
Lawmakers push for transparency in 340B program
Beat Memo
New York lawmakers are looking to create transparency in a drug rebate program offered to hospitals serving low-income communities, with a state mandate to report how the federal program's revenue is used, POLITICO Pro's Katelyn Cordero reports.
The legislation — which is the Assembly Health Committee and expected to be introduced in the Senate in the coming days — would require hospitals participating in the 340B drug discount program to report their use of funds acquired through the program to the state Department of Health.
The program's original intent was to have safety-net hospitals invest the profits back into the community or pass savings directly to patients, but lawmakers have raised concerns about where the money is actually going.
'It's just a pretty straightforward transparency bill reporting on information that, in theory, should otherwise already be available,' bill sponsor Assemblymember Amanda Septimo told POLITICO. 'So it's really compiling and sharing information, not necessarily new data collection. We don't expect it to be burdensome.'
A separate piece of legislation reintroduced in January, known as the 340B Prescription Drug Anti-Discrimination Act, would bar pharmaceutical companies from imposing administrative requirements that could discourage providers from participating in the program.
Septimo said such an expansion of the program should only be considered with the proper guardrails in place.
'The (bills) should work in tandem,' she said. 'It's difficult to make a meaningful case for the expansion of something when you don't have any meaningful data to report, with respect to how it's working as it exists.'
The legislation introduced by Septimo in March would require that hospitals report all 340B savings and payments associated with drugs in the program, as well as the total number of prescriptions and the percentage of prescriptions covered by the program. The Department of Health would be required to post the collected data on a public site.
Hospitals would be required to report data on the program by April 1, 2026.
IN OTHER NEWS:
— One Brooklyn Health is partnering with NYU Langone to expand access to kidney transplants in Brooklyn.
The health system's new program will offer transplant evaluations, clinical testing and specialist consultations to patients with advanced kidney disease at Brookdale Hospital. Patients will also receive support from social workers, financial counselors and a care navigator.
— Gov. Kathy Hochul announced four appointments to the newly restructured board of the Nassau Health Care Corporation, which oversees the financially struggling Nassau University Medical Center on Long Island: Stuart Rabinowitz, Amy Flores, Dean Mihaltses and Lisa Warren.
Under a new state law that took effect Sunday, the corporation is subject to several new oversight measures and must submit a study by Dec. 1, 2026, exploring options to strengthen the medical center.
ON THE AGENDA:
— Wednesday at 10 a.m. The Public Health and Health Planning Council's committee on establishment and project review meets.
— Thursday, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. The New York State Traumatic Brain Injury Services Coordinating Council meets.
MAKING ROUNDS:
— Kathleen Sikkema will serve as interim dean of the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, effective July 1. She succeeds Linda P. Fried, who previously announced plans to step down at the end of the academic year.
GOT TIPS? Send story ideas and feedback to Maya Kaufman at mkaufman@politico.com and Katelyn Cordero at kcordero@politico.com.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
What you may have missed
— Democratic lawmakers negotiated a deal with the state Education Department s last week on a measure that would expand access to birth control for New Yorkers, as the state faces provider shortages and federal attacks on reproductive health care.
Two bills moving through the Senate and Assembly are aimed at allowing pharmacists to administer birth control shots without a provider's prescription and requiring private insurance to pay pharmacists for consulting with patients seeking birth control prescriptions, POLITICO Pro's Katelyn Cordero reports.
— An issue brief by the New York Health Plan Association, which found the state mandates insurance coverage of more than 45 specific treatments or services, recommended that the state develop a process to review the cost of such requirements.
'The collective impact of mandated benefits contributes to the growth in health insurance premiums, adds to the cost of coverage for everyone – consumers, employers, union benefit funds and the state – and runs counter to efforts to make New York more affordable,' HPA President and CEO Eric Linzer said in a statement. 'Before new mandated benefits are passed, there should be a process to analyze their impact on the affordability of coverage, so that there's a clear understanding of what they cost.'
Odds and Ends
NOW WE KNOW — A new Covid strain has landed in New York.
TODAY'S TIP — Easily distracted? Here are some ways to improve your attention span.
STUDY THIS — Ending water fluoridation could cost nearly $10 billion over five years, and tooth decay would also rise, according to a Harvard analysis.
What We're Reading
— State health regulators signal support for long-awaited trauma center in the Rockaways. (Crain's New York Business)
— The dizzying rise of MAHA warrior Calley Means, RFK Jr.'s right-hand man. (Vanity Fair)
— Medicare plots ambitious tech agenda guided by former Palantir and Main Street Health executives. (STAT)
— American doctors are moving to Canada to escape the Trump administration. (KFF Health News)
Around POLITICO
— Via Carmen Paun and Robbie Gramer: State Department explains why it's reorganizing its global health security bureau.
— Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst spars with town hall crowd over Medicaid, Cheyanne M. Daniels reports.
MISSED A ROUNDUP? Get caught up on the New York Health Care Newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will Musk unfollow Trump? Here are the 6 most intriguing wagers gathering steam on betting markets.
Online bettors are placing wagers on possible outcomes of the feud between Musk and Trump. The two have been embroiled in a public fight this week about the Republican tax bill. Bets on whether Musk will unfollow Trump or suspend his X account popped up on sites like Polymarket. Elon Musk's squabble with the US President has investors racing to place bets on potential outcomes. Online betting forums like Polymarket and Kalshi saw a flurry of wagers on Thursday and Friday revolving around the billionaire and President Donald Trump, who have been publicly sparring on social media over the Republican tax and spending bill. The feud, which started earlier this week after Musk called the sweeping GOP budget bill an "abomination"," and culminated with Musk amplifying calls for Trump's impeachment, represents a major turning point in their relationship — something that's alarmed Tesla investors. Here are some of the wildest wagers that have appeared on betting platforms this week: Investors think it's unlikely. The priced-in odds of the scenario hovered around 27% on Friday on Polymarket. The odds that Donald Trump's X account will be suspended were initially 7.5%, but they dropped to 1% on Friday. As their feud raged on Thursday, Musk created a poll on X asking if it was time to create a new political party in the US "that actually represents the 80% in the middle." By Friday, the poll had garnered more than 5 million responses, with more than 80% of users voting yes. Bettors on Polymarket think the odds that Musk will create a new political party by June are 7%, but higher as the year goes on, rising to 21% for him to form a new party by the end of 2025. Musk and Trump have each signaled some openness to making amends. On X, Musk replied to a post by Bill Ackman, which suggested that the two should "make peace." "You're not wrong," Musk said in a post. Speaking to Politico Thursday night, Trump downplayed the public conflict to reporters, adding that his relationship with Musk was "going very well, never done better." White House aides said that Trump and Musk had a call scheduled on Friday, Politico reported, but separate reports on Friday said that no such call had been scheduled and that Trump is "not interested" in speaking with Musk. On Kalshi, the odds that Trump and Elon will publicly reconcile by the end of next week dropped to 14% on Friday, down from 36% earlier in the day. The priced-in odds that Trump will end up suing Elon Musk this year hovered around 17% on the betting platform Kalshi. One of the wildest bets—that Trump would have Musk sent to jail—had surprisingly high odds on Polymarket as the fight between Trump and Musk dragged on. The percent chance of such an outcome dropped, however, from 10.5% to 4% on Friday. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘I'm not thinking about Elon Musk': Trump tries to move on from feud
President Donald Trump said Friday that he has little appetite for reconciling with Elon Musk any time soon, signaling he's eager to move on to other topics following their extraordinary public blow-up. 'I'm not really interested in that,' Trump told reporters as he arrived in New Jersey, where he's slated to spend the weekend at one of his properties. 'I'm really interested in the country and solving problems.' The remarks represented the president's latest insistence that he's gotten over the high-profile breakup with Musk, even as he continues to talk about him. Trump on Thursday and earlier Friday conducted interviews with several media outlets — including POLITICO — to emphasize that he was shifting to other concerns. 'I'm not thinking about Elon,' Trump said. 'I just wish him well.' The high-volume conflict between Trump and Musk has consumed Washington for two days, alarming allies who have since encouraged the two to call a truce and generating anxiety on Capitol Hill, where Republicans are still trying to push through their top legislative priority. Trump later Friday downplayed the rift, touting support within the GOP for the megabill and brushing off questions about the accusations he earlier hurled at Musk — including that the billionaire had 'a problem.' 'I don't want to talk about the problems,' Trump said, pivoting quickly to talk up the state of the economy. Still, pressed on the matter, Trump acknowledged that he's still considering eliminating lucrative federal contracts with companies run by Musk — a move that he first floated on Thursday in response to the billionaire's criticism of Trump and the GOP's megabill. 'We'll take a look at everything,' Trump said of the contracts that the government maintains with companies like Musk's SpaceX. 'It's a lot of money, it's a lot of subsidy.' Despite SpaceX's central place in the U.S.'s defense and space programs, Trump said that the country 'can survive' without the contracts that it has awarded to the Musk-run company. As for the ongoing effort by Trump and Musk allies to bring the two back together, the president acknowledged that they remained ongoing — but at least for now, weren't gaining much traction.


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
‘I'm not thinking about Elon Musk': Trump tries to move on from feud
President Donald Trump said Friday that he has little appetite for reconciling with Elon Musk any time soon, signaling he's eager to move on to other topics following their extraordinary public blow-up. 'I'm not really interested in that,' Trump told reporters as he arrived in New Jersey, where he's slated to spend the weekend at one of his properties. 'I'm really interested in the country and solving problems.' The remarks represented the president's latest insistence that he's gotten over the high-profile breakup with Musk, even as he continues to talk about him. Trump on Thursday and earlier Friday conducted interviews with several media outlets — including POLITICO — to emphasize that he was shifting to other concerns. 'I'm not thinking about Elon,' Trump said. 'I just wish him well.' The high-volume conflict between Trump and Musk has consumed Washington for two days, alarming allies who have since encouraged the two to call a truce and generating anxiety on Capitol Hill, where Republicans are still trying to push through their top legislative priority. Trump later Friday downplayed the rift, touting support within the GOP for the megabill and brushing off questions about the accusations he earlier hurled at Musk — including that the billionaire had 'a problem.' 'I don't want to talk about the problems,' Trump said, pivoting quickly to talk up the state of the economy. Still, pressed on the matter, Trump acknowledged that he's still considering eliminating lucrative federal contracts with companies run by Musk — a move that he first floated on Thursday in response to the billionaire's criticism of Trump and the GOP's megabill. 'We'll take a look at everything,' Trump said of the contracts that the government maintains with companies like Musk's SpaceX. 'It's a lot of money, it's a lot of subsidy.' Despite SpaceX's central place in the U.S.'s defense and space programs, Trump said that the country 'can survive' without the contracts that it has awarded to the Musk-run company. As for the ongoing effort by Trump and Musk allies to bring the two back together, the president acknowledged that they remained ongoing — but at least for now, weren't gaining much traction.