Indian steel producers set to benefit as commerce ministry arm proposes anti-dumping duty on imports from Vietnam
:
India has moved closer to shielding its steelmakers from cheap imports, with the Commerce Ministry's trade remedies arm recommending anti-dumping duties on certain Vietnamese steel products. The move, if enforced, is set to boost giants like Tata Steel, JSW Steel, and Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL).
Last week, the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) proposed a duty of $121.5 per ton of hot-rolled flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel from Vietnam. Once notified by the Centre, the duty will stay in effect for five years.
Hot-rolled coil (HRC) flats are key inputs for welded pipes and tubes, automobiles, and construction. With the tariff in place, Vietnamese steel will turn costlier than finished steel from Indian producers.
India's imports of HRC have more than doubled in just two years, rising from 1.87 million tonnes in FY23 to 3.55 million tonnes in FY24, and further to 4.07 million tonnes in FY25, according to Big Mint, a market intelligence firm.
'The anti-dumping duty addresses the immediate challenge of cheap steel imports, stabilising domestic prices and supporting capacity utilisation," said an executive at one of India's largest steel mills, who did not want to be named.
'In the long term, it encourages domestic investment, strengthens the value chain, and supports India's self-reliance in steel."
Supply–demand equation
Apart from Vietnam, India's biggest steel suppliers include South Korea, Japan, and China. India produced 146.56 million tonnes of finished steel in FY25, of which 54.12 million tonnes was HRC. Consumption outpaced production at 152 million tonnes of finished steel, including 56.90 million tonnes of HRC, according to Big Mint.
According to industry experts, India's current steel production closely matches its total consumption, indicating a market primarily focused on meeting domestic demand. The country mainly relies on imports from South Korea and Japan for certain specialised steel grades that are not produced locally. For grades where domestic capacity exists, India has implemented protectionist measures such as safeguard and anti-dumping duties to support its producers.
Vietnamese HRC imports made up 11% of India's HRC inflows last year, falling to 0.45 million tonnes (mt) in FY25 from 0.62 mt in FY24, according to Big Mint.
Pattern of crackdowns
This isn't India's first action.
Similar tariffs exist on seamless tubes and pipes and stainless steel pipes and tubes imported from China, electro-galvanised steel from Korea, Japan and Singapore, and welded stainless steel pipes and tubes from Vietnam and Thailand, according to a submission made by H. D. Kumaraswamy, Union Minister of Steel, in the Rajya Sabha on 12 August.
DGTR noted that dumped imports hurt profitability and returns of Indian mills. 'There is also a threat of further aggravated injury…if anti-dumping duty is not imposed," said DGTR in a report.
Price pressure remains
However, while imports fell after the expiry of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification for Vietnamese mills, the lower prices continue to pressure domestic steel prices. Hence, the duty imposition will have a significant impact in the coming years.
In a post-earnings interview with Mint, JSW Steel CEO Jayant Archarya explained that import prices continue to influence the domestic market regardless of volumes.
According to Big Mint CEO Dhruv Goel, the short-term impact will be minimal, but the move could be significant over time. 'Vietnam is emerging as a major steel producer and can easily export to India, especially under the ASEAN free trade agreement," said Goel.
In simple words, with the duty in place, countries with Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) that earlier exported steel to India at little or no duty, making it cheaper, will no longer be able to do so.
SAIL welcomed the move, saying imports of carbon steel flat products from Vietnam had 'surged manifolds in the last few years". 'This is not only impacting domestic steel producers in the short term by taking away market share, but is also negatively impacting the long-term visibility and growth prospects for the domestic steel industry, which requires huge investments for its steelmaking infrastructure," said a company spokesperson.
'If corrective measures are not taken, this trend shall seriously impair the required growth of the domestic industry for meeting the growing national steel requirements. While the present duty on Vietnam shall in the short term help arrest the surge in imports, it will also convey the message to the world that India is ready and able to take appropriate measures wherever required to protect its economy," it added.
JSW Steel, Tata Steel, Jindal Steel Limited, and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India did respond to Mint's queries.
Earlier, JSW's Acharya had also flagged risks from such trade routes. During the analyst call for the last quarter of FY25, Acharya said the company remains watchful of imports from 'countries like Vietnam, Japan and Korea, which have an FTA agreement with us (India), continue to pose risk".
The DGTR had started an investigation last year on the concerning imports from Vietnam after the Indian Steel Association had applied on behalf of domestic producers, like JSW Steel and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Limited, for the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
18 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars
India misread the tariffs brought on by the United States and, at a broader level, the Trump administration. We were one of the first to approach the US on this matter, and we continued to believe that we would have a favourable deal till recently, given what we felt was a great rapport between Modi and Trump. Mainstream electronic media houses were complicit in driving this narrative. To understand why India got it wrong, it would be useful to connect two disparate data dots. Top that with India's misreading of Trump's desire to be seen as a look at the first irritant and its impact. India exports roughly $90 billion, paying approximately 2 per cent tariffs currently, and imports roughly $45 billion at 12 per cent tariffs. The trade deficit of $45 billion carries a tariff differential of $5 billion per year in India's favour after adjusting for exempted products. We should have seen this imbalance in America's trade deficit and tariffs long ago and proactively addressed this. Modi is now overhauling the tax rates in a bid to boost the economy. This is expected to cost $20 billion, four times the tariff differential India was enjoying. .The other irritant is oil imports. In 2021/22, India imported roughly 2.5 million barrels of oil every day. Under the tacit approval of the West, India's imports from Russia grew from 2 per cent then to 40 per cent today. India buys 45 per cent of the exported oil from Russia, a growth of 1900 per cent from pre-war levels. China buys the same percentage, a growth of 50 per cent from pre-war levels. So why did India need this extra oil suddenly? It was because we processed this extra oil and sold it for a profit overseas. Therefore, the rhetoric is misplaced, as we are profiting and fuelling the Russian war machine. Predicting the flow of events, we should have scaled down our offtake back to the 2022 levels and with that, justify our need to fuel the Indian economy and keep inflationary tendencies in check. We have now started to do this, drawing a balance between the US and predict that the impact of tariffs at 25 per cent is likely to be in the region of $11-12 billion per annum on tariffed goods and about 0.25 per cent on GDP. In the earliest days of cranking up our imports of oil, the difference was around $30 a barrel, leading to a gain of $16 billion. That has now come down to around $5 a barrel after accounting for logistics, etc. The benefit we get is estimated today to be only $3.5 billion, a delta of $8.5 billion from what we lose out on with the long commentators have suggested many responses, ranging from the knee-jerk to keeping the long-term in mind. The real issue is what we do now. There is no pattern in the madness. Why have the four treatments of the BRIC countries been different? Because there is a different playbook with each one. With Brazil, the US has a trade surplus. Why then, do they have tariffs of 50 per cent, which is higher than China and equal to India? Bolsonaro? With China, 150 per cent was brought down to 30 per cent; here, it is about the rare earths. For the quantities required, the ecosystem is expensive, and the returns don't work out for a commercial operation. The CCP subsidised this for leverage and their long-term plans to pursue electric mobility and clean energy. This leverage on supplies was used to resolve the $650 billion of trade at stake between the US and China. .India made public its hypocritical treatment at the hands of the US, as it bought palladium, uranium, etc. from Russia. However, the reality is that US imports from Russia were at best $3 billion, down some 45 per cent from the previous year. India's imports from Russia stood at $70 billion, almost twice what it imports from the must now not get caught in the whirlpool of its rhetoric. And it certainly must not seek to appease China and Russia in a hurry and on the rebound. One can expect that this is short-term. There are many moving parts – Russia and Ukraine could arrive at a truce as early as next month. India has already started to demonstrate it is willing to reduce its import of Russian oil while not displeasing Russia. The midterms in the US could go against Trump, and the US courts could reverse Trump's executive decisions. Importantly, Trump does not define the long-standing US relationship with India. Trump himself may not have a long-term view on this the US, it seems clear. The average tariff on its imports has seen inflows of $28 billion, three times post these levies were collected in June. This aggregates to $350 billion. Add to this DOGE cuts and some others, and we have $500 billion being saved or added to the US treasury. This pays half its annual interest cost of $1 trillion, which, if left alone, is not sustainable. This is good for no one, as it is the world's biggest market by the short term, one sees no harm in subtly managing the relationships and dynamics at play and being practical. In the long term, anyway, as economist John Maynard Keynes said, we are all dead..(The writer is the former managing director of a Tata Company and now runs a Bengaluru-headquartered corporate finance practice)


NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
Want To Live In Portugal? Indians Can Apply For A Golden Visa But There's A Catch
Known for its beautiful coastline and rich history, Portugal has emerged as one of Europe's most attractive destinations for Indians seeking permanent residency (PR). With its unique culture and high quality of life, Portugal offers a Golden Visa that allows you to stay and live there. What Is Portugal's Golden Visa? The Portugal Golden Visa is a residency by investment program that allows you to live, work, and study in the country. It also gives visa-free access to the Schengen Area. It also opens up an oppotunity for Indian citizens a chance to secure residency in Portugal and eventually EU citizenship through qualifying investments. Who Is Eligible? You can apply for a Portugal Golden Visa if you meet the following requirements: Should be 18 years or older. Open to all non-EU/EEA/Swiss nationals, including Indians. A clean criminal record from Indian or any other country where they have lived recently. Someone who can either purchase a property, transfer capital, or invest in businesses or funds. Applicant must stay in the country for 7-14 days per year to maintain residency. The catch? You need to invest a hefty amount of funds to obtain Portugal's Golden Visa. There are different types of investments that you can do, including: A fund subscription, which basically includes a minimum of €500,000 subscription in a qualifying Portuguese fund, such as Venture Capital funds and Private Equity. Start a new business wherein you create 10 new full-time jobs in Portugal. Invest a minimum of €500,000 in an existing Portuguese business and create five full-time jobs for at least 3 years. Make a donation of €500,000 for a research and development activity in Portugal. You can also invest €250,000 in preserving national heritage in Portugal. Note: As per the latest update, the real estate investment is no longer an option after October 2023 for new applicants. Documents Required Completed the Golden Visa application form A valid passport issued within the last 10 years and with a validity of 3 months Passport-sized photographs Police clearance certificate Proof of investments Portuguese bank statement confirming the investment transfer A statement stating investment for 5 years A valid health insurance covering at least €30,000 in the Schengen states Tax and social security clearance from Portugal, issued within 45 days Proof of fee payment for the application and processing How To Apply Step 1: Get a Portugese Tax Number and a bank account for completing an investment. Step 2: Make the investment by transferring funds from outside Portugal and complete the qualifying investment. The investment must be maintained for at least 5 years. Step 3: All documents must be notarized, apostilled, and translated into Portuguese if necessary. Step 4: Submit the application online, which is filed through Potugal's official immigration portal (AIMA or Agencia para a Integracao, Migracoes e Asilo). Step 5: Once the application is approved, you must travel to Portugal to provide fingerprints and photos. Step 6: The initial residence permit is valid for 2 years, renewable for another 3 years, leading to permanent residency and citizenship after 5 years. As per the latest update, the Portuguese government proposed some changes to the nationality law that may change Golden Visa rules. However, the proposal is currently under review. It is recommended to keep following the official website for the latest updates.


Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Retail fuel margins propel oil PSUs' Q1 net up 2.5-fold
Synopsis Indian Oil Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum, and Bharat Petroleum saw profits rise significantly in the June quarter. High retail margins on petrol and diesel fueled this growth. However, inventory losses impacted refining margins. Discounts on Russian crude are shrinking. Some refiners are delaying Russian oil orders due to potential US penalties. Government compensation for LPG under-recoveries may provide additional support. iStock Indian Oil Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL) posted a combined profit of ₹16,184 crore in the quarter to June, an increase of more than two and a half times year-on-year, buoyed by extraordinary retail margins on petrol and diesel despite heavy inventory earned the state-run oil marketers an estimated ₹10.3 per litre at the pump, up from ₹ 4.4 a year earlier, while diesel fetched ₹8.2 per litre versus ₹2.5, according to brokerage ICICI Securities. These gains came from a domestic price freeze even as international fuel prices slid - crude down 21%, petrol 18% and diesel 16%, as per petroleum and natural gas ministry data. The sharp fall in crude, however, inflicted large inventory losses, eroding refining margins. Indian Oil Corporation alone booked an inventory loss of ₹6,465 crore in the June quarter against a gain of ₹3,345 crore in the year-ago period. Its gross refining margin (GRM) fell to $2.15 a barrel from $6.39. Adjusted for inventory swings, GRM improved to $6.91, compared with $2.84 last expect strong marketing margins to persist if crude prices remain soft and domestic pump rates stay unchanged. But refiners face headwinds as imports of discounted Russian oil become less certain and price discounts narrow, eroding the crude-cost advantage. Companies are also diversifying their crude basket to manage supply risks. Discounts on Russian crude have shrunk to $1.5-2 per barrel, according to industry executives. Some Indian refiners are delaying orders for September-loading Russian oil cargoes as they await clarity on how US President Donald Trump's proposed 25% oil purchase-linked penalty will play out. The penalty takes effect on August 27, and some refiners are unwilling to take chances. For refiners, additional earnings support in this quarter could come from the government's decision to release ₹30,000 crore to compensate oil companies for LPG under-recoveries.