Jagdeep Dhankhar quits as Vice President after 3 yrs, cites health reasons; thanks Prez Murmu for 'wonderful working relationship'
Resignation letter mentions health and gratitude
In his official resignation letter, Dhankhar wrote, 'To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.' He cited no further details regarding his health condition or future course of action.
Acknowledges support from President and Prime Minister
Dhankhar conveyed his appreciation to President Droupadi Murmu, stating, 'I extend my deepest gratitude to Your Excellency – the Hon'ble President of India for her unwavering support and the soothing wonderful working relationship we maintained during my tenure.'He also thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Council of Ministers, adding, 'The Prime Minister's cooperation and support have been invaluable, and I have learned much during my time in office.'
Thanks parliamentarians and reflects on tenure
Dhankhar expressed sincere gratitude towards the Members of Parliament, acknowledging the trust and affection he received during his time in office. 'The warmth, trust, and affection I have received from all the Hon'ble Members of Parliament would ever be cherished and embedded in my memory,' he said.
pic.twitter.com/n4nsDOxLGb
Reflecting on his term, he added that the position gave him 'invaluable experiences and insights' into India's democratic framework. He described his tenure as a privilege and remarked that it was a 'true honor' to serve during a time of significant economic progress and national development.
Concludes service as Vice President with immediate effect
With this resignation, Jagdeep Dhankhar's term as Vice President concludes ahead of schedule. No interim appointment details have been shared yet. His departure comes during a phase he described as a 'transformative era' in the country's history, marking an early end to his constitutional role.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC rejects Justice Varma's plea challenging cash burn inquiry panel
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected Justice Yashwant Varma's petition challenging the validity of an in-house inquiry committee that had found him guilty of misconduct after the recovery of unaccounted cash from his official residence in Delhi in March this year. A Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice A G Masih held that the in-house committee had scrupulously followed the process, except for uploading photographs and video. The Bench also clarified that a writ petition challenging the conduct of a sitting judge under the in-house mechanism was not maintainable. It stated that the in-house procedure enjoys legal sanctity and is not a parallel mechanism outside the constitutional framework. "We have held that the CJI and the in-house committee had scrupulously followed the process, except uploading photos and video, and we have said it was not required. But nothing turned on it because you did not challenge it then. We have held that the CJI sending the letter to the Prime Minister and President was not unconstitutional. We have made certain observations where we have kept it open for you to raise proceedings if needed in the future. With this, we have dismissed the writ petition," the Court said. In the previous hearing, the Court had asked why Justice Varma — a former Delhi High Court judge — was questioning the panel and its formation after participating in its proceedings throughout. Justice Varma, now serving at his parent court, the Allahabad High Court, was transferred from Delhi after the alleged recovery of unaccounted cash from his official residence. The Court has, however, left open the option for Justice Varma to approach it for appropriate remedies if required. Justice Varma had also challenged the May 8 recommendation by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, urging Parliament to initiate impeachment proceedings against him. His plea alleged that the panel's findings were based on a 'preconceived narrative' and that the adverse conclusions were drawn without affording him a full and fair hearing. 'Whether to proceed or not to proceed is a political decision. But the judiciary has to send a message to society that the process has been followed,' the Bench observed. It also clarified that the post of the Chief Justice of India is not merely ceremonial. 'He (the CJI) has certain duties to the nation as the leader of the judiciary. If materials come before him (regarding misconduct), the CJI has the duty to forward them to the President and the Prime Minister. If on the basis of the material it is found that the misdemeanour is so serious as to warrant action, he would be affirming earlier decisions of this Court which state that the CJI has the authority to do so,' Justice Datta said. The 'in-house procedure' was the law laid down by the Supreme Court under Article 141 of the Constitution, Justice Datta said. However, the Bench agreed with Varma's contention that the videos showing the burning of cash should not have been leaked during the proceedings. The in-house inquiry committee examined 55 witnesses and visited the site of the accidental fire, which broke out around 11:35 PM on March 14, 2025, at Justice Varma's official residence, then serving at the Delhi High Court. He now serves as a judge at the Allahabad High Court. Based on the panel's findings, then CJI Sanjiv Khanna wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, recommending impeachment proceedings against Justice Varma.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Time to save democracy': Kharge says ECI acts as ‘representative of the ruling party', backs Rahul's voter fraud claims
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Thursday launched a scathing attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing it of acting like a 'representative of the ruling party' and allegedly failing in its constitutional duty to conduct free and fair elections. Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge alleges 'Vote Chori' is being carried out strategically across several constituencies.(Sansad TV File) 'There was a time when the Election Commission of India was praised across the world. Many countries took training from our Election Commission to conduct fair elections. When any political party raised questions, the Commission would respond or clarify within constitutional limits,' Kharge said in a post on X, originally written in Hindi. 'Today, when someone questions the ECI, instead of responding, it acts like a representative of the ruling party, leveling counter-allegations and making baseless statements without considering the demands of opposition parties,' he alleged. Referring to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's remarks on alleged electoral irregularities, Kharge said, 'Today, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, after thorough investigation, cited examples from Karnataka's Mahadevapura Assembly Segment, explaining how the Election Commission allowed gross rigging in a single election, shredding its constitutional duties, with 1,00,250 votes stolen.' Kharge claimed that such irregularities were not isolated incidents. 'This #VoteChori is happening strategically across many seats in the country,' he added. Announcing the party's next move, he said, 'The Congress Party will raise public awareness about this. Tomorrow, we will begin from Freedom Park in Bengaluru, Karnataka.' 'The time has come to save democracy and the Constitution, to save the country!' the Congress chief added in the post. Addressing reporters at the AICC headquarters in New Delhi, claimed that the Maharashtra election results confirmed the Congress party's suspicion that the polls had been manipulated. 'Not giving machine-readable voter list convinced us that the Election Commission (EC) colluded with BJP to 'steal' elections in Maharashtra,' alleged the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha. He further said, 'They said we are going to destroy the CCTV footage. This was surprising to us because there was a question in Maharashtra about a massive voting after 5.30 pm for the numbers to add up. Our people knew that in the polling booths, no such thing happened. There was no massive voting after 5.30 pm.' 'These two things made us believe with reasonable certainty that the Election Commission of India was colluding with the BJP to steal elections,' Gandhi added.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Poll body issues notice for Vice President's election after Jagdeep Dhankar quits
The Election Commission of India has issued a notice regarding the elections that will take place to appoint the new Vice President of India on September 9. The latest notice details the specific dates for filing the nomination papers and candidature to the notice, the nomination papers are to be filed on the first floor of Parliament no later than August 21, 2025. Additionally, a deposit of rupees 15,000 will also need to be submitted to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or to a Government notice also mentions additional documents needed, along with the nomination papers like the receipt of making the said deposit. Furthermore, the date and time assigned for the scrutiny of the nomination papers is at 11 a.m. on August 22. The notice also confirmed the timing of the vice-presidential polls: between 10 a.m. to 5 comes after the abrupt resignation of the former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar on July 22."To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution," Dhankhar wrote in a letter addressed to President Droupadi his resignation, the Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed the vacancy through a notification issued on July 22, planned election to fill the vacancy is in accordance with what the Constitution of India dictates in the case of a sudden vacancy of the vice-presidential Article 66 of the Indian Constitution will be implemented, allowing a secret ballot exclusively participated in by members of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Parliament
