Greece completes work on undersea cable linking mainland with Crete
The €1 billion link spanning 330 kilometres was plugged in on Saturday and is expected to be fully operational this summer, Greece's grid operator said.
The project, for which the European Union provided the bulk of funding through grants and loans, aims to bolster energy diversification after after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Athens hopes to extend the link, dubbed the Great Sea Interconnector, to Cyprus and Israel by the end of the decade.
The project is also a move towards Crete being able to replace fossil fuel-based power generation with renewables, government officials said.
"Crete is becoming a central pillar for the country's energy transition," Energy Minister Stavros Papastavrou said.
"We're moving forward with the development of an integrated network of electrical interconnections, strengthening our country as a strategic energy hub in the Eastern Mediterranean."
However, the wider project has been complicated by financial disagreements and an ongoing maritime dispute with Turkey.
Greece and Egypt also want to establish a separate undersea link on a similar timetable that would bypass the island of Crete and connect directly to the Greek mainland.
The undersea cables to Crete have been laid at a depth of 1,200 metres and will support a capacity of 1,000 megawatts using high-voltage direct current transmission systems.
Supervised by a subsidiary of Greece's Independent Power Transmission Operator, the project involved private contractors Siemens Energy of Germany, Greek construction firm TERNA and the Italy-based Prysmian Group cable company, among others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Kyiv residents react to Zelenskyy-Trump talks on ending war in Ukraine
Residents of Kyiv held their breath as they closely watched meetings between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, US President Donald Trump and European leaders. During the summit, Trump expressed hope that he and Zelenskyy would soon hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin with the objective of ending Russia's all-out war in Ukraine, now well into its fourth year. Following the conclusion of the meetings, Trump phoned Putin to initiate the three-way talks. Volodymr Novytskyy, who lives in the Ukrainian capital, said a truce can be achieved but that it will not be the end of the war. 'Even if there is a truce, this enemy will not stop within the border he has now.' 'I would not like to be in Zelenskyy's place," Kyiv resident Svetlana Gerasimenko said. 'He will not give in to Putin's desires, but it is difficult to think how the situation will unfold further.' Political analyst Oleh Saakian said the meeting went "satisfactorily". "Trump did not come out and say he was strengthening sanctions against Russia. But we live in a certain reality. The task of this meeting was to prevent Trump from pressuring Ukraine with Russian demands. We managed to achieve that 100%," Saakian said. "For Ukraine, the meeting with Putin is important to show Trump whether Russia is really ready to end the war. It is important to demonstrate that Ukraine has done everything possible on its side," he explained. "I don't think anyone in Ukraine has the illusion that a meeting with Putin could suddenly bring peace." Zelenskyy and European leaders said that Putin has demanded that Ukraine give up the Donbas in eastern Ukraine, which has seen some of the most intense fighting for over a decade, ever since Russia's initial invasion in 2014. Euronews previously reported that Russia would be unable to seize Donetsk -- which makes up the Donbas together with another eastern region, Luhansk -- unless Ukraine withdraws from it, according to the US-based Institute for the Study of War think tank.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
What does the Washington summit on Ukraine mean for the EU?
Seated around the same table at the White House, five European leaders, the President of the European Commission and the Secretary General of NATO rallied around the Ukrainian President to support his demands for peace in the presence of US President Donald Trump. The EU is back at the negotiating table on a possible peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia, according to this expert. "I dare say that the EU is back but now we have to stand firm and show determination. And that also means a willingness to accept the risk, especially by giving Ukraine a security guarantee with troops on the ground," Sven Biscop, director of the Egmont Institute, a Brussels-based think tank, told Euronews. The priority for the Europeans was to push for security guarantees in Kyiv to be an integral part of any possible future peace agreement, to protect Ukraine from another Russian attack in the future. Security guarantees In a U-turn, the US President hinted for the first time that the US might provide Ukraine with security guarantees. "Trump said this time that the Europeans should provide a security guarantee coordinated by the United States," Biscop explained. "This is really a change of viewpoint because initially he was saying that this was the job of the Europeans and that the United States or NATO would not be involved. So it's a move in the right direction, but it's still not very detailed." An agreement has yet to be reached on what security guarantees the United States and the EU are prepared to provide to Ukraine. Article 5 The best would be one that comes closest to Article 5 of the NATO treaty, according to the director of the Egmont Institute. "A security guarantee means promising to go to war if your security is threatened. Anything less than that is support, but it is not a security guarantee. The best way to make this credible is to deploy troops to Ukraine after a ceasefire or peace agreement," says the researcher. Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Western allies would formalise security guarantees for Ukraine within the next ten days.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
France faces prospect of paying higher borrowing costs than Italy
As hard as it may be to take for France, many investors no longer have any doubt: Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's Italy is now just as credible when it comes to public finances, if not more so. "Once at the bottom of the class in the European Union in terms of budget discipline, Italy is now in a position to give lessons to France," said independent economist Philippe Crevel in an analysis published at the end of July. Some observers see Italy, now led by the far right, as a model of fiscal discipline for its neighbor. The numbers most symbolic of the reversal are the interest rates that investors demand in exchange for holding the two countries' public debt. In 2011 and 2012, Italy was seen as so turbulent and unreliable that investors insisted on a premium of up to 400 basis points (4%) over French rates. When France paid 3% annual interest, Italy had to pay 7%. Since then, the risk premium has shrunk dramatically, dropping to less than five basis points for the main benchmark with a 10-year repayment period on August 15, a rate unprecedented since 2005. For five-year bonds, the gap between French and Italian debt on financial markets disappeared entirely in mid-July.
