Iran's nuclear programme set back by up to two years, Pentagon says
"We have degraded their programme by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the department assess that," Parnell told reporters at a news briefing.
"All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's (facilities) have been completely obliterated," Parnell said.
On 22 June, the US launched multiple joint attacks with Israel against three of Iran's nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, using more than 30 13,500-kilogram bunker buster missiles and Tomahawk rockets.
Parnell's statement on Wednesday offered a more cautious assessment than previous statements from Washington, while at the same time contradicting information released by UN's nuclear watchdog.
In the aftermath of the strikes, US President Donald Trump had said the facilities were "totally obliterated" and the attacks had set Iran's nuclear programme back "by decades".
Meanwhile, over the weekend, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi, said that Tehran might go back to producing enriched uranium within a few months.
"The capacities they have are there. They can have ... in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium," Grossi said in an interview with CBS News on Saturday.
"But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," he added.
Other experts have also said that Iran likely moved the already-produced stock of highly enriched uranium — believed to be near-weapons grade — prior to the strikes on Fordow and other facilities to protect it from the strikes.
US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and other Washington officials said that existing intelligence showed no signs of such a move or claims that the stockpile has been hidden away at an unknown location, further contradicting other statements.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi previously said the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage.
"No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araghchi told CBS on Tuesday.
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday ordered the country to halt its cooperation with the IAEA, according to state media.
Pezeshkian follows a law passed by Iran's parliament last week to suspend that cooperation, as politicians unanimously supported the move against the IAEA. The bill was also backed by Iran's Guardian Council.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Macron threatens retaliation after Iran lays new espionage charges on French detainees
President Emmanuel Macron called the fresh indictments a "provocation towards France" and threatened Tehran with "retaliatory measures" if Iran upheld new charges. "We won't wait to answer," he said, adding that he would soon speak to his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian. Cécile Kohler, 40, and Jacques Paris, her 72-year-old partner, have been held in Iran since May 2022 on charges of espionage that their families deny. But Iran has now charged the pair with spying for the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, as well as "corruption of Earth" and "plotting to overthrow the regime," diplomatic and family sources told AFP Agency on Wednesday, July 2. Tehran has not confirmed the new charges, all three of which carry the death penalty. A French diplomatic source has described the allegations as "completely unfounded." Macron did not mention what retaliation could be applied. But Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said earlier in the day that France would decide whether to reimpose sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme, depending on whether Tehran released the pair. "Freeing Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris is an absolute priority for us," Barrot said. "We have always told our interlocutors from the Iranian regime that any decisions on sanctions will be conditional on resolving this issue." Iran officially suspended its cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog on Wednesday. The move came after a 12-day conflict last month between Iran and Israel, which saw unprecedented Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and sharply escalated tensions between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Sanctions 'snapback' possible until deadline The United States and other Western countries, along with Israel, accuse Iran of seeking to build a nuclear weapon. Tehran denies that, but has gradually broken away from its commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal that it struck with world powers, after the US pulled out of it in 2018. Israel has maintained ambiguity about its own atomic arsenal, neither officially confirming nor denying its existence, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates that its arsenal amounts to 90 nuclear warheads. The landmark 2015 Iran nuclear deal provided Tehran with sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its atomic programme to be monitored by the UN nuclear watchdog. The deal included the possibility of UN sanctions being reimposed through a mechanism called "snapback" if Iran failed to fulfil its commitments, an option that expires in October. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European signatories of the 2015 deal to trigger the "snapback" mechanism and reinstate all UN sanctions on Iran. Iran is believed to hold around 20 European nationals, many of whose cases have never been publicized, in what some Western governments including France describe as a strategy of hostage-taking aimed at extracting concessions from the West. Three other Europeans, who have not been identified, have also been arrested in the wake of the current conflict, two of whom are accused of spying for Israel, according to authorities.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump and Putin discuss Ukraine and Iran in phone call, Kremlin says
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed Ukraine, Iran and other issues on Thursday in a "frank and constructive" phone call, the Kremlin said, in their sixth publicly disclosed talk since Trump returned to the White House. On the war in Ukraine, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said Trump emphasised his push for a quick halt to the fighting, and Putin voiced Moscow's readiness to pursue talks with Kyiv, noting the previous rounds in Turkey yielded humanitarian results. At the same time, the Russian leader said Moscow will seek to achieve its goals in Ukraine and remove the "root causes" of the conflict, Ushakov said. "Russia will not back down from these goals," Ushakov told reporters after the call. Putin has argued he sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022 to fend off a threat to Russia posed by Ukraine's push to join NATO and protect Russian speakers in Ukraine, arguments rejected by Kyiv and its allies. He insisted that any prospective peace deal must see Ukraine abandon its NATO bid and recognise Russia's territorial gains. Thursday's call follows the Pentagon's confirmation that it's pausing shipment of some weapons to Ukraine as it reviews US military stockpiles. The weapons being held up for Ukraine include air defence missiles, precision-guided artillery and other equipment. The details on the weapons in some of the paused deliveries were confirmed by a US official and former national security official familiar with the matter. They both requested anonymity to discuss what is being held up as the Pentagon has yet to provide details. Ushakov said a suspension of some US weapons shipments to Ukraine wasn't discussed in the Trump-Putin call. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in Denmark after meeting with major European Union backers that he may talk to Trump in the coming days about the suspension of weapons deliveries. "I hope that maybe tomorrow, or close days, these days, I will speak about it with President Trump," he said. Asked about his expectations from the Trump-Putin call, he said that "I'm not sure that they have a lot of common ideas, common topics to talk (about), because they are very different people." The previous publicly known call between Trump and Putin was on 14 June, a day after Israel attacked Iran. The resumed contacts between Trump and Putin appeared to reflect both leaders' interest in mending ties that have plummeted to their lowest point since the Cold War amid the conflict in Ukraine. Ushakov said Trump told Putin about his $4.5 trillion (€3.8 trillion) tax breaks and spending cuts bill and the Russian leader wished him success in pursuing his plans and also congratulated the US on the Independence Day holiday. While discussing the situation around Iran and in the broader Middle East, Putin emphasised the need to resolve all differences "exclusively by political and diplomatic means," said Ushakov. The leaders agreed that Russian and US officials will maintain contacts on the issue, he added. The United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran on 22 June, inserting itself into Israel's conflict aimed at destroying Tehran's nuclear programme. The Kremlin adviser noted the leaders also discussed developments in Syria and expressed interest in pursuing bilateral projects in the energy sector and space exploration, during what he described as "frank, businesslike and concrete conversation." Ushakov added that Putin even suggested that the US and Russia could exchange movies promoting "traditional values shared by us and the Trump administration." On Tuesday, Putin and French President Emmanuel Macron held their first direct telephone call in almost three years.
France 24
7 hours ago
- France 24
Arms deliveries, sanctions loopholes: How Trump's recent moves benefit Russia
Fewer US weapons for Ukraine, more financial leeway for Moscow – two decisions out of Washington in recent days have laid bare how Trump's return to the White House is already reshaping the war in Ukraine and Western pressure on Moscow. Washington announced on Tuesday it would suspend deliveries of certain military equipment to Ukraine. The White House said it was simply following the Pentagon's recommendations amid concerns about maintaining sufficient reserves for America's own defence needs. Just a week earlier, another Trump administration decision opened up new commercial avenues for Russian companies in the nuclear sector, most notably Rosatom. The US Treasury introduced an exemption to a Biden-era ban on doing business with Russian banks. While narrowly tailored to civil nuclear energy financing, this marks the first formal breach in US sanctions against Russia under Trump – sanctions that had steadily intensified since Washington's initial response to Moscow's annexation of Crimea in 2014. Air defences and artillery shells "These are two signals from the United States confirming what many had suspected: that Washington is no longer fully committed to standing with Ukraine, and that defeating Russia is not central to Donald Trump's understanding of American interests," said Mark Harrison, emeritus professor of economics and Russia expert at the University of Warwick. The decision to halt the next shipment of weapons leaves little room for ambiguity. Even if the Pentagon's concerns about strategic reserves are legitimate, Harrison argued the decision clearly shows that "logistical support for Ukraine is no longer a priority for the United States". Although Washington did not disclose the shipment's full contents, the New York Times reported it included artillery ammunition, air defence systems, and missiles – all critical to Ukraine's defence against Russian bombardments and drone attacks. These are vital in a war where fortified Russian positions must be shelled and air threats – from drones to missiles – must be intercepted. "The immediate effect will be limited, as other deliveries from the US and Europe are still in the pipeline,' Harrison said. 'But the long-term impact could be serious, especially if Europe fails to fill the gap left by waning American support." Beyond the battlefield, the decision also offers a morale boost to Moscow. 'It's a very different challenge to fight a Ukrainian army backed fully by the United States,' Harrison said. 'That's no longer the case.' According to economist Kirill Shakhnov of the University of Surrey, this shift is also closely tied to US domestic politics. Trump likely delayed the shipment to appease the more "America First" wing of the Republican Party, which opposed the US military operation in Iran. Isolationist voices in Congress are pressuring Trump to stick to his pledge "to withdraw from conflicts in which the United States plays a role", Shakhnov added. In that light, Ukraine is being used as a bargaining chip while Trump pursues other goals, notably Iran. A gift to Viktor Orban If Europe can hope to offset the missing American weapons, it has fewer options when it comes to the economic favour Trump just handed Vladimir Putin. The exemption that allows Rosatom and other Russian nuclear firms access to global financing comes as a surprise to many. "This clearly won't have a major impact on the Russian economy," said Shakhnov. "Gas and oil exports are far more important than uranium," added Chloé Le Coq, an energy policy expert at Paris-Panthéon-Assas University who specialises in Russian hydrocarbons. Still, analysts point to two likely motives behind Trump's decision. First, by targeting a relatively minor domain for the Kremlin, the Trump administration may be testing the waters to see if such a move sparks backlash. So far, there's been little reaction… apart from Ukrainian media outlets. Second, it's useful to consider who benefits. Rosatom, of course, but also Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban. Just two days after the exemption was announced, Hungarian authorities revealed that the waiver would allow them to restart the stalled construction of the Paks-2 nuclear power plant, a multibillion-euro project largely funded by Rosatom. " Donald Trump may have made this decision to please Viktor Orban, one of his main allies in Europe," said Shakhnov. In short, it appears to be a cosy deal between Hungarian, American and Russian interests at the expense of the sanctions enforcement. Orban had been furious last November when one of Joe Biden's final decisions put his nuclear plant project on hold after Gasprombank, a Rosatom partner, was placed under US sanctions. A Russian foothold in Europe's future energy market? Paks-2 is one of the Hungarian government's flagship infrastructure projects. The plant was to be funded with €10 billion from Rosatom and Russian banks. Trump's decision explicitly reopens the door for Gazprombank to fund civil nuclear projects. But the question remains: why is Rosatom willing to lose money by investing so heavily in a project unlikely to yield much profit? "When a company is willing to take such a financial loss, it suggests there's another motive," said Le Coq. That's especially true of Rosatom, which often serves as a foreign policy tool for the Kremlin. One possible explanation, she suggested, lies in the European project to build a single electricity market. "If a Russian actor holds even a small part of that market, it becomes a strategic concern," she said. "Unlike oil or gas, it's hard to find a substitute energy source once a nuclear plant is plugged into the grid." In other words, Trump's decision is not only a win for Russia and Hungary, it's also a blow to European interests.
