'Trump used trade in a very powerful way as leverage': White House again claims US President ended India-Pak conflict
The White House again claimed US President Donald Trump ended the conflict between India and Pakistan -- despite repeated rejection from New Delhi. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt detailed the conflicts that President Trump resolved in the past few months as she spoke at great length about Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and also the European leaders.
'We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America,' Leavitt said, detailing the seven global conflicts.
Leavitt was asked which peace deals Trump is most proud of. Leavitt said she would have to ask President Trump for the answer but she's certain that Trump is proud of each one of them.
After mentioning Armenia-Azerbaijan and Rwanda and the Republic of Congo, the White House spokesperson mentioned India and Pakistan and said, "President Trump used trade in a powerful way as a leverage to bring that conflict to an end."
Leavitt made another mention of India as she spoke about tariffs. 'The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end,' she added.
Trump imposed a 50 per cent tariff on India to be effective from August 27. A US team was set to visit India for negotiations, but it reportedly deferred the visit.
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of 'profiteering' by reselling Russian oil. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India is reselling and making a profit. "This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage -- buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product. They'sve made $16 billion in excess profits -- some of the richest families in India," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Ukraine may get to join the EU but not Nato right now
Ukraine's push for European Union membership is advancing despite Hungary's resistance, but Nato accession remains off the table. Instead, Western leaders are exploring 'Article 5-style' security guarantees to protect Kyiv without triggering a direct clash with Russia European Parliament President Roberta Metsola holds an EU flag with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the European Parliament during an address in Brussels, Belgium, February 9, 2023. File Image/European Union via Reuters While Ukraine's path toward joining the European Union (EU) is slowly advancing, albeit with major obstacles, its entry into Nato remains blocked. Instead, Western leaders are exploring 'Article 5-style' security guarantees that might shield Ukraine from future Russian aggression without granting it formal membership in the transatlantic alliance. On Monday, United States President Donald Trump made a direct appeal to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán after lengthy discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and a group of European leaders in Washington. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The talks, held at the White House, centred on finding a unified strategy to push forward both peace negotiations with Russia and Ukraine's integration with Europe. Individuals familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that Trump was urged by European counterparts to use his personal influence over Orbán, a figure often at odds with the EU, to convince him to drop his opposition to Ukraine's EU membership talks. Hungary has been one of the most significant obstacles to Kyiv's European aspirations, having blocked the start of formal accession negotiations despite overwhelming support from other EU states. Orbán, who has built a reputation as one of the EU's most defiant leaders, responded by doubling down on his objections. He wrote on Facebook: 'Ukraine's membership in the European Union does not provide any security guarantees. Therefore linking membership with security guarantees is unnecessary and dangerous.' The Hungarian leader has frequently aligned himself with Russia on sanctions and aid issues, providing Moscow with diplomatic cover inside the EU. The Trump-Orbán call came only days after Trump's own meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Trump suggested he wanted to facilitate a direct summit between Putin and Zelenskyy, followed by a trilateral meeting that he himself would attend. No location or timetable for such an encounter has been set, though Hungary has expressed willingness to host. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How Ukraine may join EU Ukraine's pursuit of EU membership began in the immediate aftermath of the invasion. On February 28, 2022, just four days after Russian forces crossed its borders, Zelenskyy signed the formal application. The urgency reflected Kyiv's desire to cement its place in the European family and to seek long-term protection against Moscow's ambitions. Eight EU member states quickly backed a fast-track procedure, though European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made clear that the accession process would still take time. Within weeks, the EU institutions moved ahead. On March 10, 2022, the Council of the European Union requested the Commission's opinion on the application. A legislative questionnaire was handed to Ukraine on April 8, with responses submitted on May 9. On June 17, 2022, the Commission recommended granting Ukraine candidate status, and six days later, the European Parliament overwhelmingly supported the move. On June 23, 2022, the European Council formally declared Ukraine a candidate for membership. The decision placed Kyiv among nine active candidate states, alongside Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Turkey. Negotiations began in earnest on June 25, 2024, when the Council opened accession talks with both Ukraine and Moldova. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission's President Ursula von der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, Finland's President Alexander Stubb and NATO's Secretary General Mark Rutte, at the White House Library, in Washington, DC, US, August 18, 2025. Image/Ukrainian Presidential Press Service The step was hailed as another milestone in Ukraine's reorientation toward Western institutions, comparable to the integration of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania two decades earlier in 2004. However, progress has not been straightforward. In June this year, Hungary blocked the official opening of talks, citing fears of 'integrating war' into the EU. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also expressed doubts that Ukraine could complete the process by 2034, underscoring the long road ahead. Reforms inside Ukraine have also posed challenges. In July, parliament passed a law undermining the independence of anti-corruption institutions, a critical demand of Brussels. The European Commission quickly warned of consequences. Hours later, Zelenskyy annulled the decision and restored the independence of the agencies, declaring that the measure 'guarantees the absence of any kind of outside influence (or) interference.' Despite these hurdles, Ukraine remains firmly on the EU track. Accession, if completed, would place another former Soviet republic inside the bloc. Why Nato remains out of Ukraine's reach In contrast to its EU bid, Ukraine's chances of joining Nato remain slim for now. At the White House meeting on Monday, Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte made clear that the alliance was not discussing membership but rather a separate framework of commitments. 'The situation is this – that the US and some other countries have said that they are against Nato membership for Ukraine. The official Nato position … is that there is an irreversible path for Ukraine into Nato,' he explained. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'But what we are discussing here is not Nato membership, what we are discussing here is Article 5 type of security guarantees for Ukraine and what exactly they will entail will now be more specifically discussed.' The remarks reflect a long-standing dilemma. Article 5 of Nato's founding treaty, signed in 1949, binds members to treat an attack on one as an attack on all. It has only been formally invoked once, after the September 11 attacks in 2001. While the principle of collective defence is at the core of Nato's deterrence, it also raises the risk of direct confrontation with Russia, a nuclear power, should Ukraine become a member. Therefore, the focus has shifted toward designing alternative security guarantees. What 'Article 5-like' protections could mean for Ukraine Western leaders have increasingly referred to 'Article 5-style' or 'Article 5-like' protections for Ukraine. The phrase suggests a collective defence mechanism modelled on Nato's clause but without formally making Kyiv a member. White House special envoy Steve Witkoff described the concept in an interview with CNN on August 17, calling it a 'game-changing' assurance. He noted that the idea had been discussed at the Alaska summit between Trump and Putin, and claimed that Moscow would not object to such a framework as part of a broader peace deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Unlike Nato's integrated military command, this arrangement would be a bespoke pact among willing nations, defining the obligations in the event of a renewed Russian offensive. The text of such guarantees would be crucial: who would commit troops or resources, under what circumstances, and with what speed. Without clear provisions, critics fear the agreement could lack credibility. Scepticism is widespread, particularly in Ukraine, which still recalls the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. Under that agreement, Ukraine gave up its inherited Soviet nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances of territorial integrity from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski summed up the doubts bluntly, writing on X: 'On 22 April 2004 Vladimir Putin solemnly ratified the Treaty on the Russian-Ukrainian Border. Suffice to respect them and the war is over.' Still, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen endorsed the concept, pointing out deterrence. 'As I have often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine, undigestible for potential invaders,' she declared. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nato currently has 32 members, with The US and other major Nato states believe extending Article 5 to Kyiv now would effectively mean joining Ukraine's war, something they are unwilling to do. Such special security guarantees for Ukraine raise a couple of questions: If guarantees are strong enough to deter Russia, why would Moscow accept them? Yet if they are watered down to secure Russian agreement, will they deter anyone at all? With inputs from agencies
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Not from IIT-NIT, not afraid of layoffs': Techie who quit Rs 65 LPA job to travel gets rehired with salary hike
A techie, who shared his unconventional career move on Reddit — quitting a high-paying job to travel for six months — has gone viral online. In his post, he revealed that he later rejoined the same company, this time with a salary hike. 'So last year I decided to quit my job where I was making 65 LPA. I didn't jump into another role, just bought a car and spent the next six months enjoying life, travelling around, doing whatever I felt like. Those months went by super fast, but honestly, I don't regret it at all,' he wrote. The techie said that after the break, he was hired back by the same company with a 15 per cent raise. 'Now I've joined back the same company (with a raise lol) and I feel way more motivated to work. I look at money differently too, there's a lot more respect for it now. The break really reset me,' he shared. Sharing details of his financial status, the techie revealed that he gets paid in US dollars and has tax benefits under Indian laws. 'I'm unmarried and have some time to play around with my career. That's why I joined the same firm again with good pay and tax benefits which Indian companies usually don't easily match when it comes to in-hand,' he wrote. 'I was planning for a master's from USA since I'm unmarried and have some time to play around with my career. That's why I joined the same firm again with good pay and tax benefits which Indian companies usually don't easily match when it comes to in-hand. (The founders already know I'm planning for a master's). I'm a full stack developer. The car I bought is a used one. I have bachelors degree from CS. I am not from IIT/NITs. just from a pretty average college,' the techie shared in the post. See the post here: Quit my 65 LPA job at 27, bought a car, chilled for 6 months, and now I'm back with a whole new mindset. AMA byu/Creative_System6833 inIndian_flex The post quickly drew attention, with a range of reactions. 'Hey man! Congratulations. In this competitive era and market conditions, taking a break may even make you feel guilty or can get you in a fomo state. But kudos to you for breaking out from all that and doing what you wanted to do,' a user wrote. 'A masters can significantly boost income if in the US. If OP can get a 65Lpa job in India, they should be able to get faang equivalent pay in the US,' another user commented.
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Let's not go below the belt': Wasim Akram warns after India avoid burning Pakistan Asia Cup question
The legendary Wasim Akram reacted on Wednesday to the ongoing backlash over the scheduled India versus Pakistan clash in the Asia Cup 2025 in the UAE, insisting that the "game must go on" regardless of whether the blockbuster encounter takes place. The two arch-rivals are slated to face each other on September 14 at the Dubai International Stadium in a Group A fixture. Wasim Akram had his say on the scheduled India vs Pakistan Asia Cup fixture Ever since the schedule was confirmed last month, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has faced significant criticism for agreeing to play against Pakistan. The controversy was heightened by the Pahalgam terror attack earlier this April, which further strained the already fragile political situation between the two countries. At one point, speculation was rife that the Asia Cup could even be cancelled if India withdrew, before the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) ended the uncertainty with an official announcement in late July. The criticism intensified after the Yuvraj Singh-led India Champions side withdrew from facing Pakistan twice in the World Championship of Legends last month, including the semifinal. More recently, at a press conference in Mumbai on Tuesday, India captain Suryakumar Yadav was asked whether his team would participate in the September 14 clash. The Indian media manager swiftly intervened, instructing reporters to restrict questions to team selection. Speaking on the Stick With Cricket podcast, Akram urged calm, stressing the importance of keeping politics away from sport. "Asia Cup schedule is out, there is backlash. But we in Pakistan are calm. We will be fine whether we play or don't play. The game must go on," he said. "Politics apart, I am not a politician. They are patriotic about their country, we are patriotic about ours. Let's not go below the belt. Talk about the triumphs of your country; the same goes for Pakistan, and the same goes for India. It is easier said than done." Akram added that while he respected the sensitivities around the rivalry, he still hoped to see India and Pakistan contest at least one bilateral Test series in his lifetime. The two neighbours have not played a bilateral series since 2012. 'I hope to see a Test series between India and Pakistan in my lifetime.'
