
Rules for portable batteries on planes are changing
The rules around flying with portable batteries are becoming more confusing as some airlines and governments change their policies, citing the risk of fires.
Southwest Airlines is the first of the four biggest U.S. carriers to tighten its rules, citing incidents involving batteries on flights across airlines. Starting Wednesday, it will require passengers to keep portable chargers visible while using them.
Airlines in South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong have also either similarly changed their rules or banned the use of portable chargers in flight since a fire destroyed an Air Busan plane on the tarmac in South Korea in January. It was one of several recent aviation episodes that made travelers anxious.
There is no definitive link between portable batteries and the Air Busan fire, and an investigation is underway.
Because rules vary across airlines, you might find yourself having to repack or turn off batteries when boarding a plane. Here's what you need to know.
Which airlines have changed their rules and why?
Southwest passengers will not be allowed to charge devices while they are stowed in overhead bins. The rule will help flight attendants act more quickly if a battery overheats or catches fire, Southwest said in a statement.
The Federal Aviation Agency requires only that devices containing lithium-ion batteries be kept in carry-on baggage, and the European Union's aviation regulator has similar rules.
Rules vary among Europe's biggest carriers. Ryanair, a low-cost Irish airline, tells passengers to remove lithium batteries before storing bags overhead. Britain's EasyJet and Germany's Lufthansa do not.
The South Korean government now requires that passengers keep portable chargers within arm's reach and out of overhead bins, saying that the rule was implemented to ease anxiety about the risk of battery fires.
Major Taiwanese airlines implemented similar changes after the Air Busan episode. EVA Air and China Airlines announced a ban on using or charging power banks on their planes, although the batteries can still be stored in overhead compartments.
Thai Airways, Thailand's flagship airline, said it would implement a similar ban on using and charging power banks, citing 'incidents of in-flight fires on international airlines, suspected to be linked to power bank usage.' Singapore Airlines and its budget subsidiary, Scoot, also announced new rules.
Malaysia Airlines, the country's flag carrier, has banned using and charging power banks, and storing them in overhead bins. Hong Kong's aviation regulator has put a similar regulation into effect for all of the territory's airlines, including Cathay Pacific.
Since 2016, the International Civil Aviation Organization, which is the United Nations agency that coordinates global aviation regulations, has banned lithium-ion batteries, which are the kind commonly found in power banks, from the cargo holds of passenger planes.
But there is no industry standard on how airlines regulate power banks, said Mitchell Fox, director of the Asia Pacific Center for Aviation Safety.
They have become a part of everyday life only in recent years, and some consumers may be unaware of the risks, he said.
What risks do these batteries pose?
Lithium-ion batteries have been used for decades to power smartphones and laptops and are commonly used in portable power banks.
Each battery has a cell that can heat up quickly in a chain reaction that causes it to catch fire or explode. The FAA warns that this reaction can happen if the battery is damaged, overcharged, overheated or exposed to water. Manufacturing defects are another potential cause.
Some products that use lithium-ion batteries, including smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles, have strict regulations and quality control standards, said Neeraj Sharma, a professor of chemistry at the University of New South Wales in Sydney who studies batteries. Others, such as power banks, e-cigarettes, e-bikes, and scooters, are less regulated, he said, raising the risk of malfunction.
'Make sure you get your devices from reputable manufacturers,' Sharma said.
How often do batteries catch fire on planes?
The frequency of incidents involving lithium-ion batteries on U.S. airlines has been increasing. There were 84 last year, up from 32 in 2016. These included cases in the cabins of both passenger and cargo planes, where batteries caught fire, emitted smoke, or overheated. Portable chargers were the biggest culprit, followed by e-cigarettes, according to the FAA.
For years, airlines around the world have required passengers to pack spare lithium-ion batteries in their carry-on luggage instead of in their checked bags so that any smoke or fire from the batteries can be noticed quickly. In the cargo hold, a fire might not be detected by a plane's automatic fire-extinguishing system until it has become a critical problem.
What do flight crews do when there is a fire?
Fires in plane cabins that are caused by lithium-ion batteries are rarely deadly, and flight crews are generally well prepared to deal with them, said Keith Tonkin, managing director of Aviation Projects, an aviation consulting company in Brisbane, Australia.
In many cases, passengers will notice that their electronics are overheating and inform crew members, who put the device in a thermal containment bag or water, with little disruption to the flight, according to the FAA.
This article originally appeared in

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
5 days ago
- Observer
Rules for portable batteries on planes are changing
The rules around flying with portable batteries are becoming more confusing as some airlines and governments change their policies, citing the risk of fires. Southwest Airlines is the first of the four biggest U.S. carriers to tighten its rules, citing incidents involving batteries on flights across airlines. Starting Wednesday, it will require passengers to keep portable chargers visible while using them. Airlines in South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong have also either similarly changed their rules or banned the use of portable chargers in flight since a fire destroyed an Air Busan plane on the tarmac in South Korea in January. It was one of several recent aviation episodes that made travelers anxious. There is no definitive link between portable batteries and the Air Busan fire, and an investigation is underway. Because rules vary across airlines, you might find yourself having to repack or turn off batteries when boarding a plane. Here's what you need to know. Which airlines have changed their rules and why? Southwest passengers will not be allowed to charge devices while they are stowed in overhead bins. The rule will help flight attendants act more quickly if a battery overheats or catches fire, Southwest said in a statement. The Federal Aviation Agency requires only that devices containing lithium-ion batteries be kept in carry-on baggage, and the European Union's aviation regulator has similar rules. Rules vary among Europe's biggest carriers. Ryanair, a low-cost Irish airline, tells passengers to remove lithium batteries before storing bags overhead. Britain's EasyJet and Germany's Lufthansa do not. The South Korean government now requires that passengers keep portable chargers within arm's reach and out of overhead bins, saying that the rule was implemented to ease anxiety about the risk of battery fires. Major Taiwanese airlines implemented similar changes after the Air Busan episode. EVA Air and China Airlines announced a ban on using or charging power banks on their planes, although the batteries can still be stored in overhead compartments. Thai Airways, Thailand's flagship airline, said it would implement a similar ban on using and charging power banks, citing 'incidents of in-flight fires on international airlines, suspected to be linked to power bank usage.' Singapore Airlines and its budget subsidiary, Scoot, also announced new rules. Malaysia Airlines, the country's flag carrier, has banned using and charging power banks, and storing them in overhead bins. Hong Kong's aviation regulator has put a similar regulation into effect for all of the territory's airlines, including Cathay Pacific. Since 2016, the International Civil Aviation Organization, which is the United Nations agency that coordinates global aviation regulations, has banned lithium-ion batteries, which are the kind commonly found in power banks, from the cargo holds of passenger planes. But there is no industry standard on how airlines regulate power banks, said Mitchell Fox, director of the Asia Pacific Center for Aviation Safety. They have become a part of everyday life only in recent years, and some consumers may be unaware of the risks, he said. What risks do these batteries pose? Lithium-ion batteries have been used for decades to power smartphones and laptops and are commonly used in portable power banks. Each battery has a cell that can heat up quickly in a chain reaction that causes it to catch fire or explode. The FAA warns that this reaction can happen if the battery is damaged, overcharged, overheated or exposed to water. Manufacturing defects are another potential cause. Some products that use lithium-ion batteries, including smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles, have strict regulations and quality control standards, said Neeraj Sharma, a professor of chemistry at the University of New South Wales in Sydney who studies batteries. Others, such as power banks, e-cigarettes, e-bikes, and scooters, are less regulated, he said, raising the risk of malfunction. 'Make sure you get your devices from reputable manufacturers,' Sharma said. How often do batteries catch fire on planes? The frequency of incidents involving lithium-ion batteries on U.S. airlines has been increasing. There were 84 last year, up from 32 in 2016. These included cases in the cabins of both passenger and cargo planes, where batteries caught fire, emitted smoke, or overheated. Portable chargers were the biggest culprit, followed by e-cigarettes, according to the FAA. For years, airlines around the world have required passengers to pack spare lithium-ion batteries in their carry-on luggage instead of in their checked bags so that any smoke or fire from the batteries can be noticed quickly. In the cargo hold, a fire might not be detected by a plane's automatic fire-extinguishing system until it has become a critical problem. What do flight crews do when there is a fire? Fires in plane cabins that are caused by lithium-ion batteries are rarely deadly, and flight crews are generally well prepared to deal with them, said Keith Tonkin, managing director of Aviation Projects, an aviation consulting company in Brisbane, Australia. In many cases, passengers will notice that their electronics are overheating and inform crew members, who put the device in a thermal containment bag or water, with little disruption to the flight, according to the FAA. This article originally appeared in


Observer
26-05-2025
- Observer
Air India ranked the most delayed airline in UK
London - Air India has been ranked the worst airline for UK flight delays. The carrier's departures from UK airports were an average of 45 minutes and 48 seconds behind schedule in 2024, according to analysis of Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) data by the PA news agency. The route with the longest average delay was Gatwick to Bangalore, with an average of one hour and 23 minutes across 50 departures. Rory Boland, editor of consumer magazine Which? Travel described Air India's performance as "completely unacceptable". The airline said the disruption was "primarily due to factors beyondour control". Guernsey-based Aurigny Air Services had the second-worst punctuality record for UK departures last year, with an average delay of 31 minutes and 12 seconds. It was followed by Turkish low-cost leisure airline SunExpress (29 minutes and 36 seconds) and Air Portugal (25 minutes and 12 seconds). Irish carrier Emerald Airlines recorded the best performance last year, with UK departures delayed by an average of just 10 minutes and 30 seconds. The analysis took into account all scheduled and chartered departures from UK airports by airlines operating more than 2,500 of these flights last year. Cancelled flights were not included. The average delay for all these airlines was 18 minutes and 18 seconds, down from 20 minutes and 42 seconds in 2023. Air India was acquired from the Indian government by the Tata Group in January 2022 after racking up billions of pounds of losses. The airline's UK operations are at Birmingham, Gatwick, and Heathrow, with routes to several Indian cities such as Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru. Data from aviation analytics company Cirium shows the airline operated 56% more flights from UK airports last year compared with 2019. This is projected to rise to 90% this year after increasing flight frequencies on several routes in March. Aviation consultant John Strickland said there has been "a lot of work going on to put the airline back on track" after it gained a"poor reputation" for delays and cancellations. This was partly caused by a lack of funds to purchase spare parts for aircraft, leading to some of its fleet being grounded. Strickland said: "They're coming out of this period of malaise pre-the Tata takeover, and now have to put in work on their engineering, manpower, spare parts holding, all those factors." He said some of Air India's promotion of its new Airbus A350 first-class product has focused on the quality of its service. He noted: "You can have great meals and a great crew, but fundamentally you've got to operate an airline which is as punctual and reliable as possible. "That's a work in progress for them." Rory Boland, editor of consumer magazine Which? Travel, said: "These latest delay figures will come as no surprise to travellers, who can find themselves paying sky-high amounts for air fares and in return receiving unreliable services. "Air India had an average delay of 45 minutes. This is completely unacceptable. "It's time for airlines to get their act together and start delivering the service their customers are paying for." A spokesperson for Air India said: "During 2024, Air India's flights to and from the UK experienced occasional delays, primarily due to factors beyond our control. "Proactive operational initiatives like self-check-in, baggage dropand automated boarding process have ensured smoother airport touchpoint experience and faster turnaround of aircraft, boosting on-time departures. "The deployment of the new Airbus A350 and upgraded B787-9 aircraft on some of the UK routes has also helped enhance punctuality of our flight operations. "Over the first three months of 2025, Air India's on-time performance has seen significant improvement on our direct flights from the UK to India, which also reflects on our NPS (customer satisfaction) scores." Depending on the distance of the route and length of delay, passengers booked on flights from UK airports that are running behind schedule are entitled to assistance such as a reasonable amount of food and drink, a means to communicate, and overnight accommodation if required. Passengers may also be able to claim compensation of up to £520 from the airline if the reason for the delay is deemed within its control, which could be a fault with the aircraft or pilot sickness. CAA head of consumers Anna Bowles said: "We expect all airlines operating in the UK to uphold high standards of service and reliability. "While the majority of airlines have made progress in reducing delays, with the average falling, delays can cause significant disruption and inconvenience to passengers. "Delays occur for many reasons, and we fully expect that airlines minimize the impact by providing timely information and upholding passengers' rights when it applies."


Observer
07-05-2025
- Observer
Airlines cancel, reroute flights after India-Pakistan clashes
Bangkok - Clashes between India and Pakistan on Wednesday sent airlines scrambling to cancel, divert, or reroute flights. The neighbours exchanged heavy artillery fire along their contested frontier after India launched missile strikes in retaliation for a deadly terror attack last month. Here is a round-up of what airlines are doing to avoid flying over the conflict zone. - South Korea - Korean Air has begun rerouting its flights from Seoul Incheon to Dubai, using a southern route that passes over Myanmar, Bangladesh, and India, instead of the previous path through Pakistani airspace. "We are currently monitoring the situation for further changes," a Korean Air official told AFP. - Taiwan - Taiwan's China Airlines said several flights have been diverted or cancelled. Two flights from Taipei to Frankfurt and Amsterdam "made a technical diversion to Bangkok" before returning to the Taiwanese capital. Three flights from Taipei to Prague, Rome, and London were cancelled on Tuesday and Wednesday. "China Airlines continues to monitor the situation and will adjust flight schedules as needed," it said. EVA Air said it will adjust flights to and from Europe "based on actual conditions to avoid affected airspace to ensure the safety of crew members and passengers". A flight from Vienna to Bangkok will return to the Austrian capital, while a flight from Taipei to Milan will be diverted to Vienna for refuelling and then continue to the Italian city, the airline said in a statement. - Malaysia - Malaysia Airlines rerouted two flights from Kuala Lumpur -- one to London Heathrow and one to Paris Charles de Gaulle. They stopped in Doha before continuing their journeys. The carrier also suspended all flights to and from India's Amritsar until May 9. - Thailand - Thai Airways said it was rerouting flights to destinations in Europe and South Asia from 5:00 am on Wednesday (2200 GMT Tuesday), warning of possible delays. - Sri Lanka - Sri Lankan Airlines said its flights were unaffected and there is no change to their four weekly flights to Pakistan's Lahore and Karachi. Some flights from India to Europe were also seen taking longer routes. Lufthansa flight LH761 from Delhi to Frankfurt turned right towards the Arabian Sea near the western Indian city of Surat, taking a longer path compared to Tuesday, according to FlightRadar24.