logo
Willmar City Council again defers Municipal Utilities land purchase decision

Willmar City Council again defers Municipal Utilities land purchase decision

Yahoo18-03-2025

Mar. 18---- The
on Monday again deferred action on a purchase agreement for 27 acres of land for
new facilities.
The presentation and discussion for that agenda item took more than an hour, after which action was deferred until the April 7 meeting of the City Council.
The land that Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to purchase for $600,000 for its new facilities is located just east of the Highway 71/23 Bypass and north of Willmar Avenue Southeast. It is adjacent to, but not within, the city limits.
The Municipal Utilities Commission approved the purchase agreement during its Feb. 24 meeting and it was on the City Council's agenda March 3 for approval. This is the fifth property down the list of properties that Willmar Municipal Utilities has tried to purchase since the search for land started in 2023.
The City Council on March 3 chose to defer approval for 30 days or until the next council meeting. City Attorney Robert Scott on Monday explained to the council that the City Charter's language is ambiguous, and he interpreted that to mean that the council could continue the matter to the April 7 meeting.
Some members of the City Council are questioning why Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to build its new facilities outside city limits — where there is significant cost to extend city sewer and water infrastructure — when there are parcels in the
that, in the opinion of those councilors, would be suitable for Municipal Utilities needs.
It should be noted that Scott has explained that if the council allows the purchase, the land would be considered owned by the city and be annexed into the city.
While most of the presentation and discussion focused on comparing the two properties, Willmar Municipal Utilities Facilities and Maintenance Supervisor Kevin Marti informed the City Council that if the purchase agreement were not approved, Willmar Municipal Utilities would not be looking at the industrial park location because other properties score higher on its list.
"This (Willmar Avenue) property scores quite a bit better than the industrial park property," Marti said. " ... There's other properties that are better, in our opinion, in our scoring system, than the industrial park. We would have to investigate those."
The cost to extend sewer and water services to the land on the bypass would be an estimated $2.7 million. However, that infrastructure, if built, would be able to service more than 400 acres of land in that area, not only the 27 acres to be purchased, according to Marti.
Of the estimated cost of $2.7 million, Willmar Municipal Utilities is responsible for more than $800,000 for extending the water main, and the remainder would be city costs to extend the sewer main and install a lift station.
Although the city does not foresee having the funds to pay for the infrastructure project at this time, one of the contingencies in the purchase agreement would be for Willmar Municipal Utilities to install private water and sewer services until such time that funds become available.
Marti asked the City Council if that is something it would consider allowing, which would not result in tax or rate increases because it is already built into the budget for the new facilities.
"I guess I worry about doing private services within the city limits," said Councilor Tom Gilbertson. "It obviously sets a precedent for any person in the city of Willmar to say, 'I don't want to hook onto the Willmar Municipal Utilities power grid. I don't want to hook onto their wastewater going forward.' And I don't think it's in your best interest to do that."
Although he said he agreed, Marti paraphrased city ordinance that states that if it is cost-prohibitive to extend sewer and water to certain properties, those properties can be served by private sewer and water until such a time that sewer and water services are extended and those properties can connect to the city system.
"That's what we would ask here. If there just isn't money in the cookie jar to do this, that would be what we would ask and pursue for this property," Marti said, noting it may be 10 years or more before the city would be able to extend the services across the bypass feasibly.
Some councilors also took issue with a perceived lack of communication to the city from Willmar Municipal Utilities about its plans.
Although there was not any direct communication with City Administrator Leslie Valiant or Willmar Planning and Development Director Christopher Corbett, Marti pointed out that since October, Willmar Municipal Utilities has been communicating with City Operations Director Kyle Box, who works directly under Valiant, and also with Kandiyohi County Engineer Mel Odens, the county's zoning board, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and a township supervisor.
"What does the Planning Commission say as far as what the future annexation of property to add to Willmar looks like?" asked Councilor Stephen Gardner. "Is this (property) even part of it? ... Is this utility pushing us in the direction we don't want to go?"
Despite the City Council's hesitancy in approving the purchase agreement, Mayor Doug Reese said he likes the location due to its ability to extend the city east of the bypass.
"I like that location because of the possibilities of annexation and extending services, because I know there has to be something that trips it up to allow the expansion to go to the east, because that bypass is a real barrier to expansion," Reese said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Batavia joins other local municipalities in restricting purchase of hemp-derived THC products
Batavia joins other local municipalities in restricting purchase of hemp-derived THC products

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Batavia joins other local municipalities in restricting purchase of hemp-derived THC products

Batavia is joining other suburban communities in restricting access to hemp-derived THC products and Kratom, in a move officials say is meant to restrict access to the products in a similar way to restrictions on recreational marijuana. Without strong state and federal regulations, stores selling hemp products that can get users high do not face restrictions on the age of their customers, nor are they required to test and report on their products' potency or impurities they contain, according to past reporting on the topic. As a result, numerous Chicago suburbs have taken to issuing bans or regulations on the products. Now, Batavia is implementing restrictions of its own, focused on limiting access to customers 21 years old and older and instituting storage and packaging limitations meant to curb young people's access to the products. The idea of restricting access to hemp-derived products and Kratom has been months in the making, Batavia Police Chief Eric Blowers explained at a City Council Committee of the Whole meeting in May. Originally, there was a proposal to restrict the types of hemp-derived products that could be sold in Batavia, said City Administrator Laura Newman, but that idea was sent back to the drawing board. Blowers said he worked with Cheryl Cryer, the owner of Urban Apothecary in Batavia, to work up a new ordinance imposing restrictions on hemp-derived THC product and Kratom sales. The ordinance brought to the City Council in June did not include restrictions on the types of products that can be sold in the city, Newman explained, but focused on limiting who can buy the products and how. After getting approval from the City Council on June 2, the ordinance will establish a new chapter in the city's code as part of its business and license regulations. Here's what it includes: First, the ordinance defines what constitutes a hemp-derived product, and defines Kratom as 'any part of the plant Mitragyna speciosa, whether growing or not, and any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of that plant, including, but not limited to, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine.' Then, it outlines the new rules governing the sale and display of the products. Per the new restrictions, businesses must check that a person buying any of these products is 21 years old or older by requiring them to show identification. Additionally, displays of 'intoxicating products' must be behind a sales or service counter or in a locked case so that a buyer requires an employee's assistance to get it, or it must be in a section of the business where other age-restricted products are kept. Or, a business can restrict access to customers 21 and older unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian who is at least 21. The business must check for written proof of identity upon entry and post a sign at the entrance of the business that indicates access is restricted to those 21 and older. Businesses that opt not to restrict entry to those 21 and older unless they're accompanied by a parent or guardian must post a sign near every display of such products informing customers that buying these products is illegal if you are under 21. Lastly, the ordinance prohibits packaging that 'resembles trademarked, characteristic or product-specialized packaging' or commercially available candy, snacks, baked goods and beverages. It also states that hemp-derived THC products and Kratom products cannot contain images of food, candy, baked goods, cereal, fruit, beverages or the words 'candy' or 'candies,' nor can the packaging include images or graphics like those typically used to advertise to children, like cartoons, neon colors and celebrities. The age restriction is meant to mirror existing limitations on recreational marijuana purchases, Blowers previously told the City Council. And, the regulations on how the products are packaged are intended to 'limit the appeal of those products to kids, but also to prevent accidental ingestion by young children who may find an adult's hemp-derived THC and then mistake it for candy,' he noted. The restrictions passed recently apply to smoke and vape shops in the area, or other stores selling hemp-derived THC or Kratom products, according to Newman. It wouldn't apply to marijuana dispensaries, Blowers told The Beacon-News, because they're regulated by the state. Although more than 60% of Batavia voters came out in support of allowing recreational weed to be sold in 2020, no dispensaries currently operate in the city. But that's set to change soon, as a recreational marijuana dispensary is preparing to open in the near future at 144 S. Randall Road, according to past reporting. Despite some debate among residents as the proposal came before the City Council, it ultimately voted to approve the dispensary's plans in January, allowing the project by Rubino Ventures to move forward with getting the necessary city permits to open a Dutchess Cannabis location in the city. It would be their fifth location in the region. Following their passage by the City Council, the hemp and Kratom restrictions will take effect immediately, Blowers said. But they're taking an 'educational stance,' he said, as businesses get into compliance with the new rules. Blowers said they've informed businesses they know are selling these products of the new ordinance, and they will begin doing compliance checks in the near future.

Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1
Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1

The sanitation fee resolution, which caused many conversations and criticisms within Lebanon, was passed by the City Council in a 4-2 vote during Tuesday's meeting. The structure of the fee will be $20 for residential customers and $40 for business customers. The city's sanitation department does not pick up dumpsters used by businesses, only bins specifically used for the city service. Geri Ashley and Camille Burdine, Councilors for Ward 2 and 3 respectively, stuck to their votes against the fee for the second reading. Both raised concerns of how residents at or below the poverty line or seniors on fixed incomes may be impacted by the $20 per month fee. Questions regarding how the sanitation department is funded were asked as confusion rippled through the community. 'This was an unadvertised discussion in a work session. It was a 15-minute discussion,' Ashley said. 'I still don't have all my questions answered. I don't feel like I have the economic information.' 'I think that we should, as a City Council, have spent more time talking about it and seeing if we could come up with any other solutions,' Ashley added. 'If in fact we are paying for garbage in our city's taxes, and now we're incorporating a fee, then what happens next year when we get our taxes? Are our taxes going to be reduced at that point, because that is a double dip.' On Wednesday, Burdine reiterated her thoughts that the city should be more proactive in studying the impact on the citizens before a fee was implemented. She said the response to rising costs caused the city to be 'reactive instead of proactive.' Burdine said she is not opposed to a sanitation fee, but feels that more time should have been spent researching it. Also on Wednesday, Ashley called the fee a 'knee-jerk reaction' and likewise felt that not enough research was done. She also said instead of a flat fee, a property tax increase would take into account the property values and Wards 1, 2 and 3 would not have to deal with a monthly fee which might be a burden. Ashley said she wants to see if the sanitation fee will disappear from the property taxes. Ward 1 Councilor Joey Carmack said he supported the fee because it's a flat fee that all residents pay, which doesn't fluctuate. 'I do not feel it's fair for the sanitation fee to be a property tax,' Carmack said. 'A property tax would be unfair, because for example, person one has a $1 million house, and [may] only have one can of trash. They would pay more taxes than person two [who has] a $350,000 home.' 'We dump the trash from the city at Walter Hill (in Murfreesboro), which has been in the news about closing soon,' Carmack added. 'When that does happen, we will be paying even more to dump trash.' Middle Point Landfill has been working with Rutherford County to increase fees for 'out-of-county' tipping fees, as well as downsizing the number of counties allowed to dump there. During a meeting earlier this year, it was proposed to double the fees for non-Rutherford County clients from $1.20 per ton to $2.50 per ton to generate more revenue for that county. The town meeting hall had more residents in attendance than usual, which was commented on by the Councilors, who expressed gratitude for the increased attendance. Burdine, Chris Crowell, Councilor for Ward 4 and Phil Morehead, Councilor for Ward 6, particularly welcomed the attendance and interest in city business. During the public comment period, nearly a dozen people spoke to the City Council. One resident, Stephen Lawson, said he and others should have the option to opt out of the fee, and that he would rather pay a private company $30 to support that business than give the city $20. He also asked if there were other landfills which could be used. 'I thought there was a landfill in Wilson County. Is that one full?' Lawson asked. 'That's owned by the Wilson County government, and it's just open to construction materials,' Mayor Bell responded. 'It's not open to us.' Alex Buhler, former Ward 1 Councilor who stepped-down in 2012, also spoke. 'They should have that option to opt out,' Buhler said. 'If a thousand people opt out, that's a thousand houses you don't have to go to.' Bell responded by saying that wouldn't save as much money as people think because the sanitation trucks will still be driving by those houses anyway. Some of the Councilors said they don't know if private companies would have the same quality of work that the city does, as officials believe sanitation is a public health matter which the Council 'takes seriously.' Another resident wondered if the sanitation fee would lead to the start of 'nickel and diming' the residents of the city. Glenn Denton, County Commissioner for District 20, which covers the downtown Lebanon region of the county, criticized the growth of the city, which he thinks sparked the need for growing services and the fees to pay for them. 'Enough is enough. We have overbuilt in our city beyond what our infrastructure can handle,' Denton said. 'When do we stop building to where we cannot service and when we cannot pay for the infrastructure around it?' Nearly an hour and a half was spent discussing the sanitation fee and budget for the next year. With the passing of the resolution, the sanitation fee goes into effect July 1.

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time
Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

SALT LAKE CITY () — Parking in downtown Salt Lake City may start making a bigger dent in your wallet. As part of the city budget for the 2026 fiscal year, the Salt Lake City Council is considering changing the hourly rates for metered parking throughout the city, as well as the collection days and hours. Currently, metered parking is available at just $2.25 an hour. The city collects this fee between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. On Saturday, the parking is free for two hours, while on Sunday, parking is free for the whole day. Carp chaos at Utah Lake as carp overpopulation becomes serious problem Under the proposed changes, the hourly rate for metered parking would rise to $3.50 an hour. The proposal would also take away the two free hours on Saturday and extend the collection hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Sunday would keep its free parking. The Salt Lake City Council will next meet on Tuesday, June 10, at 1 p.m. for a work session, where the calendar includes considering unresolved issues. A formal City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m., where council members will consider adopting the proposed budget. Escape today to OUTRIGGER Ka'anapali Beach Resort Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Salt Lake City Mission hosting pickleball event to help kids, change lives Elevate your outdoor adventure with the 2025 Forest River Rockwood Roo 17E Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store