Over 20 sessions cover diverse issues at Faiz Festival
LAHORE:
The three-day Faiz Festival concluded at Alhamra Arts Council on Sunday after drawing a large number of literary enthusiasts, intellectuals and art lovers.
The festival dedicated to the legendary poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz featured a series of academic, literary and cultural sessions.
More than 20 sessions were organised on the final day, covering a diverse range of topics related to literature, politics, society, film, history, culture and media influence.
Panel discussions focused on figures like writer Saadat Hasan Manto, as well as issues such as Palestine, secularism, women's rights, the environment, heritage, tourism and the evolving relationship between social media and politics. The craft of film writing was also explored.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
29-05-2025
- Express Tribune
'In India, hating Pakistan is how you show loyalty'
Veteran actor Hina Bayat weighed in on the controversy surrounding Indian poet and lyricist Javed Akhtar, whose recent remarks against Pakistan have sparked outrage across the border. Speaking on a local television show on Wednesday, Bayat criticised Akhtar's "hateful" comments, suggesting that his words were less about conviction and more about performance. "I think he made those hateful comments because he wanted to feel relevant," Bayat said during the segment. "He had to prove somehow that he is 'very Indian' so he used Pakistan for that purpose." Her remarks come in response to a statement Akhtar made during a press conference in India earlier this month, where he controversially declared: "If I have to choose between going to hell and going to Pakistan, I would prefer to go to hell." Akhtar made his controversial remark during the launch of Narkatla Swarg, a book by Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut, itself a politically loaded event. In such a volatile climate, words carry weight, and Akhtar's were more than just a personal preference. The Indian lyricist has made several visits to Pakistan in the past, most notably as an honoured guest at the Faiz Festival in Lahore earlier this year, where he was warmly welcomed. In contrast, amid the growing strain in IndiaPakistan relations in recent years, his rhetoric has taken a sharper, more critical turn, one that many in Pakistan interpret as politically driven or opportunistic. Bayat echoed that sense of betrayal, calling for a reevaluation of who Pakistan offers its legendary hospitality to. "In India, hating Pakistan is the way you show how loyal you are," she said. "But I request Lahoris: do not host such people in the future. We Pakistanis are hospitable, we'll sit at the knees of elders, but that man does not deserve it." Bayat's comments were among the more composed yet cutting responses from Pakistani public figures. Actor Mishi Khan, for instance, slammed Akhtar on Instagram, saying, "Javed Akhtar has chosen the perfect place for himself. No one in Pakistan will invite him again." Actor Imran Abbas wrote that Akhtar will "go to hell regardless," sarcastically adding that Pakistan had given him a business class welcome "though he wasn't even worthy of economy." Meanwhile, former MPA Sharmila Farooqui called the remarks "deeply disrespectful," and actors like Asim Mehmood issued subtler but stinging responses of their own.
Express Tribune
03-05-2025
- Express Tribune
A mouthpiece with a memory hole
It's becoming difficult to watch Javed Akhtar without feeling a profound sense of pity over his descent from a mid-tier writer to a bitter provocateur. And no, that's not an ad hominem. Bollywood has given Pakistani audiences many icons to love. Even when some of them turn into vitriol-spewing mouthpieces for the far right, fandom on this side of the border has often trumped jingoism. That is not some unique generosity Pakistanis are blessed with. It is, however, indicative of a more organic circulation of art that has survived decades of regional instability and repression, and comes with multiple, if partial, reality checks. For every inane political take, one can hope for a sane needle in the haystack. In Modi's India, both the needle and the haystack are saffron. Akhtar's response to Pakistani artists working in India in the aftermath of Pahalgam is that saffron needle begging to be found. In conversation with Indian news agency PTI, the screenwriter insisted that India allowing Pakistani artists to work has always been "one-way traffic". Citing visits by Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, Mehdi Hasan, Ghulam Ali, and Noor Jehan, Akhtar maintained that the Indian government treated these artists to ornate protocol. Even Faiz Ahmed Faiz, whom he calls "a poet of the subcontinent" and not a "Pakistani poet," was received with complete decorum. "I am afraid this has never been reciprocated. I have no complaint with the people of Pakistan. Big poets of Pakistan have written poems for Lata Mangeshkar. I'm quite convinced that in the '60s and '70s, Lata Mangeshkar, hands down, was the most popular Indian in Pakistan. But why was there not a single performance of hers in Pakistan? We have received their artists with open arms, but it was not reciprocated by [the] establishment." Any familiarity with this statement is not at all coincidental. Akhtar had the same intellectual miscarriage in 2023 when he was visiting Lahore for Faiz Festival. Same old drivel There is something both tired and dangerous in this recurring refrain. Tired, because it has been said and corrected before. Dangerous, because it reeks of a culturally coded nationalism that dresses up state policy as artistic grievance. Akhtar's remarks, delivered from a Pakistani stage, betray not only a lack of historical memory but also an opportunistic blindness to what transnational exchange has really looked like in the subcontinent. Let's begin with the obvious counterexamples. Indian singers, poets, actors, and artists have repeatedly been hosted in Pakistan with state patronage and fanfare. In February 1999, Akhtar himself was part of the official cultural delegation accompanying Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on his historic state visit to Lahore. Alongside Akhtar were Dev Anand, Shatrughan Sinha, Satish Gujral, Mallika Sarabhai, Kuldip Nayar, and Kapil Dev - all accorded state guest status by then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's government. Just the year before, the late Bollywood Peshawar-born icon Dilip Kumar received Pakistan's highest civilian award, Nishane Imtiaz, for his contribution to the arts. In 2004, Jagjit Singh performed at various venues, including DHA Golf Club, to further better Pakistan-India ties. In August 2010, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani publicly invited Bharat Ratna Lata Mangeshkar to Pakistan as a state guest, urging her to visit for her millions of fans. Singer Adnan Sami, then still a Pakistani citizen, was asked to help coordinate the visit. These events are not obscure trivia. They are widely reported, highly visible, and factually refute Akhtar's portrayal of Pakistani cultural policy as some sort of paranoid nationalist lockdown. On the contrary, it is both exhausting and futile to chart all the instances of Indian artists being welcomed by the Pakistani government or vice versa, for all it will reflect is two state narratives, a postcolonial collateral of long-standing tensions. Akhtar can posture as the subcontinent's conscience all he wants, but one wonders why anyone would willingly commit to a life of such hypocrisy: dissenter in exile, mouthpiece at home. Any overview of his cognitive dissonance treads risky waters, especially when he's still processing childhood trauma at this ripe age. But even the most afflicting darde disco wouldn't possess a teenager, let alone an 80-year-old, to sustain a hormonal rebellion long past its expiry date. Ghosts of his past Perhaps, the most painful recall that accompanies Akhtar is who preceded him. Born to the hardline communist poet Jan Nisar Akhtar and son-in-law to the equally principled Kaifi Azmi, his journey from self-proclaimed Marxist to a muddled, undifferentiated leftist ought to be taught as a cautionary tale for progressives. Akhtar is emblematic of a collapsing liberal intelligentsia; famous for knowing what it stands against (BJP, Hindutva, censorship), yet rarely able to articulate what it stands for. On the other hand, he is a lonely, tormented man living in a country that simply won't love him back. Given his steady decline in sense, it may be wiser to analyse him through the latter lens. For if not unresolved daddy issues, what else could explain his 180-degree pivot from everything India's progressives once stood for? Only a staunch right-winger could inhabit the world in 2025 and conclude that the "average Indian citizen" inspires envy for "the kind of privileges and freedoms" supposedly at their disposal. It's easy, then, to frame Pakistan as a stage-hungry neighbour whose stars come begging, and India, the benevolent patron left unthanked. But this framing doesn't hold up, not even within the dynamics of cross-border stardom. Beyond the borders Art nationalism - the idea that cultural production must mirror the state's image of itself - is always a tool of authoritarianism. When Akhtar scolds Pakistan for failing to reciprocate a cultural embrace, what he's really doing is echoing India's current border-thickening regime: a belief that art must serve the state, or else be exiled as suspect. What should be a call for solidarity becomes, in Akhtar's voice, a lament that Pakistan isn't doing nationalism as well as India. But cultural power doesn't need symmetry to be meaningful. Many of the Pakistani artists who've found fame in India - Fawad Khan, Mahira Khan, Atif Aslam - were already icons at home. That they were welcomed by Indian fans doesn't make them guests at a magnanimous banquet; it shows how porous, vibrant, and horizontal cultural affinity can be. In reality, India's entertainment industry has long benefitted from Pakistani creativity - copying music, borrowing ghazal traditions, and riding on the realism of Pakistani TV dramas when their own serials degenerated into surrealist saas-bahu battles. Visibility has not been a one-way traffic - it's been a quiet, continuous churn of influence, often uncredited, but deeply felt. What is conveniently left out of Akhtar's telling is the asymmetry of scale, not affection. India has a gargantuan industry with global distribution and diaspora capital. Pakistan, by contrast, has a far smaller market, still grappling with censorship boards, moral policing, and a fragile infrastructure. It doesn't mean Pakistani artists aren't welcome - it means there are simply fewer big-budget platforms to host cross-border productions. It appears that what Akhtar really laments is Pakistan's relatively slower embrace of big, flashy capital. And whatever perks this fictitious "average Indian" enjoys is a yet-to-be-fulfilled promise of India's hegemony in South Asia. If only Akhtar, on his many visits to Pakistan, had grasped what Fahmida Riaz once so wisely penned: "tum bilkul ham jaise nikle." That the exchange of violence and repression between Pakistan and India has always been two-way traffic. Just as the flow of art and dissent has never respected borders.
Express Tribune
20-04-2025
- Express Tribune
CM Maryam forms committee to fund film production
Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif has established an eight-member committee that will assist the government to finance producers for the production of quality films. The CM also approved proposals for the construction of Punjab's first film city, a studio and a post-production lab. To revive the industry in the province, she also gave permission to build a public sector film school to produce graduates in the field. The move comes amidst efforts to revive cultural activities in the province as the government organised the traditional celebration of Mela Chiraghan (light festival) earlier this month after a gap of many years ago. A Punjabi culture festival was also organised at Alhamra Arts Council. The government has also introduced policies and restrictions regarding stage performances. According to a spokesperson for the information and culture department, the decision to revive the local film industry has been taken because it had been suffering due to various issues for the past many years. The committee that includes senior government officers will prepare a policy to provide financial assistance to local producers. Provincial Senior Minster Mariyyum Aurangzeb is the convener of the committee that has also been given the task of building the film city, a state of the art studio and post-production lab with modern equipment. The spokesperson said land had been specified for the construction of the film city in the Nawaz Sharif Information Technology City. Work is under way to finalise the design of the film city and other related details. The committee was formed after the approval of the Punjab cabinet and funds are set to be allocation in the coming annual budget to promote the film industry, then spokesman added. A former chairman of Pakistan Film Distributors Association, Ejaz Kamran, said while commenting on the decision that producers were not working on film projects in Punjab mainly because of lack of support from the governments. He said the film associations also were unable to play any role in the prevailing situation.
