An explosion at a plant owned by US Steel, an icon of American industry, has killed 2. What to know.
Allegheny County Emergency Services said a fire at the plant started around 10:50 a.m. The explosion, which was followed by several smaller blasts, sent black smoke spiraling into air.
The blast could be felt in the nearby community and prompted county officials to warn residents to stay away from the scene so emergency workers could respond.
Advertisement
One worker was rescued from the smoldering rubble hours later.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Allegheny Health Network said it treated seven patients from the plant and discharged five within a few hours. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center said it was treating three patients at UPMC Mercy, the region's only level one trauma and burn center.
Past explosions
The plant converts coal to coke, a key component in the steel-making process. It's the largest coking operation in North America.
Coke is made by baking coal in special ovens for hours at high temperatures, which removes impurities that could otherwise weaken steel. The process creates what's known as coke gas — made up of a lethal mix of methane, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
Advertisement
Clairton Coke Works, which has 1,400 workers, has had explosions and fatal accidents before:
Plant pollution concerns
After Monday's blast, the county health department initially told residents within 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the plant to remain indoors and close all windows and doors. The department lifted the advisory after its monitors didn't detect levels of soot or sulfur dioxide above federal standards.
In 2018, a Christmas Eve fire damaged pollution control equipment and led to repeated releases of sulfur dioxide, according to a subsequent lawsuit. The fire prompted Allegheny County to warn residents to limit outdoor activities. Residents said it was hard to breathe for weeks afterward and that the air felt acidic and smelled like rotten eggs. U.S. Steel settled the lawsuit last year with an agreement to spend $19.5 million in equipment upgrades and $5 million on local clean air efforts and programs.
Dr. Deborah Gentile, the medical director of Community Partners in Asthma Care, studied asthma levels after the fire and found twice as many patients sought medical treatment. One of her colleagues found patients living near the plant had increased symptoms of asthma, including coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath.
In 2019, U.S. Steel agreed to settle a lawsuit regarding air pollution from Clairton for $8.5 million.
A storied history and new ownership
U.S. Steel has been a symbol of industrialization since it was founded in 1901 by J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie and others. It's been the icon of the American steel industry that once dominated the world market until Japan, then China, became preeminent steelmakers over the past 40 years.
Its steel has helped build everything from the United Nations building in New York City to the New Orleans Superdome.
Advertisement
Japan's largest steelmaker, Nippon Steel, in June finalized a deal to acquire U.S. Steel for nearly $15 billion. The agreement took more than a year to come together after U.S. Steel shareholders approved it as the parties surmounted obstacles created by national security concerns and presidential politics in a premier battleground state.
The deal includes what is known as a 'golden share' provision that gives the U.S. government the power to appoint a board member and a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. The combined company is the world's fourth-largest steelmaker in an industry now dominated by China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
41 minutes ago
- Forbes
Workforce Reintegration: How A Trauma-Informed Approach Can Help
Maayan Aviv, CEO, American Friends of NATAL, is a nonprofit leader with 15+ years of experience, driving impact in mental health treatment. When trauma hits, it impacts all parts of an individual's life, including career progression and professional identity. It creates disruption in the way people think and behave, which sends ripple effects through the workplace in addition to their personal lives. From a career standpoint, the impacts stretch beyond the individual suffering. It affects coworkers, colleagues and others. Three years ago, our parent organization created a career development model to help individuals coping with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) either return to the workforce or find their new professional pathway. Here's why I believe workforce reintegration should be trauma-informed: The Invisible Barrier: How Trauma Can Disrupt Career Pathways In the workplace, trauma often affects cognitive function, emotional regulation and motivation. I've seen how it can undermine traditional career development methods and cause loss of occupational identity, sleep deprivation, emotional and sensory dysregulation, negative thoughts and a break in trust and sense of safety. There are other signals that someone may be going through a trauma at work. A survey of participants enrolled in NATAL's vocational coaching program found that at the outset of coaching: • 58.6% struggled with procrastination or difficulty in self-organization and time management. • 57.5% experienced concentration difficulties. • 51.5% reported low motivation. • 48.6% experienced issues related to self-worth. Interestingly, almost half of the participants in our parent organization's program held higher education degrees. This showcases how PTSD symptoms can significantly impair work performance, even in high-potential individuals. Moreover, the skills gap isn't always about skills. Nearly 55% of individuals surveyed reported earning below the national average wage for their position, indicating that they're employed in positions that underutilize their skills. Almost half believe their current or most recent job doesn't reflect their actual capabilities. In other words, trauma survivors can have strong educational or technical backgrounds, and yet, they remain unemployed or underemployed. The challenge isn't a lack of qualifications, but the internal barriers caused by trauma. Trauma can hold survivors back from where they should be. From Healing To Hiring: Supporting Workforce Reintegration To approach career development from a trauma-informed perspective, a mentor is needed to help participants find the right career or focus on what they would like to do. Why? Because as they process their trauma, sometimes the symptoms can become more disruptive or different feelings rise up as a result of looking into the future. Career development counselors can give them the hope they need to realize that there's a lot they can do despite their trauma. Trauma-informed coaching can teach the individual to be aware of their triggers, emphasize their self-worth and skill set and help individuals set realistic goals and time frames. Importantly, it isn't therapy. It's a structured approach to vocational support that accounts for emotional and psychological realities. Look for a model that is: • Short-term, goal-oriented and trauma-informed. • Based on strengths and inner resources, including the potential for post-traumatic growth and discovering new meaning and a future-oriented career vision. • An ecological approach that not only asks what the organization can do but also what additional resources and supports exist that could aid in recovery and growth. • Evidence-based, while also promoting growth and hope. • Globally focused to account for a variety of perspectives. It's also important to consider your workplace. The post-pandemic workforce looks different than it did before, offering work-from-home opportunities with independence and flexibility. While these practices benefit many professionals, they can sometimes negatively impact those who need structure, framework and guidance. In fact, a study published in Psychology Today found that a structured return to work can significantly help with trauma recovery. Measuring Impact: Metrics That Matter In the United States, research indicates that veteran employment programs can be effective. In Israel, the Ministry of Defense and the National Insurance offer rehabilitation programs, but a study indicated they're not trauma-informed and more could be done to address the impact of PTSD on work functioning. Our parent organization's trauma-informed vocational coaching program in Israel, as noted in the study, found a sizable decrease in PTSD symptoms at the end of the program and a significant decrease in major symptoms, with the highest impacts in cognition changes and mood. About 60% of participants reported improvements in employment status or advancements in career planning, and a third reported an increase in income. Business leaders can track outcomes such as job placement or advancement, improvements in self-regulation and confidence and goal completion from individualized work plans. Continued engagement, such as opting into an extended mentorship program, can serve as an additional marker of long-term success and professional reintegration. Ultimately, trauma-informed vocational counseling should be based on safety, trustworthiness, collaboration, empowerment and choice. Trauma-informed approaches can prevent individuals from experiencing new traumas that may be caused by returning to work. Without a trauma-informed approach, workforce reintegration is difficult. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
How AI can finally fix prior authorization
If you've ever been a patient waiting—days, sometimes more than a week—for treatment approval, or a clinician stuck chasing it, you know what prior authorization feels like. Patients sit in limbo, anxiety growing as care stalls. Nurses and physicians trade hours of patient time for phone calls, faxes, and glitchy portals. Everyone waits, some in pain, while the people on both sides of the system lose faith in it a little more each day. This isn't a minor inconvenience. According to the American Medical Association's (AMA) 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey, 93% of physicians report that prior authorization delays access to care, and 94% say it negatively affects patient outcomes. Physicians handle an average of nearly 40 requests each week, spending 13 hours of their time on the process. Nearly 9 out of 10 share that it's a contributing factor to burnout. We've been down this road for many years. In 2018, health insurer and provider groups signed a consensus statement promising significant improvement of prior authorization. In 2023, the AMA reported that two major insurers pledged to reduce the number of services needing prior authorization. The promises added up—so why hasn't the burden eased? Last month, AHIP (a national trade association representing the health insurance industry) and major payers rolled out six reforms standardizing electronic submissions, speeding decisions, improving transparency, and preserving continuity of care when members switch plans. More than 50 leading health plans, encompassing 257 million Americans, signed on to be a part of this reform with all commitments delivered by 2027. That's important. But for someone awaiting chemotherapy or a nurse on the ward, 2027 feels like forever away. No need to wait Real reform doesn't need to wait. Here's what's already happening inside health plans that have embraced agent‑based AI systems—technology is being put in place that's designed not just to speed up forms but to fundamentally change how prior authorization and other core operations get done. These systems don't replace people. They work alongside nurses, case managers, and administrators, handling the repetitive, document-heavy work so humans can focus on clinical decisions and patient care. Tangible results This AI is just beginning to be adopted by plans; the transformation is measurable: Turnaround times are slashed by more than 50%. 76% of authorizations are handled automatically. Eighteen minutes are saved per prior authorization request, which for an average-sized health plan unlocks tens of thousands of hours each month, that enables clinical care teams to shift from administrative work to greater focus on patients. AI can handle the tedious parts of the process—sorting through PDFs, faxes, and clinical notes—in seconds instead of hours, while keeping nurses and physicians involved for the decisions that require human judgment. Paradigm shift This isn't just a tweak to the old process—it's a shift that allows entire operations teams to work differently. Patients get quicker answers and fewer anxious phone calls. Providers get back more time to spend helping patients. For the people working behind the scenes, it means moving past the repetitive paperwork grind—hours spent sorting through forms, faxes, and files—and focusing on work that actually supports better care. AHIP's own language makes the case: these reforms are meant to provide faster access to evidence-based care, simplify workflows for providers, and preserve care continuity when people switch insurers. That should be the minimum standard—not a distant promise. Health plans need to act now—scaling existing AI deployments and embracing process redesign—so they can deliver three concrete outcomes today: Patients can start the treatments they need sooner, without the constant back‑and‑forth or long waits for approval. Doctors and nurses get back valuable time, so they can spend more of their day with patients instead of buried in forms and phone calls. People can keep their care moving, even if they switch insurance plans mid‑treatment, without having to start the approval process all over again. Within reach Health plans don't need to wait for 2027. The technology exists today to deliver meaningful prior authorization reform. And let's be honest: another round of press releases won't change outcomes. But scaling the results and impact that AI is delivering to prior authorization today—that's reform in motion. And it's within reach. For patients trapped in limbo and clinicians stretched thinner every day, reform can't arrive soon enough. The question isn't whether we can make prior authorization faster, simpler, and less needed. It's when health plans will act—for the sake of all those involved in our health system, we must choose urgency. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Harold Pollack: I studied the high male suicide rate. Then I lost my friend to it.
When I think of my friend Andre, my mind drifts back 50 years to our times in grade school delivering papers together during frigid upstate New York winters. Then my mind drifts back 45 years to the thousands of conversations we had with our friends at our public high school cafeteria lunch table. Or my mind drifts 35 years, to our time as apartment mates, when Andre showed me how to drive our U-Haul moving truck, all the while ignoring the glances of admiring young women drawn to his movie-star good looks. A hundred more memories ran through my head as I learned of Andre's death by suicide three weeks ago. To say that I was surprised would hardly cover it. If I had to make a list of the 100 people in my life I was most concerned about, Andre would not have been on it. When we last shared a meal several months ago, he projected such confidence, solidity and strength. He leaves behind a partner and young-adult children. A friend's tribute on LinkedIn described 35 years of Andre's formidable accomplishments, which included founding several startups and playing key roles in other ventures. By a cruel twist of fate, Andre died within a week of my colleagues Nate Glasser, Jacob Jameson, Nabil Abou Baker, Elizabeth Tung and I publishing a study that documented the remarkably high suicide rate among older American men. We middle-aged and older men face higher suicide rates than are found among our teenage sons and grandsons, or among women of any age. Suicide rates among men dramatically escalate postretirement. Suicide rates among women, always a fraction of the male rate at younger ages, decline once women reach their mid-50s. This national challenge doesn't get the attention it should. Suicides among teens and young adults are far more noticeable, simply because disease doesn't take the lives of younger people like it does those who are elderly or even middle-aged. It's easy to lose sight of older-male suicides in the statistical noise, since we older men die far more frequently of various cancers and cardiovascular disease. We don't fully understand why older men have such high suicide rates. Suicides are more common in states with lax gun laws, where men who are unsafe are more likely to have lethal means close at hand. Social isolation is another important factor, as is the loss of a spouse or life partner, and the stings of financial and professional disappointments. Many of us older guys are reluctant to seek help when we are experiencing mental pain. For a million reasons as we age, it's easy to feel like a superfluous presence in this world. Several years ago, I myself experienced a bout of depression when my father passed and I faced some humbling work challenges. Andre was a source of strength and support in those difficult times. I will always regret that I could not do the same for him. I will never fully know why he took his life. I do know that he was a respected entrepreneur and colleague, a deeply loved partner, parent, brother and friend, now so very deeply missed.
