logo
The Aston Martin Vantage Roadster — it's the car of the summer

The Aston Martin Vantage Roadster — it's the car of the summer

Times4 days ago
Aston Martin's relentless release of models shows no signs of slowing down. Last year it introduced the new, more focused Vantage. Representing the current first rung of Aston Martin ownership, it is somewhat amusingly seen as the brand's entry-level car. Just in time for summer it has launched the open-top Roadster version of the Vantage, with prices from £181,000. In the past even Aston Martin's sportiest cars veered more towards a big grand tourer feel. The sharp and sporty Vantage, particularly the latest version, puts that notion to bed.
The Vantage Roadster is being launched as Aston Martin celebrates 75 years of convertible cars — it first offered the soft-top version of the DB2 in 1950. In Aston Martin parlance, the open-topped DB models are referred to as Volantes, while the Roadster badge is reserved for convertible Vantage models. This Vantage Roadster was engineered alongside the coupé from the outset as a potential convertible, meaning Aston Martin didn't have to take a figurative can opener to a car not initially conceived as a drop-top. Consequently the Roadster is essentially identical to the coupé, aside from the fabric roof, with only the header rail slightly reduced in height. As a result, the weight penalty for the Roadster over the coupé is a mere 60kg — barely noticeable to most drivers.
Performance figures are also broadly indistinguishable from those of the hard top, and with an eight-layer fabric folding roof featuring insulated glass, it provides a quiet interior experience similar to that of the coupé. It's hard not to argue that this version of the Vantage is the one to opt for. The roof folding mechanism is currently the fastest on the market — and taking only six seconds at speeds of up to 31mph, this is a real bonus, as it encourages you to use the convertible roof more regularly, even for short trips. In contrast, risking opening a slower roof on another brand's convertible, taking about 30 seconds, is a real gamble at the traffic lights, with the awkward prospect of having to pull away with the pramlike folded roof embarrassingly halfway open.
Aston Martin has also been refining the interior of the Vantage in response to customer feedback — a commendable move when a brand is willing to address sensible criticism. The interior was already a significant improvement over the previous Vantage. Still, the new Roadster version features clearer, more legible instrument graphics and, mercy of mercies, a one-touch button on the centre console that disables all of the interventions of the sometimes annoying ADAS systems (such as lane change alert, speed limit warnings, etc) that new cars are now required to start with. Expect that to be the most worn-out button on this Vantage. These upgrades will also be seen on all new coupés.
You can be sniffy about its use of a Mercedes AMG-sourced engine, but most owners will be more than happy that their car is powered by such a reliable, capable and tried-and-tested motor. You would not go as far as to describe it as emotive — turbos and emission regulations putting paid to that — but it's more than up for the job, and this is a seriously rapid car with 656bhp from that twin-turbo V8 unit. Laughably, with the enormous power hike across the range, this is the least powerful Aston Martin you can purchase. It may be the baby Aston, but it's very much a case of nobody puts baby in the corner with a top speed of over 200mph.
This is a sophisticated and striking vehicle that its rivals will be worried about. The hard-top coupé remains an option for those purists who scoff at soft tops or wish to emulate the Vantage F1 Safety Car that plies its trade on racing circuits around the globe. However, the sensible choice has to be the Roadster version of the Vantage. Thanks to its engineering integrity, this convertible offers the advantages of a split personality, allowing it to function both as a hardcore sports car and a stylish boulevard cruiser… however the mood takes you.
astonmartin.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Car insurance price rises 'out of firms' control' says City watchdog
Car insurance price rises 'out of firms' control' says City watchdog

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Car insurance price rises 'out of firms' control' says City watchdog

Soaring car insurance premiums are 'outside of firms' control' rather than being driven by insurer profits, the City regulator has said. The Financial Conduct Authority found that the cost of motor claims has been primarily driven by higher prices for cars, parts, labour and energy. The cost of hire vehicles, and the number and cost of theft claims, and uninsured drivers have also contributed to the rise. The average cost of car insurance premiums dropped 7 per cent in the first three months of 2025 compared to a year earlier, from £635 to £539, according to figures from the Association of British Insurers. However, premiums remain higher than two years ago when the average annual policy cost was £478. The FCA found that referral fees from credit hire firms and claims management companies had also pushed prices higher and contributed to slower processing. While the Government's motor taskforce, launched in 2024 to tackle the rising cost of car insurance, may help drive down premiums, the regulator said it would not prevent these kind of cost increases. The FCA also said that insurers across all sectors still needed to handle claims more efficiently. It said it had 'uncovered evidence of poor claims handling practices', particularly in the home and travel sector. This included just under a third of storm damage claims resulting in a payment, and what the FCA describes as 'insufficient management information'. Sarah Pritchard, deputy chief executive of the FCA said: 'Insurance provides peace of mind but people must be confident they can get a fair deal and be treated right when the worst happens.' Pay monthly insurance customers paying more Around 48 per cent of motor and home insurance was paid monthly in 2023, but customers could be paying higher premiums. The FCA report found that some firms that allow customers to spread costs and pay monthly rather than yearly were earning more money than the cost of providing the cover. Analysis found that the margins on these so-called 'premium finance' arrangements ranged between 14 and 62 per cent across insurers, intermediary lenders, intermediary brokers and specialist premium finance providers between 2018 and 2023. The regulator requires insurance premiums charged to customers using premium finance to be at the same level as those paying yearly, unless there is an objective and reasonable basis for the change. Some insurers say that the choice of payment method is correlated with the risk for those paying monthly. The FCA said: 'Where firms charge for premium finance, revenues appear to materially exceed costs for some providers. 'Whereas the profit margin earned on a core insurance policy may be relatively low, we see margins on premium finance that are somewhat higher. 'Different business models will have different ways of recovering costs. 'In some cases, they recover all costs through the insurance product itself, or recoup returns on lower margin insurance product through higher APRs [annual percentage rates].' As yet, the FCA will not introduce a cap or any other measures to encourage insurers to equalise premiums. Hannah Gurga, director general of the ABI said: 'Having the option to pay for insurance in monthly instalments can provide flexibility for those who need to manage their budgets. 'Offering this service does involve costs for insurers, and firms also have to keep cover in place for a period of time if a payment is delayed or missed. 'Our Premium Finance Principles, which we published last year, outline that any charges should be fair, transparent and reflective of the costs that the insurer faces. 'We'll continue to work with our members on this matter and engage with the FCA's review.'

Here's what the Porsche Carrera GT could have looked like
Here's what the Porsche Carrera GT could have looked like

Top Gear

time31 minutes ago

  • Top Gear

Here's what the Porsche Carrera GT could have looked like

Here's what the Porsche Carrera GT could have looked like In the late 1990s sketches were being drawn up at Porsche for a mid-engined V10 coupe Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. Well, this is rather fun. The sketch above shows what the Porsche Carrera GT could have looked like if it was a tin-topped, V10-engined supercar. The sketch was shown off in one of Porsche's YouTube videos, with actor Adrien Brody heading to Stuttgart to undertake an internship at the Zuffenhausen factory. Advertisement - Page continues below It's a heartwarming watch if you've got half an hour spare today, or you could skip to the 13-minute mark to see Brody meet Porsche's director of special projects, Grant Larson. Larson – who joined Porsche as a designer back in 1989 and penned the original 986 Boxster – explains that back in 1999 he was asked by the Carrera GT's project manager to come up with some ideas for a mid-engined V10 supercar. Must have been a fun few days at work after that. The sketch we're shown clearly takes some inspiration from the 911 GT1 in the roof to rear spoiler section. Looks like there would have been a hefty roof scoop, plus a dramatic ducktail-style spoiler and a giant rear diffuser section. And are those giant portrait exhausts? We love the Carrera GT, but this coupe could have been quite something. It's not too late, Porsche. Advertisement - Page continues below Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*

Technician who turned into human fireball when rally car fuel caught alight sues firm for £5m over life changing injuries suffered in incident
Technician who turned into human fireball when rally car fuel caught alight sues firm for £5m over life changing injuries suffered in incident

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Technician who turned into human fireball when rally car fuel caught alight sues firm for £5m over life changing injuries suffered in incident

A top rally car technician who went up in flames during training for a 1,300-mile desert race is suing one of Britain's top motorsport firms for £5m compensation. Matt 'Bubba' Finney caught fire after being soaked in highly volatile racing car fuel whilst filling up a high performance Prodrive Hunter T1+ rally car ahead of the November 2021 Abu Dhabi Desert Challenge. Mr Finney, 52, was put in an induced coma for three months and went through extensive skin grafts and surgery in Dubai for four months before returning to the UK. Almost four years on, he has launched a massive compensation case against Prodrive Motorsport Ltd, which produces the rally raid machine, seeking damages for the impact his injuries have had on his life. The firm is one of the biggest British names in motorsport, designing and building Aston Martin racing cars and the World Rally Championship-winning Subaru Impreza driven by Scotsman Colin McRae in 1995. It continues to produce high-performance off-road vehicles including the Hunter, and works with Lewis Hamilton 's X44 racing team in the electric-only Extreme E series. Mr Finney also worked on a record-breaking Subaru WRX which lapped the 38-mile Isle of Man course in 17 minutes and 35 seconds at an average of 128mph in 2016. Lawyers for the experienced mechanic, who has been with the firm for over 20 years, claim his accident was down to defective working practices. He was taking part in testing of the Prodrive Hunter T1+ (pictured) in November 2021 in Dubai when a fuel pump sprang a leak Prodrive maintains that the mechanic was himself at fault in failing to wear full protective equipment during testing of the 600bhp turbocharged off-roader, which saw it driven on a 22-mile loop simulating desert conditions before being refuelled. Court documents filed by his barrister James Candlin claim that a 'fountain-like spray of fuel' shot out of the fuel pump after he had attached the nozzle to the car itself. Prodrive, he alleged, had failed to deploy enough crew for the refuelling procedure and had not trained staff comprehensively in the new Piusi Ex50 refuelling pump - which he alleged was not designed to operate above 40C. Mr Finney is said to have slipped on fuel that had spilled onto a tarpaulin sheet on the ground - allegedly sparking the fire. Racing fuels are also 'volatile', his lawyers said. 'Mr Finney attempted to run back to the barrel and pump to switch it off, but slipped on fuel in the ground tarpaulin whereupon fuel or fuel vapour ignited, and he was engulfed in the subsequent conflagration,' Mr Candlin said in the papers. The mechanic was rushed to a Dubai hospital via rough roads, where he was treated for burns to his head, face, chest, back, upper and lower limbs and his throat. Although Mr Finney began a 'phased' return to work, he continued to be dogged by scarring and chronic pain, along with flashbacks and mental trauma, his lawyers say. Mr Candlin continued: 'The claimant has recently been medically certified as unfit for work... but when fit for work since the accident he has been limited to engagements mostly in desk work, rather than hands-on mechanical roles for which he is trained.' Prodrive insists Mr Finney brought disaster on himself by neglecting essential safety procedures, with barrister Vaughan Jacob claiming: '(His) decision to refuel the car while it was hot led to the ignition of the fire'. He added: 'Had he worked with two other colleagues as required, it's likely the pump would have been turned off immediately when it began to leak, and before the leaking fuel ignited.' While Mr Finney was 'valued and highly experienced', Prodrive maintains he failed to properly assess the risks, did not wear the right safety equipment, failed to check the fuel pump connections were secure and did not use the correct fuelling area. At the time of the accident early in the morning, the temperature was below 40 degrees, which meant the fuel pump in use was 'within its safe temperature range', the barrister added. With a trial date still to be fixed, Mr Finney's claim came before Master Gary Thornett in the High Court as lawyers on both sides hammered out what evidence should be heard at the trial. Technical experts are still trying to pinpoint the precise cause of the fire. Addressing the impact of the burns on Mr Finney, barrister Rob Hunter said the trial would also need to hear expert evidence on 'stroke medicine' as the mechanic last year suffered a stroke which may have been triggered by his injuries. 'There's a potential link between his severe burns and that stroke,' said the barrister, adding: 'We think an expert would be helpful in addressing that potential link'. The case will return to court at a later date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store