Two 'extremist' Israeli politicians banned from travelling to NZ
Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway said overnight they have imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli government ministers for allegedly "inciting extremist violence" against Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
The decision by Western governments friendly to Israel was a sharp rebuke of Israel's settlement policies in the West Bank and of settler violence, which has spiked since Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack ignited the war in the Gaza Strip.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, key partners in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, are champions of Israeli settlement who support continuing the war in Gaza, facilitating what they call the voluntary emigration of its Palestinian population and the rebuilding of Jewish settlements there.
They could now face asset freezes and travel bans.
In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of the five countries said Ben-Gvir and Smotrich "have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous".
ADVERTISEMENT
Foreign Minister responds
NZ First leader Winston Peters speaks at the James Hay Theatre in Christchurch. (Source: 1News)
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the pair have used their leadership positions to advocate for the annexation of Palestinian land and the expansion of illegal settlements, undermining the two state solution supported by New Zealand.
The pair are banned from travelling to New Zealand.
'Our action today is not against the Israeli people, who suffered immeasurably on October 7 and who have continued to suffer through Hamas' ongoing refusal to release all hostages," Peters said in a statement.
"Nor is it designed to sanction the wider Israeli government.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Rather, the travel bans are targeted at two individuals who are using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution."
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctions, and said they did not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring hostages home and end the war.
"We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organization that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is," he wrote on X.
"The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel."
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the two men "have been inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months" and "encouraging egregious abuses of human rights".
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Austrian school shooting, Kiwisaver deadline, and Warriors injury worry. (Source: 1News)
"These measures are directed at individuals who directly contribute to extremist settler violence," said Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand. "The measures are not directed against the state of Israel itself."
ADVERTISEMENT
Smotrich wrote on social media that he learned of the sanctions while he was inaugurating a new West Bank settlement. "We are determined to continue building," he said.
Ben-Gvir, also writing on social media, said "we overcame Pharoah, we'll overcome Starmer's Wall," referring to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Israel's government condemned the announcement, which came as traditional allies of Israel escalate denouncements of Israel's actions in Gaza, from the high civilian death toll to a monthslong blockade that led to famine warnings.
Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the sanctions decision "outrageous". He said he had discussed it with Netanyahu and they would meet next week to discuss Israel's response.
An Israeli armoured vehicle drives near burning tires during a military raid in the West Bank city of Nablus. (Source: Associated Press)
He said that the move threatened to harden Hamas' stance in ongoing negotiations to end the war in Gaza and to cut short Israel's operation in Gaza before it achieves its goals.
Benny Gantz, an centrist Israeli lawmaker an political rival to Netanyahu, wrote he "vehemently" disagreed with Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, but said the move was "profound moral mistake and sends a dangerous message to terrorists around the world".
ADVERTISEMENT
Netanyahu is the target of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court last year over alleged war crimes in Gaza, part of a global wave of outrage at Israel's conduct during its 20-month war against Hamas. Netanyahu has denied the allegations and accused the court of being biased against Israel.
The Biden administration took the rare step of sanctioning radical Israeli settlers implicated in violence in the occupied West Bank — sanctions that were lifted by US President Donald Trump.
Eitay Mack, an Israeli human rights lawyer who spent years campaigning for the sanctions on Smotrich and Ben-Gvir — along with violent West Bank settlers — described Wednesday's move as "historic".
"It means the wall of immunity that Israeli politicians had has been broken," he said. "It's unbelievable that it took so long for Western governments to sanction Israeli politicians, and the fact that it's being done while Trump is president is quite amazing."
Mack added: "It is a message to Netanyahu himself that he could be next".
Israel captured the West Bank, along with east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians want all three territories for a future state.
Successive Israeli governments have promoted settlement growth and construction stretching back decades. It has exploded under Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which has settlers in key Cabinet posts.
ADVERTISEMENT
There are now well over 100 settlements across the West Bank that house more than 500,000 settlers. The settlers have Israeli citizenship, while the territory's 3 million Palestinians live under Israeli military rule, with the Palestinian Authority administering population centers.
Most of the international community considers the settlements illegal, and Palestinians see them as the greatest obstacle to an eventual two-state solution, which is still seen internationally as the only way to resolve the conflict.
Additional reporting by 1News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Kāinga Ora to use wool carpet in new state homes
Kāinga Ora has announced it will use wool carpet in new state homes from July, following a directive that government agencies use wool in the construction and refurbishment of their buildings. The change in procurement rules, to make wool the preferred option in government buildings, was a directive to about 130 agencies in April and takes effect from July. On Wednesday, the state housing provider announced it would follow suit, with 4500 new state houses expected to be fitted out in the next three years. The return of wool carpets to state homes was welcomed by Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson at Fieldays the same day. "The decision is great news for sheep farmers, and all the New Zealanders whose jobs and incomes are tied to the fortunes of our world-leading wool industry," Willis said. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) She said the Government wanted wool producers to have more opportunities to supply woollen products to the construction industry "wherever practical and appropriate". "Kāinga Ora's new supplier agreement was made possible because the agency chose to re-open an initially nylon-only carpet tender and give wool a chance to compete. "I'm told woollen carpet manufacturers responded very strongly to that opportunity and that the new carpet supply agreements come with no additional cost." The new procurement requirements covered government-owned buildings that cost $9 million or more, and refurbishments of more than $100,000. A spokesperson said the total value of the Kāinga Ora contract was commercially sensitive and couldn't be disclosed. Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT They said some contracts for carpet in homes had already been let, but under the new supply agreement newly contracted fit-outs would be met through the wool-carpet supply contract. Where nylon carpet had already been installed in existing homes Kāinga Ora would continue to use nylon carpet for single room or smaller patch repairs. Willis said the message was clear. "When wool was put back on the table it more than held its own, delivering value for taxpayers and a win for sheep farmers." She said the new policy directed government agencies to identify opportunities to use woollen products, and to properly consider a range of factors in procurement including whole-of-life cost, sustainability and health benefits. "We're leveraging government spending to back the wool industry and the New Zealand economy. I hope private businesses will follow our lead." A new Kāinga Ora home in Richmond, August 2023. Photo: RNZ / Samantha Gee (Source: ADVERTISEMENT She previously said natural qualities allowed wool to dampen sound and absorb pollutants, while woollen fibres contributed to healthier indoor environments by naturally regulating humidity and improving air quality. Patterson said the move continued to deliver on a New Zealand First and National Party coalition agreement to prefer woollen fibres in government buildings. "Woollen fibres create safer, healthier and more sustainable living environments for families." He said the sector contributed $549m to the economy in the financial year ending 2024 from exporting processed and unprocessed wool products. "The Government is determined to help lift the fortunes of the strong wool sector in supporting our sheep farmers."
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
United Nations to vote to demand immediate Gaza ceasefire over US, Israel opposition
By Michelle Nichols , Reuters Palestinians walk among the rubble of homes in Gaza, on March 17, 2025. Photo: AFP/MAJDI FATHI The United Nations General Assembly will vote on Thursday (local time) on a draft resolution that demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza after the United States vetoed a similar effort in the Security Council last week. The 193-member General Assembly is likely to adopt the text with overwhelming support, diplomats say, despite Israel lobbying countries this week against taking part in what it called a "politically-motivated, counter-productive charade." General Assembly resolutions are not binding but carry weight as a reflection of the global view on the war. Previous demands by the body for an end to the war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas have been ignored. Unlike the UN Security Council, no country has a veto in the General Assembly. Thursday's vote also comes ahead of a UN conference next week that aims to reinvigorate an international push for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The United States has urged countries not to attend. In a note seen by Reuters, the US warned that "countries that take anti-Israel actions on the heels of the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to US foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences." The US last week vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution that also demanded an "immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" and unhindered aid access in Gaza, arguing it would undermine US-led efforts to broker a ceasefire. The other 14 countries on the council voted in favor of the draft as a humanitarian crisis grips the enclave of more than 2 million people, where the UN warns famine looms and aid has only trickled in since Israel lifted an 11-week blockade last month. The draft resolution to be voted on by the General Assembly on Thursday demands the release of hostages held by Hamas, the return of Palestinian prisoners detained by Israel and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. It demands unhindered aid access and "strongly condemns the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access and depriving civilians ... of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supply and access." "This is both false and defamatory," Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon wrote in a letter to UN member states, sent on Tuesday and seen by Reuters. Danon described the General Assembly draft resolution as an "immensely flawed and harmful text," urging countries not to take part in what he said was a "farce" that undermines hostage negotiations and fails to condemn Hamas. In October 2023 the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza with 120 votes in favor. In December 2023, 153 countries voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. Then in December last year the body demanded - with 158 votes in favor - an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. The war in Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1200 people in Israel in an 7 October attack and took some 250 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. Many of those killed or captured were civilians. Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. They say civilians have borne the brunt of the attacks and that thousands more bodies have been lost under rubble. - Reuters
1News
11 hours ago
- 1News
Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has criticised the Reserve Bank for its sharing of information surrounding former governor Adrian Orr's sudden resignation in March, saying the central bank could "have pulled their socks up." The rebuke comes after the bank yesterday released documents revealing Orr quit in March due to a funding dispute with the bank's board and the Government. It was a fact previously not disclosed publicly, with the media and financial observers having received few answers from the central bank's leadership. "I've expressed that I think they could have shared the information they shared yesterday earlier," Willis told reporters at Fieldays today. "I have spoken to their chairperson, Neil Quigley, and expressed my view that they did not manage that Official Information Act request well, and that I expect them to do better. He has acknowledged that they could have and should have done better." ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) Multiple journalists and financial observers have had Official Information Act request deadlines about the former governor's departure extended over the past few months. The Finance Minister emphasised expectations around transparency from agencies. "It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations, and wherever possible, are open and transparent with New Zealanders," she said. "Of course, they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements. "But on this one, I think they could have pulled their socks up." In response to the minister's criticism, Quigley acknowledged shortcomings in handling information requests and added he was limited in what he could've said about Orr's resignation when it was first announced in March. ADVERTISEMENT In what it described as a response to numerous Official Information Act (OIA) requests over the resignation, the Reserve Bank revealed yesterday that Orr resigned after disagreeing with the board and Willis over operational funding. Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News) Documents show Orr believed the bank needed $1.031 billion over a five-year period, but the board was willing to accept "considerably less." According to the Reserve Bank, this caused "distress" to Orr and led to his personal decision that he "had achieved all he could as governor" and could not continue with less funding than he thought viable for the bank to fulfil its obligations. The bank eventually secured $750 million in operating expenses and $25.6 million in capital expenditure. Bank chairperson 'regrets' information release delays Quigley said he "regrets" not releasing information on Orr's departure sooner. ADVERTISEMENT "The Reserve Bank was late in producing a response to some of the OIAs we received on Adrian Orr's resignation. I regret that this delay occurred," he said in a statement. "The circumstances and the volume of information associated with the OIAs on Adrian Orr's resignation were complex, and we needed to be sure that our consideration of relevant information was comprehensive. Reserve Bank Board Chair Neil Quigley. (Source: 1News) "As well as our obligations under the OIA, we needed to take into careful consideration the former Governor's exit agreement and privacy law. "For this reason, we extended consultation on the information and our response, including review by senior external counsel." He added that he was "limited" in disclosing why the former governor resigned in March. Reason behind resignation finally revealed officially ADVERTISEMENT Orr had served in the role of governor for seven years at the time of his resignation. He left his job three years before his second five-year term was due to end. Willis and bank officials were tight-lipped for months over the departure of one of the Government's most senior public sector bosses. When the former governor's departure was announced on March 5, little reason was provided beyond that it was his "personal decision". Speaking to reporters on the day, the Reserve Bank's board chairperson Neil Quigley was asked directly why Orr had resigned and whether funding issues were behind it. Quigley was also asked whether there were any "policy, conduct or performance issues which are at the centre of this resignation". He responded: "We have issues that we've been working through, but there are no issues of that type that are behind this resignation." But speaking today, the bank's chairperson said he was "limited" over what he could say at the time of the media conference. "On March 5, I was limited in what I could say about the former governor's resignation both by the terms of his exit agreement and the fact that we were still working through finalisation of the detail of the next five-year funding agreement. "We were conscious of the need to explain to staff of the Reserve Bank the potential implications for staffing levels of a lower level of funding and needed time to consider the details of that."
