Harold Pollack: I studied the high male suicide rate. Then I lost my friend to it.
A hundred more memories ran through my head as I learned of Andre's death by suicide three weeks ago. To say that I was surprised would hardly cover it. If I had to make a list of the 100 people in my life I was most concerned about, Andre would not have been on it. When we last shared a meal several months ago, he projected such confidence, solidity and strength. He leaves behind a partner and young-adult children. A friend's tribute on LinkedIn described 35 years of Andre's formidable accomplishments, which included founding several startups and playing key roles in other ventures.
By a cruel twist of fate, Andre died within a week of my colleagues Nate Glasser, Jacob Jameson, Nabil Abou Baker, Elizabeth Tung and I publishing a study that documented the remarkably high suicide rate among older American men. We middle-aged and older men face higher suicide rates than are found among our teenage sons and grandsons, or among women of any age. Suicide rates among men dramatically escalate postretirement. Suicide rates among women, always a fraction of the male rate at younger ages, decline once women reach their mid-50s.
This national challenge doesn't get the attention it should. Suicides among teens and young adults are far more noticeable, simply because disease doesn't take the lives of younger people like it does those who are elderly or even middle-aged. It's easy to lose sight of older-male suicides in the statistical noise, since we older men die far more frequently of various cancers and cardiovascular disease.
We don't fully understand why older men have such high suicide rates. Suicides are more common in states with lax gun laws, where men who are unsafe are more likely to have lethal means close at hand. Social isolation is another important factor, as is the loss of a spouse or life partner, and the stings of financial and professional disappointments. Many of us older guys are reluctant to seek help when we are experiencing mental pain. For a million reasons as we age, it's easy to feel like a superfluous presence in this world.
Several years ago, I myself experienced a bout of depression when my father passed and I faced some humbling work challenges. Andre was a source of strength and support in those difficult times. I will always regret that I could not do the same for him. I will never fully know why he took his life. I do know that he was a respected entrepreneur and colleague, a deeply loved partner, parent, brother and friend, now so very deeply missed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has built a reputation in Congress as a determined advocate for civil rights, healthcare reform, and public safety. Representing Florida in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2005, she has consistently championed legislation that addresses the needs of vulnerable communities while working to strengthen the nation's democratic values. Throughout her career, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been a strong defender of civil rights. She has taken bold positions on issues ranging from voting rights to LGBTQ equality. As a member of Congress, she has supported legislation aimed at expanding voter access, opposing discriminatory practices, and ensuring that every citizen has an equal voice in the democratic process. Her advocacy extends to protecting religious and ethnic minorities. Most recently, she has been at the forefront of efforts to create a national strategy to combat antisemitism, working across party lines to address the rise in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric. She views these initiatives not only as a matter of protecting one community, but as a fundamental defense of American democracy. For Debbie Wasserman Schultz, healthcare reform has always been more than a talking point. A breast cancer survivor herself, she has been a leading voice for policies that expand access to preventive care and early detection services. Her leadership on the EARLY Act has helped fund breast cancer education programs for young women, potentially saving thousands of lives through increased awareness and timely screenings. She has also recently introduced the Reducing Hereditary Cancer Act, a bipartisan bill designed to make genetic cancer testing more accessible to Americans who are at risk. By removing financial and coverage barriers, she hopes to create a healthcare system that focuses on prevention and equity, ensuring no patient is denied care because of cost or insurance limitations. In addition to her work on civil rights and healthcare, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been an advocate for public safety measures that protect communities while respecting individual rights. She has supported common-sense gun safety reforms, investments in law enforcement training, and improved coordination among public safety agencies. Her legislative work also extends to protecting children and families. She has championed laws like the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, which addresses child drownings by requiring safety standards for public pools and spas. These efforts reflect her broader commitment to legislation that has a tangible impact on everyday lives. While Congress is often marked by partisan gridlock, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown an ability to collaborate with colleagues from both sides of the aisle. Her bipartisan efforts on anti-hate initiatives, healthcare reform, and safety legislation demonstrate her belief that meaningful change requires cooperation and dialogue, even among political opponents. This approach has allowed her to move forward on initiatives that might otherwise stall in a divided political climate. By focusing on shared values such as safety, health, and equality, she has been able to advance legislation that benefits a broad range of Americans. As she continues her work in Congress, Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains committed to her core mission: defending civil rights, improving healthcare access, and safeguarding communities. She has made it clear that she sees these priorities as interconnected, with each influencing the strength and resilience of the nation as a whole. Her ongoing legislative efforts, from combating hate crimes to expanding medical testing access, are grounded in a belief that the government should be both responsive and proactive in addressing the needs of its people. This vision, combined with her experience and willingness to work across political divides, positions her as a significant force in shaping policy on some of the most pressing issues facing the country today. For constituents in Florida and for Americans across the nation, Debbie Wasserman Schultz continues to serve as a steadfast advocate, ensuring that civil rights, healthcare, and public safety remain at the top of the congressional agenda. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Opinion: Motivation is a myth
Before you start reading on, I can assure you: this is not clickbait. Motivation really is a myth — and I'll show you why. Let's play a game of true or false. True or false? Each and every one of us is procrastinating on one or another task right now. True . True or false? Too often do we feel unmotivated to finish or even start a task. Of course it's true. True or false? You need motivation to start anything in order to finish it. False… now that one must have come as quite a surprise. This leaves you pondering and asking yourself: why? The answer lies in the debunking of the very myth — motivation. To many, this would seem like a sceptical perspective of a 14-year-old intending to lure you out of a state of complacency. But in reality, motivation is only an ephemeral concept that fails to withstand the innate tendencies of human behaviour and mind. Before drawing any conclusions, it is imperative that we unravel the essence of motivation to its core. So, what exactly is motivation? Motivation is regarded as the act of stimulating one's desire to achieve a goal — to summon up this sort of mystical and elusive energy that would propel an individual to 'spontaneously start being productive'. Are you beginning to see the utopian nature of this concept? In an ideal world, this notion may sound like the ultimate key to unlocking productivity and a robust catalyst for action. But here lies the trap. The motivation trap — a trap too many of us have unwittingly fallen into. Dr. Russ Harris, an American psychotherapist, explained it most effectively when he said, 'we wait to feel motivated before we take any action.' Now, what's the problem with that? Well, it sets in motion a vicious cycle wherein, if you only act when you feel 'motivated' enough to do so, you may find yourself waiting indefinitely for the opportune moment to strike. This results in an accumulation of missed opportunities and unfulfilled potential — a world where backwardness dominates. Many people fall victim to the motivation trap, perpetually seeking external inspiration to drive their actions. However, relying solely on motivation can result in inconsistent behaviour and procrastination. Being a transient emotion, it often fails to provide sustained momentum. Consequently, it comes in intervals, and the frequent instances wherein an individual lacks 'motivation' can be nothing short of a bane. Consider this scenario: have you ever felt too lazy to work on a project due the next day, left wanting to go to sleep instead? A situation like this is all too familiar for many, especially for an early bird who yearns for their sleep like me. But have you noticed that once you start studying, your focus and energy gradually increase, and you become more determined to finish the task at hand? This explains the underlying truth behind productivity: motivation does not precede action, and instead, it is an outcome of it. That sense of determination and accomplishment derived after or during a task is motivation. So ask yourself: how many times have you been challenged with a seemingly 'impossible' task, only to discover that taking a few steps towards that goal makes you more motivated to complete it? But if motivation is, in fact, a myth, then the question still lies: what truly facilitates success and productivity? The answer lies in a shift of mindset from motivation to discipline . Discipline, unlike motivation, isn't reliant on a fleeting urge to suddenly initiate work. It's a routine –a habit developed with dedication and persistent work. It entails establishing precise objectives, putting together a meticulous schedule, and adhering to it despite how 'motivated' you are. Admittedly, it is undeniably arduous in nature, but it also produces results like motivation never could. For someone who prioritises outcomes, discipline becomes indispensable. Discipline is the backbone of achievement. Its objective is to completely cut the link between two mutually exclusive concepts, in this case: feelings and action. The first step to fostering life-long productivity is to internally register that your feelings should be inconsequential to the tasks that you consciously want to do. Don't feel like doing it? Do it anyway. This way, the habit of actively taking action and prioritising goals is slowly cultivated. In essence, while motivation may provide a temporary spark, it's discipline that fuels long-term achievement, success, and productivity. This paradigm shift may be hard to fathom at first; however, over time, it will seamlessly engrave itself into your routine and lifestyle. Now, about that one seemingly Herculean and 'impossible' task you are yet to finish. Embrace its challenge, take the first step, and let discipline do its work. What are you waiting for? Related
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's newest invaders are beautiful swans. Should hunters kill them?
On an early August morning, it didn't take long to spot the first pair of huge white swans with orange and black bills and graceful, curving necks as they swam in the marsh along the side of a Solano County levee road. They dabbled in the vegetation as a pickup drove through the Grizzly Island Wildlife Area. A short drive later, past a herd of a dozen tule elk, two more swans appeared in the marsh alongside the dirt road. Then four more. A few hundred yards down the road, out in the distance past a thicket of swaying reeds, dozens of swans swam in the water. For casual bird watchers, the sight of all these majestic animals might be a pleasure and bring to mind swan-themed works of literature, such as 'Leda and the Swan' and 'The Ugly Duckling.' But for wetland biologists and others with a stake in the health of the surrounding Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the largest estuary on the West Coast, the birds represent the latest — and an exponentially growing — threat to the few remaining wetlands left in California. These are mute swans, native to Europe and Asia. Weighing up to 30 pounds and with a wingspan of up to eight feet, they're the biggest bird in the marsh, and they're not the least bit shy about throwing their weight around. Fiercely territorial, especially during breeding season, they've been known to drown smaller animals and have killed at least one American kayaker. They've displaced colonies of nesting native birds in other parts of the U.S. they have invaded. Mute swans also feed gluttonously on submerged vegetation, destroying the plant life on which other native wetland species depend. 'They might be a pretty, big, white bird … and they may be charismatic, but they can be pretty nasty,' said Brad Bortner, a retired chief of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's migratory bird management programs in Washington D.C. In 2008, California banned anyone without a special permit from keeping mute swans as pets or from importing them into the state. The hope was to head off yet another destructive invasive species taking hold in the state. It didn't work. The mute swan population exploded in just a few years. In 2022, state waterfowl biologists estimated there were 1,500 of them. This spring, they estimated more than 12,000, nearly double the year before. Most of the mute swans are in the Suisun Marsh, a sprawling complex of public wetlands, agricultural lands and private duck-hunting clubs on the outskirts of the Bay Area near Fairfield. 'We keep watching them climb and climb and climb,' said Melanie Weaver, waterfowl coordinator for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A measure before the state Legislature aims to allow hunters and landowners to shoot the swans for the next five years to try to bring their numbers down to more manageable levels in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and beyond. The hunting groups supporting Assembly Bill 764 essentially ask: If Californians are OK with spending more than $13 million since 2018 to kill nearly 6,000 nutria, the 20-pound, orange-toothed South American rodents that have invaded the same waterways, why not let hunters and land owners do the same to mute swans — but for free? 'If the population gets too large and out of control, it may be beyond our ability then to really effectively manage them,' Mark Hennelly, a lobbyist for the California Waterfowl Association, told the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee this spring. 'So we want to get ahead of the problem.' Animal welfare groups object That argument has so far been a surprisingly easy sell in the Legislature, despite California's passionate and influential anti-hunting activists. Similar swan-killing proposals have led to protests in other states. The measure easily passed the Assembly without any lawmaker voting against it. It's now pending in the California Senate. No group has opposed the measure so far, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database, but that might soon change. Mute swans, unlike nutria, have a dedicated group of supporters, mostly on the East Coast. Nicole Rivard, a spokesperson for Friends of Animals, said she and fellow members of the animal welfare organization believe mute swans shouldn't be treated like vermin. The birds arrived here through no fault of their own, brought by humans, and they don't deserve to be killed for it, she said. Rivard believes the California legislation is motivated by hunters looking for an excuse to have yet another bird to legally shoot. Currently, mute swans can only be killed by landowners if the birds 'are found to be injuring growing crops or property,' according to state regulations. 'We're anti-hunting, so we don't like the idea that (hunting) might be, you know, part of the reasoning behind this,' Rivard said. Arguing that claims of mute swans' environmental damage and aggression are overblown, Friends of Animals and other groups opposed killing them decades ago, after Mid-Atlantic states proposed eradication when their populations began expanding dramatically in the 1990s and early 2000s. The groups protested, filed lawsuits and proposed legislation to try to stop the killing. They had mixed success. Some states began killing the nonnative swans over the animal welfare groups' objections. Notably, Maryland was able to knock the mute swan population down from around 5,000 birds in the early 2000s to around 200 by 2010. 'Continued control and maintenance operations have reduced that number to just a handful of birds today,' said Josh Homyack, the game bird section leader for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. In Maryland, government agency employees raided mute swan nests and destroyed eggs, captured and euthanized swans when they were flightless during their feather-molting season and shot them in carefully coordinated operations, Homyack said. The state also issued a few permits to kill the birds to local landowners. In New York, the mute swan lobby got a law passed that made it harder to kill the birds, requiring state officials to 'fully exhaust non-lethal control measures' such as nest destruction and capturing birds and moving them to wildlife facilities ' prior to any lethal removal.' The mute swan population in New York has stayed steady at around 2,000 to 3,400 birds. Charisma matters with invasive species On the East Coast, mute swans have been around since before the turn of the last century. They were first imported as ornamental livestock for zoos, parks and estates. Some of California's mute swans likely came in the same way. Weaver, the California waterfowl coordinator, said others were likely brought in the past few years to chase away Canada geese that have increasingly become a nuisance at parks and golf courses. 'People were buying these (swans), and they were just throwing them out there,' she said. Weaver noted their owners didn't do the responsible thing and clip their wings to keep them from flying off. That's hardly surprising. It's no easy task to grab a hissing 25-pound swan, big and angry enough to swamp a kayaker. So with nothing to stop them, the birds flew to nearby marshlands and began reproducing. 'Here we are, not very many years down the road, with a population that is really increasing at a rapid rate,' Weaver said. So far, California's wildlife agency hasn't enacted a mute swan eradication plan similar to the one it started almost immediately — and publicly promoted — a few years ago, after nutria first started turning up in the San Joaquin Valley. Nutria are similarly destructive feeders on aquatic plants. The South American swamp rodents also burrow holes in levees, posing a threat to the state's flood-control and water-supply infrastructure. Dave Strayer, a retired invasive species expert with the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York, said he's not surprised state officials haven't been as aggressive with the beautiful mute swans, given the uproar over killing them in other states. He said research has shown that when it comes to invasive animals, charisma matters. The more attractive a problematic non-native species is, the less appetite there is to wipe it out. Stayer gave an example: Few complain about killing common nonnative rats, but you're apt to get death threats at even the suggestion of wiping out ecologically harmful feral cat colonies in the same habitats. He noted that no one has ever complained about efforts to eradicate one of his research subjects, the nonnative zebra mussels that have also invaded California. 'I never had even one person stand up for zebra mussels and say, 'No, these are beautiful, elegant God's creatures' and so forth,' he said. Few wetlands and too many mute swans Supporters of the swan-killing legislation say reducing the number of mute swans should be fairly easy since the giant white birds are easy to spot, identify and kill. Their size and the color and shape of their bills also reduce the risk they'll be confused with other protected bird species, they say. California's native tundra and trumpeter swans would still be protected and illegal to shoot if the bill becomes law. Despite their undeniable beauty, Weaver, the state waterfowl coordinator, sees mute swans similarly to nutria. The swans pose too great a threat to native species reliant on the few wetlands left in California, which has lost at least 90% of the habitats to agriculture and urban sprawl. 'They don't move around the state all that much, and they really like the Delta-Suisun Marsh area, so it's still easy to handle the issue,' Weaver said. 'The longer we wait, it won't be.'
