Ferrari's 12Cilindri Spider Is a Sensory Experience
The 12Cilindri Spider is a first-quarter opening salvo in what's shaping up to be a pivotal year in the brand's storied history. The company will introduce six products, including its first EV in October. Meanwhile, F1 fans count the days until the Australian Grand Prix for a glimpse of Lewis Hamilton in the Scuderia Ferrari paddock. Hamilton, like Enzo, has effortless cool, an attitude that makes modern Ferrari feel distinct from the competition.
Arriving on the precipice of an expanded electrified portfolio, the 12Cilindri Spider features a naturally aspirated front-mounted 6.5-liter V-12 engine that is an internal-combustion coda to Ferrari engine lore and a delicious guilty pleasure. The operatic engine note, experienced unfiltered in the open air, is the Spider's reason for being. For the Ferraristi, driving is a provocative sensory experience. For the 12Cilindri Spider, creating that experience was the assignment.
"I'm getting emotional," said Ferrari designer Andrea Militello, only half-joking. Militello is head of sport design projects for Ferrari and participated in a panel discussion with his engineering and product planning colleagues the night before our coastal drive. Militello explained how the engineers, designers, and test drivers work side by side. "The final design of the car, it transmits something that we can't describe with words" he said. "It's something that happens in the guts."
The 12Cilindri Spider's look references the 1969 365GTS/4, the famed Daytona Spider styled by Leonardo Fioravanti of Pininfarina. You can see the classic proportions in the long, clamshell-shaped hood and the set-back cabin. The modern car's contours and surfaces are tucked and shaped in sympathy with the front end and carefully frame the large 21-inch wheels. The A-pillars are swept back dramatically, and flying buttresses fade from the headrests into the rear decklid.
The Spider is meant to be savored outside in the elements, and so we traveled to Cascais, Portugal, for our drive. There, we found a half-dozen Spiders in Verde Toscana, a gemstone green hue that sparkled in the sunshine. For this car, Ferrari says it started with the "gentleman driver" in mind. What that driver is looking for in a Ferrari is defined by Raffaele de Simone, Ferrari's chief development driver, who was there to walk us through the ins and outs of the driving setup. De Simone paused to listen as we brought the 12Cilindri Spider engine to life with a tap of the haptic button on the center of the steering wheel. He let the sonic drama sink in. "Bellissimo! It sounds like music," he said. De Simone recommended the 1600-watt Burmester audio system's Live setting (others include Pure, Comfort, and 3D Surround) as an accompaniment to the V-12's engine note. Live produces a full-on concert experience in the way the sound is distributed through the speakers. It's one of the more impressive systems we've tried, balancing the audio sound with the engine note even with the top down.
Act one of the 12Cilindri Spider opera was underway as we warmed up the tires on Portuguese coastal roads that were made for King Luís I of Portugal's court in the 19th century. For the unfiltered experience, we turned off the ADAS with the touch-sensitive button. The haptic-touch buttons and sliders are a bit fussy but became more intuitive over eight hours of driving. The 10.3-inch center infotainment screen and 8.8-inch passenger's display are low-key compared to the Purosangue's more digitally based cockpit.
A violent windstorm had left the pavement sand-swept, and the 12Cilindri's little wiggles in the turns were a thrilling reminder of its rear-wheel drive and V-12 power in action. Soon the roads opened up, and we pursued the engine's delightful 9500-rpm crescendo. We cycled through high notes, trying out the various driving modes, reveling in the palpable feedback of 819 horsepower as the eight-speed dual-clutch transmission worked its silky magic. Top down, the Spider magnified the V-12's glory.
On public roads, we never saw the claimed 211-mph top speed—same as the coupe's—but 60 mph comes quickly at an estimated 2.8 seconds, and the four tailpipes served as trumpets for those we left in the dust. On-the-money steering and confidence-inspiring carbon-ceramic brakes checked boxes on a GT-car wish list. The suspension's magnetorheological dampers produced a smooth ride on bumpy concrete, a welcome bonus.
The neck-level heat vents and the retractable center window between the headrests kept the cabin serene and let us settle in to focus on the driving dynamics. In third and fourth gear, Ferrari now does electronic torque shaping, like it's done previously on turbocharged models, to keep the rising crescendo of power linear, a move the company claims doesn't slow acceleration. Later, we closed the retractable hardtop, a quick 14-second maneuver—raising or lowering the roof can be done when the car is in motion at speeds up to 28 mph, a fun party trick to deploy with the touch of a center switch.
Top up or down, 12Cilindri Spider satisfies all five senses.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
F1 Under Fire From Fan Over Alleged Grand Prix Ticket Overcharging
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Formula One fan has criticized F1's official ticketing website on Reddit, claiming that they were overcharged for Austrian Grand Prix tickets that were available for much less at the circuit. The fan received a disappointing response when they approached for a refund. Several fans have commented on the thread, revealing similar experiences. The fan in question has been furious and has asked others to remain cautious when purchasing F1 tickets online. The comments in the thread suggest that the official website selling F1 tickets is an agent, while the circuit is the actual seller. The aggrieved fan stated they received neither a refund nor an apology for being overcharged. The post, which is titled " overcharged me €500+ – be cautious," read: "Bought Austrian GP general admission tickets in January. Asked their customer support what tickets my kids (2 & 5) needed – they said full-price. So I paid €195 + €8 handling each. Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain driving the (44) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 leads George Russell of Great Britain driving the (63) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 on track during the F1 Grand Prix of Austria... Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain driving the (44) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 leads George Russell of Great Britain driving the (63) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 on track during the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 29, 2025 in Spielberg, Austria. More"Two weeks before the race, tickets arrived showing €150 each. At the track, I learned kids under 14 are free. I overpaid €500+ on tickets for €300! "Post-race, I tried email – always got "undeliverable" after 24h. On WhatsApp, they instantly refused any refund, no apology. "We enjoyed the weekend and don't regret going, but we could have saved €500 or used that money for much better seats. "So my advice is to buy directly from the circuit or better resellers to avoid overpaying." One fan responded with a similar experience at the 2024 Belgian GP. The comment read: "Buying directly from the circuit is much cheaper. I dont remember how much but last year I went the full weekend to Spa and the price difference on the websites was significant." Comment byu/pafpajpav from discussion informula1 Another fan offered a piece of advice: "Always by tickets from the tracks website. F1 is the middle man/reseller when you buy from f1 tickets" [sic] Comment byu/pafpajpav from discussion informula1 This fan stated it wasn't F1's fault. The comment read: "With many concerts (or any event really) that have both in-house and third party (Ticketmaster, StubHub, etc) ticket availability, it is in your best interest to always check the venue's website first. Their prices are usually lower and, in the very least, avoid the dumb service surcharge. "These tickets are usually the first to go when tickets go on sale. "I understand it's a bit frustrating to pay extra, but just be aware next time. The F1 ticket website didn't really do anything wrong here. It's clear they didn't get any of these "free for 14 and under" tickets. I wouldn't expect them to say "go to the track website for free 14 and under tickets" either." Comment byu/pafpajpav from discussion informula1 One fan stated that they faced an entirely different situation, advising that it's always good to compare prices on multiple websites before making a purchase. The comment read: "Had the same but different thing when buying tickets for the Dutch GP. The Dutch GP site was saying €800 per person for the three days but on the f1 site, the same tickets are €400 and some change each. So it really does pay to shop around."
The Drive
16 hours ago
- The Drive
Florida Man Trades Ferrari F40 for Ineos Grenadier and $2.4M
The latest car news, reviews, and features. While I've never been to one, I can imagine that a salesperson at an Ineos showroom isn't the busiest salesperson in the world. As a result, the sales rep who recently took in a Ferrari F40 on trade for an Ineos Grenadier probably saw the iconic supercar approaching from a mile away. I wonder what went through their mind as the F40 got closer to the lot—did they think it was a prank? It wasn't. Florida Man was out doing Florida Man things, and on that specific day, that meant trading in one of the most coveted supercars ever built for a niche British off-roader. Oh, and a check for $2.4 million. According to Newsweek , when the salesperson approached their manager with the deal, he was told, 'You've got to get it and get out of it. So, he wrote a check for $2.4 million,' George Ratcliffe, president of the Americas at Ineos Automotive, told the outlet. The customer will allegedly use their new Grenadier on their farm, but the report did not elaborate on the F40's provenance. How did this person acquire said supercar? Was it a collector who just grew sick of the F40? Or maybe they inherited it and wanted nothing to do with its upkeep? Also, why the hurry? There's a good chance they could've made more money selling it privately or at auction, but then again, that would've been a more complex and longer ordeal. It all seems rather odd. I bet you there's a good story there, one that I hope to surface one day. Either way, the dealership reportedly turned around and sold the car the next day for $2.5 million. So, I guess everyone went home happy. Got a tip? Email us at tips@
New York Times
20 hours ago
- New York Times
F1 has a complex history in America, but cracked it eventually
This article is part of our 75 Years of Speed series, an inside look at the backstories of the clubs, drivers, and people fueling Formula One. The idea of Formula One taking over Times Square for the premiere of a new Hollywood movie about the sport was fanciful just 10 years ago. For so long, F1 had tried to crack America but failed time and time again. It seemed like whatever the sport did, no matter where it raced, F1 couldn't quite tap into the American psyche enough to enjoy sustained success. Advertisement But as Brad Pitt posed on the 'grey' carpet (resembling an F1 starting grid) at Radio City Music Hall in New York City to promote the new F1 movie in June, it proved just how far the sport had come in the United States. The film went on to become a box office hit, pulling in more than $500 million to stand as one of summer 2025's biggest blockbusters. 'Having been in the sport for so long, to see the progress from then to now, it's pretty phenomenal,' Lewis Hamilton, the seven-time world champion, told reporters in June. '(It's) not only within the paddock, but just how the world perceives (the sport) and appreciates it. It's so great to see and be able to share that with so many more people around the world.' The turnaround has been dramatic. The calendar now features three American races per season – in Austin, Miami and Las Vegas — and two teams, Haas and Cadillac, will race under the star-spangled banner in 2026. The success of Netflix docuseries 'Drive to Survive' and the embracing of digital media undoubtedly played an enormous role in finally capturing that much-prized American audience. But to understand why F1's Stateside success is so significant, and in some ways sudden, the tricky path to this point cannot be ignored. When the F1 world championship was formed in 1950, the United States hosted the only round outside of Europe in the inaugural season. But it wasn't a 'grand prix', nor a race for F1 cars. The Indianapolis 500 had long established itself as the 'greatest spectacle in motor racing,' first taking place in 1911. But it was included on the F1 calendar between 1950 and 1960, offering points towards the world championship. That wasn't enough to lure F1 regulars over. Alberto Ascari was the only one to make a proper go at the Indy 500 in this stretch, opting to skip the season-opening Swiss Grand Prix in 1952 so he could qualify at the Brickyard. He retired from the race after 40 laps. But Ascari still secured the F1 world championship that year, winning the next six races. F1's Indy 500 years remain statistical quirks to this day — with true interest from F1 drivers in 'crossing codes' only starting in the 1960s, as Jim Clark and Graham Hill made successful attempts to win the famous race in 1965 and 1966 respectively. But the first running of the United States Grand Prix as an F1 world championship round did not occur until 1959, when it was held at Sebring in Florida that December as the season finale. It was backed by businessman Alec E. Ullmann, who was also bankrolling the 12-hour sportscar race at the track. Advertisement The F1 race proved a financial failure and wasn't warmly received by the F1 paddock, which prompted a move to Riverside, California, for 1960. But a low fan turnout in the desert meant this too was one-and-done. F1 instead moved to Watkins Glen in New York, which was quickly becoming the premier road course in the United States. The United States Grand Prix's move to Watkins Glen in 1961 also coincided with the crowning of the first American F1 world champion, Phil Hill, who raced for Ferrari. Hill won the title in tragic circumstances after his teammate and championship rival, Wolfgang von Trips, was killed in the penultimate round at Monza. Hill won the title by a single point and Ferrari opted not to compete in the Watkins Glen season finale. As F1 bedded in at the Glen, staying there through to 1980, American drivers also enjoyed success. Dan Gurney was one of the leading lights of the 1960s, winning four races, while Richie Ginther, Masten Gregory and Peter Revson all also claimed grand prix victories. But no name was bigger than Mario Andretti, who went on to become the second (and most recent) American F1 world champion in 1978. Driving for Lotus, his title was also won under tragic circumstances following the death of his teammate and close friend, Ronnie Peterson, again at Monza. Sensing a growing interest in the sport and with local figures eager to boost the popularity of the city, a second American race was added to the calendar in 1976 in Long Beach, California. Andretti's victory in 1977 boosted the race's profile, while the 1983 United States Grand Prix West (as it was known) featured John Watson's remarkable charge from 22nd on the grid to victory. As eventful as the racing was, it wasn't enough to convince race organizers that keeping F1 was financially viable. The Grand Prix of Long Beach became a Championship Auto Racing Teams (CART) event from 1984, and today remains a regular fixture on the IndyCar calendar. By the start of the 1980s, Watkins Glen had also started to lose its allure, its facilities growing outdated, and by now there were several other American cities circling a calendar slot. The financial success of the Las Vegas Grand Prix's debut in 2023 starkly contrasted the first time F1 visited Nevada. Back in 1981, the season finale was held on a track constructed on the Caesars Palace car park. Chris Pook, the Long Beach promoter, was drafted in to try and establish a high-roller event similar to the boxing prize fights that were taking place in the city. But it never resonated with locals. Nor did the event endear itself much to F1, which left after two races. Former F1 driver Derek Daly told The Athletic in 2023 the race was 'more a novelty than an event.' Advertisement Caesars Palace wasn't the only fleeting venture for F1 in the United States in the 1980s. Dallas held its one and only race in 1984, an event marred by extreme heat that caused the track to break up. Nigel Mansell even collapsed as he pushed his Lotus car over the finish line. Serious financial issues meant by 1985, the company behind the race was bankrupt The only lengthy home for F1 in the United States through the 1980s was in Detroit, which joined in 1982 as a third American round. By 1988, it would be the last one standing. The event's backers viewed F1 as a way to boost the city's image, while Detroit's significant automaker presence also provided an added interest spike. The drivers found the street track to be a grueling, bumpy challenge that took its toll on both their cars and bodies. F1 demanded improvements to temporary pit and paddock arrangements that the city would not agree to, leading to the Detroit Grand Prix falling off the schedule after 1988. Ayrton Senna had just won the race for a record third time. The 'United States Grand Prix' moniker returned one year later with a new race in downtown Phoenix on a five-year deal. This faced immediate opposition from locals, with a low turnout for 1989's inaugural race being put down to June heat. But a March move to become F1's season opener for 1990 did little to boost interest and the race was cancelled after 1991. Few tears were shed in either F1 or the city. But it did leave an America-sized hole in an calendar that was becoming increasingly global. The gap would ultimately be filled by Indianapolis Motor Speedway (IMS). Tony George, then IMS president and CEO, was in talks with F1 ringmaster Bernie Ecclestone from the early 1990s about the possibility of bringing grand prix racing back to the Speedway. Eventually, a deal was announced in late 1998 for a first race in 2000. Advertisement A huge crowd of more than 220,000 fans attended the return race, but it was always an awkward fit between slotting F1's own traditions and quirks into America's established racing capital. F1 gained some goodwill by becoming the first international sporting event to take place in the United States after the 9/11 terror attacks. But in 2005 a farcical race occurred with only six cars taking part. This was after all cars running Michelin tires were forced to withdraw on the formation lap due to safety concerns. This marked the beginning of the end for the sport's tenure at Indianapolis. The final United States Grand Prix held there was won by Hamilton in 2007. Fresh financial terms could not be agreed as F1's demands grew increasingly difficult for organizers to reasonably accommodate. The event's failure did little to dispel the thought that F1 simply couldn't crack the United States long-term. But that wasn't going to stop F1 trying again, with a new project emerging in the late 2000s. This was aimed at hosting a grand prix on a barren patch of land on the outskirts of Austin, Texas. Originally earmarked for affordable housing before the 2007-09 Great Recession, land owner Bobby Epstein was put in touch with Ecclestone about creating America's first purpose-built F1 track. Plans for the United States Grand Prix to take place at the Circuit of The Americas (COTA) were unveiled in 2010, but Austin was not alone in trying to entice F1 back. Ecclestone had been pushing ahead with a long-held dream of taking F1 to New York City — or close enough — and struck a deal for a street race to be held across the Hudson River in New Jersey as the 'Grand Prix of America' from 2013. The NYC skyline was to feature in the event's backdrop. COTA's development had stalled amid financial concerns and wrangling behind the scenes, only for the New Jersey threat to prompt organizers to rally under Epstein. The track was finished in time to host its first United States Grand Prix in 2012. The circuit drew acclaim from drivers for its undulation and exciting corners, many of which took inspiration from great race tracks across the world. Despite being included on provisional F1 calendars for 2013 and 2014, the New Jersey race never got close to becoming a reality. This left Austin to cement itself as F1's only American round in the 2010s. The event may have been popular for the F1 paddock and fans who attended, but it proved a big ask financially. Heavy rain in 2015 proved disastrous for subsequent ticket sales and this coincided with a $6 million cut in state funding due to concerns over gate numbers. This caused serious doubts over F1's long-term future in Austin — and again in America overall. Advertisement But COTA's owners doubled down on attempts to become more than a race. The track secured big headline acts – including Taylor Swift, Bruno Mars and Ed Sheeran – to play over its grand prix weekend. Swift's show in 2016 was her only performance of that year, contributing to a record crowd that breathed fresh life into the Austin race. In early 2017, F1 itself came into American ownership after Liberty Media completed its acquisition of the sport. It quickly identified a series of easy wins to unlock what it saw as huge untapped potential in the United States market. An overhauled, modern approach to digital media was unleashed, which introduced long-standard practices from other sports. Examples included making highlights available online and loosening restrictive social media rules for competitors. It all helped F1 reach a wider audience. But no move was more significant than F1 opening its paddock gates to cameras from Netflix for 'Drive to Survive,' which debuted in 2019. Despite initial concern from some teams over the secrets it might give away — Ferrari and Mercedes refused to take part in the first season — the series proved to be a huge hit. It was boosted notably in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when much of the world's population was required to stay home. F1's fanbase changed and evolved through this time, becoming younger and more diverse. When F1 returned to Austin in 2021 after missing a year due to COVID-19, a record crowd of 400,000 fans attended, signaling the explosion of interest. Liberty also set about reaching what it called 'destination cities'. The first was Miami. Various proposals were considered before a race around Hard Rock Stadium, home to the Miami Dolphins, was ultimately selected. The event debuted in 2022 and was won by Max Verstappen. One year later, F1 was racing down the Strip in Las Vegas, the memories of the Caesars Palace failure soon banished. This came about after F1 secured an agreement with the city's casinos to stage a grand prix. The first two runnings, despite facing significant local pushback, have proven a financial success for Las Vegas and F1 itself, which promotes the race. Advertisement To have just one successful, stable grand prix in the United States was the dream for many in F1 across eras. Yet it now has three races that are firm parts of its identity and its future. Miami's contract was renewed in May through to 2041; Austin's deal runs until next year, but there's no doubts over an extension; and officials in Las Vegas are moving toward another two years beyond 2025, but with longer-term plans in mind. F1 has also entered the cultural mainstream, both globally and in the United States. The movie's success proves as much. F1's transformation in the United States has been dramatic under Liberty Media. But as complex as its history may have been in the U.S., the sport's potential was always there. It just required a big shake-up to unlock it. The 75 Years of Speed series is part of a partnership with Shell. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Top image: Rudy Carezzevoli, Bernard Cahier,; Illustration: Will Tullos/The Athletic) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
