Did the Viljoens of Tammy Taylor-fame skip the country?
Did Peet and Melany Viljoen of Tammy Taylor franchise fame really skip the country? It seems like they did if you look at Peet Viljoen's latest video on Instagram, where he makes various racist statements and urges white people to follow him to the US.
Peet Viljoen and his wife, Melany, have been in the news for the past few years after various people accused them of selling Tammy Taylor franchises that never materialised. Some of these complainants won their court cases against the Viljoens.
In the latest court case that The Citizen reported on, North Gauteng High Court judge, Joseph Raulinga ordered that the Viljoens must pay back the R600 000 a woman paid for a Tammy Taylor franchise. He also declared the transaction unconscionable, unjust and unreasonable in terms of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), and void.
He also ordered that Tammy Taylor Global Franchising, as well as both the Viljoens, 'immediately cease representing or holding out to the public that they have the legal authority and right to sell Tammy Taylor nail franchises in South Africa, without authorisation under the Trade Marks Act.'
In addition, he ordered that they remove all references to Tammy Taylor from their websites, stationery, forms, marketing material, salon products, and social media platforms within 30 days from 25 April.
Raulinga also ordered the registrar of the court to forward a copy of the order and all the papers to the National Prosecuting Authority. The Hawks confirmed to The Citizen that it is investigating.
ALSO READ: Tammy Taylor Global Franchising gets a big hiding in South African high court
Viljoens earlier denied they are leaving SA
Private investigator Mike Bolhuis said in May, just after news of the latest judgment against the Viljoens became public, that he received information indicating that the Viljoens planned to evade justice by moving to the United States of America.
In response, Peet Viljoen told Rapport that they are not leaving the country and that they are simply going on holiday to Perth in Australia where they will open a franchise. He said that they had no intention to leave South Africa permanently and even provided 'evidence' in the form of copies of plane tickets to Perth.
However, this past Sunday, Viljoen told Rapport that he has in fact left South Africa for the US and that he has no intention of returning to South Africa.
Rapport referred to – now deleted – statements Peet made on his Instagram account. According to Rapport, his original video included the statement: 'I don't speak baboon anymore,' and the assertion that he left South Africa for the US due to South Africa's racial laws and the 'inferior mental capacity of the black person in South Africa'.
ALSO READ: WATCH: Real Tammy Taylor says Peet and Melany Viljoen stole her identity
Viljoen says they moved to US for safety reasons
In addition, he claimed he moved to America because he fears for his safety in South Africa, citing the EFF and its leader Julius Malema in several claims. It seems that these claims have been edited out later as it is not on his account anymore, while the post shows that it has been edited.
However, there are videos on his Instagram and TikTok accounts where he talks at length about leaving South Africa to live in the US and offering to help South Africans who want to move there, as he believes there is no future for the white man in the country.
This is his video on Instagram:
This is his video on TikTok:
But Bolhuis says the Viljoens are planning to use the current political climate between South Africa and the US as an excuse to evade justice for crimes they committed in South Africa.
'It is clear from Viljoen's statements that he is attempting to provoke a public response from the EFF and other anti-racism activist groups, with the hope of using it to appeal to the US government that his life could be in danger if he returns to South Africa.
'This is a sly and corrupt way of obtaining and using refugee status to evade justice in South Africa.'
According to Bolhuis, the Viljoens sold their assets in South Africa and lied about their intentions to leave the country by claiming they were merely taking a holiday in Australia.
ALSO READ: Real Tammy Taylor owns her trademark, not the Viljoens – expert
Viljoen says he is an attorney despite being disbarred
Viljoen also says in his TikTok video that he is a South African attorney who moved to America for his own safety, although he was debarred in South Africa. On his X profile he describes himself as a 'law broker' who 'uses his legal expertise to help people find the right lawyer'. In a post on another platform, he claims to be the first law broker in South Africa.
According to Bolhuis, a warrant of arrest will soon be issued for them, which he says is the main reason for their departure from South Africa. 'If the Viljoens succeed in evading justice by finding refuge in America, this will set a standard and it will open the door for widespread corruption and many similar cases will soon follow.
'They must return to South Africa and face justice for their actions.'
Bolhuis is warning the South African and American public not to fall victim to Viljoen's manipulation.
'He is well-spoken and he knows how to appear sincere. There is a good reason why Viljoen has been the centre of several controversies surrounding his business dealings over the years.
'He uses manipulation and sophistication to draw victims into conducting business with him. Once the victims discover that he is not adhering to his end of the agreement, he turns to intimidation, extortion and threats to convince his victims not to file or to withdraw criminal charges against him.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
South African Lens: Pakistan's Divorce Laws Leave Women in Financial Limbo
As it stands, Pakistan follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled—regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. Image: Supplied In many societies, divorce is not just a personal rupture but a financial reckoning — especially for women. This is starkly true in Pakistan, where the legal system fails to recognise a woman's right to marital property, often leaving divorced wives with little more than the clothes on their backs. For South Africans watching global gender justice trends, Pakistan's legal landscape raises urgent questions about how tradition, law and social norms can entrench inequality in the private sphere. Despite Islam's emphasis on justice and the protection of the vulnerable, Pakistani women who exit a marriage often do so without any claim to assets acquired during the relationship. This is because Pakistan does not currently have legislation that guarantees women a share in property accumulated while married. As it stands, the country follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled, regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. The Lahore High Court recently instructed the federal government to consult on a proposed amendment to the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961. The amendment, initially brought forward by Senator Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, introduces terms such as 'matrimonial asset' and seeks to give women fairer recognition of their contributions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The court's intervention may become a turning point, as public discourse grows around the injustice of women leaving long marriages with nothing, despite having raised children, run households and sacrificed careers. To understand the impact, it helps to look beyond Pakistan's borders. Countries such as Turkey, Malaysia and Morocco — Muslim-majority states like Pakistan—have adopted laws that balance Islamic principles with modern family realities. In Turkey, marital assets are presumed to be jointly owned unless otherwise agreed. Malaysia takes both financial and non-financial contributions into account when dividing property. Morocco's Family Code permits couples to decide beforehand how to share property, with the law recognising joint management during the marriage. These countries demonstrate that religious values and women's rights need not be in conflict. Legal frameworks can uphold the dignity and equality of both spouses, particularly when marriages dissolve. Currently, Pakistan's system mirrors what legal scholars call a pure separate property regime. Under this model, property belongs only to the person who earned or acquired it. There is no assumption that marriage creates an economic partnership, and courts generally require strict proof of ownership. This often disadvantages women who have worked in the home or made indirect contributions, as they lack titles or formal income records. South Africa, by contrast, provides multiple options when couples marry, including community of property, which assumes equal ownership of assets acquired during the marriage. This legal approach acknowledges that both spouses contribute to the financial foundation of the household, even if in different ways. South African courts, when dividing property, also take into account each partner's needs, contributions and the duration of the marriage. It is a system far more aligned with the complex social reality of marriage than Pakistan's outdated laws. The cost of inaction in Pakistan is high. Women who divorce often lose access to shelter and income. Even where they have invested years in managing the home or caring for children, the law offers no recourse. Many end up dependent on their families or feel pressured into remarriage for economic survival. This perpetuates gendered cycles of poverty and limits women's agency. Pakistan has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which requires states to ensure equality in marriage and family relations, including property rights. CEDAW's guidance calls for equal access to marital assets. Other Muslim-majority countries have made strides toward compliance. Tunisia and Iran, for instance, have introduced property-sharing rules that acknowledge both partners' roles in a marriage. Pakistan, however, remains out of step. Legal reform is not only a technical matter. It is about recognising that women are equal partners in family life, deserving of financial security when that partnership ends. Amending the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance to define and protect matrimonial property would help courts provide more consistent, fair outcomes. It would also signal that Pakistan is serious about its commitments to gender equality, both to its citizens and the global community. For South Africans, watching this debate unfold is a chance to reflect on how far we have come and how far others still need to go. In a world where women's rights are constantly under pressure, the battle for fairness within the family is as important as any public policy reform. Pakistan stands at a fork in the road. One path leads to continued injustice and economic hardship for women. The other leads to fairness, dignity and the recognition of women's work — paid or unpaid—as valuable and deserving of protection. The choice, now, is in the hands of lawmakers.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Daily Lotto results: Sunday, 27 July 2025
Tonight's jackpot is R400 000! Here are your winning Daily Lotto results for 27 July 2025. Get the Daily Lotto results as soon as they are drawn on The Citizen. Daily Lotto results for 27 July 2025: 14, 17, 25, 28, 32. Here are the DrawResults & Payouts for (27/07/25): #DAILY LOTTO: 14, 17, 25, 28, 32 Congratulations to all the #winners! Players must be 18 years or older, play responsibly. ITHUBA is the proud operator of the National Lottery. — #PhandaPushaPlay (@sa_lottery) July 27, 2025 The winning Daily Lotto numbers will appear below after the draw. Usually within 10 minutes of the draw. You might need to refresh the page to see the updated results. How to play Daily Lotto in SA? If you are buying a ticket in-store: Pick up a betslip in any lottery store. Choose five numbers between 1 and 36, or select a Quick Pick. Entries cost R3 each. You can play a max of R150, but you are allowed to play multiple boards. Select how many consecutive draws you wish to enter, up to a maximum of 10. Leave blank for a single draw. Take your betslip to the teller to pay for your ticket. Write your details on the back of your ticket in case you need to claim a prize. If you do not sign your ticket and it is lost, anyone can use it to claim the prize. If you are playing online: Set up a lottery account here and make a deposit to pay for tickets. Choose five numbers from 1 to 36 or select 'Quick Pick' to generate a random set. Repeat this on as many boards as you want to play. Decide whether to enter a single draw or multiple draws. Confirm and pay for your entry The Daily Lotto draws take place shortly after 9:30pm every evening, and tickets can be bought until 8:30pm. Is there a winner every day? Yes. The jackpot prize money is guaranteed to be given away even if no one matches all five numbers. When this happens, the jackpot is split between everyone who matches two or more numbers. Visit and go to the How to Play Daily Lotto section to learn more.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
COSATU urges unity as racial rhetoric threatens South Africa's AGOA trade benefits
Thabo Makwakwa | Published 2 days ago The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has issued a strong call for organisations across the country to tone down on divisive and destructive rhetoric that fuels racial tensions. The organisation stressed the importance of unity as South Africa seeks to renew the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) with the United States. In a statement released on Friday, COSATU's parliamentary coordinator, Mathews Parks, highlighted the potential consequences of inflammatory discourse, warning that "the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, particularly Afrikaans farmers and workers." COSATU's call comes amid the US' annual review of AGOA member eligibility, a critical process determining whether South Africa and other nations will retain preferential trade benefits. Parks expressed the federation's support for renewing AGOA before its expiry at the end of September, highlighting its significance for South Africa's economy. 'AGOA has been an important stimulant for key jobs and revenue-rich sectors such as mining, agriculture, motor manufacturing, and more,' Parks said. 'It has facilitated trade and investment between the US and South Africa, with over 600 American companies invested here and 500,000 South African jobs linked to US trade. It's a framework that benefits both nations and the continent.' He further noted that South African vehicle exports, including components like steering racks from Tunisia and rubber from Côte d'Ivoire, demonstrate the interconnectedness of regional trade, which AGOA has helped to facilitate. Parks stated the importance of a mutually beneficial trade agreement, highlighting opportunities for expanding product inclusion, supporting emerging sectors, and strengthening cooperation on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). COSATU expressed the positive reception of its proposals in Washington and lauded the solidarity shared with American labor movements, especially the AFL-CIO. The federation pledged to continue working closely with the South African government, business sectors, and US counterparts to deepen bilateral relations—while respecting sovereignty and promoting sustainable economic growth. 'Progress under President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership to reset bilateral relations is encouraging,' Parks stated. 'However, it is vital that all parties support these efforts and refrain from inflammatory language that undermines social cohesion.' The federation strongly urged organisations such as AfriForum, NEASA, Sakeliga, and the Freedom Front Plus to prioritise national unity over partisan point-scoring. 'Whilst social media clicks may entertain friends over a braai, the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, in particular Afrikaans farmers and workers.' Parks stated that legitimate grievances should be addressed through constitutional and legal channels like Parliament, the judiciary, or law enforcement, rather than through rhetoric that incites racial divisions. 'Now is the time to shed narrow racial interests and place the nation's needs first,' he asserted. 'Partisanship has its place during elections, but the current climate demands maturity and responsibility from all stakeholders. Meanwhile, In a letter dated February 11, 2025 Republican congressmen Andrew Ogles, Tom Tiffany, Joe Wilson and Don Bacon asked President Donald Trump to revoke South Africa's access to the US market through AGOA and diplomatic relations alleging that South Africa had a vendetta against Israel, allegedly committing human rights violations and was friendly with China's Community Party. [email protected] IOL Politics
