US Has Launched Over 50 Airstrikes In Somalia In 2025
AFRICOM said that the strikes targeted the ISIS affiliate in Somalia's northeastern Puntland region, to the southeast of the port city of Bossaso. The command offered no further details, as it has stopped sharing estimates of casualties or assessments of potential civilian harm.
AFRICOM confirmed to Antiwar.com in an email that the latest attack marked the 51st US airstrike in Somalia of the year, putting the Trump administration on track to easily break the annual record, which President Trump set at 63 in 2019. Antiwar.com is also seeking details on casualties from AFRICOM, but so far hasn't received a figure.
The US has been backing local Puntland forces against ISIS in battles in the Cal Miskaad mountains in Puntland's Bari region. Puntland Counter-Terrorism Operations announced on Sunday — the day the US launched two airstrikes — that it was conducting a 'clearance operation' against ISIS remnants in the mountains and said the area being targeted was 'last used by terrorists as a hideout with their foreign women and children.'
Puntland's forces announced a new military operation on June 30 against ISIS-affiliated militants, and since then, the US has launched at least four airstrikes in the area. The ISIS affiliate in Somalia started in 2015 as an offshoot of al-Shabaab, a group the US has also been bombing in southern and central Somalia.
In the war against al-Shabaab, the US is backing the Mogadishu-based Federal Government, which controls little territory inside Somalia's internationally recognized borders. Somali media reported on Tuesday that government forces killed 15 al-Shabaab fighters in the central Hiraan region, an operation that was supported by 'international partners,' likely a reference to US AFRICOM.
Al-Shabaab has been making significant gains against the government and reportedly captured a town in the Hiraan region on Monday. Fighting has also been ongoing in the southern Jubaland region, where the US carried out multiple airstrikes from June 27 to June 30 to support a battle that the government claimed killed 50 al-Shabaab fighters.
Al-Shabaab's offensive has been successful enough that US officials recently discussed the possibility of Mogadishu falling to the militant group.
The New York Times reported on April 10 that State Department officials suggested closing down the US embassy in Mogadishu and evacuating most US personnel due to the threat. But other officials, including Sebastian Gorka, the top counterterrorism official on the National Security Council, called for the US to escalate in Somalia and double down on its policy of propping up the government, and they appear to have won the internal debate.
Hawks who favor continued intervention in Somalia portray al-Shabaab as a major threat to the US due to its size and al-Qaeda affiliation, but it's widely believed the group does not have ambitions outside of Somalia.
Al-Shabaab was born out of a US-backed Ethiopian invasion in 2006 that toppled the Islamic Courts Union, a coalition of Muslim groups that briefly held power in Mogadishu after ousting CIA-backed warlords. Al-Shabaab was the radical offshoot of the Islamic Courts Union. The group's first recorded attack was in 2007, and it wasn't until 2012 that al-Shabaab pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda.
Also read: Military Aircraft's Mysterious Crash Sparks UFO Speculation In U.S. Airspace
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
7 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Modi denies third party brokered peace with Pakistan
Prime Minister Narendra Modi yesterday denied that any world leader pushed India to stop fighting Pakistan during their recent conflict, after repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he had brokered peace. The South Asian rivals fought an intense four-day conflict in May that left more than 70 people dead on both sides before Trump announced a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed neighbours. "No world leader asked us to stop the operation," Modi told parliament during a debate on "Operation Sindoor", the military campaign launched against Pakistan in May. Modi did not name Trump in his speech. The Indian prime minister also claimed that it was Pakistan that pleaded with India to stop fighting after feeling the "heat of our attacks". The conflict was sparked by an April attack on tourists by gunmen in Indian-administered Kashmir that left 26 men dead, mostly Hindus. India accused Pakistan of backing the attackers, a charge Islamabad denied. Trump has claimed numerous times that he brokered peace between the rivals, including most recently on Monday. "If I weren't around, you'd have, right now, six major wars going on. India would be fighting with Pakistan," Trump said during his visit to Scotland. Modi's assertion came after Rahul Gandhi from the opposition Congress party challenged the premier to say "inside the parliament that Donald Trump is lying". Earlier Tuesday, home minister Amit Shah told lawmakers that three Pakistani gunmen involved in the attack in Indian-administered Kashmir were killed during a military operation on Monday. Shah told parliament that all three were Pakistani nationals and identified two of them as members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN-designated terrorist group based in Pakistan.
Daily Tribune
7 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Russia wants to mine Niger's uranium
Russia wishes to mine uranium in Niger, a top source of the radioactive metal ruled by a military junta friendly to the Kremlin, Energy Minister Sergei Tsivilev has said. Since the junta took power in a 2023 coup, Niger has turned to Russia, which commands the world's largest arsenal of atomic weapons, for help in fighting the west African country's jihadist insurgency. Arguing that Niger should benefit more from being the world's seventh-largest producer of uranium, the junta has also insisted on greater control over its natural resources. That policy has led to tensions with former colonial ruler France, whose nuclear power plants have long relied on uranium extracted from Niger. While on an official visit to the capital Niamey on Monday, Tsivilev met Niger's junta chief, General Abdourahamane Tiani, to talk about the two countries' burgeoning economic cooperation. 'Our main goal is to mine uranium,' Tsivilev said after meeting the general. 'Our task is not only to participate in uranium mining, but to create an entire system for the development of civil nuclear power in Niger,' the energy minister is quoted as saying in an official Russian statement. Mining stand-off During the visit, Russia's atomic agency Rosatom and Niger's energy ministry signed a memorandum of understanding on civilian uses for nuclear power, according to the statement. Among others, Tsivilev pointed to the construction of atomic power plants, advances in nuclear medicine and the training of Nigerien specialists in those fields. Like its fellow junta-run allies in Burkina Faso and Mali, Niger has pivoted away from France and the West in favour of closer cooperation with Russia. As a result of its insistence on exercising more control over Niger's natural resources, the junta is currently locked in a stand-off with the Orano nuclear group, which is 90-percent owned by the French state. In 2024, Niger removed Orano's operational control of its three main mines in the country -- Somair, Cominak and Imouraren -- which the Paris-based company has attempted to win back through arbitration. The Imouraren mine is home to one of the largest deposits of uranium in the world. In June the ruling junta announced it would nationalise the Somair mine, in a move Orano slammed as 'asset stripping'. There was no indication from Monday's meeting that any of Orano's Nigerien mines would be turned over to Russia. When contacted by AFP, the Paris-based miner did not wish to comment on the prospect of Moscow mining uranium in Niger. Uranium was first discovered in the country in 1957 while under French rule, with mining beginning in 1971. Niger produced 3,527 tonnes of the radioactive metal in 2023, equal to 6.3 percent of global production, according to mining industry publication Globaldata.
Gulf Insider
10 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Oil Prices Spike As Trump's Shortened Deadline
Polar opposite understandings of the Sino-Indo prisoner's dilemma lie at the core of their calculations… Trump announced on Monday that he was shortening his 50-day deadline to Putin for a ceasefire in Ukraine to 'about 10 or 12 days from today', thus meaning that he plans to impose up to 100% tariffs on all its trading partners by 7-9 August, but likely with exceptions such as the EU that he just subjugated. Turkiye might also be excluded given its attempt to expand its influence eastward at Russia's expense, as could minor US trade partners like the Central Asian Republics as long as they curtail trade with Russia. The question on everyone's mind is whether he'll tariff China and India, if they don't cut off or at least curtail their resource-centric imports from Russia, that is. They're Russia's top trading partners, which collectively form the RIC core of BRICS, yet they trade more with the US (with whom they're in ongoing trade negotiations) than with Russia. China and India are also some of the world's largest economies so the US' imposition of 100% tariffs could destabilize the global economy and raise prices for Americans. Trump just clinched a lopsided trade deal with the EU that turned it into the US' largest-ever vassal state, which might embolden him to tariff China and/or India despite their ongoing trade talks if they defy him should he believe that this new arrangement can help reduce the blowback to the US. He's therefore calculating that China and/or India will at least curtail energy imports from Russia, whether voluntarily or under tariff duress, thus hitting its coffers and making Putin more pliable to concessions with time. For his part, Putin is calculating that Russia can still achieve its goals in full – controlling the entirety of the disputed regions, demilitarizing Ukraine, denazifying it, and then restoring its constitutional neutrality – even if China and/or India curtail trade with it, though he's not sure they will. Each is under tremendous pressure from the US in their own way so he might expect them to defy it. If both do so, then they might patch up their problems, thus turning RIC into a force to be reckoned with by the US. Trump's and Putin's calculations have the prisoner's dilemma in common. Trump's tariff threats and the other arms-related pillars of his new three-pronged policy towards Ukraine are correspondingly intended to coerce economic-political concessions from China and India and geopolitical-security ones from Russia. He expects at least one of BRICS' Asian anchors to even only partially comply, thus enabling him to exacerbate the Sino-Indo rivalry for the US' hegemonic benefit and then put more pressure on Russia. None of them wants to be the last to reach a deal with the US, Trump believes, and accordingly have much less negotiating flexibility than ever. Putin conversely believes that China and India are more concerned about the consequences of the other becoming Russia's top partner if their country complies with the US but their rival doesn't (as explained here) than with the consequences of Trump's threatened tariffs. He's also confident that the US can't stop Russia from achieving its goals in any case. Trump's shortened deadline for Putin will therefore soon reveal which of them miscalculated. The whole reason why everything has gotten to the point where the US might further escalate its involvement in this conflict is due to Trump being manipulated into mission creep by Lindsey Graham and others as elaborated in the preceding hyperlinked analyses. Early June's assessment that 'The Russian-Ukrainian Talks Are At An Impasse That Only The US Or Brute Force Can Break' has just been vindicated. Also read: Thailand, Cambodia Agree To Ceasefire Following Trump's Diplomatic Pressure
