New High Commissioner to the UK named
Hamish Cooper, who has 40 years of experience at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, will take up the role in September.
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said New Zealand's relationship with the United Kingdom was "one of our most important".
"Mr Cooper is one of New Zealand's most senior and experienced diplomats and is eminently well-qualified to take on this significant role."
Chris Seed, who previously served as the New Zealand High Commissioner to Canberra and Port Moresby, was named in the role in an acting capacity.
ADVERTISEMENT
Goff made the comments which led Foreign Minister Winston Peters to declare his position "untenable" at a Chatham House event. (Source: Chatham House/YouTube) (Source: Supplied)
Goff was fired after making comments on US President Donald Trump in a question he posed at a live-streamed Q&A event with Finland's foreign minister Elina Valtonen.
He asked the speaker: "I was re-reading Churchill's speech to the House of Commons in 1938 after the Munich Agreement, and he turned to Chamberlain, he said, 'You had the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, yet you will have war.'
"President Trump has restored the bust of Churchill to the Oval Office. But do you think he really understands history?"
Peters said the comments were "seriously regrettable" and made Goff's position "untenable".
"When you are in that position — you represent the Government and the policies of the day. You're not able to free think. You are the face of New Zealand," Peters said.
He did say it was a disappointing decision to have to make.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I've worked with Phil Goff, I have known him for a long time, I've worked in government with him, but it's just one of those seriously disappointing decisions one has to make."
Former London representative says he was more than willing to pay the price for speaking out against US President Donald Trump. (Source: 1News)
'No regrets'
Goff said he had "no regrets" about questioning Donald Trump's understanding of history, in his first public statement since being sacked from his diplomatic role.
Goff said he asked the "serious and important question" about Trump — that led to his dismissal — because silence would have made New Zealand "complicit" in the US president's "disgraceful bullying" of Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky.
He defended his actions in a lengthy letter, released to 1News. Goff said New Zealand could not remain silent while the Trump administration made "dishonest" and "untruthful" statements about Russia's invasion.
"As one untruthful statement followed another like something out of an Orwell novel, I increasingly felt that the lies needed to be called out," he stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Why Putin is not ready to meet with Zelensky, and may never be
By Clare Sebastian , CNN Russian President Vladimir Putin after participating in a US-Russia summit on Ukraine in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. Photo: AFP / Andrew Caballero-Reynolds Analysis : Agreement at the White House on Monday (US time) on the next step - a bilateral meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky - seemed broadly unanimous. Then came the Russian response. "The idea was discussed that it would be appropriate to study the opportunity of raising the level of representatives of the Russian and Ukrainian sides," said Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov, briefing reporters on US President Donald Trump's call with Putin. No mention of either leader by name, or any indication the "representatives" could be raised to that level. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov took a more conciliatory tone in a state TV interview later on Tuesday. "We do not refuse any forms of work - neither bilateral nor trilateral," he insisted. But: "Any contacts involving top officials must be prepared with the utmost care." In Kremlin speak, that means they are nowhere near ready to agree to this. And that should come as no surprise. This is a war that Putin started by unilaterally recognising a chunk of Ukrainian land ( the self-styled Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics ) as independent. He has argued Ukraine is "an inalienable part of (Russia's) own history, culture and spiritual space", and its separation from Russia is a historical mistake. So if this meeting happens - as Orysia Lutsevich, the director of Chatham House's Russia and Eurasia program puts it - Putin "will have to accept the failure of sitting down with a president he considers a joke from a country that doesn't exist". It would also, she argued, be a huge reversal in tone that would be tough to explain to the Russian people. "(Putin) so much brainwashed Russians on state television that Zelensky's a Nazi, that (Ukraine's) a puppet state of the West … that Zelensky's illegitimate, why is he suddenly talking to him?" Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky looks on during a meeting with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. Photo: MANDEL NGAN The Kremlin not only routinely questions the legitimacy of the Ukrainian leader, fixating on the postponement of elections in Ukraine, illegal under martial law, but in its latest "peace" memorandum requires Ukraine to hold elections before any final peace treaty is signed. Putin and other Russian officials rarely refer to Zelensky by name, instead preferring the scathing moniker of "the Kyiv regime." And don't forget it was Zelensky who travelled to Turkey for the first direct talks between the two sides in mid-May, only for Putin to send a delegation headed by a writer of historical textbooks. Tatiana Stanovaya, senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre and founder of RPolitik, which provides news and analysis on Russia, argues that while Putin does not view a meeting with Zelensky as critical in a war that for Russia is more about confronting the West than Ukraine, he could still take the meeting if he thought it would be successful. "The key demands must be on the table and Zelensky must be ok to talk about it," she told CNN in an interview on Tuesday. As of now Zelensky has ruled out those key demands, which include giving up territory Ukraine still controls. But Putin, she argued, sees Trump as the key to changing that. "Trump is seen as an enabler of (the) Russian vision of the settlement and for that the United States is supposed to work with Kyiv to push them to be more flexible, to be more open to Russian demands." Stanovaya suggested Russia may try to keep the US on side by doing what Ushakov suggested, and suggesting a new round of Istanbul talks, but with a higher-level delegation, perhaps including Ushakov himself, and foreign minister Lavrov. But he won't risk an "ambush" by sitting down with Zelensky only to find all his demands rejected. Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump at the Alaska summit. Photo: AFP / Andrew Caballero-Reynolds Trump ended his day on Monday by posting on Truth Social that he "began the arrangements for a meeting … between President Putin and President Zelensky". By the time he had woken up and dialled into the breakfast show on Fox News on Tuesday morning, it seemed to have dawned on him this was not a done deal. "I sort of set it up with Putin and Zelensky, and you know, they're the ones that have to call the shots. We're, we're 7000 miles away," he said. Putin has no reason to acquiesce at this point. Having made zero concessions, he has been rewarded with a grand summit in Alaska, the dropping of a demand by Trump to sign onto a ceasefire before a peace talks, and the crumbling of all sanctions ultimatums to date. Having slightly dialled down the scale of nightly drone attacks on Ukrainian cities so far in August, Russia ramped them up again Monday night, firing 270 drones and 10 missiles. If Trump's pressure on Zelensky hasn't yet yielded the results Moscow wants, there's always military force to fall back on. The only wild card for Russia at this point is who Trump will blame when this latest peace effort fails. -CNN
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump administration imposes new sanctions on four ICC judges, prosecutors
By Humeyra Pamuk and Anthony Deutsch , Reuters Trump's dislike of the International Criminal Court goes back to his first term. Photo: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP President Donald Trump's administration has imposed sanctions on two judges and two prosecutors at the International Criminal Court, as Washington ramped up its pressure on the war tribunal over its targeting of Israeli leaders and a past decision to investigate United States officials. In a statement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the court "a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare" against the United States and Israel. Washington designated Nicolas Yann Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji, Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal, and Kimberly Prost of Canada, according to the US Treasury and State Department. All officials have been involved in cases linked to Israel and the United States. "United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicisation, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach," Rubio said. The second round of sanctions comes less than three months after the administration took the unprecedented step of slapping sanctions on four separate ICC judges. It represents a serious escalation that will likely impede the functioning of the court and the prosecutor's office as they deal with major cases, including war crime allegations against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. ICC, which had slammed the move in June as an attempt to undermine the independence of the judicial institution, and the office of the prosecutor, did not have immediate comment. ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. In March 2020, prosecutors opened an investigation in Afghanistan that included looking into possible crimes by US troops, but since 2021, it has deprioritised the role of the US and focused on alleged crimes committed by the Afghan government and the Taliban forces. The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the United Nations Security Council. The International Criminal Court ICC signage and buildings in The Hague, Netherlands. Photo: NICOLAS ECONOMOU / NurPhoto via AFP Although the ICC has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in its 125 member countries, some nations, including the US, China, Russia, and Israel, do not recognise its authority. It has high-profile war crimes investigations under way into the Israel-Hamas conflict and Russia's war in Ukraine, as well as in Sudan, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Venezuela. The sanctions freeze any US assets the individuals may have and essentially cut them off from the US financial system. Guillou is an ICC judge who presided over a pre-trial panel that issued the arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Khan and Niang are the court's two deputy prosecutors. Netanyahu's office issued a statement welcoming the US sanctions. Canadian Judge Kimberly Prost served on an ICC appeals chamber that, in March 2020, unanimously authorised the ICC prosecutor to investigate alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Afghanistan since 2003, including examining the role of US service members. Global Affairs Canada and the office of Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ICC sanctions, including against Prost. The Trump administration's dislike of the court goes back to his first term. In 2020, Washington imposed sanctions on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and one of her top aides over the court's work on Afghanistan. - Reuters
1News
13 hours ago
- 1News
Kiwi mum speaks to media after three weeks in US detainment centre
New Zealand mother Sarah Shaw has spoken to media for the first time since her release, describing her three-week stay in a US detainment centre. Shaw and her six-year-old son Isaac were held at the Dilley, Texas facility for three weeks after a mix-up with her visa at the Canadian border. Speaking to King 5 news in her home state of Washington, still wearing an ankle monitor and facing further court dates, she described living in close quarters with dozens of other detainees, six-year-old Isaac constantly with her. "If I needed to go to the bathroom, Isaac was there, yelling at me outside the stall. If I wanted to take a shower, he had to come with me, so we were completely joined at the hip." She was detained on July 24, after driving across the border to Vancouver to put two of her three children onto a direct flight to New Zealand to visit their grandparents. ADVERTISEMENT The issue arose when she tried to re-enter the US, without both parts of her visa renewed. "I'd spoke to my attorney about it, and she'd said, 'You'll be fine, your paperwork's all valid'. She was kind of like, that would be worst-case-scenario. But I really didn't think that was going to happen." Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son have been detained by US immigration officials after she tried to return to America from a trip to Canada. (Source: 1News) She was detained by immigration officials and flown to a centre in Dilley, Texas – the nearest one which could accommodate families. Her lawyer Minda Thorward told RNZ on Tuesday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement had caved to the pressure, following international media coverage and involvement from New Zealand and US state officials. But she was released with none of her documents and wearing an ankle monitor. She was dropped off in Laredo, Texas, a two-and-a-half-hour drive from San Antonio airport, where her flight home was booked from – only just making it onto the plane because of flight delays. ADVERTISEMENT Now, with more court appearances ahead of her, she was working with her lawyer to get her anklet removed. Customs and Border Patrol told King 5 news: "When someone with an expired parole leaves the country and tries to re-enter the US, they will be stopped in compliance with our laws and regulations. "If they are accompanied by a minor, Customs and Border Patrol will follow all protocols to keep families together, or arrange care with a legal guardian." A GoFundMe page set up to help pay her bills and rent while she was detained had by Wednesday afternoon raised more than NZ$105,000 (more than US$61,000). The page description has been updated thanking people for their support and noting "the fight is not over".
