Palace lose appeal against Europa League demotion
European football's governing body demoted Crystal Palace last month. Photo: Reuters
Crystal Palace's appeal over their demotion from the Europa League to the Uefa Conference League has been rejected by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas).
The London club, who won last season's FA Cup, fell foul of Uefa's rules governing multi-club ownership.
European football's governing body determined that as of March 1, American businessman John Textor had control or influence in Palace and French club Lyon.
It means under Uefa rules they are unable to compete in the same European competition and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position.
Palace appealed to Cas last month after Textor agreed to sell his 43 percent stake in the Premier League club to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson.
However, that deal was struck well after Uefa's deadline of March 1 for multi-club conflicts to be resolved.
"After considering the evidence, the Panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL and was a Board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of Uefa's assessment date," Cas said in a statement.
"The Panel considered that the Uefa Regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed," it added.
Palace, who beat Liverpool on penalties to win the Community Shield after a 2-2 draw at Wembley on Sunday, will enter the Uefa Conference League in the play-off round later this month.
Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League, are set to replace Palace in the second-tier Europa League. (AFP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
US foreign policy's long been transactional – but not like Trump's
The US president, Donald Trump, watched on recently as the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan shook hands in the White House. They had just signed what Trump called a 'peace deal' to end nearly four decades of conflict. The deal grants the US exclusive rights to develop a transit corridor through southern Armenia, linking Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan. The White House says the corridor will be named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity. Trump has positioned the US as the guarantor of security in the South Caucasus, packaging this as a commercial opportunity for American companies. This exemplifies what researchers call transactional foreign policy, a strategy that offers rewards or threatens costs to get others to act rather than persuading them through shared values. US presidents have long mixed economic incentives with diplomacy. But Trump's approach represents something very different. It's a foreign policy that operates outside institutional constraints and targets democratic allies. It exploits American power for personal gain in ways no previous president has attempted. US presidents have commonly used transactional approaches in their foreign policy. In the early 20th century, Theodore Roosevelt promised to protect Latin American governments from internal rebels and external European intervention to ensure debt payments to American bankers. This sometimes required the US military to take control of customs houses, as happened in the Dominican Republic in 1905 and Cuba in 1906. Presidents Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge ordered similar military interventions in Nicaragua in 1911, Honduras in 1911 and 1912, Haiti in 1915 and Panama in 1926. In the mid-20th century, presidents Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy innovated foreign aid policy in an attempt to dampen the appeal of communism. They did so specifically through land reform policies. American officials viewed rural poverty in developing countries as fertile ground for communist recruitment during the Cold War. So US aid was used to promote food price stabilisation and facilitate land distribution. Around the same time, Dwight Eisenhower applied financial pressure on the UK during the 1956 Suez crisis. Britain and France, coordinating with Israel, invaded Egypt to retake the critical Suez Canal waterway after it was nationalised. The US blocked British access to financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to force the withdrawal of its troops. More recently, Barack Obama's 2015 Iran nuclear deal bundled sanctions relief with nuclear limits. And Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, coupled export controls with subsidies and tax credits to pull allies into a shared tech-security posture. As a result, Japan and the Netherlands limited the sale of semiconductor equipment to China. The Armenia-Azerbaijan peace negotiations also began under the Biden administration. It is not hard to imagine that a similar deal, without the Trump branding, would have occurred under a Kamala Harris presidency. Trump's undemocratic approach While a transactional approach isn't unique in American foreign policy, Trump's strategy marks a shift. Particularly in his second term, it resembles that of a typical authoritarian leader. Trump is carrying out his approach with minimal congressional or judicial constraint, with policies shaped by personal whims rather than institutional consistency. This manifests in four key ways. First, Trump operates outside international and domestic legal frameworks. His tariff policies, for example, probably violate international and US domestic laws. Second, Trump systematically targets democratic allies while embracing authoritarian partners. The US has had strained relationships with its allies before. But there has never been this level of animosity towards them. Trump has threatened to annex Canada, while praising authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Viktor Orban and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Third, Trump prioritizes domestic political enemies over traditional foreign adversaries. He has gutted institutions that he views as politically hostile, like the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department. He has even deployed federal forces in US cities under dubious legal reasoning. And fourth, Trump exploits American foreign policy for personal gain in ways no previous US president has attempted. He receives more gifts from foreign governments, including a US$400 million Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet from Qatar. The jet was expected to serve as Air Force One during his presidency, but was transferred to Trump's presidential library foundation. Trump's own company, the Trump Organization, has also signed deals to build luxury towers in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. And Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner secured US$2 billion from Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund just six months after leaving the White House. Kushner has denied that the investment represented a conflict of interest. Authoritarian approaches lead to authoritarian outcomes. Research consistently shows that authoritarian systems produce weaker alliances, underinvestment in public goods and non-credible promises. They also decrease state capacity as professional institutions are hollowed out in favour of personal loyalty networks. Trump's weakening of career diplomatic services and development agencies sacrifices institutional competence for direct presidential control. This undermines the very capabilities needed to implement international agreements effectively. Trump's style further encourages flattery over mutual interests. The naming of the Armenian transit corridor mirrors earlier examples: Poland's 2018 proposal for a US military base named 'Fort Trump', foreign nominations for a Nobel peace prize and overt flattery at diplomatic meetings. These are all designed to sway a leader with personal praise rather than emphasising American interests. Previous US presidents usually embedded transactional bargains within larger institutional projects such as NATO, the IMF, non-proliferation regimes or the liberal trade system. While those arrangements disproportionately benefited the US, they also produced global gains. Trump's deals may yield benefit. The Armenia-Azerbaijan peace agreement, for instance, could reduce the risk of conflict and unlock trade in the South Caucasus. But his approach represents a fundamentally different kind of American leadership – one that is undemocratic. Patrick E Shea is senior lecturer in international relations and global governance, University of Glasgow This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
RTHK
6 hours ago
- RTHK
PSG storm back to win Super Cup on penalties
PSG storm back to win Super Cup on penalties PSG's victory marks the first time any club from France have won the annual Super Cup match. Photo: Reuters European champions Paris Saint-Germain began the new season by lifting more silverware as they beat Tottenham Hotspur 4-3 on penalties in the Uefa Super Cup after producing a late comeback to draw the match 2-2. Spurs looked set to get their hands on the trophy in their first competitive match under new coach Thomas Frank as they led 2-0 just after half-time at the Stadio Friuli in Udine, Italy. Micky van de Ven gave last season's Europa League winners the lead on 39 minutes and Cristian Romero got their second goal three minutes into the second half. However, PSG were rescued by two substitutes as Lee Kang-in pulled a goal back in the 85th minute and Goncalo Ramos headed in the equaliser four minutes into injury time. That meant a penalty shoot-out, although it started badly for PSG when Vitinha put their first kick wide. However, new Paris goalkeeper Lucas Chevalier saved from Van de Ven and Mathys Tel missed the target, allowing Nuno Mendes to convert the winning penalty for PSG. Dominic Solanke, Rodrigo Bentancur and Pedro Porro all scored from the spot for Spurs, in vain. Ramos, Ousmane Dembele and Lee converted for PSG before Mendes stepped up. It is the first time PSG, or indeed any French club, have lifted the Super Cup, as they take their tally of trophies won in 2025 to five. "I am proud. We have hadn't much preparation but you could see that football is not only about the physical aspect – it is also about the mental aspect, being in the right place, having the right tactics," PSG captain Marquinhos told broadcaster Canal Plus. "They sat back a lot after going 2-0 up and it is dangerous to invite PSG to come at you like that," he added. It is the perfect start to the new campaign for Luis Enrique's team, who had a shortened off-season break having lost the Fifa Club World Cup final to Chelsea exactly a month ago. (AFP)
RTHK
6 hours ago
- RTHK
PSG storm back to win Super Cup on penalties
PSG storm back to win Super Cup on penalties PSG's victory marks the first time any club from France have won the annual Super Cup match. Photo: Reuters European champions Paris Saint-Germain began the new season by lifting more silverware as they beat Tottenham Hotspur 4-3 on penalties in the Uefa Super Cup after producing a late comeback to draw the match 2-2. Spurs looked set to get their hands on the trophy in their first competitive match under new coach Thomas Frank as they led 2-0 just after half-time at the Stadio Friuli in Udine, Italy. Micky van de Ven gave last season's Europa League winners the lead on 39 minutes and Cristian Romero got their second goal three minutes into the second half. However, PSG were rescued by two substitutes as Lee Kang-in pulled a goal back in the 85th minute and Goncalo Ramos headed in the equaliser four minutes into injury time. That meant a penalty shoot-out, although it started badly for PSG when Vitinha put their first kick wide. However, new Paris goalkeeper Lucas Chevalier saved from Van de Ven and Mathys Tel missed the target, allowing Nuno Mendes to convert the winning penalty for PSG. Dominic Solanke, Rodrigo Bentancur and Pedro Porro all scored from the spot for Spurs, in vain. Ramos, Ousmane Dembele and Lee converted for PSG before Mendes stepped up. It is the first time PSG, or indeed any French club, have lifted the Super Cup, as they take their tally of trophies won in 2025 to five. "I am proud. We have hadn't much preparation but you could see that football is not only about the physical aspect – it is also about the mental aspect, being in the right place, having the right tactics," PSG captain Marquinhos told broadcaster Canal Plus. "They sat back a lot after going 2-0 up and it is dangerous to invite PSG to come at you like that," he added. It is the perfect start to the new campaign for Luis Enrique's team, who had a shortened off-season break having lost the Fifa Club World Cup final to Chelsea exactly a month ago. (AFP)
