logo
The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars

The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars

Deccan Herald2 hours ago
India misread the tariffs brought on by the United States and, at a broader level, the Trump administration. We were one of the first to approach the US on this matter, and we continued to believe that we would have a favourable deal till recently, given what we felt was a great rapport between Modi and Trump. Mainstream electronic media houses were complicit in driving this narrative. To understand why India got it wrong, it would be useful to connect two disparate data dots. Top that with India's misreading of Trump's desire to be seen as a peacemaker..Let's look at the first irritant and its impact. India exports roughly $90 billion, paying approximately 2 per cent tariffs currently, and imports roughly $45 billion at 12 per cent tariffs. The trade deficit of $45 billion carries a tariff differential of $5 billion per year in India's favour after adjusting for exempted products. We should have seen this imbalance in America's trade deficit and tariffs long ago and proactively addressed this. Modi is now overhauling the tax rates in a bid to boost the economy. This is expected to cost $20 billion, four times the tariff differential India was enjoying. .The other irritant is oil imports. In 2021/22, India imported roughly 2.5 million barrels of oil every day. Under the tacit approval of the West, India's imports from Russia grew from 2 per cent then to 40 per cent today. India buys 45 per cent of the exported oil from Russia, a growth of 1900 per cent from pre-war levels. China buys the same percentage, a growth of 50 per cent from pre-war levels. So why did India need this extra oil suddenly? It was because we processed this extra oil and sold it for a profit overseas. Therefore, the rhetoric is misplaced, as we are profiting and fuelling the Russian war machine. Predicting the flow of events, we should have scaled down our offtake back to the 2022 levels and with that, justify our need to fuel the Indian economy and keep inflationary tendencies in check. We have now started to do this, drawing a balance between the US and Russia..Experts predict that the impact of tariffs at 25 per cent is likely to be in the region of $11-12 billion per annum on tariffed goods and about 0.25 per cent on GDP. In the earliest days of cranking up our imports of oil, the difference was around $30 a barrel, leading to a gain of $16 billion. That has now come down to around $5 a barrel after accounting for logistics, etc. The benefit we get is estimated today to be only $3.5 billion, a delta of $8.5 billion from what we lose out on with tariffs..Play the long game.Many commentators have suggested many responses, ranging from the knee-jerk to keeping the long-term in mind. The real issue is what we do now. There is no pattern in the madness. Why have the four treatments of the BRIC countries been different? Because there is a different playbook with each one. With Brazil, the US has a trade surplus. Why then, do they have tariffs of 50 per cent, which is higher than China and equal to India? Bolsonaro? With China, 150 per cent was brought down to 30 per cent; here, it is about the rare earths. For the quantities required, the ecosystem is expensive, and the returns don't work out for a commercial operation. The CCP subsidised this for leverage and their long-term plans to pursue electric mobility and clean energy. This leverage on supplies was used to resolve the $650 billion of trade at stake between the US and China. .India made public its hypocritical treatment at the hands of the US, as it bought palladium, uranium, etc. from Russia. However, the reality is that US imports from Russia were at best $3 billion, down some 45 per cent from the previous year. India's imports from Russia stood at $70 billion, almost twice what it imports from the US..India must now not get caught in the whirlpool of its rhetoric. And it certainly must not seek to appease China and Russia in a hurry and on the rebound. One can expect that this is short-term. There are many moving parts – Russia and Ukraine could arrive at a truce as early as next month. India has already started to demonstrate it is willing to reduce its import of Russian oil while not displeasing Russia. The midterms in the US could go against Trump, and the US courts could reverse Trump's executive decisions. Importantly, Trump does not define the long-standing US relationship with India. Trump himself may not have a long-term view on this matter..For the US, it seems clear. The average tariff on its imports has seen inflows of $28 billion, three times post these levies were collected in June. This aggregates to $350 billion. Add to this DOGE cuts and some others, and we have $500 billion being saved or added to the US treasury. This pays half its annual interest cost of $1 trillion, which, if left alone, is not sustainable. This is good for no one, as it is the world's biggest market by far..In the short term, one sees no harm in subtly managing the relationships and dynamics at play and being practical. In the long term, anyway, as economist John Maynard Keynes said, we are all dead..(The writer is the former managing director of a Tata Company and now runs a Bengaluru-headquartered corporate finance practice)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Visa Chaos, Harvard Shock & Canada Cap: What's Next for Indian Students Abroad?
Visa Chaos, Harvard Shock & Canada Cap: What's Next for Indian Students Abroad?

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Visa Chaos, Harvard Shock & Canada Cap: What's Next for Indian Students Abroad?

Visa clampdowns, fake documents, and even Harvard's shock move—global education is shifting fast. Where does that leave Indian students? From CBSE vs IB competitiveness to whether Canada is still worth it, and if Asia is the new frontier, Namita Mehta, President and Partner, The Red Pen, breaks it all down. We dive into ROI across US, UK, Europe, and Canada, the misinformation crisis in visas, and the real opportunities in Ireland, Netherlands, and beyond. This is your essential guide to navigating the new study abroad landscape.

Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House
Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House

Hindustan Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump took several actions, including the secondary tariffs on India, to bring the war in Ukraine to an end. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible.(AFP) This reiteration comes as a top US official said that India made "huge" profits on the sale of Russian oil during and after the war in Ukraine, and Trump said that his sanctions on New Delhi probably played a role in Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting him. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war and he has rejected the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meetings takes place." She asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the "best conversation" he had with the US President so far. Scott Bessent on India tariffs US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, while speaking to CNBC, argued why China has not yet seen any penalties for buying Russian oil, while the case for India has been otherwise. He said that the treatment is different because India has been "profiteering" and "making billions" from its reselling of the oil. Bessent said India had "less than 1 per cent" of its oil from Russia "and now its up to 42 per cent". He added, "India is just profiteering, they are reselling... They made 16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India." "This is a completely different thing. Indian arbitrage, which is buying cheap oil and reselling it, has just sprung up during the [Ukraine] war. This is just unacceptable," Bessent added. Top US advisor criticises India over Russian oil trade Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to "hit India where it hurts" to get New Delhi to change its policy. He termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to end the war in Ukraine and isolate the Russian economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times. Before his meeting with Putin in Alaska last week, Trump had told a Fox News Radio show that his 'penalty' on India prompted the Russian President to meet him, saying that "everything has an impact". The US President said that when he told India about the doubled tariffs, it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia". He noted that India is the second largest purchaser of Russian oil and said it was getting pretty close to China, the largest buyer of oil from Russia. Before Trump doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent, he said that India was "fueling the war machine" by buying oil from Russia.

Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal
Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal

India.com

time18 minutes ago

  • India.com

Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal

New Delhi: After U.S. President Donald Trump signalled the possibility of higher tariffs on Indian exports, China renewed its pitch to bring India into a zero-tariff Asian trade market. Extending access to a massive consumer base, the offer has been positioned as a strategic opportunity. Analysts say the proposal, however, could pose a far more significant challenge for India than Trump's tariff threats. India's market is enormous. A population of 1.4 billion, coupled with a growing middle class and strong purchasing power, makes it one of the most attractive markets in the world. Global powers cannot achieve maximum economic leverage in the region without India's participation. In response to the rising pressure from Washington, China has once again invited India to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Beijing has been lobbying for New Delhi's inclusion in the RCEP since 2019, offering zero tariffs as a key incentive. Still, India has repeatedly declined. It is wary of Beijing's ambitions and the potential risks to its domestic industries. Understanding RCEP The RCEP is a free-trade agreement encompassing 15 countries: 10 ASEAN members and five of their Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners – China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. The RCEP is the world's largest trade bloc, representing nearly 30 percent of global GDP and covering roughly three billion people. The agreement aims to simplify trade rules, reduce barriers and integrate the markets of its member nations. Signed in November 2020, the RCEP came into effect on January 1, 2022. Its primary goals include lowering or eliminating tariffs, easing non-tariff restrictions and facilitating cross-border investment and commerce. China's Perspective China's state-run Global Times highlighted India's growing vulnerability due to its heavy reliance on the U.S. market, especially in light of Trump's proposed 50 percent tariff increases. The newspaper argued that diversifying toward Asian markets could not only mitigate risks but also provide India with strategic flexibility and greater market opportunities. According to the daily, India must actively explore alternative markets. Asia's expansive economies and untapped potential could provide India with a more stable path for growth. The paper suggested that joining the RCEP would represent a critical step toward restructuring India's trade orientation within the region. The publication also emphasised 'long-term benefits'. Over next 10 to 15 years, it says, RCEP's zero-tariff framework could apply to 90 percent of goods. For India, the daily says, this could act as a protective buffer against the volatility of U.S. trade policies, while opening access to a dynamic and growing market. India's Concerns India has consistently expressed reservations about the RCEP. The government believes the agreement does not adequately reflect India's interests and could have unbalanced outcomes. A primary concern is the potential impact on domestic industries. Cheap imports from China and other Asian nations could flood the Indian market, undermining local manufacturing and making it difficult for Indian products to compete. China's production efficiency exacerbates this risk. India had proposed mechanisms to limit imports of certain goods exceeding set thresholds, but negotiations failed to yield consensus. India also faces a significant trade deficit with China, which reached $99.2 billion in the 2024-25 fiscal year. Joining the RCEP without safeguards could worsen this imbalance. For China, India's inclusion is both an economic and geopolitical priority, supporting regional dominance and the Belt and Road Initiative. India continues to prioritise national interests, self-reliance and strategic autonomy. The government aims to maintain control over supply chains and assert a strong position in any scenario that may challenge its trade or geopolitical stance vis-à-vis China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store