logo
Lalu Prasad: ‘Indira still had respect for democracy – she held elections, accepted defeat… Now there is undeclared Emergency'

Lalu Prasad: ‘Indira still had respect for democracy – she held elections, accepted defeat… Now there is undeclared Emergency'

Indian Express25-06-2025
RJD chief and former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad was a part of the Jayaprakash Narayan Movement that rattled the Indira Gandhi government, and one of the triggers for the declaration of Emergency. Lalu was among the Opposition leaders rounded up in the crackdown that followed. Excerpts from an interview:
What is your first memory of the Emergency?
As a student leader, I was a very active member of the JP Movement. I was arrested well before the Emergency was imposed. More student leaders were jailed as we kept rallying against all injustices, including demanding better food in prison.
Humour and wit became powerful tools in the face of adversity. I would often regale fellow inmates with dialogues from the famous radio drama Loha Singh. One such dialogue was: 'E Khadedan ki maa, jab hum Kabul ke morche par the, hum kaath ki banukh se lohe ka sanukh todte the (When I was at the Kabul border, I would smash iron trunks with wooden guns)'. It would bring smiles on the faces of the inmates. Dialogues from the radio drama still bring smiles (on the faces of) those who remember it.
On a serious note, the cry for dignity and the rights of the people cannot be silenced. History bears witness to atrocities committed in the name of progress. The rights we enjoy today were hard won, and it's up to us to protect them. The stories of those who suffered during the Emergency will never be forgotten. The forced sterilisation programme left scars that will take years to heal. Innocent lives were forever changed by the brutal hand of authority.
How did you come into contact with JP? Did you anticipate that a students' movement would lead to a step like the Emergency?
When we took out a protest march on March 8, 1974, demanding improvement in hostel and mess conditions, and the reduction of college fees and bus fare, it was purely a students' movement. There was barely any participation by politicians. After the protest turned violent and its scale got bigger, we met JP at his Kadamkuan residence (in Patna) and requested him to lead the movement. He was unwilling initially, but agreed on one condition — that protesters would not engage in any kind of violence.
We had no idea that the movement would shake the regime of Indira Gandhi, who had emerged as a strong and authoritative leader after India's victory over Pakistan in 1971 and the creation of Bangladesh. JP built the momentum in such a way – from Patna's Gandhi Maidan to Delhi's Ramlila Maidan, with all top Opposition leaders joining in – that Indira was left clueless.
After 50 years, what are your reflections on the Emergency?
After all these years, I feel Indira still had respect for democracy – she announced fresh elections in 1977 and humbly accepted her defeat. Later, she worked hard to come back to power in 1980.
As for the present NDA regime, these feel like times of undeclared Emergency. The present dispensation has scant respect for democratic institutions. Central investigation agencies have been working at the behest of the government for political witch hunts. I have been singularly targeted for years. But I am not one to cow down.
The NDA government's counter to this is that the Opposition parties are only bitter because of their inability to defeat the BJP?
Go to any educational institution, you will see stamps of the RSS and the BJP in their functioning and appointments. Talk to their rival political parties, they will tell you about political vendetta. Despite the NDA doing so well against us, PM Narendra Modi is still targeting me. It shows that I am among the few standing up to him, opposing his authoritative style.
Finally, how do you see the coming Assembly polls in Bihar?
Tejashwi Yadav (Lalu's son) has been carrying the burden of responsibility well. He has made Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar hold recruitment for government jobs. The Nitish government has also had to raise the social security pension from Rs 400 to Rs 1,100 per month, given Tejashwi's old assurance of raising it to Rs 1,500 per month if we formed the government in Bihar. I have been cautioning people against falling for false promises in a poll year. PM Modi has been raining jumlas during his Bihar visits. People should be cautious about the rain of loud and unrealistic announcements.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC overturns acquittal of four in 1984 riots case, orders retrial of surviving accused
HC overturns acquittal of four in 1984 riots case, orders retrial of surviving accused

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC overturns acquittal of four in 1984 riots case, orders retrial of surviving accused

The Delhi high court has set aside a nearly 40-year-old verdict that acquitted four men in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case and ordered a retrial, saying the trial was conducted in a 'hasty manner' and that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) failed to make sufficient efforts to collect evidence. (Shutterstock) The case concerned the killing of Harbhajan Singh in Ghaziabad's Raj Nagar on November 1, 1984 — a day after then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination. According to his wife, a group of men attacked and set her husband ablaze and also torched their home. In May 1986, a trial court acquitted the four accused of arson and murder, citing contradictions between the woman's statements to police and in court, as well as the delay in filing the complaint. A bench of justices Subramanian Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar took up the matter suo motu after prima facie finding faults in the 1986 judgment and describing the investigation as 'perfunctory'. The issue came up while the bench was hearing appeals in another case from the same locality, in which five men — including former Congress councillor Balwan Khokhar, ex-MLA Captain Bhagmal, and Girdhari Lal — were convicted in 2013 for the murder of five Sikhs. Among the appellants in that case was Krishan Khokhar, brother of Balwan Khokhar. The court noted that neither the state nor the victims had challenged the 1986 acquittal, but said it could not ignore a flawed investigation and trial, particularly when the verdict was being cited in other appeals. In its verdict delivered on Monday, the bench said the trial court's decision had resulted in a 'miscarriage of justice' to the victim's wife and children, depriving them of their fundamental right to a fair trial. The judges faulted the CBI for failing to trace the victim's body or recover articles stolen from the house. They also noted that investigators did not associate key witnesses with the probe, including the victim's children — who were present at the time — and neighbours. The court rejected the trial court's conclusion that contradictions in the woman's testimony undermined the case, saying there was enough material to support her account. It also said the investigating agency had not taken 'sufficient efforts' to gather the best possible evidence. 'Failure to order a reinvestigation 40 years after the incident would be turning a Nelson's eye to society's needs and the victim's rights to a comprehensive, free, and fair probe,' the bench said. Quoting the amicus curiae, senior advocate Vivek Sood, the court noted that after the assassination of Indira Gandhi, large-scale violence forced widows, children, and residents to flee their homes for safety. This, it said, meant witnesses would not have been readily available for investigation — but that did not absolve the agency of its duty to secure evidence using the powers under the Criminal Procedure Code. 'These errors have resulted in miscarriage of justice… If not rectified, this may result in loss of hope in our legal system and compromise the interests of society,' the bench observed. Sood argued that the acquittal was 'totally perverse' and ignored the scale of violence, property destruction, and displacement suffered by victims. He pointed out that the complainant herself was forced to leave Delhi after her husband's killing and the loss of her home. While the counsel for the sole surviving accused argued that a retrial would serve no useful purpose, the court clarified that the fresh trial would apply only to him. Proceedings against the three other accused have abated due to their deaths. The CBI has been directed to conclude the probe expeditiously, bearing in mind the age of the case. In a separate ruling, the same bench ordered the reconstruction of four-decade-old trial records in another 1984 anti-Sikh riots case from Raj Nagar. That case concerns the acquittal of five men, including Balwan Khokhar, in the killing of four Sikhs. The court said victims' and society's rights to a fair investigation and trial cannot be undermined by missing files or flawed earlier proceedings, and directed the trial court to undertake the reconstruction.

Kangana Ranaut Slams Jaya Bachchan Over Selfie Incident, Calls Her Spoilt and Privileged
Kangana Ranaut Slams Jaya Bachchan Over Selfie Incident, Calls Her Spoilt and Privileged

India.com

time4 hours ago

  • India.com

Kangana Ranaut Slams Jaya Bachchan Over Selfie Incident, Calls Her Spoilt and Privileged

Mumbai: Actress and politician Kangana Ranaut has shared a sharp reaction to Jaya Bachchan's unfortunate selfie incident, calling the veteran actress a 'spoilt and privileged' woman. On Wednesday, veteran actress and Samajwadi Party's MP was seen getting angry at a fan who tried to take a selfie with her as she arrived at the Constitution Club in Delhi. Losing her temper, Jaya pushed the man back with great force, saying, "Yeh kya kar rahe ho? (What are you doing)" After this, the man stepped back. During the incident, fellow parliamentarian and Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Priyanka Chaturvedi was also present with Jaya Bachchan. Bashing her political opponent for her recent behavior, Kangana reshared the video on her Instagram stories and wrote: 'Most spoilt and privileged woman. People put up with her tantrums/nonsense just because she is @amitabhbachchan ji's wife. That Samajwadi topi looks like a rooster comb, while she looks like a rooster cock!! Such disgrace and shame.' However, this is not the first time Kangana has taken a dig at Jaya Bachchan. Back in 2020 as well, Jaya Bachchan had attacked Kangana for calling the film industry a 'gutter.' Responding to this, the 'Emergency' actress penned on her X (formerly Twitter) timeline: 'Jaya ji, would you say the same thing if it was your daughter Shweta who was beaten, drugged, and molested as a teenager? Would you say the same if Abhishek faced constant bullying and harassment, or if he was found hanging one day? Show compassion for us also.' Prior to this, Kangana had wholeheartedly welcomed the government's decision to ban OTT platforms such as Ullu, ALTT, and Desiflix for showing soft porn content. Speaking exclusively to IANS, Kangana lauded the government's decision, saying that it was important in order to preserve our culture and future generations. "In order to preserve the overall culture of our country and the future path of our youngsters, and so that our society does not collapse completely, this step was much awaited and is now much appreciated. The action taken against these apps, especially the illegal ones, is highly appreciated", the 'Simran' actress said.

'Trust deficit': SC on Bihar SIR showdown; what happened during the hearing
'Trust deficit': SC on Bihar SIR showdown; what happened during the hearing

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Trust deficit': SC on Bihar SIR showdown; what happened during the hearing

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reiterated that it can set aside the results of the entire special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral bonds in poll-bound Bihar - in as late as September - if its illegality is established. While hearing a bunch of petitions against poll body's exercise, a bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi said that logjam over the exercise is largely due the "trust deficit" between the poll body and the opposition. Here is what happened during the hearing Senior advocate Kapil Sibal , appearing for RJD MP Manoj Jha, said that the exclusion of about 65 lakh voters from the draft electoral roll published on August 1 is illegal. However, the top court said that as per the rules, the persons excluded have to submit applications for inclusion, and it is only at this stage that anyone's objection will be considered. Sibal argued that most of the population of Bihar does not posses the documents specified by the ECI as acceptable. 'Bihar people don't have these documents, that's the point.' Justice Kant said it was a 'very sweeping argument' to suggest no one in Bihar possessed valid documents, noting Aadhaar and ration cards existed but could not be treated as definitive proof. 'Bihar is part of India. If they don't have them, other states won't either,' the top court said. 'There must be something to prove you are a citizen of India… everybody possesses some certificate - you need it even to buy a SIM. OBC, SC, ST certificates." Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for Association for Democratic Reforms, said that the poll body not published a list of names of the 65 lakh persons who have been deleted from the draft roll. He also accused the EC of not specifying who are dead or migrated persons. "Today, what they have done is something mischievous. Till the 4th of August, the draft of the roll was searchable. After the 4th of August, the document is not searchable. They say, go and ask the Booth Level Agent of the political party. Why should I, as a citizen, not know from their document and should ask an agent of the political party?" Bhushan said. Meanwhile, appearing for the EC, senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi said an exercise of this nature was 'bound to have some defects', but errors could be corrected before the final roll is published on 30 September. Opposition leaders and civil society groups have petitioned against the EC's June 24 decision. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said "You cannot start by presumptively doubting the citizenship of 5 crore of voters (who are in the post-2003 roll). The presumption is that they are citizens unless established otherwise through a procedure in accordance with the you declare 5 crore people to be not valid and give them 2.5 months." Political activist Yogendra Yadav, who addressed the court in person, questioned the data given by the poll panel and said instead of 7.9 crore voters there was total adult population of 8.18 crore and the design of SIR exercise was to delete the voters. "They (EC) were not able to find any individual whose name was added and the booth level officers visited house to house for deletion of names," Yadav said, calling it a case of "total disenfranchisement". The hearing will resume again on Wednesday. On July 29, the top court warned it would step in immediately if there was 'mass exclusion' of voters. The draft roll was published on August 1, with the final version due on September 30. Opposition parties claim the process could disenfranchise crores of eligible voters. The pleas have been jointly filed by leaders from RJD, Trinamool Congress, Congress, NCP (Sharad Pawar), CPI, SP, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Thackeray), JMM, CPI (ML), along with PUCL, ADR and activist Yogendra Yadav, challenging the EC's June 24 decis ion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store