28 Otago Projects Gain More Than $1m Environmental Funding From ORC
ORCs Chair of the ECO Fund Assessment Panel, Alan Somerville, highlighted how community groups throughout Otago carry out vital environmental work.
ORC Councillors today unanimously gave the green light for 28 community-lead environmental projects around Otago to receive a total $1,059,178, from its annual ECO Fund disbursement.
Total ECO Fund disbursements since mid-2018 are now more than $3.5 million.
ORC's Chair of the ECO Fund Assessment Panel, Alan Somerville, highlighted how community groups throughout Otago carry out vital environmental work.
'The community effort and commitment is inspiring. I'm only sorry we didn't have the funds to support more of the applications, noting that some very good projects have missed out.'
Of the original 69 applicants this year seeking a total $2.87 million, there were eventually 28 shortlisted who will receive a total $1,059,178 from the $1,059,500 million available. The fund was again oversubscribed almost three times.
'Since 2018 the ECO Fund has been there to support these community efforts. Otago gets immense value from the ECO Fund,' Cr Somerville says.
The funding supports community driven projects, which protect, enhance, and promote Otago's environment.
'Besides the benefits for biodiversity and freshwater quality, local people build valuable knowledge and skills and strengthen their community connections,' he says.
This year the Fund has supported a wide range of projects: control of wilding conifers, sycamores and willows, rabbits and predators; weed clearance and native planting; programmes to upskill volunteers in trapping and monitoring and to help schools with restoration projects.
'We've funded groups with a proven track record, but also some first-time applicants,' he says.
While thanking all the groups who applied, Cr Somerville says there was still plenty more to do and encouraged organisations to begin thinking about next year's ECO Fund.
Reallocation
Council today endorsed a budget reallocation from two of the ECO Fund funding categories to another ECO Fund funding category, which allowed for the funding of two additional projects in the General funding category.
The ECO Fund Assessment Panel met on 15 April 2025 to assess the applications, ultimately recommending 28 applications to Council for funding to a total value of $1,059,178. This includes the reallocation of $3502 and $35,000 from the categories of weed removal and revegetation (Biodiversity operations budget) and critical source area management on private land (Land and Water operations budget) respectively, to other specific ECO Fund funding categories due to undersubscription.
To date, $3.63 million distributed since 2018
Over the past 11 rounds of ECO Fund since mid-2018, a total $10.45 million was applied for, with a total 194 applicants (those shortlisted) from a total 420 applicants, successful, with a total $3.63 million having been distributed.
On average, each of the 11 rounds was oversubscribed by 300%.
Table 1 – Summary of recommendations from the Assessment Panel
Funding category Number of applications recommended for funding Total grant amount
Large-scale biodiversity projects 4 $450,000
General 9 $348,001
Sustained rabbit management 3 $100,000
Biodiversity enhancement on protected private land 7 $99,757
Critical source area management on private land 1 $15,000
Weed removal and revegetation 4 $46,420
Total 28 $1,059,178
Table 2 – Large-scale biodiversity projects – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Southern Lakes Sanctuary Trust Makarora Biodiversity Protection QLDC Pest animal control $ 105,572
Upper Taieri Wai Restoring the Upper Taiari Scroll Plain CODC Weed control and native planting $ 149,900
Central Otago Wilding Conifer Control Group Contorta to Native Shelterbelt Transitions CODC Weed control and native planting $ 150,000
Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust Mapping Biodiversity Outcomes at Okia DCC Pest animal control, native planting
$ 44,528
(part)
Total $ 450,000
Table 3 – General – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Te Nohoaka o Tukiauau – Sinclair Wetlands Te Nohoaka o Tukiauau / Sinclair Wetlands CDC Weed and pest animal control, wetland hydrology enhancement $ 49,800
Predator Free Cromwell Predator Free Cromwell: Educate, Protect, Restore CODC Pest animal control $ 42,791
Whakatipu Wildlife Trust Building Community Monitoring Capability QLDC Pest animal control and native fauna $ 39,003
Whakatipu Reforestation Trust Educate for Nature QLDC Native revegetation $ 49,500
Matukituki Charitable Trust Innovation in the Matukituki Valley QLDC Pest animal control $ 49,490
Manuherekia Catchment Group Keeping Orkney Wetland Flourishing CODC Weed control, wetland hydrology enhancement $ 29,032
Tomahawk-Smaills BeachCare Trust Growing Habitat for New Zealand Sea Lions DCC Native planting $ 48,200
Tucker Beach Wildlife Trust Tucker Beach Wildlife Reserve Restoration QLDC Weed control and native planting $ 37,200
Dunedin Environment Centre Trust Kaikorai Estuary Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 2,985
Total $ 348,001
Table 4 – Sustained rabbit management – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Peregrine neighbours ECO group Peregrine neighbours ECO group QLDC Pest animal control $ 42,570
Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Kātiki Point Rabbit-proof Fencing and Planting WDC Pest animal control
$ 23,560
(part)
Titri Pest Management Group Titri Pest Management CDC Pest animal control
$ 33,870
(part)
Total $ 100,000
Table 5 – Biodiversity Enhancement of Protected Private Land – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Sutton Creek Trust Jones Tors Covenant DCC Native planting and threatened species $ 9,757
Remarkables Station National Trust Limited Remarkables Station Sycamore Control QLDC Weed control $ 15,000
Reid Family Trust Porteous Road Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Matai Hill Trust Matai Hill Restoration Project DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Waitati Beach Reserve Society Waitati Beach Reserve Habitat Restoration DCC Weed control and native planting $ 15,000
Hazeldale Farming Limited Hazeldale Fen Fencing CDC Fencing $ 15,000
Makarara Farm Makarara Farm QEII Enhancement DCC Native planting $ 15,000
Total $ 99,757
Table 6 –Critical source area management on private land – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Cardrona Alpine Resort Ltd Pringles Creek Native Plant Restoration QLDC Water quality $15,000
Total $ 15,000
Table 7 – Weed removal and revegetation – Projects and funding allocation – March 2025 round
Organisation Project Name District Project Activity Grant Amount
Dog Owners Group Cape Wanbrow DOG Cape Wanbrow WDC Native planting $ 400
Otokia Creek and Marsh Habitat Trust Weed removal on the Otokia Marsh DCC Weed control $ 15,000
Ida Valley Catchment Group Poolburn gorge willow removal and revegetation CODC Weed control $ 15,000
Deborah Bay Residents' Association DBRA Sycamores DCC Weed control $ 16,020
Total $ 46,420
Location of projects Number of projects per location
Clutha district 3
Central Otago district 5
Dunedin area 10
Queenstown Lakes district 8
Waitaki / North Otago 2
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
24-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
‘Enduring' solutions important, councillors say
The Otago Regional Council building on the corner of Broadway and MacLaggan st. PHOTO: ODT FILES Resource management reform should produce "enduring, consistent and stable" solutions, Otago regional councillors say. The Otago Regional Council this week approved wide-ranging submissions on infrastructure and development, the primary sector, and freshwater management ahead of government reforms of the Resource Management Act and the national policy statements and standards that sit under it. Cr Tim Mepham said he was hopeful the council submissions would help to shape the new national directions. "But I definitely have concerns for our environmental management and the future of our freshwater quality. "I'm pretty happy with the comments that have been made in the submission in regards to the need for cross-party agreement because with the political cycles, to-ing and fro-ing, it doesn't create a lot of certainty." Cr Alan Somerville agreed. "Finding some enduring, consistent and stable solution to all this, so there aren't always changes, is very, very important," he said. The submissions demonstrated the value of local government and bringing together a diverse set of views around the council table, chairwoman Cr Gretchen Robertson said. "We listen to each other, just as we have again today and generally, we do come up with solutions that we all agree with — sometimes we don't, though, and that's fine as well." As well as the direct points the submissions made, the submissions made a "broader point" about the value the regional council provided "in partnership with central government and with mana whenua and with our communities", she said. The council submission on infrastructure and development national directions said infrastructure "in particular" needed a stable regulatory environment to drive investment. However, the submission on the primary sector also addressed the "need for enduring solutions". "Without broad political support for the proposals, there is a risk that future governments will reverse this reform, undermining the commitment of communities, industries, agencies and local authorities to plan their future and buy into actions that achieve the desired outcomes." The council supported moves "to better enable quarrying and mining". Its submission on commercial forestry had been drawn up with community concerns in mind, it said. "ORC is aware of the concerns that exist within Otago's communities about the conversion of large tracts of pastoral farmland into commercial forestry and how this may affect Otago's rural communities." The council submission on freshwater management said "three large overhauls" of freshwater policy — in 2014, 2017 and 2020 — "put considerable financial strain on councils and ratepayers and have disrupted planned or ongoing initiatives". The council also said it did not have a consensus view on whether the controversial concept of Te Mana o te Wai should be retained as the fundamental concept underpinning the national direction for freshwater. The council decided to finalise its submission on "going for housing growth" — a reform package designed to free up land for development and remove planning barriers — after staff had spoken to Otago's district and city councils.
Otago Daily Times
18-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Hollyer's hoping for ORC seat
Queenstown's Matt Hollyer, who's seeking election for Otago Regional Council. PHOTO: SUPPLIED Queenstowner Matt Hollyer's hoping to enter politics. The 51-year-old, who's lived in the Whakatipu for the past 30-odd years, is announcing his run for Otago Regional Council (ORC), standing for one of four seats in the Dunstan regional constituency. While much of his background's in tourism, Hollyer's been more sharply focused on conservation over the past five or so years, and it's sparked his desire to help "on a larger scale". His experience includes management roles at Tourism Holdings Ltd, almost 15 years as Shotover Canyon Swing's general manager, and six years as Destination Queenstown's board chair. Since 2019, he's been AJ Hackett Bungy NZ project and innovation manager and, since 2020, ops manager for GSD Workforce, a subsidiary of Bungy, created during Covid to support community conservation groups through Jobs for Nature funding. He's also been ops manager for Southern Lakes Sanctuary since mid-'21 and has been working with ORC, including through the Catchment Action Plan (Cap). He also helped "get the ball rolling" for a targeted ORC rate to assist large-scale conservation projects throughout Otago. "I realised through Covid when we got involved in helping out community conservation groups there are awesome people that are making a great difference to the environment, but it's all boot strapping. "It's sausage sizzles and trying to keep themselves ... volunteering, but you really need to have scale ... to actually make a big difference." He believes there's huge opportunity for ORC to work more closely with community groups and businesses "for the good of everybody". "What I've seen with the people and the engagement they're trying to do through the [Cap], the connections they're making and wanting to [build] with the community, I think is really impressive. "Now it's about starting to deliver that stuff ... we can do better, we can make a difference, and if the community works together, that's possible." Hollyer also thinks should the regional deal eventuate, involving Queenstown and Central Otago district councils and ORC, it's important to have local voices around the ORC table. "I think I can bring a really good understanding of tourism, and what it takes to get conservation projects done." He notes, too, Queenstown, in particular, has a "big responsibility" as it pertains to the headwaters. "What we do up here, that goes into the water and ... goes into much of Otago. "We need to step up and acknowledge that, and get better connected with the whole region." Nominations trickle in As of yesterday afternoon, Glenorchy's John Glover remains the only official Queenstown mayoral candidate, while first-term councillor Melissa White's officially seeking re-election in her Arrowtown-Kawarau ward. Fellow first-termer Gavin Bartlett's again been nominated for the Queenstown-Whakatipu ward, as has local lawyer Stephen Brent, who's seeking election for the first time. Nominations close on August 1.
Scoop
11-07-2025
- Scoop
QLDC's Shotover Consent Applications Going Direct To Environment Court
Otago Regional Council has confirmed two resource consent applications made by Queenstown Lakes District Council – around operation of its Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant - can go directly to the Environment Court for a hearing and decision. Provisions for public notification around the applications remain in place. ORC's Manager Consents Alexandra King says ORC received a letter from QLDC on 27 June 2025 requesting the two applications for resource consent (RM25.206 and RM25.177) be directly referred to the Environment Court – which can be done under section 87D of the Resource Management Act (RMA). 'The ORC has granted QLDC's request for direct referral of those applications to the Environment Court. A factor in reaching this decision is that public notification of the applications will proceed. This will happen once some outstanding information being sought from QLDC across both applications has been received [due by 11 August] and assessed,' Ms King says. 'It's a pragmatic decision and this approach ensures security of the public notification process and the opportunity for public participation is based on having complete and accurate information, and is consistent with the requirements of the RMA,' she says. In its 27 June letter to ORC, QLDC put forward several reasons to ORC for direct referral to the Environment Court, including that the referral would save all parties 'considerable time and money'. The QLDC letter noted there is 'significant public interest' given the consents being sought came from activities associated with the use of emergency works and direct referral to the Environment Court would enable a more efficient and effective determination, especially given the significant resources and issues in play. QLDC's letter also said that whether ORC held a hearing or the Environment Court, either result was 'very likely to be appealed irrespective of the outcome'. Ms King says ORC will continue to process the applications in accordance with the RMA and reiterated ORC will publicly notify the applications, as had been requested earlier by QLDC, following receipt of the requested, additional information; due in by 11 August. QLDC has applied for two resource consent applications (RM25.206 and RM25.177). These applications include the following activities: Divert the Shotover River to ensure the discharge is always going to running water. Disturb the bed of the Shotover River to create and maintain a diversion channel. Discharge consent for remobilising sediment from the Shotover River when creating the channel. Discharge treated wastewater to the Shotover River from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant. Disturb the bed of the Shotover River for the purpose of installing a riprap outfall structure. Ms King says ORC continues to closely monitor the Shotover treatment plant site and continues to undertake its regulatory role. *Background Two abatement notices are in place and 10 infringements have been issued since the start of 2024. Five of these infringementnotices have been issued this year (2025) relating to issues that happened on site towards the end of 2024. All the (5) new notices that have been issued, relate to the alleged discharge of contaminants (namely treated wastewater) to land on the Shotover Delta in circumstances which may result in contaminant (or any other contaminant entering water; namely groundwater), the Shotover River and/or Kawarau River. Following conclusion of a more than year-long investigation of the Shotover site, ORC decided on 23 February to apply to the Environment Court for an Enforcement Order - under section 316 of the Resource Management Act 1991; to have QLDC abide by its consent conditions. The Enforcement Order application was made because of issues around QLDC's consent compliance, mainly related to the performance of the Shotover plant's ground disposal field; where treated wastewater from the plant was expected to soak through the ground and not to pond. Following the application to the Environment Court and subsequent mediation process, there is now an Enforcement Order still in place relating to the Shotover site. (An Enforcement Order is a court issued directive requiring certain actions to be taken within set time frames to fix a problem). NB - There is further supporting material / documents now available on the dedicated Shotover web page Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant
