logo
Al Zeyoudi: UAE, India continue to reap benefits of CEPA

Al Zeyoudi: UAE, India continue to reap benefits of CEPA

Zawya09-04-2025
Dr. Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi, Minister of State for Foreign Trade, said that the UAE and India share a strong mutual commitment to elevating their strategic partnership across all sectors. This cooperation, he noted, is aligned with the ambitious development goals of both nations and contributes to sustainable economic growth and shared prosperity for their peoples.
Speaking to the Emirates News Agency (WAM), Al Zeyoudi emphasised that the reciprocal visits by the leaders of both countries reflect this joint vision and help strengthen strategic collaboration. These high-level engagements continue to create opportunities for building deeper partnerships, especially in trade and investment between the business communities and private sectors of both nations.
He noted that the official visit of H.H. Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai, Deputy Prime Minister, and Minister of Defence, to India comes as the two friendly countries approach the third anniversary of the implementation of their Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), which came into effect on 1st May 2022. This agreement was the first of its kind signed by the UAE under its CEPA programme and the first to be implemented—highlighting the long-standing and robust ties between the UAE and India.
Al Zeyoudi pointed out that the UAE and India continue to reap tangible benefits from the CEPA, which over the past three years has led to significant growth in bilateral trade and investment flows. Non-oil trade between the two countries grew by 20.5%, reaching over AED240 billion in 2024, compared to AED199.3 billion in 2023. This growth underscores the vast opportunities in trade and investment between the two nations.
India also ranked as the top destination for UAE's non-oil exports in 2024, accounting for 13.5% of total non-oil exports—a remarkable year-on-year increase of 75.2% compared to 2023.
He further explained that both nations play a vital role in each other's economies. India is the UAE's second-largest global trading partner after China, while the UAE is India's third-largest trading partner, following China and the U.S.
India is also the second-largest investor in the UAE, holding a 6.3% share with investments totaling nearly US$10 billion by the end of 2022. Conversely, the UAE has cumulative direct investments in India of around US$23 billion by the end of 2024—making it India's seventh-largest global investor and the top Arab investor.
The value of UAE investments flowing into India between April 2022 and December 2024 reached US$10.4 billion, coinciding with the implementation of the CEPA.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How To Take Forward The Latest Improvement In India-China Bilateral Relations?
How To Take Forward The Latest Improvement In India-China Bilateral Relations?

Arabian Post

timean hour ago

  • Arabian Post

How To Take Forward The Latest Improvement In India-China Bilateral Relations?

By Nitya Chakraborty India-China political relations have started improving giving all the indications that the leaderships of the two countries with the largest population in the world, are ready for building stable relationship after an uneasy period of five years since the Galwan killings on the border in 2020 in which 20 Indian soldiers lost their lives. The process of healing began from last year itself but the course has intensified since US President Donald Trump started his tariff war and imposed 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the USA and announced additional tariff of 25 per cent as a penalty for buying Russian oil to be effective from August 27 this year. The initial 25 per cent tariff has already taken effect. President Trump's personal relations with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi worsened since the ceasefire of the four day India Pakistan war announced on May 10 at 5 PM. Trump claimed credit for compelling both the warring governments to opt for the ceasefire which Modi consistently opposed. The India-US political relations got a further jolt with the sudden improvement in Pak-US relations. Trump hosted lunch in his Oval office for the Pak General Asim Munir who during his stay in USA threatened of a nuclear strike against India. It was in this deteriorating state of India-US relationship, Chinese foreign minister paid a three day visit from August 18 to 20 and met Prime Minister Narendra Modi as also external affairs minister Dr. S Jaishankar and the National Security Adviser Ajit Modi told the Chinese foreign minister that the stable, predictable and constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global prosperity. PM is visiting Tianjin in China to attend the summit of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to be hosted by the Chinese President Xi Jinping on August 31 and September 1 next. Indian Prime Minister will have bilateral talks with both President XI Jinping as also the Russian President Vladimir Putin who will be attending. The question is what is the basic imperative of the Prime Minister's sudden hobnobbing with both China and Russia just after getting the snub from President Trump on both political and trade tariff issues? Is it a jerk reaction to the US attitude to India or it is a part of a deliberate calibrated strategy to build India's strategic autonomy to look after India's national interests without being dependent on any of the big three powers USA, China and Russia. This issue is of crucial importance as Indian PM will be attending Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit this month where he will discuss India's global strategy with both President Xi and President Putin. This will be followed by the US dominated QUAD meet in India hosted by Narendra Modi by the end of this year. The QUAD schedule is still on. It has not been postponed. In 2026, Prime Minister will host the BRICS summit in India. President XI and even President Putin might be attending. In any case, President Putin is scheduled to arrive in India by year end as a part of his bilateral visit. As regards China, the official Chinese view regarding India-China relations has undergone changes in the last one year and more so in the last two months in the context of the deterioration of India-US relations. The Chinese commentators have taken note of the recent moves by both sides in normalizing relations. For instance both governments are expediting visa facilitation; talks on resuming direct flights are reportedly underway; the two sides are discussing resuming border trade of domestic goods. Further multiple friction points along the Line of Actual Control have seen disengagement with reinforced buffer arrangements; and both the Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) and the Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question have become regularized. Together, these steps show that both countries are prioritizing stability and embracing a practical approach of 'managing differences while expanding common ground.' According to Global Times, the official English daily of the Chinese Government, several factors explain why relations are improving now. First, profound shifts in the international landscape have heightened the shared desire for multipolarity and strategic autonomy, particularly regarding BRICS cooperation. With supply chains being reconfigured and geopolitical flashpoints multiplying, major Asian economies are seeking to reduce bloc-based risks and preserve policy flexibility. Second, structural complementarities and mutual security concerns create intrinsic momentum. As two large economies with complementary markets, China and India have significant opportunities to collaborate in manufacturing ecosystems, the digital economy, green transition, public health and poverty reduction. Third, regional and multilateral platforms provide responsibility and traction. Frameworks such as BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the G20 enable the two countries to coordinate on development priorities. Practical collaboration amplifies the voice of the Global South and prevents differences from diluting broader cooperation. As the Chinese official media sees it, a stable border is foundational for regional development; any escalation raises costs and constrains cooperation. Wang Yi's visit for boundary talks to India at this juncture carries substantive weight. The boundary question is central to the relationship and underpins further progress. This comment was made by GT on August 19 issue the day the Chinese foreign minister met the Indian PM Narendra Modi. Together, China and India account for roughly 2.8 billion people. Expanding cooperation in lower-sensitivity areas of supply chains, cross-border e-commerce, healthcare, clean energy and connectivity can boost jobs and investment while enhancing regional supply-chain resilience and efficiency. In the fields of technological and green transition synergy, complementarities in digital infrastructure, renewables, energy storage and electric mobility offer practical avenues for aligning projects. Chinese government wants to channelize more investments in India. New Delhi is careful about the sectors where national security is involved. But in the latest economic survey, the finance ministry has favored increased investments from China. Both governments can discuss the sectors and clear concerns about national security. Once the process starts and other areas open up, there will be more trust between the two governments and the delicate border disputes can be tackled more effectively for arriving at an understanding. The Chinese official media also underlines that, the gradual improvement of bilateral relations is conducive to increasing mutual trust. From a broader perspective, the bilateral relations have to be seen as a part of a long term strategy by India. Only then the border issues can be solved amicably. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to give a relook at the contours of Indian foreign policy and reset the priorities on the basis of strategic autonomy and multipolarity. India will be able to talk to all three big powers USA, China and Russia with strength and conviction. Just as India should not be a part of Trump's global strategy,, similarly, India can't align with China and Russia in their respective strategies to further their national interests. India is the country with the largest population in the world and it will soon become the fourth largest economy globally. This nation of 1.44 billion with more than 5000 years of rich civilization behind it has the capacity to move on its own with flexibility to deal with all including the big powers. It is to be seen whether Narendra Modi imparts a dynamic shift in his foreign policy in that direction or goes back to his old ways after a small gap due to some political compulsions. .Indian Prime Minister is on test. (IPA Service)

US-Palestinian advocacy group condemns Trump administration's sanctions on ICC officials
US-Palestinian advocacy group condemns Trump administration's sanctions on ICC officials

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US-Palestinian advocacy group condemns Trump administration's sanctions on ICC officials

A US-Palestinian advoacy group has condemned the Trump administration's decision to sanction ICC judges and prosecutors as a "disgrace." "When the US punishes judges for daring to pursue justice for Palestinian victims, it confirms what so many of us already fear — that international law doesn't apply to the powerful, regardless of the gravity of their crimes," Sandra Tamari, Executive Director of Adalah Justice Project, told Middle East Eye. 'Palestinians turned to the ICC because every other door was slammed in our faces. And now, even that door is being torched. These sanctions are not just political; they are moral failure. If genocide and apartheid can't even be investigated without retaliation, then what justice is left for our people?' she added.

Targeted for Gaza protests: The Palestinian still in US custody
Targeted for Gaza protests: The Palestinian still in US custody

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Targeted for Gaza protests: The Palestinian still in US custody

Of all the high-profile, pro-Palestine, non-US citizen arrests linked to campus protests made by the Trump administration's immigration authorities earlier this year, Leqaa Kordia is the only one still languishing in a detention centre in Alvaredo, Texas. On Monday, the 32-year-old's lawyers filed an updated petition in her federal lawsuit seeking her immediate release from the Prairieland Detention Facility based on new evidence unearthed last month in a separate case. The case in question is American Association of University Professors (AAUP) v. Rubio, which sought to challenge Secretary of State Marco Rubio's policy of what the plaintiffs describe as a "policy of ideological deportation". It was during the AAUP v. Rubio trial that government officials revealed they leaned on the pro-Israel doxxing site Canary Mission to target particular students for immigration detention. "The evidence shows that the administration's policy of targeting, investigating, surveilling, arresting, confining and seeking the deportation of noncitizens who have expressed support for Palestinians extends to anyone involved in protests on or near campuses, irrespective of affiliation with a campus or immigration status," a statement from Kordia's legal representatives at the Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP), Muslim Advocates (MA), and the CLEAR Project at the City University of New York (CUNY) said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This new evidence makes clear that Ms Kordia's targeting is part and parcel of the same, suppressive policy the administration has weaponised against so many others, including Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi, whose release federal courts have compelled under the First Amendment," the statement continued. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attempted to strip Khalil, Ozturk and Mahdawi of their legal status in the US at the time they were taken away by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents (ICE). For Kordia, the DHS maintains that she was already out of status at the time she was arrested in New Jersey, and issued a statement on 14 March insisting she was "overstaying her expired F-1 student visa", which was terminated on 26 January 2022 for "lack of attendance". US federal judge grants bail to Turkish national Rumeysa Ozturk Read More » The DHS also cited Kordia's arrest by the New York Police Department in April 2024 during a protest against Israel's war on Gaza, organised by Columbia University students. The police, however, had arrested several students at the time, and Kordia was eventually let go after charges against her were dropped. "It is true that at that time she did not have lawful status," Amal Thabateh, a staff attorney at CLEAR who is working on Kordia's case, told Middle East Eye. She thought she was close to becoming a lawful permanent resident because her US citizen family had filed for such a status on her behalf, Thabateh explained. But upon receiving "faulty advice" from a mentor, Kordia voluntarily signed a termination notice, withdrawing from the F-1 visa program, leaving her out of status entirely. "We all know based on how other cases have gone, and just routinely [that] this happens all the time where people have losses in status," Thabateh told MEE. "They're in transition periods... and that's quickly solved and fixed." 'Forgotten prisoner' But that wasn't the case in what is now the era of enforcement under US President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown targeting pro-Palestine voices. "The ways in which the government has criminalised the visa overstay is just another attempt to target Palestinian rights activists," Thabateh said. "The question is not whether overstaying a visa is criminal or a violation, but instead it's whether the ways in which Leqaa has been punished and targeted, whether that is a justification for very innocently following false advice about her immigration status." Kordia arrived in the US from the occupied West Bank in 2016 on a Palestinian Authority passport, was initially a visitor before adjusting her status to a student as she began learning English. Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil files $20m claim against Trump administration Read More » She has lost 200 extended family members to Israel's genocide in Gaza. Thabateh told MEE that Kordia voluntarily went to meet with immigration agents to find out what was happening after learning that people who knew her were being questioned about her life, and that agents had also approached her home. It was during that meeting in Newark, New Jersey, that she was served with a notice to appear in court, and then taken away overnight to the Texas facility. Kordia has frequently described poor and discriminatory treatment at the Prairieland Detention Facility to her legal team, but they say that she's persevering. "I think that her spirits are strong, but the conditions she's enduring are not easy," Golnaz Fakhimi, the legal director at Muslim Advocates, told MEE. Authorities interfered with her ability to observe Ramadan and did not provide accommodations so she could carry out her five daily prayers as a Muslim, Kordia had told renowned Muslim scholar and civil rights activist Omar Suleiman, who was granted a visit with her in May. He had called her "the forgotten prisoner" in an op-ed published earlier this year. "In litigation, the government has taken the position that that her confinement is based on having overstayed a visa, [but] the authority that the government has asserted... is a discretionary authority," Fakhimi said. "She is not someone who, by law, has to be confined." "The underlying policy of the administration to target non-citizens - according to the government's own officials who testified - really zeroed in on association with viewpoints supportive of Palestine," she added. "I think it's pretty clear what there is to see when you read between the lines. They're confining her because they have marching orders to do that pursuant to an umbrella-level policy." On 27 June, US Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford recommended to the federal judge in the case filed against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem - Kordia v. Noem - that Kordia should be released, given the main threat present is one to her own liberty. She remains in custody after a government appeal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store