Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may lose on birthright citizenship
An executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship, a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called 'universal' injunctions.
But the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday — while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief — left enough room for the challengers to Trump's directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legality plays out.
'I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect,' said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions, whose work the court's majority cited extensively in Friday's ruling.
Trump's executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident.
The three judges found that the order likely violates citizenship language in the US constitution's 14th amendment.
The directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days — a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those courts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
China, US extend tariff hike suspension: Stability amid uncertainty
After weeks of speculation, the US has extended the suspension of higher tariffs on China for another 90 days, following crucial trade talks. Image: VCG After about two weeks of delay in making the announcement, White House officials confirmed on Monday that US President Donald Trump had signed an executive order to extend the suspension of higher US tariffs on China for another 90 days. The decision was hardly a surprise. It followed the July 28-29 China-US economic and trade talks in Stockholm, where both sides reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining the suspension of the 24-percent reciprocal tariffs, along with China's corresponding countermeasures. This marks the third such extension since the Geneva talks in May 2025, reflecting the shared goal of giving negotiators more time to bridge their differences. The continuation of the suspension is the expected result after over four months of intense negotiations. Through repeated rounds of talks and strategic moves, each side has gained a clear understanding of the other's options and likely outcomes. They have realised that cooperation brings shared benefits, while confrontation causes damage to both. However, despite this common understanding, political and structural limitations still exist. The Trump administration has long relied on tariffs as its main bargaining tool, and domestic political pressures are increasingly making it difficult for Washington to implement significant, large-scale tariff cuts on Chinese products. Aside from maintaining the current tariff ceiling and assuming the 24 percent additional tariff can be avoided, the only notable concession the U.S. might consider is a targeted 20-percent reduction specifically related to the fentanyl issue. However, the Trump administration's demands on this matter are even more demanding than during his first term. As a result, the current negotiations are deadlocked, with both tariff hikes and cuts facing major obstacles. In this context, extending the suspension appears to be the most practical and mutually advantageous option. If the two sides do not reach a comprehensive agreement by mid-November, another 90-day extension could easily happen — a scenario that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has already hinted at. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ While sweeping changes to the overall tariff system are still unlikely, more targeted measures remain possible. This could involve exemptions for specific sectors or, alternatively, the addition of tariffs on certain industries. These sector-specific actions could be the next opportunities — or flashpoints — for breakthroughs in the upcoming phase of negotiations. However, the outlook remains unstable. The wider economic effects of tariff hikes on most countries are only now starting to appear in the US market. Additionally, some economies that have signed so-called "framework agreements" with Washington may not see real benefits anytime soon. Countries like Japan and the European Union, for instance, are still largely making empty promises — offering vague, aspirational commitments in exchange for temporary relief from US tariffs, hoping that by the time they need to take real action, it is already close to the end of Trump's term. These tactics buy them time but provide the US with little immediate economic gain. This means the inflation trend in the third and fourth quarters will be crucial. If consumer prices in the US rise sharply — especially during the key Christmas shopping season after Thanksgiving — ordinary Americans might start feeling the impact of Trump's tariff policies. If the political cost becomes too high, Trump could be forced to change his approach or at least find a face-saving way to soften his stance. Another potential "game-changer" lies in high-level diplomacy. On June 5, in the phone talks initiated by President Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomed him to visit China again. Trump places considerable emphasis on leader-to-leader diplomacy and the cultivation of personal rapport with China's top leadership. Should such a meeting take place and go smoothly, the potential for a significant breakthrough cannot be dismissed. Nevertheless, experience from Trump's first term tempers such optimism. Even if the two countries were to reach a meaningful, phased agreement, Washington could reverse course shortly afterward and resume applying pressure. The pattern of negotiating, reaching partial deals, and then escalating demands has been a hallmark of Trump's approach.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's struggle for happiness: insights from the World Happiness Report 2025
A global report has released the rankings of the happiest and most miserable countries based on the wellbeing of its residents. Social media platforms and online forums are filled with complaints about various issues. In present-day South Africa, national affairs continue to spark conversations among citizens. However, these discussions arise not from disdain but from deep patriotic sentiment and a desire to address the country's challenges. In May 2025, a group of 49 Afrikaners made headlines by leaving South Africa for the United States, claiming victimhood to discrimination and seeking refugee status. The Trump administration extended this status to them, and reports indicated that the US Embassy in Pretoria was processing around 8,000 similar applications, potentially signalling a larger wave of Afrikaners relocating to the US. Conversely, many African Americans are now seeking new beginnings in SA. Motivated by factors such as a more welcoming environment and a desire to escape racial tensions in the US, the allure of SA's rich culture and lower cost of living resonates with many. This juxtaposition of migration trends presents a complex picture of factors influencing an individual's happiness in a country. Perceptions of places vary, and while some individuals thrive in one environment, others may struggle in another. The World Happiness Report 2025 ranks countries based on their citizens' well-being. It uses data from 147 countries and analyses various factors that contribute to happiness. SA ranks 95th out of 147 countries assessed. While this may seem like a decline from previous years, local happiness economists suggest that the data reflects a three-year rolling average, indicating that individual annual assessments might show a more positive view of wellbeing. The report also highlights the happiest countries globally, with Nordic nations leading the rankings. Finland, Denmark, Iceland and Sweden are celebrated for their high public happiness and strong social organisations. Their success starkly contrasts with the lowest-ranking nations, many of which face civil unrest, war, or natural disasters. The World Happiness Report further lists the ten least happy countries, underscoring the societal challenges they face:
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Smithsonian focuses too much on 'how bad slavery was': Trump
US President Donald Trump suggested on Tuesday he will pressure the Smithsonian Institution — a premier museum, education and research complex for US history and culture — to accept his demands, as he did with some colleges and universities, by threatening to cut federal funding. In a social media post, Trump complained about what he called excessive focus on 'how bad slavery was.' 'I have instructed my attorneys to go through the museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with colleges and universities, where tremendous progress has been made,' Trump said on Truth Social. The Smithsonian, which was established in 1846 and includes 21 museums and galleries and the National Zoo, had no immediate comment. Most of its museums are in Washington, DC. The White House said last week it will lead an internal review of some Smithsonian museums after Trump earlier this year accused it of spreading 'anti-American ideology' and raised alarm among civil rights advocates. When asked if Trump would threaten funding cuts to the Smithsonian based on the findings, a White House official said 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable.'
