
Drones: A new weapon for Colombia's guerrillas
The projectile that you can see in the video was dropped by a drone. Armed groups in Colombia are increasingly using this method.
Catatumbo is a region that borders Venezuela. It's known as a region where coca is grown – the plant used to produce cocaine. Since January, bloody clashes have been taking place in the region between the ELN (the National Liberation Army), a guerrilla group that has been active since the 1960s, and Frente 33, a group made up of dissidents from FARC (the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia).
Catatumbo is far from the only region that has experienced violence in Colombia, where an armed conflict has been ongoing for more than 60 years. In late 2024, there were armed groups in 71 percent of the country's municipalities.
In 2016, the government and the former guerrillas from the FARC movement signed peace agreements. But some FARC militants then picked up their weapons again. And, what's more, this agreement didn't include groups like the ELN, who just continued on with their activities.
In 2022, the country's first leftwing president, Gustavo Petro, took office. And despite his ambitions of 'total peace', which would involve demobilising all armed groups through dialogue, the violence has continued.
Increase in drone attacks since 2024
Against this backdrop, drone attacks have been on the rise since 2024. Most of the armed groups use commercial drones made by the Chinese manufacturer DJI, which they sometimes modify, or homemade drones. Projectiles, both homemade and conventional, are then attached to the drones, which then drop them.
Drones were being used, however, well before 2024. Our team spoke to Camilo Mendoza, a former Colombian fighter turned defence consultant, who says that a drone was used in 2018 in Barranco Minas, a town in the department of Guainía.
'A commercial drone dropped explosives on a unit in the army,' Mendoza said. 'Just by chance, it didn't explode.'
The army reported back in 2019 that it had discovered 'two Syma drones [Editor's note: a Chinese brand] carrying explosives' in the department of Nariño. They shared images of the drones.
While the increase in drone attacks is a relatively recent phenomenon, armed groups were using them at least as far back as 2015, often for reconnaissance.
The country's security forces have also been using drones since at least 2015 (see here and here). But, for the time being, they don't seem to be using them to attack.
Armed groups, on the other hand, have been using drones to target the army, the police and rival groups. But civilians have also been paying the price for this violence, as is the case in any armed conflict. It is estimated that around 80 percent of deaths in the recent decades of the conflict were civilians.
'Drones are different from the anti-personnel mines and the gunfire that we are used to'
Drones represent a new threat to civilians, says Miguel (not his real name), who lives in Catatumbo. We gave him a pseudonym because of the risks to people who criticise the armed groups.
Up until now, we've gotten used to the threat of anti-personnel mines and exchanges of gunfire. When it comes to mines, the armed groups often leave signs saying where they have placed them so that the population doesn't go there. So it is something we can see.
In a similar vein, you can hear the sound of gunfire when there are clashes. So we can get down on the ground or get behind a tree or a wall and, sometimes, that's enough to stay safe.
With drones, it's different. You don't know when they might appear, or where they might drop their explosives. They're in the sky. You don't see them. Usually, when we realise they are there, they are already above our heads. Residents have already been killed.
These drones and the fighting have forced us to leave our homes, to abandon our land. Some people have left the department entirely, others have sought refuge in town. What we have in this region is terrorism, and it is civilians who pay the price, as always.
'These attacks violate the principles of proportionality and distinction'
Lina Mejía Torres works for 'Vivamos Humanos', a Colombian NGO and human rights organisation that is monitoring the situation in Catatumbo. She agrees with Miguel about the specific dangers caused by drones and worries about a certain category of people – those who are already under protection due to the threats they receive, including from armed groups.
There are armoured vehicles for some of these people. But mostly, the armour is underneath the carriage of the vehicle, to protect them from anti-personnel mines and bombs. The national protection unit isn't ready for these drone attacks [Editor's note: an estimated 15,000 people benefit from protection measures through this unit. About 10,000 of them are social leaders and human rights defenders.]
We still have not seen an attack that directly targeted civilians. It seems more like they are collateral victims. But any attack in a densely populated area should be considered an attack on the civilian population. Homes were destroyed, and I'm not just talking about just a bit of damage. All of this violates the principles of proportionality and distinction, rules of war that armed groups are supposed to respect.
Mendoza says that most of the civilian victims weren't targeted as such: 'These are mostly piloting errors, which could be linked to a lack of training or to weather conditions.'
In order to estimate the number of victims of drone attacks, our team cross-referenced a number of sources. First, we looked at cases reported by the local press and on social media. We also looked at numbers given to our team by experts, as well as those recorded by the army and the police in the departments of Cauca and North Santander.
According to our estimates, at least six people were killed – three civilians and three soldiers – between January 1, 2024, and May 13, 2025.
One of the victims was 73-year-old Luis Ernesto Mendoza, whose home in Catatumbo was hit on March 27. Mendoza was brought to the hospital with serious injuries to his neck and arms. One of his arms was amputated, but it wasn't enough to save him: Mendoza died two days later.
According to one of our sources, the projectile was dropped by a drone, a version that was also reported by the Colombian press. Moreover, the local police shared with our team a list of victims of attacks committed by drones. The second-to-last line seems to refer to Mendoza.
This list includes the case of another civilian killed in Catatumbo on April 12. This is likely referring to Farid Alonso López, age 72, whose case also appeared in the Colombian press.
In July 2024, a ten-year-old child, Dylan Camilo Erazo Yela, was also killed by a drone. He was on a sports field in the department of Cauca, located in the southeast of the country. His death was widely reported by the Colombian media.
The three soldiers were all killed in Catatumbo between March and May 2025.
Though, for the time being, there haven't been too many deaths, there have been dozens of people injured. We counted at least 92 people injured in drone attacks, including 30 civilians, 48 soldiers and 14 police officers, between January 1, 2024, and May 20, 2025.
During the same period, anti-personnel mines injured or killed 173 people, including 85 civilians and 88 soldiers or policemen, according to information published by the Colombian government on May 31.
Violence and narcotrafficking
Most of the drone victims were in the department of Cauca. That's also where most of the drone attacks were documented: 100 in 2024, and then 59 between January 1 and May 6, 2025, according to the police from this department. The attacks took place in five municipalities. All of them are places where coca is grown, like Catatumbo, where drone attacks have been on the rise since March.
There is nothing surprising about this. The regions where coca and cocaine are produced are infected by armed groups. These groups have been fighting for control of the territory in an attempt to maximise profits from this lucrative industry. They also periodically attack security forces when, for example, they attempt to take back control of certain zones.
'The drone is the poor man's missile'
Currently, most of the attacks have come from guerrilla forces like the FARC dissidents and the ELN. These groups have always had to use unconventional weapons in their fight against the security forces, according to experts who spoke to our team. They use anti-personnel mines, booby-trapped vehicles, bombs made from gas cannisters and filled – sometimes – with scrap metal to cause more serious damage, and homemade projectiles. Drones – especially homemade ones – fit within this way of doing things.
As for commercial drones, Camilo Mendoza says: 'Buying a drone is easy and also cheap, especially when compared with conventional weapons. They call drones 'the poor man's missile'. They're a way of having a mini air force. Pretty much anyone, in about a week, can learn to pilot them effectively. And they reduce the risks for the attackers, who no longer need to be on the front lines, and can cause extensive damage from five kilometres away.'
A slow response from the authorities
Faced with this new threat, Colombia is starting to equip itself with anti-drone systems. The aim is to detect drones and then scramble their signal so as to neutralise them. However, experts say that the government is late in adopting them and that there aren't nearly enough.
Our team spoke to Erich Saumeth, another Colombian analyst specialising in defence. 'Up until now, a number of local authorities bought anti-drone equipment in Singapore (see here and here) and Australia,' he said. 'But there are very few to have done it, and they only bought a few, mostly because of their price – more than $100,000.'
He says that it is too bad that the defence ministry – which oversees the army and the police – has not invested in more anti-drone equipment, outside those bought in China (2019), in France (2022) and in the United States (2024).
'A Colombian company developed its own system, but I think the Air Force only used one,' he said.
Our team contacted the army's communication service, which said on May 20 that they had bought anti-drone equipment, but didn't specify how much.
Moreover, police in the department of North Santander said that the national police had a 'global plan' to manage drones and mentioned anti-drone equipment, but did not provide further information.
In early June, the defence ministry spent $25 million buying equipment from a US company. However, it seems as if the equipment has not yet arrived in Colombia.
'I think that the government failed to prepare, even though we've been talking about drones for years. The armed groups have an upper hand,' Mendoza says.
Manfred Grautoff, another Colombian security expert who spoke to our team, said, 'Each unit should already have anti-drone equipment and people trained to use it, but that isn't the case.'
Will Colombians soon start using FPV drones?
Another concern is that Colombians could soon begin using more sophisticated drones, like those seen on the front lines in Ukraine.
'For now, the techniques used and the extent to which drones are used there isn't being reflected here… thankfully,' Mendoza said. 'We don't yet have FPV (first-person view) drones. But I think that the armed groups will start buying this technology before the end of the year. However, we currently don't have any systems that would be effective against FPV drones. Moreover, armed groups will certainly begin to use anti-drone equipment as well, to neutralise drones used by security forces.'
He is also concerned that, in Ukraine, people have started to use fibre optic drones that seem immune to electronic jamming.
If all of these drones start to be used in Colombia, experts think that the internal conflict could be profoundly transformed and that armed groups could gain further advantage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Colombian ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest
Uribe, aged 73, received the maximum possible sentence after being found guilty of witness tampering, a legal source told AFP. The sentence, which is due to be publicly announced later on Friday, marks the first time in Colombia's history that a former president has been convicted of a crime and sentenced. Uribe led Colombia from 2002 to 2010 and led a relentless military campaign against drug cartels and the FARC guerrilla army. He remains popular in Colombia, despite being accused by critics of working with armed right-wing paramilitaries to destroy leftist rebel groups. And he still wields considerable power over conservative politics in Colombia, playing kingmaker in the selection of new party leaders. He was found guilty of asking right-wing paramilitaries to lie about their alleged links to him. A judge on Monday found him guilty on two charges: interfering with witnesses and "procedural fraud." Uribe insists he is innocent and is expected to appeal the ruling. A law-and-order hardliner, Uribe was a close ally of the United States and retains ties to the American right. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier decried Uribe's prosecution, claiming, without providing evidence, that it represented "the weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges." Recent opinion polls revealed him to be the South American country's best loved politician. Other probes In 2019, thousands protested in Medellin and capital Bogota when he was first indicted in the case. On Monday, a smaller group of followers gathered outside the court wearing masks fashioned after his image and chanting: "Uribe, innocent!" The investigation against Uribe began in 2018 and has had numerous twists and turns, with several attorneys general seeking to close the case. It gained new impetus under Attorney General Luz Camargo, picked by current President Gustavo Petro -- himself a former guerrilla and a political arch-foe of Uribe. More than 90 witnesses testified in the trial, which opened in May 2024. During the trial, prosecutors produced evidence of at least one ex-paramilitary fighter who said he was contacted by Uribe to change his story. The former president is also under investigation in other matters. He has testified before prosecutors in a preliminary probe into a 1997 paramilitary massacre of farmers when he was governor of the western Antioquia department. A complaint has also been filed against him in Argentina, where universal jurisdiction allows for the prosecution of crimes committed anywhere in the world. That complaint stems from Uribe's alleged involvement in the more than 6,000 executions and forced disappearances of civilians by the Colombian military when he was president.


Euronews
4 days ago
- Euronews
Former Colombian president convicted of witness tampering and bribery
Former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe has been convicted of witness tampering and bribery in a historic trial that shocked the South American nation. The ruling followed an almost six-month trial in which prosecutors presented evidence that Uribe tried to influence witnesses who accused him of links to a paramilitary group. The 73-year-old — who was president from 2002 to 2010 — faces up to 12 years in prison but a sentencing will be delivered in a separate hearing. He is Colombia's first-ever former head of state to be convicted of a crime. Uribe is expected to appeal the ruling, having maintained his innocence. He was not in court in the capital, Bogota, for the verdict as the judge has so far not ordered his arrest. The former president attended the trial virtually and could be seen shaking his head as the verdict was read out. Uribe is a polarising figure in Colombia, where many credit him for saving the country from becoming a failed state, while others associate him with human rights violations and the rise of paramilitary groups in the 1990s. Rubio criticises ruling In her ruling, Judge Sandra Heredia said there was sufficient evidence to find that Uribe conspired with a lawyer to persuade three imprisoned former members of paramilitary groups into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a left-wing senator. Cepeda had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged links to a paramilitary group. The case dates back to 2012 when Uribe filed a libel suit against Cepeda before the Supreme Court. However, in an unexpected twist, the high court dismissed the charges and instead began investigating Uribe in 2018. During Uribe's presidency, the Colombian army forced Latin America's oldest leftist insurgency, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), into remote areas and held peace talks which led to the disarmament of more than 13,000 fighters in 2016. Known for his work ethic and temper, Uribe still has many supporters in Colombia and is one of the fiercest opponents of the current president, leftist ex-guerrilla Gustavo Petro. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reacted to the ruling as it became clear that Judge Heredia would find the former president guilty of bribery. "Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland," Rubio wrote on Monday on X. "The weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent." Colombian President Gustavo Petro defended the ruling. He wrote on X that "a solid justice system" would allow Colombia to emerge from violence. He added in another message that Rubio was interfering with Colombian sovereignty. "The world must respect Colombia's judges," Petro wrote. Heredia said that her ruling should not be interpreted as "a victory for anyone" but as "an act of justice". State crimes Critics blame Uribe for several state crimes. According to Colombia's Truth Commission, which was set up in 2017, more than 6,400 civilians were executed by the Colombian army and identified as members of rebel groups by soldiers seeking promotions during the conflict with paramilitary groups. This phenomenon reportedly peaked during Uribe's government. Prosecutors accused Uribe of sending lawyers to meet with imprisoned ex-paramilitary members and pressuring them to withdraw testimony they had given to Cepeda. During the trial, Uribe denied trying to manipulate the witnesses, but acknowledged requesting interviews with them as part of his preparation for the trial. He said this was also done to verify testimony that was also being used in a murder trial against his brother, Santiago Uribe, who was also accused of links to armed paramilitaries. Cepeda spoke to the press after the ruling and said he would continue to fight for truth and justice for the victim of Colombia's conflict. "No one can defy or sully the rule of law," he said.


France 24
4 days ago
- France 24
Colombia's ex-president Uribe convicted in landmark witness tampering case
A Colombian court on Monday found Alvaro Uribe guilty of witness tampering, making him the South American country's first ex-president to be convicted of a crime. The 73-year-old -- who led Colombia from 2002 to 2010 -- was found guilty of asking right-wing paramilitaries to lie about their alleged links to him. As the judge started reading out her verdict Monday, Uribe -- who attended the trial virtually -- sat shaking his head. The still-powerful ex-president is expected to hear his sentence on Friday. He risks 12 years in prison. The judgement brought rapid condemnation from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who decried "the weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges." A law-and-order hardliner, Uribe was a close ally of the United States and retains close ties to the American right. At home his popularity has waned as alleged rights abuses during his tenure have come to light. Even before the ruling and Rubio's high-profile attack, a Colombian lawyers' guild asked for more protection for Judge Sandra Heredia, who is presiding over this case. Colombia's leftist President Gustavo Petro shot back at Rubio's criticism and insisted the judiciary was independent. Allegations "to the contrary were an insult that would not be tolerated", he said. Dirty war Paramilitary groups emerged in the 1980s in Colombia to fight Marxist guerrillas that had taken up arms against the state. A plethora of armed groups that emerged in the standoff adopted cocaine as their main source of income -- the genesis of a deadly rivalry for resources and trafficking routes that continues to this day. Uribe led a relentless military campaign against drug cartels and the FARC guerrilla army, which signed a peace deal with his successor Juan Manuel Santos in 2016 -- much to Uribe's chagrin. After leftist senator Ivan Cepeda accused him of ties with paramilitary groups responsible for human rights violations, Uribe is alleged to have contacted jailed ex-fighters to lie for him. The judge Monday found him guilty on two charges: interfering with witnesses and "procedural fraud." Popular politician Uribe remains popular in Colombia for his anti-FARC campaigns, and is still a prominent voice on the right. Recent opinion polls revealed him to be the South American country's best loved politician. In 2019, thousands protested in Bogota and Medellin when he was indicted in the case, and on Monday, a smaller group of followers gathered outside the court wearing masks fashioned after his image and chanting: "Uribe, innocent!" They clashed with a group of critics. The investigation against Uribe began in 2018 and has had numerous twists and turns, with several attorneys-general seeking to close the case. It gained new impetus under Attorney General Luz Camargo, picked by Petro -- himself a former guerrilla and a political arch-foe of Uribe. More than 90 witnesses testified in the trial, which opened in May 2024. Prosecutors produced evidence during the trial of least one paramilitary ex-fighter who said he was contacted by Uribe to change his story. 'Vengeance' The former president is also under investigation in other matters. He has testified before prosecutors in a preliminary probe into a 1997 paramilitary massacre of farmers when he was governor of the western Antioquia department. A complaint has also been filed against him in Argentina, where universal jurisdiction allows for the prosecution of crimes committed anywhere in the world. That complaint stems from Uribe's alleged involvement in the more than 6,000 executions and forced disappearances of civilians by the military when he was president. Uribe insists his trial is a product of "political vengeance."