Jacobson. "And that's an increase from about 53% last year, and 48% the previous year." Those calculations, as well as Cal ISO's data, don't include private homes equipped with solar and battery systems. "These are sufficient to provide electricity for my home from solar for 24 hours a day for most of the year," said Jacobson, as he gestured to his garage Powerwall. Jacobson also drives electric vehicles. In addition, he uses energy-efficient electrical devices. "Electricity is the future for everything. It's much more efficient. It's cleaner and it's cheaper, and it does far less damage to the environment than gas or other types of fossil fuels," he said. Among his devices: an induction stove which uses 60% less energy than gas, and a heat pump that transfers heat between the indoors and outdoors. Jacobson's heat pump uses a ductless "mini split" model that uses 75% less energy than a gas heater because, as he explained, it doesn't create the heat. The pump simply moves it around. As for hot water, the home uses a heat pump electric water heater. The temperature was set at 129 degrees Fahrenheit. "It's got plenty of water for showers, and it reheats pretty rapidly," he said. Jacobson received a 30% federal tax credit and a state subsidy when he installed his system. He has generated about 120% of what he has used on average and sold the extra 20% back to the grid under the net metering program. He is also studying his home and collecting data to use in a class that he teaches. He has also published the data in a textbook with the goal of informing others about a combustion-free future.