Energy calculator - see how your bill will change as Ofgem confirms price cap
You can estimate how much your energy bill will drop from July after the changes from Ofgem were confirmed by using our calculator below
Energy bills are set to fall from July as Ofgem announces its new energy price cap - and you can use our calculator to see how much less you will pay.
The regulator changes the price cap every three months, with the latest one set to take effect on July 1 and continue through to September 30.
The new cap means that the typical household will pay £1,720 annually for gas and electricity, for a standard dual-fuel direct debit plan.
This represents an average fall of 7% per household compared to the cap for between April and June. It works £129 a year less for the typical bill. You can estimate how much your energy bill will drop from July by using our calculator.
It also means that bills will be 28%, or £660 lower than at the height of the energy crisis in 2023. The impact of these changes will vary from household to household though, depending on how much fuel you use.
The cap does not limit household total bills - the £11 monthly fall is based on typical usage - but rather the amounts charged per unit and the daily standing charge.
Tim Jarvis, Director General of Markets at Ofgem, said: 'A fall in the price cap will be welcome news for consumers, and reflects a reduction in the international price of wholesale gas. However, we're acutely aware that prices remain high, and some continue to struggle with the cost of energy.
'The first thing I want to remind people is that you don't have to pay the price cap – there are better deals out there so it's important to shop around, and talk to your existing supplier about the best deal they can offer you. And changing your payment method to direct debit or smart pay as you go can save you up to £136.
Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money
'In the longer term, we need an energy system where prices are insulated from the volatile international gas market, and which ensures more stable prices and energy security. And we're working closely with government to get the investment we need to reach our clean power and net zero targets as quickly as possible.
'We're also doing everything we can to support consumers today and pushing ahead with more changes to help consumers. This includes working on ways to support those trapped in energy debt and bringing in reforms to standing charge tariffs for this winter.'
The Chief Executive of National Energy Action - a fuel poverty charity - Adam Scorer says, 'Any fall in the price of energy is always welcome news, but this is a short fall from a great height. Bills remain punishingly high for low-income households.
'Four years of extraordinarily high energy bills has taken its toll. We hear heart-breaking cases every day.
'The likely expansion in eligibility for the Winter Fuel Payment will be a relief for some, but National Energy Action is calling for deeper energy bill support and a real focus to support households out of debt.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
The five key issues from chancellor's winter fuel payment U-turn
There are considerable problems with the winter fuel payment U-turn, but perhaps the political argument in favour outweighs them all? First, Rachel Reeves has executed the plan without working out how to pay for it. This, for an iron chancellor, is a wound that opponents won't let her forget. A summer of speculation about tax rises is not a summer anyone looks forward to. Second, the fig leaf that she and Treasury ministers are using is an improvement in economic conditions. If you were being polite, you'd say this is contested. The OBR halved growth this year and the OECD downgraded UK forecasts, albeit only by a little, last week. The claim that interest rates are coming down ignores that their descent is slower because of government decisions of the last six months. Third, the question immediately becomes, what next? Why not personal independent payments (PIP) and the two-child benefit cap? At this stage, it would feel like a climbdown if they did not back down over those. But then, what will the markets - already policing this closely - make of it, and could they punish the government? 1:46 Fourth, this is aggravating divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party: the soft left Compass group and ministers like Torsten Bell pushing bigger spending arguments. Those MPs in Tory-facing seats who rely on arguments that Labour can be trusted with the public finances are worried. Fifth, this has created a firm division between No 10 (the PM) and No 11 (the Chancellor). No 10 is now conscious that it does not have enough independent advice about the market reaction to economic policies and is seeking to correct. Others, I am told, are just critical of the chancellor's U-turn - for she wobbled first. Given the litany of arguments against, why has it happened? Because the hope is this maxi U-turn lances the boil, removes a significant source of pensioners' anger and brings back Labour voters, a price they calculate worth paying, whatever the fiscal cost.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Martin Lewis lists five things DWP will check after £300 payment rule change
Martin Lewis lists five things DWP will check after £300 payment rule change The finance expert has set out what exactly the DWP will be counting as income for the winter fuel payment Martin Lewis has listed out the five things that constitute as "income" for the Winter Fuel Payment (Image: PA ) Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced that millions of people across England and Wales will be receiving the winter fuel payment this year in a major U-turn. The Labour-led UK government had taken the unpopular decision to stop the universal winter fuel payment, instead making it means tested for pensioners. This decision drew widespread criticism, as it reduced the number of pensioners receiving the benefit from 11.4 million people to nearly 1.5 million. Though the payment remains means tested, Reeves has said her government is 'expanding' the payments, 'to benefit nine million pensioners this winter". This means that those on state pension who have an income of £35,000 or below will be receiving the payment worth up to £300 going into winter this year. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The chancellor has defended her government's decision to keep the payment means tested (Image: PA ) What constitutes 'income'? Martin Lewis took to X, to explain five things that would constitute an income under the scheme. These would likely be: Article continues below The State Pension Income from Earnings Private Pension Income Investment income (eg dividends) Savings interest Though he hasn't '100%' confirmed this, the financial guru added that non-taxable payments like the Attendance Allowance would likely not be included. Content cannot be displayed without consent Will you need to do anything to receive the benefit? If you're eligible, you'll automatically receive the payment this winter without needing to take any action. If your income exceeds the threshold, HMRC will automatically recover the money. This winter, households will automatically receive a payment of £200, or £300 if there is someone over 80 in the household. Over 12 million pensioners across the UK will also benefit from the Triple Lock, with their State Pension set to increase by up to £1,900 during this parliament. Pensioners earning above the £35,000 threshold - approximately two million people in England and Wales - will have the full amount of the winter fuel payment they received automatically collected via PAYE or through their self-assessment return. There's no need for anyone to register with HMRC or take any further action. Pensioners who wish to opt out and not receive the payment at all will be able to do so, with details to be confirmed. Content cannot be displayed without consent The chancellor has defended the government's decision to means test the payment, saying this would make the payment 'targetted and fair'. Reeves has said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' Article continues below Speaking on the u-turn, she said: 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves may have U-turned on winter fuel, but her problems are far from over
Standing in what appeared to be a garden centre to announce her latest U-turn on the pensioners' winter fuel payment, Rachel Reeves looked as if she was wilting a bit. Never at ease in front of a camera, the chancellor was more stilted than usual and didn't make much of an attempt to justify the change on any rational grounds. If this 'difficult decision' was the right thing to do last year, when the public finances were under pressure, one might ask: why is it the wrong thing to do this year, when the public finances are still under pressure, albeit for different reasons? She cannot, for reasons of pride, admit the U-turn is because of the recent electoral punishment-beating administered by an angry public – with the added force of Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage both declaring they'd restore the payment in full and immediately. She certainly cannot concede that this totem of her 'iron determination' to do whatever it took to achieve sustainable public finances has had to be tossed away, against her wishes, because the prime minister publicly ordered her to do so and her backbenchers increasingly demanded this hated policy be ditched. But she knows that everyone knows the truth – and to her credit, she cannot disguise her discomfort. She is in the worst of all worlds: she looks callous (even if she is not) but now she also looks weak, and will get few thanks for giving the winter fuel payment back (mostly). This is not a dream combination of attributes for a senior Labour figure or, for that matter, for a finance minister hoping to dazzle the markets. In fact, even in executing this U-turn she has somehow managed to botch things, by trying to retain some element of the means-testing she introduced last year, just to save face. So, even now, not all pensioners will receive their £200 or £300 (depending on age). Or rather, all will receive it initially, but some, not fantastically rich on an income of £35,000 or more, will find it entirely clawed back by HM Revenue and Customs through the self-assessment procedure. It would have been easier all round just to complete the U-turn: instead, Ms Reeves has stopped around the 170-degree mark. It hardly seems worth it. Even when it was first announced at the end of July last year, means-testing the WFP was an ill-conceived move. Of all the options available to her – and all chancellors, even in the tightest of binds, have choices – she plumped for the one that combined an incredibly modest saving (about £1.5bn) with the maximum political damage. Some 10 million active and motivated pensioners were ready to head to the nearest polling station at the earliest opportunity to make their displeasure clear. Too late, Ms Reeves and Liz Kendall pointed out how relatively generous the triple lock on the state pension was. Yet they didn't attempt to point out what a functioning NHS might do for the quality of life of older people. There was never so much as the faintest hint that an incoming Labour government would scrap something introduced by Gordon Brown and retained by the Conservatives since 2010. Making the U-turn announcement now, two days ahead of the comprehensive spending review was, presumably, an attempt to manage the news cycle – getting the good-but-embarrassing news out of the way. That might be shrewd, if the review does indeed show how the public services will 'live within their means' in the coming years, with welcome extra resources for the NHS, schools and the defence of the realm, restoring Ms Reeves's prestige. Yet the authority of the chancellor has been badly compromised by the missteps she's taken in her first year in office – unforced errors compounded by poor presentation. The so-called 'tractor tax' and an over-reliance on employers' national insurance contributions have also landed badly. As some old Treasury hands suggest, it feels very much as though her civil servants reached for their favourite policies when the inexperienced chancellor asked about options, and she accepted the recommendations all too readily, in a way her predecessors did not. Maybe the very real 'black hole' she inherited panicked her. It looks like it. At any rate, she is finding it even more difficult to resist her more powerful colleagues in the spending departments when they push for politically expedient solutions. We need not exaggerate matters, though. Ms Reeves is not like Kwasi Kwarteng being recalled from an IMF summit to be sacked by Liz Truss for delivering (her) mini-Budget in 2022. Nor is this a repeat of a dazed Norman Lamont staggering into Whitehall to announce that sterling was leaving the European ERM in 1992. Unlike in those episodes, the government's economic policy has not been destroyed by an adjustment of about £1bn in a social security budget of more than £300bn. But she knows that she is in a weakened position – and, with no following in the party, depends heavily on the confidence of the prime minister to survive. Sir Keir Starmer knows, as she does, that if he were to move her this early in the life of the government it would only make matters worse in every respect. For now, they're still in this together.
