The Royal Mail won't deliver my post because of ‘health and safety gone mad'
But Royal Mail has now made the 62-year-old's life a 'nightmare' by refusing to deliver to her home and the hamlet's seven other residents, she says, claiming the bumpy, pothole-ridden dirt track the settlement sits along makes it too 'dangerous' to do so.
In recent correspondence sent to Bennallick, who relies on her post to manage hospital appointments for multiple sclerosis, Royal Mail said its employees were no longer willing to deliver her mail as the road posed a risk to their 'health and safety'.
Instead, the letter seen by The Telegraph proposed she undertake a 14-mile round trip to collect her post from a depot in Okehampton. After doing so a number of times, Bennallick asked the company whether she could receive her post at a nearby post office in Hatherleigh – roughly one mile away – instead. Royal Mail has now confirmed she and the other residents in Essworthy may do so. But the sense of frustration at being cut off from direct deliveries remains.
'Would anyone really be happy with having to do that trip every time you thought you might have mail?' Bennallick says from her country home. 'This is health and safety gone mad. I know the road is not very good, but by doing this Royal Mail is screwing over the small people.'
Her saga takes place while Royal Mail is in the midst of a major shake-up. Under new proposals put forward by its regulator, Ofcom, the postal service's quality-of-service targets will be watered down, with the delivery of second-class post to be halted on alternate weekdays and Saturdays.
Critics have accused the company, which lost £348 million in 2024 – when it was bought by Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský – of having 'systematically failed' to meet its statutory obligations in recent years.
'I've lived here for 10 years and always had lovely posties who would just throw open my front door and stop for a chat,' says Bennallick. 'But now they've stopped delivering.'
Canvassing the opinions of those who have made a home of this remote hamlet, which enjoys views of native woodland and the Hatherleigh Moor, it is clear the road has been a problem for some time.
A protected bridleway, which cannot be tarmacked or concreted over, maintenance of the track falls upon the five properties to which it leads – one of which is now derelict.
Two years ago, some of the residents clubbed together and spent £2,000 filling in the worst of its offending potholes.But following heavy rains this winter, the narrow lane is once again riddled with deep cavities and uneven ground, which strain any vehicles trying to make their way down it. Some locals say it needs £80,000-worth of repairs.
Still, Bennallick, a retired teacher who drives a Ford Fiesta, insists that many vehicles regularly traverse the road despite its poor condition, casting question marks over Royal Mail's health and safety claims. 'All types of delivery vans come down,' she says. 'And oil tankers and tractors. So why can't Royal Mail?'
'On the Scottish island of Kerrera, they used to have posties who went about on quad bikes to deliver to rural locations. But clearly this isn't possible in darkest Devon. How many others are being refused like me?' Bennallick says her post stopped coming in December, and claims there was no initial warning from Royal Mail that it would no longer be delivered to her home.When she was made aware the service had been curtailed, Bennallick discovered she had missed important letters from the hospital – which were therefore weeks out of date.Royal Mail has since apologised for the lack of communication, but stands firm in its decision to cancel deliveries to Essworthy.
In a letter seen by The Telegraph signed by Simon Broad, the customer operations manager at Okehampton depot, it said delivery staff were 'unable to deliver to the address safely… due to the condition of the access track'.
It went on to describe the track as a 'real health and safety concern', adding it presents the 'potential for an accident'.
The letter said that deliveries had been suspended with immediate effect until 'modifications or improvements' to the road are carried out, and 'the risks have been sufficiently removed or mitigated'.
It directed Bennallick to the depot in Okehampton – open between 8am and 10am on Monday to Friday, or 8am to 12pm on Saturdays – to collect her post. If letters were not picked up within 18 days, they would be returned to the sender, Royal Mail's letter explained.
Bennallick says her condition makes it difficult to collect the post, rather than have it delivered to her door, given issues with finding parking and having to queue – all without the certainty there are even any letters waiting for her. 'Despite having MS, I don't have a blue badge,' she says.
A neighbour of Bennallick, who did not wish to be named, says Royal Mail's decision has forced him to resort to buying a large personal post-box for £80, which will be stationed at the end of the lane for deliveries.'I completely sympathise with my neighbour, but I do also understand Royal Mail's point of view,' he says. 'The road is poor, and my local taxi driver has also stopped coming down it.'A spokesman for Royal Mail said: 'Deliveries were suspended for four properties due to concerns from the local team about the poor quality of the private road leading to them. We have spoken to Mrs Bennallick and provided her with a solution.'
But the residents of Essworthy are far from alone in their struggles, it seems, with other areas in the region reporting delivery issues.
'We have a post 'shed' at the end of our drive as we live on a moor and Royal Mail will not deliver to us either,' a post on the Hatherleigh Facebook page reads.
'It works OK most of the time but we did have an item stolen once. We now get anything valuable delivered to a friend's house. Incidentally, Tesco delivers to our house every week and a baby oil tanker – it's just RM [Royal Mail] who won't deliver.'
Another, who lives 10 minutes' drive away in Exbourne, added: 'I have [also] had this issue. You need to travel along a lane that isn't in the best condition but by no means dangerous.
'I was told that if I didn't put a post box at the end of my lane I would no longer be able to have my mail delivered.'
The complaints come amid wider concerns over the company's standards. One outlet for such gripes is the Royal Mail Unofficial Complaints Group, another Facebook page. 'There have been several posts recently about rural areas no longer being served by RM [Royal Mail],' one recent post on the page read. 'The contract RM [Royal Mail] have is to deliver to all addresses for the same price.'
The plans put forward by Ofcom for scaled-back deliveries have attracted particular ire. The charity Age UK said many older people would view the proposals as 'just another staging post in the progressive decline of the post'.
The regulator and Royal Mail have been quick to defend themselves from such criticism.
Ofcom estimates that the move to stop delivering second-class post on alternate weekdays and Saturdays will enable Royal Mail to achieve annual net cost savings of between £250 million and £425 million, which 'could enable it to improve reliability and redeploy existing resources to growth areas such as parcels'.
Natalie Black, Ofcom's group director for networks and communications, says: 'The world has changed – we're sending a third of the letters we were 20 years ago.
'We need to reform the postal service to protect its future and ensure it delivers for the whole of the UK.'Emma Gilthorpe, Royal Mail's chief executive, says: 'Ofcom has recognised the urgent need for change so that the future of the universal service can be protected for all.
'Our proposal… is designed to preserve what matters most for our customers – maintaining a one-price-goes-anywhere service to 32 million UK addresses and first class deliveries six days a week.'Back in Essworthy, Bennallick is far from convinced. The service is failing, she says, and others will suffer yet.
'I just want to have my post delivered. I don't want help. I just want what I should rightly have,' says Bennallick.
'Put simply, this is rationalisation. They will cut out awkward deliveries, then only deliver second-class post half the week,' she adds. 'What will be next, and where does it leave old people in rural locations?'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
Czech Opposition Party Pledges to End Austerity If Wins Election
The Czech Republic must drop its penchant for 'fiscal self-flagellation' in favor of investing in economic growth, according to a senior official from an opposition party poised to sweep to victory in October elections. The central European nation of 11 million will hold a parliamentary ballot in less than two months as voters decide whether to extend the mandate of an administration that's placed its bets on budget belt-tightening — or replace it with a populist billionaire who aims to return to office on promises for ramped up spending.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Property giant hit by whistleblower allegations
A FTSE 250 property giant has hired lawyers to investigate claims about its company culture made by a whistleblower, The Telegraph can reveal. Bosses at Great Portland Estates told staff late last week that a law firm had been called in to conduct an investigation into its culture after concerns were raised by a former employee of the West End-based property giant. On Friday, executives held an all-company call to inform employees of the investigation amid concerns that the whistleblower was about to go public. The investigation is expected to be completed in a matter of weeks, with the findings shared with non-executives on the board who will then decide what actions, if any, must be taken. Toby Courtauld, the chief executive, did not go into specifics about the nature of the allegations but said he did not recognise the picture painted of Great Portland Estates' culture. In the call with staff on Friday, Mr Courtauld said the company's culture was one where staff looked out for each other and respected one another. In its last annual report in May, Great Portland Estates said that 86pc of its employees said they felt comfortable and accepted at work, up from 79pc in early 2024. It said its 'overall favourability rating' had increased from 74pc in February 2024 to 78pc in February 2025. News of the investigation threatens to cast a shadow over the property giant, which is one of London's biggest office landlords. The company owns office space across the capital, with a total portfolio of properties worth £2.9bn. Great Portland Estates' holdings include buildings at prestigious addresses in London such as Regent Street and Piccadilly. The decision to bring in an outside law firm will be viewed as a sign of the seriousness with which it is taking the allegations. Under Great Portland Estates' whistleblowing policy, matters reported to the company by employees are initially investigated by its general counsel and company secretary or the senior independent director. Great Portland Estates declined to comment. It come amid a wider rise in the number of whistleblower reports made across corporate Britain. Official data showed the number of whistleblowing claims in the employment tribunal rose 92pc between 2015 and 2023, with lawyers attributing the increase to high-profile cases such as the Post Office scandal. Earlier this year, the estate agent Foxtons was hit by allegations of inappropriate behaviour within the company. In March, Bloomberg reported allegations of unwanted touching and harassment. At the time, Foxtons' chief executive admitted the company had more to do to improve workplace culture. The company said it conducted mandatory annual training for all its employees on issues such as sexual harassment and said it took the allegations extremely seriously. It urged employees to use its whistleblowing process. Great Portland Estates has recently been boosted by the wider crackdown on remote working across corporate Britain, with its value swelling by more than £150m to £1.3bn since the start of the year. In May, the company, which has let space in Fitzrovia, central London, to companies including Next, said it was expecting rents to rise by between 4pc and 7pc this year amid strong demand for office space. Around 90pc of Great Portland Estates' office portfolio is within walking distance of the Elizabeth Line, making its sites attractive for companies trying to convince workers to go back to the office. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten


Newsweek
14-08-2025
- Newsweek
Trump Reportedly Offering Putin Natural Resources Off Alaska Sparks Fury
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A report that President Donald Trump is preparing to offer Russian President Vladimir Putin economic incentives to encourage him to end the war in Ukraine—including opening up access to natural resources off Alaska's coast—has sparked anger online. The Daily Telegraph reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is exploring the economic trade-offs the U.S. can make with Russia in order to facilitate a ceasefire and peace agreement. These include giving Putin access to the rare earth minerals in the Ukrainian territories Moscow partially occupies, as well as opportunities to tap into the natural resources in the Bering Strait between Alaska and Russia's eastern coast. There has been no confirmation that such a proposal is on the table, and Newsweek has contacted the White House and the office of Alaska's governor for comment. The Telegraph cited a White House statement that it did not comment "on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening." But social media users have responded with anger at the prospect of opening up Alaska's natural resources to Russian interests, including Trump critic and former GOP representative Adam Kinzinger who posted on X: "Let's see republicans defend this." Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska is shown in this August 13, 2025 image ahead meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska is shown in this August 13, 2025 image ahead meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir It Matters Trump's America First policy has seen him strike mineral deals with Ukraine and Kazakhstan. While the Telegraph report has not been verified and there are few details, the prospect of opening up resources near Alaska to Putin would bolster Russia's strategic interests in the Arctic region. What To Know Trump will meet Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday as the U.S. leader hopes for a breakthrough in the three-and-a-half-year war, following previous negotiations involving his envoy Steve Witkoff and the Russian president's rejection of a U.S. ceasefire proposal. On Wednesday, Trump warned Russia would face "very severe" consequences if it did not stop its war. The Telegraph report said he would present Putin with commercial opportunities in occupied Ukrainian territory as well as the Bering Straits, and that Bessent was exploring the economic trade-offs the U.S. could make with Russia—such as lifting American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry—to expedite a peace deal. Ukraine is estimated to hold 10 percent of the world's reserves of lithium—which is used in the production of batteries— and two of its largest lithium deposits are in Russian-occupied territory. Meanwhile, the area beneath the Bering Straits is thought to hold significant undiscovered oil and gas reserves. 🚨BREAKING: Donald Trump will offer Vladimir Putin rare earth minerals as an economic incentive as per the Telegraph. Trump plans to offer to open up Alaska's natural resources to Russia and lift American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry. Another key element of the… — CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) August 14, 2025 Americans, are you ok with offering Alaskan natural resources to russia? 🤯 — Kate from Kharkiv (@BohuslavskaKate) August 13, 2025 No, no, & no! It's not Trump's place to offer Alaska's resources, just as it's not his place to offer any of Ukraine! He's neither a king nor an emperor. Why does Trump so often submit to Putin? Why is he so easily manipulated? It's highly embarrassing. It seems that, among… — Amy Coplan (@amycoplan) August 14, 2025 What People Are Saying The White House would not comment on the report, telling The Telegraph: "We do not comment on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening. As the president stated, everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and that is what he is working towards." But the prospect of Russia tapping resources so close to the U.S. mainland has sparked an angry response. Kinzinger posted on X: "so hang on.... Trump is going to offer to open up F*** ALASKA TO THE RUSSIANS?? Wow. Let's see republicans defend this." Other X users were also exercised about the reported proposal. X user Amy Coplan wrote: "No, no, & no! It's not Trump's place to offer Alaska's resources, just as it's not his place to offer any of Ukraine! He's neither a king nor an emperor." X user MM posted: "If true, under no circumstance can this be allowed. The president does not own America's resources. PERIOD." Pro-Ukrainian X user Kate from Kharkiv wrote: "Americans, are you ok with offering Alaskan natural resources to russia?" Andreas Østhagen, from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in Oslo, told Newsweek Anchorage was the natural location for the presidents to discuss the surrounding strategic region, with oil and gas exploration, developing the Northern Sea route, and fishing as areas of mutual interest that could be on the agenda. He said that joint exploration in shared areas like the Chukchi Sea, north of the Bering Strait, could be considered. However, offering financial incentives to Putin would be at odds with economic sanctions Trump had threatened previously if Russia refused a ceasefire. He reiterated these Wednesday after a call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and Kyiv's allies. Sanctions have roiled Russia's economy and Trump could use tougher measures as leverage over Putin, said Richard Portes, professor of economics at London Business School. "The Russian economy is in deep trouble and its decline would be accelerated if we were to apply sanctions as fully and rigorously as we could and as Trump sometimes thinks that thinks that he wants to do," Portes told Newsweek. According to Russia's Ministry of Finance, the country's federal budget has a deficit 4.4 times higher than this time last year. A labor shortage, state bailouts for firms and a high key interest rate have added to turbulence. "There is a significant slowdown and I think that slowdown will accelerate if serious economic pressure is applied, Putin is playing a weak hand," Portes added. What Happens Next More diplomatic wrangling involving Kyiv's allies is expected in the coming two days. Thousands of people are expected to gather in Anchorage on Thursday to protest against the arrival of Putin ahead of Friday's summit. Trump told a press conference Wednesday that following the bilateral meeting, there was a chance of a second meeting with Putin that would include Zelensky.