'I make more than £2,500 a month selling breast milk to bodybuilders'
Meet the mum who makes around £2,600 a month by selling her breast milk to bodybuilders. McKenzie Stelly, 23, said she had to rely on donor milk when her first child, Elias, four, was born with two bottom teeth - leaving it "impossible" to nurse him.
After welcoming her second child, Rhett, one, whom she breastfed, McKenzie, from Louisiana in the US, noticed she had a "decent" supply of milk. She then started donating her oversupply of milk via the hospital agency, Tiny Treasures, receiving $1 for every ounce she donated.
Advertising her oversupply on Facebook, McKenzie was then contacted by a bodybuilder seeking breast milk to "build muscle". In July 2025, she started selling her breast milk for $5 per ounce to bodybuilders - making $3,500 a month. While there is no scientific evidence to support this claim, many bodybuilders are drawn to breast milk due to its high protein content.
McKenzie, a homemaker from Lafayette, said: "I've always wanted to breastfeed my babies because I believe it gives them the best start in life. My mom did it, I've always wanted to do it too.
"When we had Elias, I was devastated. I couldn't breastfeed, but I was thankful for the milk donor I connected with through Facebook.
"When welcoming Rhett, I realised I had an oversupply, so I wanted to help others like I'd been helped. I needed to get rid of the extra milk to avoid getting clogged milk ducts, which leads to mastitis.
"Donating through Tiny Treasures meant my supply helped moms all over the world - and I got a little bit of money in return. People think that breastmilk should always be given for free, and I do agree to some extent, but it's still a product of my body and time.
"I've had clients ask for a discounted rate because they're struggling, but then turn up to collect the milk in a Rolls-Royce. I charge a higher rate for a bodybuilder because they're grown adults and it's a lifestyle choice they're choosing to explore.
"Breast milk isn't a necessity to them; it's a tool they use to up their protein intake. I found it strange at first, but that's before I saw how much I could make."
Despite wanting to breastfeed from the beginning, McKenzie - who is married to Zachary Stelly, 23 - welcomed Elias, was born with natal teeth - when teeth are present from birth - leaving it "impossible" to nurse him.
"It was upsetting because breastfeeding was something I had looked forward to, even before I found out I was pregnant," McKenzie said. "I relied on a milk donor instead because I still wanted him to get the nutritional benefits of breast milk."
According to the National Library of Medicine, breast milk provides unique and dynamic bioactive components that play a key role in the development of the immune system. After being able to breastfeed her second son, Rhett, in August 2024, McKenzie found she had an oversupply of breast milk.
Donating through Tiny Treasures, McKenzie made an average of $1,000 per month. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, breastfeeding in the United States has increased from 60 per cent in 1994 to 77 per cent in 2005 to roughly 83 per cent in 2024.
By September 2024, she started advertising her oversupply in local Facebook groups, selling her breastmilk for ¢70 per ounce to moms, and she was then contacted by a bodybuilder seeking breast milk to "build muscle". McKenzie charges $3 per ounce for her clients who are bodybuilders, which amounts to $730 per week and $3,500 per month.
She said: "At first, I thought it was a bit strange. That was before I realised, I could make (money). Pumping isn't as easy as it might sound.
"Yes, my body produces it, but I have to stick to a routine to avoid my milk ducts getting clogged. Pumps can cost up to $300, which isn't cheap, and I brought a second fridge for stock rotation."
McKenzie has been posting about her business venture on TikTok since August 2024 and claims some online say she "shouldn't be profiting" from breast milk.
She said: "People will have their opinions - but I let it go in one ear and out the other. It's my choice what I do with my own body.
"I am still offering a product which I have to put time and effort into. It helps my family out. Cost of living affects us all.
"I've donated lots through an agency, and my higher prices are only for grown adults like bodybuilders because it's not a necessity.
"I'm still breastfeeding Rhett. I won't be able to do it forever, so I have to cash in as much as I can now."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Llanidloes to host first ever Chocolate Festival of Wales
A Powys town is set to host the very first Chocolate Festival of Wales. The brand-new festival is coming to Llanidloes on Saturday, October 25. As well as bringing together chocolate businesses from across Wales, and just beyond, for a special indoor market, there will be a series of events and activities across the day. This includes chocolate tasting, film screenings, storytelling sessions, cooking demonstrations and outdoor activities. There will be activities for both children and adults, and most will be free. Award-winning Powys chocolatiers celebrate sweet 10th anniversary in style Businesses across the town are getting involved by creating special dishes, window displays and even chocolate-themed cocktails. The day also includes a hot chocolate pop-up which will be held in one of the central cafes in town. Meredith Whitely is the Llanidloes -based creator of the Calm Cocoa mindful hot chocolate range and member of the Llanidloes Chamber of Trade which is organising the inaugural festival. She loves using chocolate as a tool to help people live more mindfully and to bring people together. Meredith said: "The Chocolate Festival will be a fun and delicious day that celebrates the many fascinating parts of chocolate and cacao, as well as the lovely community of Llanidloes." The Llanidloes Chamber of Trade was formed in June 2023 following a consultation with business owners and other organisations in the town. Their aim is to help revitalise the town through bringing together the many and varied businesses to promote the qualities, culture and work of Llanidloes. Organisers will share a more detailed agenda for the day as the festival gets closer, with updates coming on the dedicated Facebook and Instagram pages at @chocolatefestivalwales.
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Facebook teaches early lesson in unbounded AI risk
NEW YORK, Aug 14 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Artificial intelligence calls for a rethink on the tradeoffs between technological utility and risk. Unguided chatbot responses, for example, cannot be neatly constrained. Attempts to do so will either be insufficient or entangle developers in a morass of third-rail social issues. Just look at Facebook owner Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab, where internal AI guidelines incredibly and explicitly allowed 'sensual' conversations with children and racist arguments. The chance of backlash is underpriced. Meta's 'Content Risk Standards' framework for its generative AI includes a range of controversial guidelines, according to a Reuters special report published on Thursday. Examples of acceptable responses include comments on an 8-year-old's body to 'statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics,' like race. It follows Wall Street Journal probes, opens new tab on Meta chatbots engaging in sexually explicit conversations with users identifying as minors. A spokesperson told Reuters that the company is in the process of revising its guidelines and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed, adding that the 'examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies.' U.S. lawmakers already have dragged Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg into hearings over whether Facebook or its sister app Instagram pose harms to children. The difference with AI is that the company produces the dangerous content. Reuters also chronicled the story of one man's spiral into fantasy with a flirtatious chatbot. Repeated interventions to protect children, including age limits in places like Australia, have done little to slow the $2 trillion social media juggernaut. AI represents a whole new proposition, however, because its instability is inherent to the product, forming its core use case and its greatest weakness. Happyish mediums can be reached, as in coding, but putting kids in harm's way is far harder to brush off than a Python glitch. Beyond the potential psychological harms, going off-script can be disastrous for businesses. In a 2024 case, opens new tab, a tribunal found airline Air Canada responsible for misinformation given by its AI helper to a customer. Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of buy-now-pay-later giant Klarna (KLAR.N), opens new tab, told Bloomberg, opens new tab that its pivot into automated customer service agents led to 'lower quality.' Citizens of Silicon Valley famously prefer to seek forgiveness rather than permission. The headlong rush into AI, while largely brushing aside guardrails, pushes the ethos to a new level. There were more than $120 billion of venture-capital-backed deals in large language models and machine learning in the first half of 2025, according to PitchBook data, opens new tab, nearly matching last year's entire tally. Valuations are also climbing unabated; OpenAI's jumped from $300 billion to $500 billion in a matter of days. Seductive rewards are glossing over AI's inherent risks. Follow Jonathan Guilford on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.
Reuters
14 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
Aug 14 (Reuters) - An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage, opens new tab in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots, opens new tab have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as 'Taylor Swift with enormous breasts,' 'Taylor Swift completely naked,' and 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.
