
Who is John Woeltz? $100M crypto king kidnaps, tortures Italian man for Bitcoin password in NYC before dramatic escape
A cryptocurrency investor from Kentucky has been accused of torturing an Italian businessman with a chainsaw for weeks in an attempt to obtain his Bitcoin password at a ritzy Manhattan apartment. The captive eventually managed to make a daring escape. Law enforcement sources described the victim's shocking ordeal as 'The Wolf of Wall Street' meets 'American Psycho,' as reported by the New York Post. The victim was a 28-year-old businessman.
The suspect, 37-year-old John Woeltz, was arrested after the bloodied and bruised victim broke out of the SoHo horror house Friday morning, May 23. He ran to a cop and revealed that he had been held captive for over two weeks.
The victim's ordeal began on May 6 when he arrived in New York City from Italy and went to see Woeltz. The two are believed to have had past business dealings.
When the victim went to meet Woeltz, the latter snatched his passport and tied him up. Woeltz was allegedly renting the luxurious Prince Street pad for about $30,000 to $40,000 a month.
Woeltz tortured the victim for days, which were documented by Polaroids that police later found at the scene. The Polaroids were possibly made to extort money from the victim or his family in Italy, sources said, as reported by the New York Post. The nightmare stemmed from a dispute over cryptocurrency.
Police discovered several Polaroid photos of the victim, who is also a crypto trader, being tied up with electrical wire and tortured. One photo shows him bound to a chair with a gun pointed at his head.
Woeltz has been accused of threatening to kill the victim's family back in Italy. At one point, Woeltz 'carried the victim to the top flight of stairs of the apartment in the compound and hung the victim over the ledge, after threatening to kill the victim if the victim did not provide the defendant with the victim's Bitcoin password,' Assistant District Attorney Michael Mattson said told Judge Eric Schumacher.
T-shirts with an image of the victim with crack cocaine in his mouth were discovered by authorities. The businessman, from Turin, Italy, had told his family before the ill-fated tour that he was traveling to the United States 'for a trip of tourism and language learning,' the Italian news outlet la Repubblica reported. The victim had been studying psychology in college at one point, but later dropped out to trade crypto, another Italian news report said.
After being imprisoned by Woeltz, the victim was bound with an electric cord, Tased while his feet were put in water, pistol-whipped, and even forced to take cocaine. He was also cut on his legs and arm with a chainsaw. An Apple AirTag was tied around his neck. He was eventually taken to Bellevue Hospital with injuries that included a wound on his arm believed to be from a chainsaw, as well as a wound on his head from being pistol-whipped.
The victim's made-for-television escape happened after he told Woeltz he will give up the password by plugging it into his laptop. Woeltz turned his back to get the computer, which is when the injured victim, with no shoes on, ran down the stairs and fled to the street before eventually getting help.
Besides the Polaroids, authorities also found night vision goggles, a bulletproof vest, ballistic helmets, a firearm and ammunition in the blood-soaked torture chamber, according to police and prosecuties.
Public records show that Woeltz is the owner of a 150-acre spread in Kentucky. After being arrested, he was charged with two counts of second-degree assault, first-degree kidnapping, first-degree, first degree unlawful imprisonment and criminal possession of a weapon. Woeltz' assistant, Beatrice Folchi, was initially also held on kidnapping charges, but was later released after the district attorney refused to prosecute, pending further investigation. At least one more suspect, who allegedly worked for Woeltz, is being sought.
Law enforcement sources said that Woeltz is worth $100 million, but it is unclear how he amassed his wealth. According to sources, he worked in blockchain and other cryptocurrency identifying security flaws. He may also have been involved in a hedge fund that invested in crypto assets. He owns a nearly 150-acre farm in Smithland, Kentucky, which is priced at more than $860,000.
Woeltz appeared in Manhattan Criminal Court on Saturday, May 24, where he was ordered held without bail. He has also been ordered to stay away from the victim.
A relative of the Woeltz said the suspect was 'an easy victim' who was forced into this situation. 'He's a kind, caring, loving person, so he was completely controlled by other people,' the relative said of Woeltz, adding the suspect was 'easily manipulated.'
'I'm getting calls from John's friends, girlfriends, everyone saying, 'John was railroaded,' ' she claimed. 'He was hijacked and manipulated and scammed. I think they stole his money as well. He's a victim.'
Woeltz faces 15 to 25 years behind bars on the charges. Assistant District Attorney Mattson told the judge that Woeltz 'has the means to flee,' and called for the suspect to be sent to jail without bail. The request was granted by Schumacher, who also issued an order of protection to the victim.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Sean Diddy Combs' ex testifies she 'felt obligated' to have sex with male escorts, reveals shocking 'freak-off' details
A former girlfriend of Sean "Diddy" Combs testified at his federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Thursday. The woman, using the pseudonym 'Jane,' said she felt a "feeling of obligation" to have sex with escorts while the mogul watched because he was paying the $10,000/month rent on her home, reports New York Post. The woman told the court he brutally beat her and forced her to have unprotected sex with strangers. She told the jury Thursday that 90% of their three-year relationship was spent in the drugged-up 'freak-offs' Diddy orchestrated, filmed and pleasured himself to, which are at the center of this case. The testimony comes as prosecutors are accusing Combs of using his business empire to lure women into his orbit with promises of romantic relationships or financial support, before physically abusing them or coercing them into sex. ALSO READ: Thomas Fugate: A novice who replaced an army veteran to lead US terror prevention centre Sean Diddy Combs' victim testifies Combs, 55, is accused of using his fame, fortune and many businesses to run a decade-long scheme in which he controlled and manipulated his longtime girlfriend, R&B singer Cassie Ventura, 38, using violence and threats, forcing her and others — including several male escorts — into sex marathons that went on for days. Live Events The rapper has pleaded not guilty to RICO charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution. He faces life in prison if convicted. Jane testified that she would take Xanax to help her sleep after using ecstasy and other substances during intense "hotel nights"—also referred to as " freak-offs "—with Sean "Diddy" Combs. Her remarks about drug use surfaced when she was questioned about the various security personnel and assistants involved in obtaining drugs for Combs during their relationship. She mentioned that one individual, named Guido, regularly supplied drugs to him. ALSO READ: Meet Thomas Fugate: 22-year-old ex-gardener and grocery store assistant to lead $18 million terror prevention team Guido would deliver, Jane testified that he brought over ecstasy, molly, Xanax and cocaine, she testified — before she confirmed that she took Xanax. "I just wanted to fall asleep, and it's really hard to fall asleep after you've been taking so many drugs," Jane explained about taking Xanax. She testified that she would take drugs to help her power through the "hotel nights" that could last up to three days. Jane said she would take Xanax after she "put Sean [Combs] asleep." Jane, a single mother, said she met Sean "Diddy" Combs during a 2020 girls' trip to Miami, accompanying a friend who was dating him. What began as a romantic relationship in 2021 eventually turned serious, lasting until 2024. She said they affectionately referred to each other as 'Bert' and 'Ernie.' ALSO READ: Amid Trump-Musk spat, Tesla CEO's immigration status under scanner. Can President deport him? But the tone of the relationship shifted dramatically in May 2021, Jane testified, growing emotional as she recalled the change. Combs began discussing sexual fantasies involving other men and role-playing, which she initially agreed to, assuming it was a distant and isolated request. Instead, she said, she found herself hours later in a Miami hotel room as Combs' staff prepared for a group sex encounter. 'That night opened a Pandora's box,' she said. 'It set the tone for everything that followed… a door I couldn't close.' Though she initially felt a rush afterward, Jane said she later regretted the experience. From then on, she claimed, the majority of their sexual encounters involved other men, with Combs watching. Asked whether she wanted to be with those other men, she quietly replied, 'No… just Sean.' Her account of these 'hotel nights' echoed previous testimony from Cassie, another woman linked to Combs. Both described enduring long encounters — sometimes stretching over 24 hours — and trying to get through them as quickly as possible. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )


NDTV
11 hours ago
- NDTV
US Jiu-Jitsu Student Awarded Rs 466 Crore After Instructor's Move Leaves Him Paralysed
In a landmark case, 30-year-old Jack Greener was awarded over $56 million (Rs 466 crore) after a 2018 jiu-jitsu sparring session left him paralyzed, according to New York Post. As a beginner white belt at Del Mar Jiu-Jitsu Club in San Diego, Greener was paired with instructor Francisco "Sinistro" Iturralde. During the session, Iturralde executed a manoeuvre that placed his full body weight on Greener's neck, crushing his cervical vertebrae and rendering him quadriplegic. The incident occurred just weeks before Greener's college graduation. He underwent multiple surgeries and suffered strokes during his hospitalisation. Initially awarded 46 million in 2023, the total compensation rose with post-judgement interest. The California Supreme Court upheld the verdict, emphasizing that instructors can be held liable when they increase risks beyond those inherent in the sport. Greener has since become a motivational speaker and mountain climber, advocating for athlete safety and accountability in sports training. "The black belt instructor did a technique that placed his entire body weight on Greener's neck, causing him to instantly fall limp and lose all function of his limbs," BJJ legend Rener Gracie, who was called as an expert witness in the case, told The NY Post. Greener was hospitalized for several months, suffering multiple strokes as a result of his injuries - which came just weeks before he was due to graduate from college, his attorneys said. He sued the Del Mar Jiu Jitsu club in San Diego for the injuries he blamed on Iturralde, who earned the nickname "Sinistro", or "Sinister", for his "dynamic, aggressive grappling style", according to his bio on a site selling online instructionals.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a day ago
- First Post
Why Giorgia Meloni's 'anti-protest' law has divided Italy
Italy's new security law, pushed through by PM Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government, is stoking nationwide outrage. From harsher protest penalties and a ban on cannabis light to legal cover for police, critics warn it criminalises dissent and threatens civil liberties. Protests, international concerns and Senate drama have all followed read more Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni waits for the arrival of French President Emmanuel Macron, at Palazzo Chigi, in Rome, Italy, June 3, 2025. File Image/Reuters A new security decree introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government has divided Italy. Approved by the Senate with 109 votes in favour, 69 against, and one abstention, the legislation has sparked a backlash from opposition lawmakers, human rights bodies and legal groups, who argue that it undermines fundamental freedoms and disproportionately punishes marginalised communities. The decree expands legal authority for law enforcement, imposes stricter penalties on demonstrators, and introduces a variety of criminal provisions touching on protests, public order, cannabis regulation, and social housing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the government insists the law is a necessary measure to safeguard security, critics see it as a repressive attempt to criminalise dissent and curb civil liberties in one of Europe's major democracies. What the new security law in Italy comprises Among the central features of the law is the criminalisation of disruptive protest tactics, such as blocking roads and defacing public monuments—methods commonly used by environmental activists and other political movements in Italy. Participation in sit-ins, particularly when they affect transportation or public property, may now lead to criminal prosecution and even prison time. The law also introduces new criminal categories tied to unrest inside prisons and migrant detention facilities. Notably, acts that had previously been treated as non-violent expressions of dissent — such as passive resistance — now carry the risk of formal charges. Tougher sentences are introduced for individuals accused of inciting or participating in riots within detention centres. Critics say this expansion of legal definitions could lead to disproportionate punishment for migrants and incarcerated individuals, especially in situations where the use of force by the state is already under scrutiny. Evictions of people occupying vacant buildings — especially those used for informal housing — will now proceed under stricter rules. Squatting, which was earlier treated with leniency in some cases due to Italy's housing crisis, will now invite potentially severe penalties, including longer prison terms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to lawyer Cesare Antetomaso from the National Association of Democratic Lawyers, 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in,' adding that the housing crisis should be addressed through welfare policy, not criminal enforcement. One of the decree's most controversial provisions bans the sale of 'cannabis light,' a legal form of hemp that contains only trace amounts of THC and does not have psychoactive effects. This decision has enraged business owners who argue that the move will destroy an entire legal market, cost thousands of jobs, and result in major financial losses in an already fragile economy. Another provision removes a long-standing legal exemption that allowed convicted pregnant women or mothers of small children to avoid incarceration or serve sentences in alternative facilities. The government justifies the move by claiming the rule was being exploited by repeat offenders, particularly among Roma women. Gianni Berrino, a senator from the Brothers of Italy party, defended this position by stating, 'It's useless to say that this decree is inhumane, because women who have children in order to steal are not worthy of having them.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How this law changes protection for police Under the new law, significantly enhanced protections have been granted to police and armed forces personnel. Officers under investigation or standing trial for actions committed during duty — including the use of force — will be eligible for legal assistance of up to €10,000. The legislation also establishes specific penalties for causing injury to law enforcement officers during demonstrations. An especially controversial aspect concerns the increased discretion granted to intelligence services, whose agents may now commit certain criminal acts without facing prosecution, provided these are justified on grounds of national security. Human rights watchdogs and opposition politicians have condemned this clause as a threat to democratic oversight and accountability. Meloni's government, which won power in the 2022 general election and has remained popular in polls, has described the law as part of a broader initiative to restore order and strengthen Italy's internal security. 'With the final approval of the Security Decree in the Senate, the Government takes a decisive step to strengthen the protection of citizens, the most vulnerable groups and our men and women in uniform,' Meloni said following the Senate vote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Party leaders have frequently linked their legal reforms to public demands for tougher governance. 'Order, security and legality are at the heart of the Meloni government's actions,' said Carolina Varchi, a deputy from the Brothers of Italy party. 'Challenging this decree means, in effect, turning one's back on the demand for security that comes from citizens.' How the new security law has divided Italy The opposition, led by centre-left parties, has reacted strongly both inside and outside Parliament. During the final Senate vote, lawmakers from the Democratic Party staged a protest on the chamber floor, chanting 'shame, shame' and sitting down in defiance of protocol. Elly Schlein, the party's leader, accused the government of using the law to silence political opposition: 'It is a decree that is not about more security, but about more repression.' Francesco Boccia, a senior Democratic Party senator, condemned the criminalisation of youth activism and labour protests: 'We challenge a government that wants to imprison children, students who strike and protesters outside factories.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Saturday, May 31, thousands of demonstrators marched through central Rome under heavy police presence, braving intense heat to protest the law. Participants carried trade union and Palestinian flags, chanting slogans and calling for the law's repeal. Speaking at the protest, Cesare Antetomaso of the National Association of Democratic Lawyers told AFP, 'We consider this law the biggest attack on the freedom to dissent in the history of the Italian republic.' He specifically criticised its approach to housing and homelessness: 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in. The housing crisis cannot be solved with seven-year prison sentences for those without shelter, but with various social policies.' Human rights institutions have also issued multiple warnings about the decree's compatibility with international law. The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O'Flaherty, expressed deep concern in a letter to Senate President Ignazio La Russa, warning the law could compromise protections for protesters, migrants, and young activists under European standards. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights has earlier raised red flags, stating that several provisions in the law could 'undermine the fundamental tenets of criminal justice and the rule of law.' In two separate communications, eight United Nations Special Rapporteurs had intervened. Six of them highlighted how the decree might breach obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Meanwhile, the Special Rapporteurs on housing and poverty pointed to violations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, particularly concerning the criminalisation of squatting and homelessness. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies