
‘Weapons' Review: The Best Movie I've Seen All Year
The setup is pretty straightforward. One night, at exactly 2:17 am in the fictional town of Maybrook, seventeen children from the same 3rd grade class all simultaneously leave their homes and vanish. Only one child shows up to school the next day. Their teacher, Justine Gandy (Julia Garner) is immediately suspected of some wrongdoing. Why else would all these kids from the same class simply up and disappear?
What follows is part horror movie, part Brothers Grimm fairytale, part black comedy, with little nods to Stephen King and Roald Dahl, among others. It's really hard to describe. Even if I littered this review with spoilers, it would be hard to explain why it works so well, and why it feels absolutely singular and unique. I'm so used to formulaic slop, and not just in the horror genre. This felt new. Cregger's nonlinear, Rashomon-style storytelling helps the various characters and their stories unfold into something truly remarkable.
It starts out a bit slow, and at first I worried it was going to be just another horror movie with some jump scares and suspense. I couldn't have been more wrong. The two-hours and eight-minute runtime flew by, as we were sucked deeper and deeper into the weird, surprisingly hilarious and twisted tale of these missing children and the people searching for them, including Archer (Josh Brolin) the father of one of the missing kids, and school principal, Andrew Marcus (Benedict Wong). The scene stealer, however, the dark horse of this film, was Austin Abrams as homeless drug addict, James – though he shares some of the best scenes with Alden Ehrenreich's Paul Morgan, a police officer who has seen better days.
I really enjoyed Sinners earlier this year (you can read my review here) but no matter how great it was, I couldn't help shake the sense that it borrowed just a tad too much from Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino's From Dusk Till Dawn. I don't think that takes away from how genuinely great the movie was (and honestly, what a year for quality horror!) but it was a nagging thought throughout. Weapons, on the other hand, is something unto itself. I've never seen anything quite like it, despite whatever cultural references are sprinkled throughout.
There are many ways you could interpret this film. Is it an allegory for school shootings? On some level, I think so. Is it about the many ways we, as humans, can be weaponized – our words, are interactions, our bodies, our thoughts? Definitely. But it's also a modern fairy tale that never gets bogged down in allegory. There is nothing preachy here, no in-your-face political message that takes away from your enjoyment of the film. In the end, it's just wildly entertaining.
There's so much to unpack here. Look for my follow-up piece here on this blog and on my YouTube channel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RB position preview: WHY this may be the DEEPEST RB has ever been + WHO you need to target in drafts
Subscribe to Yahoo Fantasy Forecast Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube Position preview week on the pod rolls on with Justin Boone joining Matt Harmon to preview the running backs. The two dive into the most crucial position in fantasy football and debate if this season is the deepest we've ever seen the position in fantasy. Harmon and Boone identify potential league winners at RB, which rookies you need to target and the late draft gems you need to steal in the later rounds. (2:45) - Elite RB tier (18:35) - RB1 ceiling guys (29:15) - Ideal RB2 targets and the potential drop off and RB cliff (50:45) - Boone's backup RB rankings (1:03:05) -Late round RB gems you need to target that are going outside Yahoo ADP 120 (1:18:40) - Fantasy Film Room segment - ONE RB you need to come away with in your drafts 🖥️
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's Something From The '90s That People Are Nostalgic About, But It Wasn't Really That Great?
I was barely alive in the '90s, but my generation loves to romanticize that decade. However, I'm sure it wasn't all Blockbuster and Dunkaroos. There are definitely some things that are way better in people's memories than they actually were IRL. For example, a lot of people reminisce about waiting all day by the radio for their favorite song to play so they can record it on a cassette. TBH, that sounds more frustrating than fun. And downloading music from LimeWire was basically Russian roulette with a computer virus. And a Tamagotchi seems like choosing to do that high school project where you take care of a fake baby for fun! So, in your opinion, what's something about the '90s that people are super nostalgic about, but it wasn't actually that great? Why? Share your thoughts with us in the comments (or in the anonymous comments box below), and you may be featured in an upcoming BuzzFeed Community post! Also in Community: Also in Community: Also in Community:


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: How Sly Stallone and Gloria Gaynor explain Trump and his presidency
President Donald Trump would love cultural elites to sniff at his Kennedy Center honorees. He relished unveiling the stars he'll fete at the iconic arts center's annual gala later this year, after motorcading to the complex Wednesday through streets now patrolled, on his orders, by federal agents and army reservists. The line-up explains a lot about him, his power and why he's president. 'Rocky' star Sylvester Stallone, Broadway legend Michael Crawford, disco icon Gloria Gaynor, country crooner George Strait and glam rock band KISS are more populist than 'high' culture. That's not to say that they are unworthy. Who could argue that Stallone didn't leave an 'indelible' mark on his art form? That's one of the criteria for selecting nominees. And Kennedy Center honorees have been trending toward the popular arts for decades, under presidents of both parties. As always, Trump was setting a trap for his political foes. Any criticism of his choices as too lowbrow or undeserving will only bolster his claims to be a scourge of the establishment and endear him more to supporters who lionize him as the ultimate outsider. Trump's critics see his takeover of the Kennedy Center and his efforts to destroy progressive values in the arts, the universities and elsewhere as cultural warfare. He pretty much agrees, proclaiming that he'd scrubbed his list for 'wokesters.' He admitted he'd even considered using his newly seized power over the citadel of American cultural life to honor himself. No wonder critics — including, no doubt, many liberal Kennedy Center subscribers, given the capital region's progressive lean — perceive a would-be authoritarian who wants to dominate and dictate every aspect of American life. Presidents don't generally select honorees. You'd think the world's most powerful man would have bigger fish to fry. Most commanders in chief just throw a White House reception and turn up for the show. But Trump is a ravenous consumer of pop culture and is unusually skilled at leveraging it for political gain. He's the executive producer of his own life and political career. So there was no chance he'd pass up a chance to stage-manage this show — and even plans to host the televised gala himself. He professed to have been press-ganged into it by White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. She probably didn't have to twist his arm for too long. More seriously, Trump's Kennedy Center Honors will also represent another important victory for his 'Make America Great Again' movement and his hostile takeover of Washington institutions. 'I would say I was about 98 percent involved,' Trump said, of the selection process. 'No, they all went through me … I turned down plenty. They were too woke. I turned them — I had a couple of wokesters.' There's an important political dimension to this. Trump's base voters, and many other conservatives, believe that liberal elites spent decades cementing an ideological takeover of multiple areas of US life — in the arts, the media, academia, and even in sports — and dragged them to the left. The anger of millions of Americans about this pulsated from Trump's rallies in three consecutive campaigns. Voters gravitated toward a candidate who was mocked for his brassy ways by sophisticated Manhattanites. This is why Hillary Clinton's ill-judged insult of Trump supporters in 2016 as 'deplorables' became a badge of honor and a source of power for the president. When Trump's critics bemoan what they see as a takeover of top political and cultural institutions, his fans think he's taking those entities back. On conservative media, hosts lash out at movie stars for demeaning Hollywood with progressive views, or socially conscious NFL or NBA stars for 'ruining sports.' Previously, Kennedy Center honorees were chosen by a nominally bipartisan panel of arts and entertainment industry luminaries. But try convincing a conservative that these judges were free of bias, since they were drawn from the liberal arts milieu that Trump is seeking to destroy by taking over the Kennedy Center. Trump celebrated his dominance of yet another liberal bastion by admitting he was politicizing it — in another show of his unchecked power. 'I shouldn't make this political because they made the Academy Awards political, and they went down the tubes,' he said. The president went on, 'So they'll say, 'Trump made it political,' but I think if we make it our kind of political, we'll go up, OK?' But while Trump aimed for levity, his actions are threatening. On its own, his takeover of the Kennedy Center would be unusual, even a little bizarre. Taken against the backdrop of everything else he's doing, it's more worrying. He's weaponized the Justice Department against his political enemies, including members of the Obama administration. Trump's federalizing of the Washington, DC, police and deployment of the National Guard on the capital's streets and endless offensives against judges mirror the tactics of authoritarian rulers. The administration plans to scrub exhibits at the Smithsonian so they don't conflict with Trump's hardline views ahead of America's 250th birthday next year. His attempts to control the curricula of elite universities and his attacks on the media along with his dominance of the Kennedy Center make it feel like he's trying to control what Americans see, learn and even do in their leisure time. It's easy to believe that Trump chose the honorees himself because they all reflect aspects of his own character and experience. Stallone plays rough guys like John J. Rambo and Rocky Balboa, who trampled political correctness. It's not hard to see that Trump sees himself in them. 'He's a little bit tough, a little bit different, I will tell you. He's a little, tough guy,' Trump said, noting that Stallone, too, has his star in cement in Hollywood. 'In fact, the only way that's a bigger name on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, they say, is a guy named Donald Trump.' Strait is a massive recording star known as the 'King of Country' and a titan of rural America whose traditional sound evokes the kind of down-home appeal that Trump seeks to emulate. Crawford, who starred in the original London and Broadway productions of 'Phantom of the Opera,' shows the president's affinity for musicals. Like Trump, the show was big in New York in the 1980s. And the score, composed by Andrew Lloyd Webber, was considered mass market by trendy elites, while being widely popular among the masses. Crawford is also famous for another role — PT Barnum, a 19th-century showman, impresario, businessman and ring master whose carnival-barker style foretold Trump's. 'Barnum's' most famous number is 'There's a sucker born ev'ry minute' and sums up the business philosophy of a hero remembered for publicity stunts and hoaxes that blurred truth and reality. Sound familiar? KISS, a band with a catalogue of platinum albums, is also known for over-the-top stagecraft. And there's no better anthem for Trump's life of personal, business and political scandals that almost but never quite destroy him than Gaynor's biggest hit: 'I Will Survive.'