logo
Comedy influencer rips California law doubling his ambulance bill after he provided proof of insurance

Comedy influencer rips California law doubling his ambulance bill after he provided proof of insurance

Yahoo29-03-2025
Comedy influencer Robby Witt is calling out California state legislators for recent laws that have added new fees and confusing insurance "discounts" to first responder services. One of these laws made it so that the bill for his young daughter's ambulance ride became more than twice as expensive after he provided proof of insurance.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Witt slammed the lawmakers behind Ab 716, a law that went into effect in California last year that gives uninsured individuals discounts on healthcare payments. It turns out that in Witt's case, having insurance doubled the price of the ambulance bill compared to if he was not insured – the "opposite" of how he thought it should work.
"Your whole life you've been told, right? Like, you want to buy health insurance so that if something – God forbid – happens, then you will get a lower rate than if you didn't have the insurance. Like, that's what we've all been told our whole lives. And then the exact opposite happened," Witt, who has more than 580,000 TikTok followers, told Fox.
Blue Sanctuary State Operating As 'Control' Center For Vicious Migrant Gang: Acting Dea Chief
Though he's from the Los Angeles area, Witt also ripped the San Jose City Council for voting unanimously this week to allow its fire department to bill locals $427 for emergency medical care starting in 2026.
As a local NBC Bay Area affiliate reported, "demand for emergency medical care significantly increased after the COVID-19 pandemic -- with 911 incidents reaching all-time highs since 2022," leading to the proposal from Fire Chief Robert Sapien.
Read On The Fox News App
"Implementing a first responder fee will align the department with other medical care providers, helping our community to sustain critical life safety services through cost recovery from medical care payers," Sapien told the San Jose Spotlight.
With the city's approval, San Jose's Fire Department joins 23 other fire departments across the state that have implemented first responder fees.
Witt told Fox he disagrees with the added fees.
"We pay high taxes in CA to fund the fire departments. I don't like the idea of turning around to nickel and dime people in their time of need. As Americans, we have always been told you pay your taxes and that goes towards police and fire, etc.," he said.
"And now you still pay your taxes, but here comes an additional bill. That doesn't sit right," he said, adding his own advice for the government: "If the states/counties/cities could mix in a little operational efficiency with our tax dollars [they] could keep these services running without the need to go after citizens for new fees. That's the recipe."
Maine Universities Agree To Keep Transgender Athletes Out Of Women's Sports After Trump Admin Pauses Funding
However, California's statewide AB 716 law is the one that hit the young father too close to home.
Witt went viral on TikTok last month with a video depicting his phone call with a healthcare company after his daughter took an ambulance to the hospital for an allergic reaction to food.
During the clip, which has been viewed more than 30 million times, Witt detailed his confusion to a customer service member over the $600 ambulance bill somehow morphing into a $1,300 bill after he provided proof of insurance.
"We got a bill and then we realized that you guys didn't have our insurance, so we sent you the insurance and it looks like the bill went up," Witt told the representative in the now-viral clip.
"OK, yeah, so the first thing you received, that's a discount that you received if you're uninsured. So, you're not eligible for the discount since you are insured," the person on the line responded.
As the representative explained to him, Witt's insurance paid $1,078.85 of the $2,342.14 ambulance ride, leaving him with nearly $1,300 left to pay. Had he never provided proof of insurance, California law would have capped his payment at $600.
"OK, so I'll get cheaper healthcare if I'm uninsured?" Witt asked the rep, pointing out the ridiculousness of his situation.
Trump Visits California After Ripping 'Idiot' Newsom On Wildfire; Critics Bash Crime, Homelessness, Spending
As the representative explained on the call, Witt's original bill being so low was due to the California law, which mandates that "a ground ambulance provider shall not require an uninsured patient or self-pay patient to pay an amount more than the established payment by Medi-Cal or Medicare fee-for-service amount, whichever is greater."
The father told Fox he found the reasoning behind the law problematic, noting that people could just opt out of insurance to pay less.
"My real problem, I guess, is that it's based off of insurance and why this bill wasn't written based off of income… So in fact, you could have a higher-income family than me who decides to say, you know what? We're not going to buy insurance. And now, all of a sudden, their ambulance bills are going to be cheaper, even though they're higher income."
He then called out the lawmakers who came up with it.
"And so, you know, sometimes when they go to legislate these things, I don't know if they ran out of IQ points to get it done, but it just doesn't make sense to me that you would offer discounts based on whether someone's insured and not based off of their W-2 income."
Putting the whole situation into perspective, he added, "I paid $10,000 in healthcare premiums a year, and I was worse off on an ambulance ride than if I didn't do that. So just on the ambulance ride, I should have an extra $10,000 back in my pocket, and I would have got a cheaper bill."Original article source: Comedy influencer rips California law doubling his ambulance bill after he provided proof of insurance
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue countdown signals Taylor Swift's sixth 'Showgirl' album: 'Baby, That's Show Business'
Blue countdown signals Taylor Swift's sixth 'Showgirl' album: 'Baby, That's Show Business'

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Blue countdown signals Taylor Swift's sixth 'Showgirl' album: 'Baby, That's Show Business'

Taylor Swift has added another variant to her growing "The Life of a Showgirl" campaign. A shimmering blue countdown clock appeared on her website at 11 a.m. ET on Aug. 21, set to expire at 2 p.m. ET. This marks the third countdown in 10 days that sent Swifties into a frenzy of speculation. Some were hoping for a single release. The timer led to a sixth version of the album available for $29.99. Enter, "Baby, That's Show Business," in a first and only pressing limited run. The "lakeside beach blue sparkle" and "lovely bouquet golden" vinyls are available until Aug. 23 at 1:59 p.m. ET The sixth version is resurfacing the conversation on "Taycapitalism" with fans buzzing over growing fatigue: Influencer Dan Cashio posted a video with an empty threat: "I'm not engaging. You can take your glitter blue and you can... empty my bank account." Taylor Swift 'New Heights' podcast: All the biggest moments about her 'Showgirl' era 3... 2... 1... On Aug. 11, Swift launched a orange countdown leading to a "New Heights" tease followed by a purple one on Aug. 18 that unveiled her "Shiny Bug" variant. Both were four-hour timers. Swift announced her upcoming album, "The Life of a Showgirl," on "New Heights." The concept is the singer's life at the end of the night, after the Eras Tour wrapped. The 12 track album is produced by Max Martin and Shellback — the two Swedish masterminds behind her "1989" and "Reputation" albums — and includes a duet with Sabrina Carpenter. The album is out on Oct. 3. Don't miss any Taylor Swift news; sign up for the free, weekly newsletter This Swift Beat. Follow Taylor Swift reporter Bryan West on Instagram, TikTok and X as @BryanWestTV.

California is too ‘overregulated, expensive, and risky'  for Bed Bath & Beyond, chairman says
California is too ‘overregulated, expensive, and risky'  for Bed Bath & Beyond, chairman says

Los Angeles Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

California is too ‘overregulated, expensive, and risky' for Bed Bath & Beyond, chairman says

As Bed Bath & Beyond emerges from a bankruptcy that forced the closure of all its stores, the company's executive chairman took aim at California, saying he refuses to reopen locations in the state. 'California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive, and risky environments for businesses,' Beyond, Inc. executive chairman Marcus Lemonis said in a statement posted on X. 'It's a system that makes it harder to employ people, harder to keep doors open, and harder to deliver value to customers.' The home goods retailer, once common in strip malls and shopping centers, joins a handful of companies that have denounced California's business environment. Some executives say California's high taxes, high cost of living and stringent environmental regulations hinder businesses trying to thrive. Billionaire In-N-Out owner Lynsi Snyder announced her departure from California earlier this summer, saying that doing business and raising a family in the Golden State was 'not easy.' While In-N-Out's corporate headquarters will remain in the state, several high-profile firms have moved their headquarters out in recent years, including Chevron, Tesla, SpaceX and Charles Schwab. Economists say the state is still one of the world's premier tech hubs and has a lot to offer, including a range of industries and a vast talent pool. Still, more companies have been leaving the state than entering since 2015, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows. After Lemonis disparaged California in his lengthy statement, Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office fired back on X. 'After their bankruptcy and closure of every store, like most Americans, we thought Bed, Bath & Beyond no longer existed,' the post said. 'We wish them well in their efforts to become relevant again.' Bed Bath & Beyond filed for bankruptcy in 2023, after several failed turnaround strategies left the company facing mounting debt. has since bought the company's assets and rebranded as Beyond, Inc. The revamped venture reopened its first store in Nashville earlier this month. Conservative commentator and California gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton said on X he was 'disgusted' by Newsom's 'attack on job-creating businesses.' He recently described California as the 'most hostile business environment in the country.' Lemonis said his decision to keep Bed Bath & Beyond brick-and-mortar locations out of California wasn't about politics. The executive chairman has become a familiar presence on Fox Business Network and once guest-hosted 'The Celebrity Apprentice' alongside future president Donald Trump. California customers will be able to shop for Bed Bath & Beyond products online, Lemonis said.

Uganda agrees to take deported migrants from U.S. if they don't have criminal records
Uganda agrees to take deported migrants from U.S. if they don't have criminal records

Los Angeles Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Uganda agrees to take deported migrants from U.S. if they don't have criminal records

KAMPALA, Uganda — Uganda has agreed to a deal with the United States to take deported migrants as long as they don't have criminal records and are not unaccompanied minors, the foreign ministry said Thursday. The ministry said in a statement that the agreement had been concluded but that terms were still being worked out. It added that Uganda prefers that the migrants sent there be of African nationalities, but did not elaborate on what Uganda might get in return for accepting deportees. The U.S. Embassy in Uganda declined to comment on what it called 'diplomatic negotiations,' but said that diplomats were seeking to uphold President Trump's 'policy of keeping Americans safe.' The Trump administration has been seeking ways to deter migrants from entering the country illegally and to deport those who already have done so, especially those with criminal records and including those who cannot easily be deported to their home country. Human rights activists criticized the deportee deal as possibly going against international law. Henry Okello Oryem, Uganda's state minister for foreign affairs, on Wednesday had denied that any agreement on deportees had been reached, though he said his government was in discussions about 'visas, tariffs, sanctions, and related issues.' He also suggested that his country would draw the line at accepting people associated with criminal groups. 'We are talking about cartels: people who are unwanted in their own countries. How can we integrate them into local communities in Uganda?' he said at the time. Oryem and other Ugandan government officials declined to comment Thursday. Opposition lawmaker Muwada Nkunyingi suggested that such a deal with the United States would give the Ugandan government legitimacy ahead of elections, and urged Washington not to turn a blind eye toward what he described as human rights and governance issues in Uganda. Uganda's leaders will rush into a deal to 'clear their image now that we are heading into the 2026 elections,' Nkunyingi said. Human rights lawyer Nicholas Opio likened a deportee deal to human trafficking, and said it would leave the status of the deportees unclear. 'Are they refugees or prisoners?' he said. 'The proposed deal runs afoul of international law. We are sacrificing human beings for political expediency; in this case because Uganda wants to be in the good books of the United States,' he said. 'That I can keep your prisoners if you pay me; how is that different from human trafficking?' In July, the U.S. deported five men with criminal backgrounds to the southern African kingdom of Eswatini and sent eight more to South Sudan. The men from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Vietnam sent to Eswatini are being held in solitary confinement until they can be deported to their home countries, which could take up to a year. A legal challenge in the U.S had halted the deportation process of the eight men in South Sudan but a Supreme Court ruling eventually cleared the way for them to be sent to South Sudan. Uganda has had challenges with the U.S. after lawmakers passed an anti-homosexuality bill in 2023 that punishes consensual same-sex conduct with penalties including life imprisonment. Washington threatened consequences and the World Bank withheld some funding. In May 2024, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Uganda's parliamentary speaker, her husband and several other officials over corruption and serious abuses of human rights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store