
Parliament holds a whip-round for man who kept democracy afloat
The role of chief whip on the Westminster stage is normally a non-speaking one. Unheard by the public, at any rate. Their job is to lurk in the shadows, nudging and cajoling, whispering and promising, applying thumbscrews if necessary and doing whatever they can to get the Government through another difficult day.
Some have liked to 'put some stick about', as Francis Urquhart called it in House of Cards, but modern party management is a bit less harsh. As Sir Gavin Williamson, Theresa May's first chief, once said: 'It's amazing what can be achieved with a sharpened carrot.'
It is rare for one chief whip to speak about his job. To hear six is extraordinary. What would be the collective noun? A flagellation? It takes something special for them to open up, and that something was the death of a man who made their lives much easier (or, in the case of Simon Hart, a publisher's advance).
Formally, Sir Roy Stone, who has died in his early 60s, was called principal private secretary to the chief whip, a civil service role he held for 21 years under five prime ministers and 13 chiefs, five Labour, eight Tory. In Westminster, they knew him by a euphemism. Yesterday, they said goodbye to The Usual Channels.
As ducks float serenely across a lake while paddling like mad underwater, so Stone was the opposite: his job was to make democracy run smoothly no matter how chaotic it looked on the surface. It was appropriate that tributes to The Usual Channels followed Foreign Office questions, for it is important to realise that amid such rancour and unrest, with questions on Gaza, Ukraine, Iran, Trump, politicians can put aside their differences to say 'well done, good and faithful servant'.
Sir Alan Campbell, the current Chief, rose first to praise Stone's integrity in 'tumultuous times'.
Sir Julian Smith, May's second chief, reminded MPs that The Usual Channels was how legislation, debates, statements and, most importantly, recess dates were arranged. Stone was 'fair to all sides', he said, but often frustrated by politicians' ineptitude.
Williamson said that Stone told him he 'worked for me 51 per cent of the time and for the Opposition 49 per cent'. The former chief asked if he should study the manual of parliamentary procedure (that Williamson thrice referred to it as 'Erskine and May' suggests he didn't make it past the cover) and was told that 'only strange people and clerks' do that. After the 2017 election, when May didn't get the landslide she expected, Stone told Williamson 'you clucking screwed that up' (he may have misheard), and then calmly got on with working out how the Government could function. Up to a point.
The smaller parties valued him too. Wendy Chamberlain, a Lib Dem, had a lump in her throat as she expressed gratitude for the respect he gave her as chief whip for a party of 11. Further praise came from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It fell to Alistair Carmichael, however, to speak of Stone's finest balancing act, when he served two masters in the coalition years.
There was only one occasion when Stone's mask slipped, Carmichael said, and that was early in the power-sharing era when he had been called on as Lib Dem chief to look after an MP's baby in the whips' office and Stone walked in mid-nappy change. To the unflappable Usual Channels, a chief wiping a baby's backside was a modernisation too far.
'One glimpse at his face,' Carmichael said, 'told me that this realised his worst fears about having Liberal Democrats in government'.
Perhaps, however, Stone was simply thinking of the line that is often attributed, wrongly, to Mark Twain: 'Politicians and nappies should be changed regularly and for the same reason.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Crackdown on family visas risks breaching human rights laws, Starmer told
A proposed crackdown on family visas aimed at reducing immigration risks breaching human rights laws, Government advisers have warned. The advisers have said that raising the annual salary threshold required for a Briton to bring their foreign partner or spouse to the UK from its current £29,000 to £38,700 would 'most likely' conflict with rules ensuring rights to a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The warning, from the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC), comes as Sir Keir Starmer tries to cut net migration. Last month, the Prime Minister warned Britain must not become an 'island of strangers'. The Tories under Rishi Sunak proposed the family visa change as part of a plan to slash net migration by 300,000 after it hit a record high of 906,000 in the year ending June 2023.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour MPs call for benefit cuts to be scrapped after winter fuel payment U-turn
Labour backbenchers are urging the Government to reconsider planned disability benefit cuts following the restoration of winter fuel payments to the majority of pensioners by Rachel Reeves. The chancellor's £1.25 billion initiative, revealed on Monday, will provide automatic payments of up to £300 to pensioners with an income below £35,000 annually. This decision reverses last year's removal of the universal scheme for pensioners, which was reinstated for those claiming specific benefits like pension credit. Nadia Whittome, Labour MP for Nottingham East, cautioned ministers against repeating a "similar mistake" by tightening eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Richard Burgon, MP for Leeds East, implored pensions minister Torsten Bell to heed the concerns of backbenchers, offering their assistance to help the Government 'get it right.' In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving PIP is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so PIP claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the PIP daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on PIP and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.'


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE 'One rule for them and another for us': Ed Miliband is blasted by Brits who are being forced to object to energy plant plans near their homes AGAIN - when minister's wife did the same recently...
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has been accused of 'sheer hypocrisy' following his wife's objection to a block of flats near their liberal north London home. Householders in Walsall, West Midlands say it is 'one rule for them and another for us' as a potentially explosive energy system is set to come to green belt near them. It comes as prominent academics have raised concerns about the 'eco-friendly' stored energy system saying it could be 'the next Grenfell', with a nearby school also expressing fears. Robert Withers, of the Beacon Action Group, has blamed the rush to Net Zero by 2050 for the development's approval in Great Barr Village at Chapel Lane. He told MailOnline: 'It's an absolute disgrace that Ed Miliband and others in the Labour government are destroying our green belt - it's a tragedy. 'People who live in this conservation area can't even put a shed in the garden. But somebody can come along and say we'll plant this unsightly very, very noisy equipment in the middle of this field - and they'll get away with it. 'These are bombs and this one would be adjacent to a school. If this thing explodes the school children would have to all be evacuated.' The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is earmarked for a five-acre field surrounded by ancient buildings, woodland, and rare species of bats. There are fears the UK could see explosions bigger than the one picture above that destroyed the harbour in Beirut in 2020 It would operate using batteries to store electricity which would be released when needed, and has been described as 'crucial technology for integrating renewable energy sources'. The development, set to exist for 40 years, received over 700 objections. It was rejected by the local council but then approved on appeal by the planning inspectors. Householders are now combining their efforts to put a stop to it all together as they challenge the verdict. Last month it emerged Justine Thorton, a High Court judge and wife of Mr Miliband, had written to Camden Council in relation to a five-storey building proposed near their home. She cited concerns the design was 'too tall, too bulky and to dense given the context of the surrounding houses and the wider conservation area'. Among her fellow opponents were actor Benedict Cumberbatch, with many of the campaigners citing concerns around the multiple 'noisy' air source heat pumps due to be attached to the controversial development. Responding to their objections, Jenny Hulme, another opponent to the energy storage system in Walsall said: 'We have to make do and put up with a five-acre field full of Lithium-Ion batteries and the noise, pollution, destruction of biodiversity and wildlife and the ever present thought that the batteries will explode as they have done in many cases across the world. 'Due to the topography of the land, this ticking timebomb would also be built below a 1500+ pupil, plus staff, Secondary School, utter madness and a total disregard for Health and Safety.' She concluded: 'Would the Milibands live next door to that?' Another householder, Miss H B White, said: 'It would be good to think that everyone is treated the same - not one rule for them and another for us! 'The proposed building is next to a Grade II Listed Church, a woodland which has many species of wildlife including foxes, birds, bats (12 varieties) badgers and deer. 'The local school it just above the land which if there is a problem with the BESS will cause issues for the children and staff.' Staff at the school - the Matrix Academy - have come out to speak at recent meetings against the development. It comes as Professors from Oxford University are among those to issue words of warning against the energy storage systems. An article from 2021 authored by Dr Edmund Fordham, Dr Wade Allison and Sir David Melville read: 'The race for renewable energy driven by the 2050 Net Zero target requires energy storage and this is bringing large lithium-ion batteries into our day to day lives, close to our homes and work-places, on an unprecedented scale. 'Government failure to properly understand the dangers of insulating cladding resulted in the Grenfell tragedy. Government needs to get a firm grasp of the hazards of Lithium-ion batteries before there is a another 'green' disaster.' Mr Withers, who has lived in the area for fifty years, said: 'We are expected to live in fear of this potentially explosive device for the next 40 years knowing that any day or night this could blow up, despite scientists telling us they wouldn't live within one mile of it.' The 81-year-old added the article 4 conservation area - 'quality agricultural land - was unsuitable and that the '40 years figure' was 'ridiculous' as 'once you've lost it it's gone forever'. He accused Mr Miliband and his wife of 'sheer hypocrisy'. In Merseyside in 2020, one of three battery cabins on a site caught fire while a shocking eruption also occurred in Beirut, Lebanon that same year. South Korea saw 23 battery farm fires in just two years. Meanwhile a battery fire in Illinois burned for three days and thousands of residents were evacuated. The Labour Party's deputy, Angela Rayner, is currently spearheading the Government's efforts to overhaul planning rules to build 300,000 new homes a year. And the Labour Party said it planned to designate some previously untouched greenbelt land as 'grey belt' so they could get approval for more developments. The flats' developers have relied on Labour's updated planning rules to argue extra homes are needed and that local objections should not stand in the way of houses on brownfield sites Mr Miliband previously vowed to put the 'delayers' in their place as part of his green energy agenda. And Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has also been vehement in his criticism of 'nimbys' and 'blockers' describing himself as a 'yimby' - yes in my backyard. A spokesperson for the Planning Inspectorate said: 'As the appeal is part of a legal challenge we are unable to comment further on the details of the case. 'A key principle of the planning system is that each planning application and any subsequent planning appeal will be treated on its own individual circumstances and merits, in the light of the current local plan for the area, the National Planning Policy Framework and any other specific material considerations.'