&w=3840&q=100)
Crypto's new trend: Publicly traded companies buying bunches of bitcoin
It's one of crypto's hottest trends: publicly traded companies buying bitcoin and then buying even more.
President Donald Trump's media company just announced a plan to raise USD 2.5 billion to buy bitcoin, joining a growing number of so-called bitcoin treasury companies as the world's most popular crypto-currency hits all-time highs.
The companies buy bitcoin for different reasons: Some hold it as a hedge against inflation or to signal support for the crypto-currency industry, while some firms have made using debt and stock sales to buy bitcoin their primary business strategy.
The world at large has no idea what's happening and they're in for a big shock, Dylan LeClair, an executive at the Japan-based Metaplanet, which recently went from being a budget hotel firm to a bitcoin treasury company, said at a recent crypto conference. This is a one-way train, nothing is going to stop this.
The massive increases in some firms' stock price may seem to validate LeClair's bravado, but there are plenty of warnings that a downturn in bitcoin's prices could lead to large selloffs.
Here's a look at bitcoin treasury companies by the numbers: 582,000 That's how many bitcoins owned by MicroStrategy the undisputed goliath of bitcoin treasury companies.
With nearly 3 per cent of the total bitcoin supply, MicroStrategy owns more bitcoins than every other bitcoin treasury company combined. It also owns more bitcoin than every nation state combined, according to the tracking site bitcointreasuries.net.
Now called Strategy, the software company first started buying bitcoin in 2020 with reserve cash. Now, its software business is a small part of a perpetual bitcoin-buying machine that uses a variety of strategies like selling shares or issuing debt to keep growing its bitcoin holdings.
More than 3000 per cent That's how much MicroStrategy's stock price has increased in the last five years, compared to around 1,000 per cent gain in bitcoin and the 1,500 per cent jump for chipmaker and stock market darling Nvidia during that same period.
The company's success has boosted the profile of MicroStrategy's founder and chairman, Michael Saylor, who has visited Trump at Mar-a-Lago and the White House while becoming bitcoin's enigmatic high priest.
Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy, Saylor said in a social media post.
Saylor's success has also spawned many imitators.
It's kind of shocking that it took someone four years after Michael Saylor started doing it to finally do it and pull the trigger and now it feels like everyone's pulling the trigger, said Eric Semler, the chairman of Semler Scientific, a healthcare company that started acquiring bitcoin last year.
USD 90,000 That's the average purchase price of bitcoin for half of the 61 publicly traded bitcoin strategy companies, excluding bitcoin mining companies and bitcoin exchange-traded funds, according to a recent analysis by Standard Chartered.
Geoff Kendrick, the bank's head of digital assets research, said in the report that restrictions on investors buying bitcoin directly help explain the popularity of bitcoin treasury companies, as their stocks can serve as bitcoin proxies.
But as crypto becomes more mainstream, the case for investing in bitcoin treasury companies becomes weaker, Kendrick said.
He added that bitcoin's volatility could force some newer bitcoin treasury companies to sell their holdings to satisfy their debts if it falls under the purchase price.
The question then becomes, how much pain can companies withstand before being forced to sell their BTC? Kendrick said, referring to the symbol for bitcoin.
Triple digits That's how much of a one-day percentage increase in stock prices firms have seen after recently announcing plans to hold other types of cryptocurrencies as corporate treasuries, highlighting how the appetite for such companies extends beyond bitcoin.
SharpLink Gaming, a gambling marketing firm, saw its share price increase by more than 400 per cent after it announced plans to buy up to USD 425 million in Ethereum, the second most popular form of cryptocurrency.
And crypto firm Upexi saw its stock price soar more than 300 per cent after it announced plans to buy USD 100 million of Solana, a cryptocurrency popular in the meme coin ecosystem.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
US tech company penalised by Department of Justice for favouring H‑1B visa workers over American candidates
The US Justice Department has penalized Epik Solutions, a California-based tech recruiter, for discriminating against American workers in favor of H-1B visa holders. This settlement, the first under the revived "Protecting US Workers Initiative," addresses violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Epik Solutions must pay a civil penalty, revise hiring policies, and cease discriminatory advertising practices. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pay $71,916 as civil penalty to the US government Revise its hiring and recruitment policies Undergo compliance training Cease the practice of placing ads that exclude US workers Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The US Justice Department has penalised California-based tech recruiter Epik Solutions for discriminating against American workers in favour of foreign H‑1B visa holders, as per a report by the Times of India. The action marks the first settlement under the revived 'Protecting US Workers Initiative.'An investigation found that Epik Solutions violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by posting job advertisements that excluded US citizens and gave preference to H‑1B visa the terms of the settlement, the company has agreed to:The Department emphasised that this move signals stricter enforcement against discriminatory hiring.'Protecting American workers from unlawful discrimination in favour of foreign visa workers is a top priority of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division,' said assistant attorney general for civil rights, Harmeet K. Dhillon to TOI. She further stated, 'The days of the federal government looking the other way on American workforce protection are over.'The 'Protecting US Workers Initiative' was relaunched to ensure that US citizens are not unfairly excluded from employment opportunities . Epik Solutions' settlement is expected to serve as a warning to other firms employing similar practices.(With inputs from TOI)
The Hindu
42 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday, marking the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorized copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from 'Despicable Me.' 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. 'I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time,' Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around.' In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers in generating new video, synthetic voices and editing help. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement Wednesday that 'strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry' and it supports a 'balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centered innovation.' Endorsing the lawsuit Wednesday as a 'critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation' was the Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against companies that make AI-generated music. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
HighlightsDisney and Universal Pictures have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Midjourney, marking a significant legal action from major Hollywood companies against generative artificial intelligence technology. The lawsuit alleges that Midjourney has created and distributed unauthorized copies of iconic characters, including Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from Despicable Me, by unlawfully using the studios' copyrighted libraries. Midjourney's CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit during a conference call, expressing confidence in the company's longevity despite the legal challenges and likening the image-generating service to a search engine that learns from various images on the internet. Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday, marking the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute "endless unauthorized copies" of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from "Despicable Me." "Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. "I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time," Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around." In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as "kind of like a search engine" pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. "Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?" Holz said. "Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine." The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers in generating new video, synthetic voices and editing help. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement Wednesday that "strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry" and it supports a "balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centered innovation." Endorsing the lawsuit Wednesday as a "critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation" was the Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against companies that make AI-generated music. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the "fair use" doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
