logo
Arms deliveries, sanctions loopholes: How Trump's recent moves benefit Russia

Arms deliveries, sanctions loopholes: How Trump's recent moves benefit Russia

France 2419 hours ago
Fewer US weapons for Ukraine, more financial leeway for Moscow – two decisions out of Washington in recent days have laid bare how Trump's return to the White House is already reshaping the war in Ukraine and Western pressure on Moscow.
Washington announced on Tuesday it would suspend deliveries of certain military equipment to Ukraine. The White House said it was simply following the Pentagon's recommendations amid concerns about maintaining sufficient reserves for America's own defence needs.
Just a week earlier, another Trump administration decision opened up new commercial avenues for Russian companies in the nuclear sector, most notably Rosatom. The US Treasury introduced an exemption to a Biden-era ban on doing business with Russian banks.
While narrowly tailored to civil nuclear energy financing, this marks the first formal breach in US sanctions against Russia under Trump – sanctions that had steadily intensified since Washington's initial response to Moscow's annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Air defences and artillery shells
"These are two signals from the United States confirming what many had suspected: that Washington is no longer fully committed to standing with Ukraine, and that defeating Russia is not central to Donald Trump's understanding of American interests," said Mark Harrison, emeritus professor of economics and Russia expert at the University of Warwick.
The decision to halt the next shipment of weapons leaves little room for ambiguity. Even if the Pentagon's concerns about strategic reserves are legitimate, Harrison argued the decision clearly shows that "logistical support for Ukraine is no longer a priority for the United States".
Although Washington did not disclose the shipment's full contents, the New York Times reported it included artillery ammunition, air defence systems, and missiles – all critical to Ukraine's defence against Russian bombardments and drone attacks.
These are vital in a war where fortified Russian positions must be shelled and air threats – from drones to missiles – must be intercepted.
"The immediate effect will be limited, as other deliveries from the US and Europe are still in the pipeline,' Harrison said. 'But the long-term impact could be serious, especially if Europe fails to fill the gap left by waning American support."
Beyond the battlefield, the decision also offers a morale boost to Moscow. 'It's a very different challenge to fight a Ukrainian army backed fully by the United States,' Harrison said. 'That's no longer the case.'
According to economist Kirill Shakhnov of the University of Surrey, this shift is also closely tied to US domestic politics. Trump likely delayed the shipment to appease the more "America First" wing of the Republican Party, which opposed the US military operation in Iran. Isolationist voices in Congress are pressuring Trump to stick to his pledge "to withdraw from conflicts in which the United States plays a role", Shakhnov added. In that light, Ukraine is being used as a bargaining chip while Trump pursues other goals, notably Iran.
A gift to Viktor Orban
If Europe can hope to offset the missing American weapons, it has fewer options when it comes to the economic favour Trump just handed Vladimir Putin. The exemption that allows Rosatom and other Russian nuclear firms access to global financing comes as a surprise to many.
"This clearly won't have a major impact on the Russian economy," said Shakhnov.
"Gas and oil exports are far more important than uranium," added Chloé Le Coq, an energy policy expert at Paris-Panthéon-Assas University who specialises in Russian hydrocarbons.
Still, analysts point to two likely motives behind Trump's decision. First, by targeting a relatively minor domain for the Kremlin, the Trump administration may be testing the waters to see if such a move sparks backlash. So far, there's been little reaction… apart from Ukrainian media outlets.
Second, it's useful to consider who benefits. Rosatom, of course, but also Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban. Just two days after the exemption was announced, Hungarian authorities revealed that the waiver would allow them to restart the stalled construction of the Paks-2 nuclear power plant, a multibillion-euro project largely funded by Rosatom.
" Donald Trump may have made this decision to please Viktor Orban, one of his main allies in Europe," said Shakhnov.
In short, it appears to be a cosy deal between Hungarian, American and Russian interests at the expense of the sanctions enforcement. Orban had been furious last November when one of Joe Biden's final decisions put his nuclear plant project on hold after Gasprombank, a Rosatom partner, was placed under US sanctions.
A Russian foothold in Europe's future energy market?
Paks-2 is one of the Hungarian government's flagship infrastructure projects. The plant was to be funded with €10 billion from Rosatom and Russian banks.
Trump's decision explicitly reopens the door for Gazprombank to fund civil nuclear projects. But the question remains: why is Rosatom willing to lose money by investing so heavily in a project unlikely to yield much profit?
"When a company is willing to take such a financial loss, it suggests there's another motive," said Le Coq. That's especially true of Rosatom, which often serves as a foreign policy tool for the Kremlin.
One possible explanation, she suggested, lies in the European project to build a single electricity market. "If a Russian actor holds even a small part of that market, it becomes a strategic concern," she said. "Unlike oil or gas, it's hard to find a substitute energy source once a nuclear plant is plugged into the grid."
In other words, Trump's decision is not only a win for Russia and Hungary, it's also a blow to European interests.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'You'll never walk alone': Football world mourns Diogo Jota
'You'll never walk alone': Football world mourns Diogo Jota

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

'You'll never walk alone': Football world mourns Diogo Jota

Papers are reacting to Trump 's "Big, Beautiful Bill", which he's set to sign this Friday, July 4, which is US Independence Day. The bill will cut major welfare programmes and add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The Washington Post calls it one of the most consequential and expensive economic legacies in modern American presidential history. The Wall Street Journal takes us through how the bill managed to pass the finish line. Trump used his executive authority to made deals to avoid the bill heading back to the Senate. He agreed to explore new tariffs on parts used in wind turbines in a bid to placate conservative Republicans who wanted greater limits on renewable energies. The Journal notes that his "vague promises and cajoling" paid off, with the House passing the bill on Thursday. It also underscores his iron grip on the Republican Party. In the conservative press, the Washington Times is hailing "big, beautiful wins." The sweeping tax cut legislation caps a "summer of victories" for Trump, it says. The National Review calls the bill's passage a significant conservative policy win that will make permanent the "meat of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017", in reference to a bill passed during Trump's first term in office. The magazine celebrates a provision defunding planned parenthood from Medicaid but laments that it's pared back to just a one-year restriction. It does say, however, that the failure to get spending under control will come back to "haunt any Republican who wants to be remembered for helping bring our debt under control". In other news, Russia has acknowledged the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan, something a lot of the press is reporting on. The New York Times notes that Russia has become the first country to recognise the Taliban as Afghanistan's government, four years after the group seized control of the country. Russia's recognition is a "significant victory" for the Taliban, the paper says, reminding us that their draconian restrictions on women have made the country a pariah state. The Taliban moved to eradicate opium production in a bid to entice foreign partners, but its refusal on women's rights means it has stayed diplomatically isolated. Last year, China and India appeared to soften towards Afghanistan. The football world is mourning the loss of Diogo Jota, a Portuguese player and Liverpool forward. The 28-year-old and his brother André Silva were killed when the Lamborghini they were travelling in veered off the road in Santander, Spain. Jota was heading back for Liverpool's pre-season training. A Bola, the Portuguese sports paper, goes with a sober black and white photo of Diogo and André and their respective date of births. You'll never walk alone, reads the title in English – a nod to Liverpool FC's slogan. "Forever our number 20", the Liverpool Echo says in an edition featuring several pages dedicated to the footballer. The Guardian also focuses on the terrible accident on its front page. The pair were driving to Santander to catch a ferry back to England because Jota was advised against flying back to England after recent surgery. He had just recently married his partner and was a father of three. Finally, a new study has shown wild orcas appearing to present humans with gifts of food, but it's unclear if this is a gift or an attempt at manipulating us. The Times of London reports on the study which notes 34 examples of this behaviour in six different orca populations, from Norway to New Zealand. The orcas approached people in boats, in the water or on shore, and brought fish, bits of whale, birds, seaweed and even a turtle. They then usually hovered around waiting to see what would happen. In a few cases, the food was picked up, inspected and tossed back. The whales then retrieved and returned the gift. The results were published in a psychology journal and offer some theories about what this behaviour could mean: that the orcas were extending a flipper of friendship and nothing more. Or a darker, "Machiavellian" explanation: it was an attempt to attract a species of prey – us – and kill us but not eat us. With the word killer in their names, you'd be forgiven for being a bit suspicious!

'I was raped for three days': Ukrainian police investigate war crimes
'I was raped for three days': Ukrainian police investigate war crimes

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

'I was raped for three days': Ukrainian police investigate war crimes

After her release, she did not go to the police. She remained silent for a long time to protect her children. At first, because they were still living in territory occupied by Moscow's army, and then, after they joined her on the Ukrainian side of the front line, because "these things are not their concern," even though "one day they will know everything." She kept silent also because it seemed unlikely that the Russian officer who had imprisoned her and raped her would ever be brought to justice. She believed she was just one woman among many living through the nightmare of Russian occupation and that her rapist was just one among many, safe in Russia, in a sea of impunity. Since the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022, the Ukrainian police and justice system have embarked on a titanic, almost impossible mission: to investigate every crime committed during the war, from the most serious to the most trivial, from the worst killings of innocent civilians to looting and theft. Tens of thousands of cases are under investigation. So far, indictments have been issued against 679 individuals (171 Ukrainians and 508 Russians), including 53 accused of crimes involving sexual violence, and courts have convicted 189 people for war crimes (19 in custody and 170 in absentia).

United States: A budget bill with an exorbitant price tag
United States: A budget bill with an exorbitant price tag

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

United States: A budget bill with an exorbitant price tag

The final adoption by Congress on Thursday, July 3, of a sweeping budget bill is an undeniable political victory for Donald Trump. The "One Big Beautiful Bill," as the president of the United States chose to name it, brings together many of his campaign promises, making it a crucial issue on which he could not afford a defeat. Before signing it on July 4, Independence Day, he threw all his weight behind it, using threats to convince divided Republican lawmakers to support a bill that will increase both inequality and public debt to worrying levels. One of the main measures of the bill is to extend the tax cuts adopted in 2017 during his first term, which were set to expire at the end of this year, along with other tax exemptions. At the same time, the defense and border security budgets have been increased. In an attempt to offset these measures, Congress has decided to slash the budget for Medicaid – the health coverage program for low-income or disabled people – while also reducing food assistance for the most vulnerable. Finally, the bill eliminated the tax credits adopted under President Joe Biden in support of the energy transition. Robin Hood in reverse Elected on the promise to restore hope to America's working classes, Trump risks making them even more desperate with this law. Like a Robin Hood in reverse, he is simply proposing to take from the poor to give to the rich. While the wealthiest 10% will benefit from tax savings of several thousand dollars, between 11 million and 15 million people will lose health insurance, and millions more will no longer have access to food assistance. Even though Congress has scheduled these measures to take effect after the midterm elections in November 2026, the direction of the law is clear to everyone. According to polls, two-thirds of Americans are opposed to it. Given how clearly this redistribution to the wealthy breaks with Trump's campaign promises to help the forgotten Americans, his party risks suffering the consequences at the polls. The bill also strongly favors fossil fuels, cutting all support for green investments. Zero Lab, a research group at Princeton University, calculated that the bill would result in a 10% increase in CO 2 emissions. By abandoning the energy transition, the US was giving China a clear advantage in an increasingly strategic field. This budget is built on reckless expansion, increasing the debt by more than $3.3 trillion over the next decade. With it, the Republican Party is demonstrating that it can advocate a certain budget discipline while in opposition, but that it is capable of spending without restraint once in power. At a time when interest rates and inflation risks remain high, the law could weaken the US economy in the long term. Wary investors are already demanding ever-higher risk premiums to buy US debt. By pushing this bill through, Trump is ignoring the warnings from the bond market in recent weeks. While his political victory is assured, the cost to the country looks set to be exorbitant.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store