logo
There is no sense of urgency from politicians for radical land reform

There is no sense of urgency from politicians for radical land reform

The National28-04-2025

I'd wager that since the inception of The National, land reform has been one of its most popular topics.
I had hoped that Ms Burgess would show a commitment to it beyond the woolly platitudes we are tired of hearing from the ranks of politicians and various players in land whose living is made from it.
What they do either on purpose or by direction is avoid the central question: when is the Scottish Parliament going to get serious about taxing land? Why did Ms Burgess give that a body swerve too?
READ MORE: Historic ruling paves way for first forced private land sale to community in Scotland
She cites the current Land Reform Bill as having the potential 'to break up big estates and empower communities to buy and transform the land around them'.
I have spoken with representatives of two large landowners. They have indicated to me that if their land was taxed annually and became a significant financial burden, they would dispose of much of the land as their business model can operate without it.
So why would any serious politician with the interests of communities at heart encourage them to buy land with good public money without first establishing just how much of the land owners would retain if it was taxed?
Poverty is the greatest blight on our people, yet we commend our government for introducing the Scottish Child Payment when it has the power to eliminate child poverty. Our political classes in national and local government and their advisors pussyfoot around with initiatives here and there to increase and spread public funds at the margins, instead of dealing with the fundamentals through the legislative powers they have enjoyed for years.
READ MORE: Scottish Tory council leader appears to promise 'pals' contracts
Our politicians and media institutionalise the fixed budget when it is not Westminster which fixes the budget; it's the Scottish Government which chooses to do so. Incredibly, the opposition parties are complicit in this, as one never hears them bring forward any proposal which would expand the budget to such an extent that all our lives can be transformed.
Over recent years I have been present when politicians and their officials engage with stakeholders on matters of great national and human importance. The common denominator of all such experience is that there is no sense of any urgency.
Tinkering at the edges is our national political sport. The ball is at their feet, but it's what's under their feet which is the solution.
Graeme McCormick
Arden
IN a few years Visit Scotland will be adding a new tourist experience for the people of Scotland and their visitors. This will be a wonderful addition to our iconic NC500, The West Highland Way and the Southern Upland Walk.
It's the Pylon Paths. Routes stretching from our islands in the west and north. Running through our stunning Highland landscapes, then cutting through our best arable farming land on the east coast and continuing through the tranquil Tweed Valley and finishing up on the rolling Border Hills.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn speaks out as Labour snub Scottish carbon capture scheme
Hundreds of miles of majestic steel structures. Some the biggest anywhere, the envy of our European neighbours and a tribute to the multinationals who decided Scotland was the best place for this attraction.
VisitScotland will host an opening launch and pay tribute to our First Minister and his government for their unstinting and selfless support to enable this magnificent undertaking to come to fruition. Also attending the launch will be Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. He will echo the words of VisitScotland in praising the Scottish Government for delivering this unique development and with its completion a milestone for his task of delivering net zero emissions by 2050. Job done.
David Smart
via email
HUGE interest will have to be paid to the banks for money borrowed to finance the cost of net zero, as the UK operates a deficit economy.
The weakness of the present UK system is that the banks create the government's money supply from thin air, in exchange for government guarantees, rather as they might demand guarantees for a personal loan or business overdraft.
At present, government pays interest to the banks of around £120 billion a year on such money, as its debt to the banks is around £3 trillion.
READ MORE: Scotland shouldn't aim for independence without a currency plan, says expert
The answer of course is for government itself to create and issue the money supply, but interest-free. This would save those billions for better use, and could also keep expenditure in proportion to the assets of the nation, such as roads, schools, public housing, the NHS, and so on, and of course those assets would be more cheaply created without an interest burden.
Equally, the banking system itself would be unlikely to fund the massive cost of net zero without guarantees that would bankrupt the nation if ever exercised. In effect, Britain would become the property of the banks.
It is clear that in an independent Scotland, government itself must issue and control the volume of the money supply, as well as directing its proper use, and thus be free of the banks that are presently in a position to tell the UK Government what it can and can't do.
Malcolm Parkin
Kinross

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership
Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership

The National

time21 minutes ago

  • The National

Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership

Attendees said that the First Minister has two weeks in which to come up with a new strategy on independence or face a 'bloodbath' at the SNP conference, The Herald reported. A source told that paper: 'It feels like Groundhog Day. The last time John was in charge he dropped independence, surrounded himself only by people who agreed with him, and pushed out the likes of Margo [McDonald] and anyone who challenged his devolutionist strategy. 'For those with short memories, that ended in a bruising defeat. If he stays, we will be heading for a repeat. What is left of the membership will not tolerate it.' READ MORE: Controversial Loch Lomond Flamingo Land plans recalled by Scottish ministers It comes after SNP insiders made a similar argument to The National, warning that it felt like the party was being headed up by a small, private leadership group and 'heading back into the same old internal splits'. The Herald reported that the Monday meeting was ostensibly about forcing the party to move forward on independence, but there was a unanimous view that the First Minister 'has no intention of putting independence anywhere near the party's narrative whatsoever". Previously, the SNP's former policy chief Toni Giugliano told The National that independence had never been so far off the party's agenda as currently under Swinney. One source told The Herald: 'If there is nothing in the next couple of weeks from the leadership, then conference will be a bloodbath.' Though they doubted that any MSP or MP would challenge Swinney directly, they said it did not matter if the only competition came from an activist, as any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous". Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote. (Image: PA) Last year, Swinney faced a leadership challenge from party activist Graeme McCormick, who claimed to have secured the necessary nominations. However, McCormick was later talked out of the challenge after a 'lengthy and fruitful conversation' with Swinney. An SNP insider predicted similar challenges, saying: 'NEC members better start looking for new hobbies unless the leadership announces a change of direction soon — because at this rate we are heading for a mass clear-out.' They went on: 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description – it is essential – and he has failed on probation. 'The Presbyterian schoolmaster might fly in Perthshire – but in the rest of Scotland it just does not land. Stabilising the party only works for a short time. There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.' Last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election saw the SNP lose to Labour by 602 votes. READ MORE: 'Absurdity' of UK position on Israel while still supplying arms called out by SNP MP The party had been favourites, with Swinney calling it a two-horse race between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Yesterday, the constituency's new MSP, Davy Russell, took his oath at Holyrood and, in a speech on the steps of the garden lobby, said his win could be a 'springboard' to Labour winning power next year. The seat had been held by Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie until her death earlier this year at the age of 57. At a press conference on Friday, Swinney insisted there had been progress for his party when the result was measured against their dire performance at last year's general election. One MSP told The Herald on Sunday that that was not enough. They said it was time for Swinney to make changes to his top team. 'I think a proper ministerial reshuffle is required, and an exercise undertaken to seek new policies. For example, I would call in the former MPs who have experience but have had time to refresh their perspective. 'I can sense that many – for the first time – are now nervous, and rightfully so. 'On independence – again, it can never be enough to simply run a competent devolved government without a vision of what could be.' The First Minister is expected to conduct a limited reshuffle of his ministerial team in the coming days. Swinney's previous time in charge saw the party's vote share and number of seats fall. He resigned in 2004, paving the way for the return of Alex Salmond. Asked by the BBC on Sunday if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said: 'Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me. 'I was not seeking high office – I had held high office for a long time in my life – and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.' Professor Sir John Curtice said the close battle for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did not mean Anas Sarwar was a shoo-in for Bute House. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed The election expert told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'The recent message from opinion polls is the SNP is running at just over 30%, Labour is around 20%, so it seems a reasonable expectation that such a result would not mean Anas Sarwar is Scotland's next first minister.' An SNP spokesperson said: 'Since John Swinney became leader last year he has brought the SNP back together and the party is back to doing what it does best – standing up for the people of Scotland. 'In the run-up to next year's Scottish Parliament election, the SNP will continue to deliver for people across the country, while setting out a clear and hopeful vision for their future as an independent country. 'With the latest polling putting support for independence at 54%, the SNP will continue to focus on demonstrating how having the full powers of an independent country is key to addressing the everyday concerns of people across Scotland and creating a more prosperous society for us all.'

Spending review live updates: Rachel Reeves to reveal how Britain will splash the cash with NHS, defence and schools in line for windfalls
Spending review live updates: Rachel Reeves to reveal how Britain will splash the cash with NHS, defence and schools in line for windfalls

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Spending review live updates: Rachel Reeves to reveal how Britain will splash the cash with NHS, defence and schools in line for windfalls

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will today unveil her spending review in Parliament. The review, which will set out day-to-day spending plans for the next three years and capital spending plans for the next four, is expected to see boosts for the NHS, defence and schools. But it is also likely to involve squeezes for other departments as the Chancellor seeks to keep within the fiscal rules she has set for herself. Her room for manoeuvre has also been further constrained by the Government's U-turn on winter fuel payments, which will see the benefit paid to pensioners receiving up to £35,000 per year at a cost of around £1.25 billion to the Treasury.

When is the spending review and what might Rachel Reeves announce?
When is the spending review and what might Rachel Reeves announce?

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

When is the spending review and what might Rachel Reeves announce?

All eyes are on the Treasury this week as Rachel Reeves is set to lay out her spending review to Parliament on Wednesday. She'll announce the Government's day-to-day spending commitments up to 2028-29, and investment spending plans to 2029-30 – but there have been varying reports of what we can expect. Here, Telegraph Money takes you through what we know and what the plans could mean for you. What is the spending review? Spending reviews take place every few years, and it is when the Government lays out all spending that can be reasonably planned. The plans account for around 40pc of all public spending, according to the House of Commons Library, with the rest dependent on demands such as the benefits bill. The last multi-year spending review was in 2021 under Boris Johnson's Conservative administration. In the run-up to the review, government departments have been in negotiations with the Treasury to try to secure as much funding as they can. The current review process was launched in December last year, and the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said it could be 'one of the most significant domestic policy events of this parliament'. However, Ms Reeves has warned that 'not every department will get everything that they want', as she has had to 'say no' to things that she would support in an ideal world. Many departments are expecting a real-terms cut in their funding. The Government previously said that the review is 'zero-based', meaning that decisions will be made based on an assessment of spending line by line, rather than an overall increase or decrease to the current budget. What time will Rachel Reeves announce it? The Chancellor will stand up in the House of Commons on Wednesday June 11 after Prime Minister's Questions, at roughly 12.30pm. Once Ms Reeves has finished speaking the review will be published on the government website, along with any accompanying documents. What is likely to be included? Some government spending plans have already been announced. Last week, Reeves announced £15.6bn of funding for regional transport, and the Government has confirmed a partial U-turn on the decision to remove winter fuel payments from all but the poorest pensioners. The Treasury has today announced that nine million pensioners will receive winter fuel payments this winter as a result. It has also been reported that the Chancellor will focus on three priorities in the spending review: health, security and the economy. This means spending on the NHS, defence and infrastructure, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper understood to be putting in a final plea for more police funding. There are also suggestions that the two-child benefit cap may be lifted, and schools are understood to be in line for £4.5bn uplift. Funding these plans may be tricky, however. Ms Reeves has confirmed she will be sticking to the Government's non-negotiable fiscal rules on borrowing. At the same time, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) said 'momentum is weakening' in the economy, as they told Ms Reeves that efforts to cut government borrowing must be 'stepped up'. If more borrowing is off the table, it may mean cuts for some departments. The IFS has warned that 'because headline real growth rates [over the period] are relatively modest, sharp trade-offs are unavoidable. Achieving stated objectives in some areas will likely require real-terms cuts elsewhere.' Deutsche Bank is a little more optimistic. In a recent analyst note Sanjay Raja, senior economist, said the bank is seeing more 'resilience than expected' in the UK economy, and their forecasts for growth until the end of 2027 currently sit above the consensus. But, in short, Reeves still needs to find more money. Will any tax changes be announced? No, there will be no tax rises in the spending review on Wednesday. As tax increases demand new legislation through a finance bill, we won't hear about any changes until the Budget in the autumn – but there is already speculation that any additional spending will necessitate a higher tax burden unless a spur in economic growth helps to boost the Treasury's coffers. Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'Of course, a lot can happen between now and the Budget and we have a number of economic data points that could influence the Chancellor's decisions come the autumn, but speculation about what may be on the table is naturally already rife. 'Perhaps the most drastic decision the Government could make would be to walk back on its manifesto commitment not to tax 'working people' and consider increasing income tax, national insurance or VAT.' Mr Selby added that ideas for a wealth tax may also be considered, along with speculation of further pensions reform. Another option Ms Reeves could be weighing up is extending the current freeze on income tax thresholds. The Finance Act 2025 extended the freeze on inheritance tax thresholds until 2030 – and the Chancellor will be under pressure to do the same to other allowances and thresholds, too. The latest forecasts suggest eight million workers will be pulled into higher rates of tax by 2028, raising an extra £38bn per year for the Treasury. Extending the threshold would also allow the Chancellor to keep to Labour's manifesto commitment not to raise taxes on working people. Lindsay James, investment strategist at Quilter, said as there were no tax rises in the Spring Statement, investors are expecting to see rises in the autumn Budget if growth continues to 'lag'. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, made a series of suggestions in a leaked memo – including reinstating the pensions lifetime allowance and removing more inheritance tax reliefs, which were calculated to raise approximately £3bn in total. Chris Etherington, tax partner at RSM UK, added: 'It may already feel pretty claustrophobic at the Treasury, with limited headroom below the fiscal ceiling. The hope will be that economic growth will ease this pressure, and the next few months could be crucial to the Chancellor's plans. 'As it stands, the foundations may need further stabilisation and another sizeable rise in tax receipts to fund that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store