New York Declaration fails Gaza's reality
The declaration bluntly demands that Hamas relinquish power in Gaza and disarm, handing authority over to the Palestinian Authority (PA).
Yet when it comes to Israel's decades-long occupation, its illegal blockade and devastating military campaign that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians — most of them women and children — it retreats into euphemism.
It is a deliberate choice to privilege political convenience over legal obligation.
Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel, as the occupying power, must protect the civilian population.
The destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and water systems; the starvation of civilians; and the displacement of nearly two million people are not "collateral damage" but grave breaches under Articles 53 and 147, attracting individual criminal responsibility.
The declaration rightly condemns Hamas' Oct 7 attacks as war crimes and crimes against humanity. But justice cannot be selective.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court applies equally to armed groups and states. If its authors truly believe in the rule of law, then they must apply it without fear or favour.
The declaration's vision for Gaza's future is equally troubling. By proposing the transfer of authority to the PA backed by an international stabilisation mission, it risks turning the PA into an unelected subcontractor for the occupation — administering Gaza without real sovereignty.
History shows that transitional administrations, from Timor-Leste to Kosovo, succeeded only when paired with credible elections, clear timelines for self-governance and respect for self-determination. The declaration offers none of these guarantees. Most tellingly, it evades the root cause of Palestinian resistance: the occupation itself.
The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2024 advisory opinion reaffirmed that Israel's occupation is illegal and must end "as rapidly as possible" while the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2334 demands the cessation of all settlement activity, calling it a "flagrant violation" under international law.
Yet the declaration treats these binding norms as optional talking points. It says nothing of the siege imposed on Gaza since 2007, or the refugees' right of return under United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194.
There is no insistence on lifting the blockade, opening humanitarian corridors or securing reparations for the destruction. In short, it offers Palestinians process without protection and symbolism without sovereignty.
If the world is serious about peace, any credible agreement must meet three minimum standards:
Impartial investigations into all alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity — whether committed by Hamas, Israel or any other actor — under ICC jurisdiction or an independent UN mechanism.
Enforceable timelines for ending the occupation, dismantling illegal settlements and lifting the blockade, in compliance with the ICJ's opinion and existing UNSC resolutions.
Guarantees of Palestinian self-determination through internationally supervised elections in Gaza and the West Bank, and constitutional processes reflecting the will of the Palestinian people — not the dictates of external powers.
Without these, the declaration is not a peace plan but a blueprint for managing Palestinian submission.
Some will argue that half-measures are better than none. But unjust peace is no peace.
I have spoken to Palestinian children who have lost their entire families and represented them in legal proceedings. I have read the legal texts meant to protect them — and seen how those protections collapse when expedience trumps principle.
The world does not need more declarations that appear balanced on paper but tilt towards power in practice. It needs the courage to hold every violator of international law accountable, and the resolve to end an occupation that is both illegal and immoral.
Until then, Gaza will remain not a test case for peace, but the gravest indictment of the international system's unwillingness to enforce its own laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Slovenia bans imports from Israeli settlements over Gaza war
LJUBLJANA: Slovenia on Wednesday announced a ban on imports of goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, in a "symbolic measure" designed to ratchet up diplomatic pressure over the war in Gaza. Slovenia's government has frequently criticised Israel over the conflict, and last year moved to recognise a Palestinian state as part of efforts to end the fighting in Gaza as soon as possible. "The actions of the Israeli government... constitute serious and repeated violations of international humanitarian law," the government said in a statement on Wednesday. Slovenia "cannot and must not be part of a chain that enables or overlooks" such violations it said includes the "construction of illegal settlements, expropriations, the forced evictions of the Palestinian population." The Slovenian government thus decided to "ban imports of goods originating from Israeli illegal settlements." Its latest move represents a "clear reaction to the Israeli government's policy, which... undermines the possibilities for lasting peace and a two-state solution." "While symbolic", the ban "is a necessary response to the ongoing humanitarian and security situation in Gaza," Slovenia's Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon said of the measure. The government said it was also examining a ban on exports of goods from Slovenia "destined for (the) illegal settlements", saying that it would then "decide on further measures." According to the STA news agency, citing a government statement from January, Slovenia did not import any goods from Israeli settlements in 2022 and 2024, respectively. In 2023, imports amounted to some 2,000 euros. Early in July, Slovenia was the first EU country to ban two far-right Israeli ministers from entering the country. It declared both Israelis "persona non grata", accusing them of inciting "extreme violence and serious violations of the human rights of Palestinians" with "their genocidal statements." In June 2024, Slovenia's parliament passed a decree recognising Palestinian statehood, following in the steps of Ireland, Norway and Spain, in moves partly fuelled by condemnation of Israel's bombing of Gaza after the Oct 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel.--AFP
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
EU may have just deepened its reliance on the US, former Chinese envoy says
The latest trade deal between Brussels and Washington may deepen the European Union's economic and security dependence on the US and increase the risks to the bloc's pursuit of strategic autonomy, according to a senior Chinese diplomat. Shi Mingde, who served as China's ambassador to Germany from 2012 to 2019, gave his assessment of Sunday's transatlantic agreement to academics and reporters at an event in Beijing on Tuesday to mark 50 years of China-EU relations. The deal came hard on the heels of last Thursday's one-day EU-China summit in the Chinese capital, which also marked the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and the 27-member bloc. While Beijing has supported Europe's push for strategic autonomy, it has firmly rejected its de-risking policy – to reduce the EU's reliance on China – as a veiled attempt to contain Chinese growth, particularly in technology and the economy. 'The Europeans have proposed to reduce reliance to mitigate risk, but this reasoning is flawed,' Shi said. 'They claim that greater reliance leads to greater risk, yet their dependence on the United States remains even stronger – both in terms of security and economics – and the recent deal ... further reinforces the EU's dependence on the US in terms of security and the economy. 'So, will this agreement ultimately lead to greater strategic autonomy for Europe? Not yet.' Touted by US President Donald Trump as 'the biggest deal ever made', the agreement puts a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports to the United States, while the average rate on goods in the other direction will drop below one per cent, according to the White House. The EU has also agreed to buy US$750 billion in American energy and make US$600 billion in new investment in the United States – all by 2028. There have been concerns that a transatlantic agreement may increase Trump's leverage in the continuing trade talks with Beijing while allowing the US and the EU to refocus on their alignment in the competition with China. On Monday, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said that as part of the deal, Washington and Brussels would develop a metals alliance to mitigate the impact of subsidised Chinese products – notably 'steel, aluminium, copper and the derivatives' – on global markets. Without going into the agreement's details, Shi said that while Beijing's policy with the bloc had been 'consistent' and 'cooperative', it was the EU's own job to shape its future with major powers like the US, China and Russia. How Sino-EU relations develop would depend on how the bloc definef China, 'but the premise is how the EU defines itself in a turbulent world', he said. '[Would Brussels really] want a full-scale confrontation with Russia, comprehensive suppression by the US ... and an increasingly fractious relationship with China?' Despite the frictions in the relationship, China has positioned itself as a partner to Europe and has been encouraging the European Union to do more to assert its strategic autonomy. At last week's summit, expected to set the tone for China-EU relations, President Xi Jinping urged his visitors – European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and the president of the European Council Antonio Costa – to make 'the right strategic choice'. Speaking before Shi at the same event, Di Dongsheng, professor and associate dean of the Renmin University of China's school of international studies, observed that the EU's policy on China had been largely influenced by Washington rather than Beijing. The results of a 2023 study by his team at Renmin University suggested there was a risk that the EU might use China as leverage if Brussels was pressed hard by the US, he said. The researchers analysed more than 200 million recorded events – including diplomatic engagement and conflicts – related to relations between China, the US and Washington's allies since 2009, when former president Barack Obama took office. 'Our research shows Europe's China policy isn't shaped by Beijing's actions at all – whether we're positive or negative makes no difference in the EU's attitude on China,' Di said. 'The real decider is America's stance towards China and, to a lesser extent, the United States' attitude towards the EU. 'In this sense, when the Europeans talk about cutting dependence on China, in the economy and supply chains, I think they should also be pursuing real political and strategic autonomy.' - South China Morning Post
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Israeli army directed to execute govt's orders on Gaza
Israel's government is expected to order a full military occupation of Gaza. (AP pic) JERUSALEM : The Israeli military will have to execute any government decisions on Gaza, the defence minister said today after reported disagreements over the prospect of a full occupation of the Palestinian territory. Signs of a rift over strategy emerged as prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to announce a new phase in the war, after he said Israel must 'complete' the defeat of Hamas in order to secure the release of hostages still held in Gaza. The Israeli press, citing officials speaking on condition of anonymity, has predicted an escalation of operations, including in densely populated areas where hostages are believed to be held, such as Gaza City and refugee camps. The reports also said Netanyahu and his cabinet would order a full military occupation of Gaza, sparking dissension from the army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir. Yesterday, Netanyahu held a restricted three-hour meeting with security chiefs to discuss options for the continuation of the war, his office said in a statement. At the meeting, Zamir reportedly warned that a full occupation would be like 'walking into a trap', according to public broadcaster KAN. The army chief suggested alternatives to a full occupation, such as an encirclement of specific areas where Hamas is believed to be hunkering down, according to the Channel 12 broadcaster. But defence minister Israel Katz hit back with a clear message. 'It is the right and duty of the Chief of Staff to express his position in the appropriate forums,' he wrote on X. 'But once decisions are made by the political echelon, the IDF will execute them with determination and professionalism… until the objectives of the war are achieved,' he added, using an acronym for the Israeli military. Trump says 'up to Israel' Israelis are increasingly alarmed about the fate of the 49 hostages still held in Gaza. (EPA Images pic) Netanyahu is expected to convene the security cabinet tomorrow to finalise a decision on the expansion of the offensive, local media reported. US President Donald Trump told reporters yesterday he was not aware of reported plans to occupy the entire Gaza Strip, but said that such a decision would be 'up to Israel'. At war with Hamas since the unprecedented attack by the Palestinian Islamist movement on Israel on Oct 7, 2023, the Israeli government is under growing pressure to bring the conflict to an end. Israelis are increasingly alarmed about the fate of the 49 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom 20 are believed to be alive. The UN Security Council held a special session yesterday to discuss Israeli hostages in Gaza, as the country seeks to keep the issue on top of the global agenda. Yesterday, Trump described a recent video released by Hamas of emaciated Israeli hostage Evyatar David purportedly digging his own grave as 'horrible'. In parallel, international criticism has surged over the suffering of over two million Palestinians, who the UN warns are at risk of widespread famine. 'Dangerous routes' In the besieged Gaza Strip, where humanitarian aid has only been trickling in, the civil defence agency said today that at least 22 people had been killed in an overnight incident involving an aid truck that overturned onto a crowd of aid seekers. 'The truck overturned while hundreds of civilians were waiting for food aid in the Nuseirat area' of the Gaza Strip, civil defence agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP. 'The truck had been forced by the Israeli army to take dangerous roads,' in poor condition after being bombed, he added. The Hamas-run government in Gaza accused Israel of 'deliberately obstructing the safe passage and distribution of the aid'. Asked by AFP, the Israeli army said it was looking into the incident. At the end of May, Israel eased the humanitarian blockade it had imposed in early March on the territory, whose population is entirely dependent on international aid. The quantities of humanitarian supplies allowed into the Strip via land or airdrops are deemed insufficient by the UN. The Oct 7, 2023, attack led to the death of 1,219 people on the Israeli side, the majority of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official data. The Israeli offensive launched in retaliation has killed at least 61,020 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry, which are considered reliable by the UN.
