Lawmakers push for transparency in 340B program
New York lawmakers are looking to create transparency in a drug rebate program offered to hospitals serving low-income communities, with a state mandate to report how the federal program's revenue is used, POLITICO Pro's Katelyn Cordero reports.
The legislation — which is the Assembly Health Committee and expected to be introduced in the Senate in the coming days — would require hospitals participating in the 340B drug discount program to report their use of funds acquired through the program to the state Department of Health.
The program's original intent was to have safety-net hospitals invest the profits back into the community or pass savings directly to patients, but lawmakers have raised concerns about where the money is actually going.
'It's just a pretty straightforward transparency bill reporting on information that, in theory, should otherwise already be available,' bill sponsor Assemblymember Amanda Septimo told POLITICO. 'So it's really compiling and sharing information, not necessarily new data collection. We don't expect it to be burdensome.'
A separate piece of legislation reintroduced in January, known as the 340B Prescription Drug Anti-Discrimination Act, would bar pharmaceutical companies from imposing administrative requirements that could discourage providers from participating in the program.
Septimo said such an expansion of the program should only be considered with the proper guardrails in place.
'The (bills) should work in tandem,' she said. 'It's difficult to make a meaningful case for the expansion of something when you don't have any meaningful data to report, with respect to how it's working as it exists.'
The legislation introduced by Septimo in March would require that hospitals report all 340B savings and payments associated with drugs in the program, as well as the total number of prescriptions and the percentage of prescriptions covered by the program. The Department of Health would be required to post the collected data on a public site.
Hospitals would be required to report data on the program by April 1, 2026.
IN OTHER NEWS:
— One Brooklyn Health is partnering with NYU Langone to expand access to kidney transplants in Brooklyn.
The health system's new program will offer transplant evaluations, clinical testing and specialist consultations to patients with advanced kidney disease at Brookdale Hospital. Patients will also receive support from social workers, financial counselors and a care navigator.
— Gov. Kathy Hochul announced four appointments to the newly restructured board of the Nassau Health Care Corporation, which oversees the financially struggling Nassau University Medical Center on Long Island: Stuart Rabinowitz, Amy Flores, Dean Mihaltses and Lisa Warren.
Under a new state law that took effect Sunday, the corporation is subject to several new oversight measures and must submit a study by Dec. 1, 2026, exploring options to strengthen the medical center.
ON THE AGENDA:
— Wednesday at 10 a.m. The Public Health and Health Planning Council's committee on establishment and project review meets.
— Thursday, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. The New York State Traumatic Brain Injury Services Coordinating Council meets.
MAKING ROUNDS:
— Kathleen Sikkema will serve as interim dean of the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, effective July 1. She succeeds Linda P. Fried, who previously announced plans to step down at the end of the academic year.
GOT TIPS? Send story ideas and feedback to Maya Kaufman at mkaufman@politico.com and Katelyn Cordero at kcordero@politico.com.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
What you may have missed
— Democratic lawmakers negotiated a deal with the state Education Department s last week on a measure that would expand access to birth control for New Yorkers, as the state faces provider shortages and federal attacks on reproductive health care.
Two bills moving through the Senate and Assembly are aimed at allowing pharmacists to administer birth control shots without a provider's prescription and requiring private insurance to pay pharmacists for consulting with patients seeking birth control prescriptions, POLITICO Pro's Katelyn Cordero reports.
— An issue brief by the New York Health Plan Association, which found the state mandates insurance coverage of more than 45 specific treatments or services, recommended that the state develop a process to review the cost of such requirements.
'The collective impact of mandated benefits contributes to the growth in health insurance premiums, adds to the cost of coverage for everyone – consumers, employers, union benefit funds and the state – and runs counter to efforts to make New York more affordable,' HPA President and CEO Eric Linzer said in a statement. 'Before new mandated benefits are passed, there should be a process to analyze their impact on the affordability of coverage, so that there's a clear understanding of what they cost.'
Odds and Ends
NOW WE KNOW — A new Covid strain has landed in New York.
TODAY'S TIP — Easily distracted? Here are some ways to improve your attention span.
STUDY THIS — Ending water fluoridation could cost nearly $10 billion over five years, and tooth decay would also rise, according to a Harvard analysis.
What We're Reading
— State health regulators signal support for long-awaited trauma center in the Rockaways. (Crain's New York Business)
— The dizzying rise of MAHA warrior Calley Means, RFK Jr.'s right-hand man. (Vanity Fair)
— Medicare plots ambitious tech agenda guided by former Palantir and Main Street Health executives. (STAT)
— American doctors are moving to Canada to escape the Trump administration. (KFF Health News)
Around POLITICO
— Via Carmen Paun and Robbie Gramer: State Department explains why it's reorganizing its global health security bureau.
— Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst spars with town hall crowd over Medicaid, Cheyanne M. Daniels reports.
MISSED A ROUNDUP? Get caught up on the New York Health Care Newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Russia might be responsible for the PACER hack
Just a few days after administrators announced that the 'federal Judiciary is taking additional steps to strengthen protections for sensitive case documents in response to recent escalated cyberattacks,' the New York Times reports investigators have found evidence Russia is 'at least partially responsible' for a recent hack. Politico reported on the breach last week, saying it was 'believed to have exposed sensitive court data across multiple U.S. states' and that while the system's managers had been aware of its impact since around July 4th, they are still trying to figure out its full extent. Searches by the attackers reportedly included cases 'involving people with Russian and Eastern European surnames,' and may have compromised sealed records that weren't publicly available. After the SolarWinds breach in 2021, new procedures called for highly sensitive documents to be filed using paper or a secure electronic device, and not uploaded to CM/ECF. In 2022, the DOJ reportedly informed the judiciary of another ongoing breach. According to the Times, district court chief judges were warned last month to keep cases with documents 'related to criminal activity with an overseas tie' off of the usual document management system for federal cases, which is made up of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) where files are uploaded and managed, as well as PACER, a database that's available to the public. It points to this order issued Friday by Eastern District of New York chief judge Margo Brodie, saying that, until further notice, 'criminal cases and in cases related to criminal investigations are prohibited from being filed in CM/ECF,' and are instead to be uploaded to a separate system that doesn't connect to PACER. Last week's notice from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said: The vast majority of documents filed with the Judiciary's electronic case management system are not confidential and indeed are readily available to the public, which is fundamental to an open and transparent judicial system. However, some filings contain confidential or proprietary information that are sealed from public view. These sensitive documents can be targets of interest to a range of threat actors. To better protect them, courts have been implementing more rigorous procedures to restrict access to sensitive documents under carefully controlled and monitored circumstances. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Security Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
Atlantic
3 hours ago
- Atlantic
Trump Forces His Opponents to Choose Between Bad Options
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker has made himself a spokesperson for Democratic resistance to Republican plans for a brazen mid-decade gerrymander, and on Sunday, he appeared on Meet the Press to state his case. 'It's cheating,' Pritzker said of the Texas redistricting that the president has demanded. 'Donald Trump is a cheater. He cheats on his wives. He cheats at golf. And now he's trying to cheat the American people out of their votes.' It's a clever line. But it would have been better if not for the fact that some of Pritzker's fellow Democrats, including the governors of New York and California, are now trying to redraw their state's maps to squeeze Republicans. (It might also have landed better if Illinois' maps weren't already gerrymandered, as Representative Mike Quigley, a Chicago Democrat, recently acknowledged.) If they're going to strike back, Democrats in some of these states don't just have to draw new maps—they have to find ways to circumvent structures they enacted in recent years to make maps fairer. Former Attorney General Eric Holder has been the driving force behind Democrats' work for fairer districts, but he's now in the awkward position of calling for cutthroat maps. 'My hope would be you have these temporary measures,' he told The New York Times. Of course, everyone always hopes that. The political scientist Sara Sadhwani, who helped draw the Golden State's current maps, argued for tossing them, telling Politico 's California Playbook, 'These are extraordinary times, and extraordinary times often call for extraordinary measures.' This reasoning feels both dangerous and alluring. Democrats pushed for fairer districts to bolster democracy; if they remain pure and Republicans rig the system, then it was all for naught. Yet if they abandon the push for fairness, what are they preserving? Saying that Americans should resist tyranny is all well and good, but the past decade has shown that resisting involves a lot of risky judgment calls. Part of Trump's political genius, and his threat, is that he forces his opponents to choose between bad options. During the first Trump administration, for example, some of his aides simply refused to execute on things the president told them to do—or, in one case, reportedly even swiped a draft letter from his desk to prevent it from being signed. On the one hand, they were probably right on the merits: Trump has lots of bad ideas, some of which might have endangered the country if enacted. On the other hand, they were unelected officials refusing lawful commands from the elected president. What's right in the short term can set perilous precedents in the long run. This week, Trump dispatched the D.C. National Guard and federal officers to the streets of the capital. Five summers ago, amid major protests, he did the same—and reportedly contemplated calling in active-duty soldiers. Then–Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley was able to talk Trump out of that, but the price he paid was participation in a photo op with the president as he walked across Lafayette Square from the White House. The resulting images 'created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics,' as Milley put it. He quickly came to regret that decision and apologized. Knowing which choice was better is nearly impossible. Once Trump left office, federal prosecutors had to grapple with how to handle both his attempt to steal the 2020 presidential election and his hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump's misdeeds were not especially murky or covert: Everyone watched him try to subvert the election in real time, culminating in the January 6 insurrection; the documents in question were demonstrably at Mar-a-Lago, and the government had subpoenaed them. Declining to prosecute Trump for these actions would have encouraged his own further abuses and also fostered the impression that not everyone is equal under the law. Yet political leaders in functioning democracies generally do not charge their political rivals who have left office with crimes, because it injects partisanship into the system, eroding it for the future. Trump falsely accused President Joe Biden of engaging in banana-republic-style politics, but now that Trump is in power, his government is reportedly pursuing an absurd investigation against former President Barack Obama. Once criminal charges were set in motion, the judges presiding over the cases had their own challenges. Would they give Trump a gag order—standard procedure to prevent a defendant from attacking witnesses publicly—and create an opportunity for him to claim 'election interference,' or would they allow attacks that no other defendant could get away with? (They mostly tried to split the difference.) The country ended up with perhaps the worst outcome: Trump faced charges, he reaped political benefit from claiming persecution, and now he has avoided convictions or even trials in all but one case, evading accountability by running out the clock. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser is now facing her own tough choice: If she forcefully opposes the president's temporary takeover of the city's police force, as well as other measures that he says he is taking to fight crime, then she risks inviting even more aggressive action from an angry Trump. If, however, she mostly acquiesces, then she is yielding the city's powers and surrendering her constituency's preferences to his. Meanwhile, university presidents are weighing whether to give in to Trump's attempts to seize control over their operations. Is it better to strike a costly settlement and regain some limited autonomy, or to fight the administration and risk even greater damage? 'Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice,' Republican Senator Barry Goldwater said during his 1964 presidential bid. 'Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.' Americans resoundingly rejected that vision at the time, but now many of Trump's opponents and targets are adopting it as a philosophy. Forcing Americans who care about democracy into these dilemmas is part of what gives him such power. Trump's dreams for D.C. could soon hit reality. Vladimir Putin could be laying a trap. Today's News About 800 National Guard troops have arrived in Washington, D.C., to support local law enforcement in carrying out President Donald Trump's order to deal with crime. Trump is considering filing a lawsuit against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell over the Fed's building renovation, amid ongoing tensions over interest rates. Inflation remained steady in July despite price increases on some goods caused by Trump's tariffs. Evening Read Americans Are All In on Cow-Based Wellness By Yasmin Tayag A not-insignificant number of TikToks aim to convince the viewer that beef-tallow moisturizer will not make your face smell like cow. The beauty influencers who tend to appear in these videos—usually clear-skinned women rubbing tallow into their face as they detail their previous dermatological woes—describe the scent as 'buttery' or 'earthy' or grass-like. Many of them come to the same conclusion: Okay, even if the tallow does smell a little bit, the smooth skin it leaves behind is well worth it. Beef tallow (as both a moisturizer and an alternative to seed oils) is one of many cow-based products that have crowded the wellness market in the past five or so years. Beef-bone broth is a grocery-store staple. Demand for raw milk has grown, despite numerous cases of illness and warnings from public-health officials that drinking it can be fatal. In certain circles, raw cow organs—heart, liver, kidney—are prized superfoods … More From The Atlantic Culture Break Look. In the 1980s and '90s, Adrienne Salinger photographed American teenagers in their natural habitat: their bedroom.
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
DOGE math 200 days in
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben The Department of Government Efficiency is drastically overstating its savings, according to a new POLITICO analysis of public data and federal spending records. Through July, DOGE said it has saved taxpayers $52.8 billion by canceling contracts, but of the $32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings that POLITICO could verify, DOGE's savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion. And despite the administration's claims, not a penny of those savings will lower the federal deficit unless Congress intervenes. Instead, the money was returned to agencies mandated by law to spend it. POLITICO's findings come on top of months of scrutiny of DOGE's accounting, but the magnitude of DOGE's inflated savings claims has not been clear until now. West Wing Playbook sat down with JESSIE BLAESER to discuss her reporting. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. How did you come up with the idea of doing this analysis? From the early days of contracting experts pointing out flaws in DOGE's savings math, I knew we'd eventually be able to use federal spending records to see what DOGE had actually done. This piece is the first to do that: to hold up what DOGE has said it has saved taxpayers from canceling contracts against what the real receipts say. What was the most surprising finding from your reporting? The way the administration has taken action (or not) on the contracts it has listed for termination, particularly when it comes to contracts' ceiling value. For context, one expert explained the ceiling value on a contract as a 'credit card limit.' So, imagine lowering your credit card limit by $20,000 and saying you just saved $20,000. That is exactly what DOGE is doing to calculate savings. But even when using that fuzzy logic, DOGE still falls short of its claims by over half. And even that amount won't go toward reducing the deficit. Why? Because agencies have to spend the funds Congress gives them. What does it tell us about the quality or the scope of DOGE's work? In reality, we won't know the true scope or impact of DOGE's terminated contracts for years. At most, DOGE's savings claims for canceled contracts amounts to the absolute maximum the government could avoid paying on these specific deals. That number, known as the 'contract ceiling,' was never guaranteed to be spent in the first place. There's also no way to predict how much terminating these contracts will actually cost. There is an inevitable price tag associated with closing out a contract — costs like outstanding payments, litigation fees or the cost of administrative time. What was the biggest challenge in verifying DOGE contracts? Every contract is different, and that's part of the reason why DOGE math doesn't work. On top of that, some contracts on DOGE's page lack any identifying information. I had to navigate how to capture every single contract we could and every action the administration has actually taken on them. That's a lot of data points to check and contextualize against DOGE's claims. What's your next reporting target in this vein of the Trump remaking government? We'll keep reporting on the reality of DOGE's cost cutting compared to the group's claims. The more DOGE posts and the more time that passes, the more we will be able to contextualize DOGE's true impact. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Who was the one president to be born in Illinois? (Answer at bottom.) In the Courts DOGE GETS THE DATA: A federal appeals court panel today cleared the way for DOGE to access data held by the Office of Personnel Management and departments of Treasury and Education, thwarting a lawsuit brought by public sector unions, our KYLE CHENEY writes in. The 2-1 ruling lifts a preliminary injunction issued in March by U.S. District Judge DEBORAH BOARDMAN restricting the ELON MUSK outfit's access to sensitive employee information. The opinion, authored by DONALD TRUMP appointee Judge JULIUS RICHARDSON and joined by GEORGE W. BUSH appointee Judge G. STEVEN AGEE, concludes that the unions likely lacked standing to sue over the issue. 'The harm that might come from this generalized grant of database access to an additional handful of government employees — prone as they may be to hacks or leaks, as Plaintiffs have alleged — seems different in kind, not just in degree, from the harm inflicted by reporters, detectives, and paparazzi,' the judges wrote. Judge ROBERT KING, a BILL CLINTON appointee, dissented, saying the majority opinion set an unusually high bar for the unions to clear. He also noted that the full bench of the 4th Circuit is slated to weigh in on the matter when it considers a separate case on DOGE's access to Social Security data. Agenda Setting IN THE HOT SEAT: The Justice Department found George Washington University failed to adequately address antisemitism on campus, making it the latest college to face scrutiny from the Trump administration, our BIANCA QUILANTAN reports. The agency said it is offering GWU the chance to enter into a voluntary resolution agreement before the officials proceed with enforcement but did not include the terms the school must agree to in their notice. The university did not respond to a request for comment. A PERFECT LOOPHOLE: Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics, E.J. ANTONI, floated in a recent Fox News interview the idea of suspending the monthly jobs report in favor of less frequent quarterly data published by the agency, our NICK NIEDZWIADEK reports. In a change that would almost certainly unnerve markets, Antoni said that BLS should halt issuing reports — widely relied upon by economists, the Federal Reserve and Wall Street to gauge the state of the economy — until its methods can be improved to limit subsequent revisions. White House press secretary KAROLINE LEAVITT diverted from that opinion at the podium this afternoon, saying the 'plan and hope' is for BLS to still put out monthly reports. ALL ABOUT ME: The White House is planning to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of the nation's 250th anniversary to ensure the museums align with Trump's interpretation of American history, WSJ's MERIDITH McGRAW reports. In a letter sent to LONNIE BUNCH, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, three top White House officials said they want to ensure the museums' 'unity, progress and enduring values that define the American story' and reflect the president's executive order calling for 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' A spokesperson for the Smithsonian didn't respond to a request for comment. WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT THE ROOOMATE BOND KNOWS NO BOUNDS: The Justice Department chief of staff, CHAD MIZELLE, is moving to appoint his wedding groomsman and law school housemate as an official overseeing corporate fraud, Bloomberg Law's BEN PENN reports. Although the effort is not finalized, Mizelle is pushing to install CODY HERCHE as the DOJ criminal division's deputy supervising the fraud and appellate sections. Compared to his predecessors, including in Trump's first term, Herche has far less experience in criminal trials and leading prosecutors, but a DOJ spokesperson defended his 'wealth of experience' in a statement, Penn reports. The final decision lies with Attorney General PAM BONDI pending the president's approval. What We're Reading Trump officials cast a wider net for Powell replacement at Fed (POLITICO's Victoria Guida) Kari Lake's Attempt to Deport Her Own Employees (The Atlantic's Toluse Olorunnipa) The Palestinian Who Led a Militia, a Theater and a Jailbreak (NYT's Patrick Kingsley and Fatima AbdulKarim) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER That would be former President RONALD REAGAN, who was born in Tampico, Illinois, in 1911, where he resided for 22 years until moving to Iowa to pursue a career in sports broadcasting.
