India, Pakistan have had contact at national security level
WASHINGTON: Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S. said on Thursday that India and Pakistan have had contacts at the level of their respective National Security Councils, when asked if the nuclear-armed Asian neighbors had any ongoing lines of conversation.
The ambassador, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, made the comments in an interview with CNN in which he also said the responsibility to de-escalate tensions between the two countries lay with India after two days of clashes.
Key quotes
'I think there have been contact at the level of NSCs, but then this escalation, both in terms of the actions that have been taken and in terms of rhetoric that is coming out, has to stop,' Sheikh said in the interview without giving more details about the contacts.
'Now the responsibility for de-escalation is on India, but there are constraints on restraint. Pakistan reserves the right to respond back. There is enough pressure from our public opinion on the government to respond,' he added.
Why it's important
Many global powers, including the U.S., have urged New Delhi and Islamabad to de-escalate tensions and keep lines of communication open. Washington has called for direct dialogue.
Context
On Thursday, Pakistan and India accused each other of launching drone attacks, and Islamabad's defence minister said further retaliation was 'increasingly certain,' on the second day of major clashes between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Two days of fighting have killed nearly four dozen people.
The latest escalation in the decades-old India-Pakistan rivalry began on April 22 when Islamist militants killed 26 people in India-administered Kashmir in an attack that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad, which denied the accusations and called for a neutral probe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
No M'sians on board ill-fated Air India flight, foreign ministry confirms
CNN reported that the death toll from the plane crash had risen to 133. (EPA Images pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Malaysian consulate-general in Mumbai has confirmed that no Malaysians were on board Air India flight AI171 which crashed near Ahmedabad Airport. Earlier, it was reported that the London-bound flight with 242 people on board, including 12 crew members, crashed on Thursday shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport in the western state of Gujarat. Separately, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim conveyed his condolences to the families and friends of all those affected by the crash. In a Facebook post, Anwar said he was deeply distressed to learn of the tragic crash. 'On behalf of the government and people of Malaysia, I extend our heartfelt condolences to the families and loved ones of all those affected. 'We share in India's sorrow and stand in full solidarity as relief efforts continue. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and with everyone mourning this terrible loss.' CNN, meanwhile, reported that the death toll from the plane crash had risen to 133.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
UK PM Starmer calls Air India crash ‘devastating'
Firefighters work at the site where Air India flight 171 crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad. (AFP pic) LONDON : UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer today called the scenes of the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad 'devastating', adding 'my thoughts are with the passengers and their families'. 'The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating,' Starmer said in a statement issued by his Downing Street office. 'My thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time,' he said. Air India said the 242 passengers and crew on board the Boeing 787-8 included 53 British nationals. UK foreign minister David Lammy wrote on X that he was 'deeply saddened by news of a devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad'. 'My thoughts are with all those affected,' he added. 'The UK is working with local authorities in India to urgently establish the facts and provide support,' he added. Buckingham Palace said King Charles III was being kept updated on the accident, while Conservative leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch called the news 'heartbreaking'.
Focus Malaysia
4 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Raising retirement as Malaysia ages: Navigating the workforce challenge
THERE is a well-known Asian saying—'older ginger will be spicier'—highlighting the wisdom that often comes with age. Across many Asian cultures, including our own, elders are held in high esteem, seen as valuable sources of guidance and experience. This deep-rooted respect reflect a broader tradition of valuing age not just as a number, but as a reservoir of accumulated insight. However, the increase in the elderly population is putting us between a rock and a hard place. With Malaysia's fertility rate continuing to decline, we are steadily marching into the category of an aged society. According to the Department of Statistics Malaysia, 11.6% of our total population in 2024 was aged 60 and above. This is projected to grow to 17.3% in 2050, and by 2057 we will become a super-aged society, as 20.5% of our population will be over 60 years old. This immediately poses some important questions that need to be answered quickly, like 'Will our healthcare system be adequate enough to handle the surge of senior citizens?' and 'Will the government be able to shoulder the financial strain of taking care of our elders?' However, the most important question among these is, 'Will we be able to replace the retired workforce when we inevitably become a super-aged society?' Currently, the minimum retirement age is set at 60 years old. Amid rising workforce concerns, the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said suggested we raise the minimum retirement age from 60 to 65. Raising retirement age to cope with demographic change—especially one that concerns the ageing population—is common practice across the globe. The Chinese government raised the retirement age for men from 60 to 63 years old, for women in blue-collar jobs from 50 to 55, and for women in white-collar jobs from 55 to 58. The Danish government is set to increase the retirement age for people born after December 31, 1970 to 70 years old by 2040. However, common practice does not mean that it is the only one we should consider, and it certainly doesn't mean it is the best. While it is logical, raising the retirement age has its own merits and concerns that need to be addressed. For one, raising the retirement age will certainly benefit future retirees, particularly in terms of their finances, as the cost of living continues to rise. Five more years in employment will be very helpful for workers to financially prepare for their retirement, considering only 33% of active EPF members had minimum savings of RM240,000 for retirement in May 2024. Furthermore, medical insurance premiums continue to rise. In lieu of more and more Malaysians living an unhealthy lifestyle, which leads to an increase in non-communicable diseases and a higher obesity rate, which is projected to hit 41% by 2035, this could quickly deplete retirement savings for the common working class. On a bigger scale, it was estimated that a 1% increase in elderly dependency would reduce our GDP growth by 6.6%. Other than economic and financial concerns, raising the retirement age would definitely have a positive impact on our workforce not only in quantity but also in the depth of experience older workers can provide. This is particularly important given the scale of Malaysia's brain drain. Our highly skilled youth are increasingly seeking better job opportunities abroad, leaving critical gaps in sectors such as engineering, healthcare, and ICT. In such a context, retaining experienced older workers becomes not just a demographic adjustment, but a strategic imperative. Yet, concern over its impact on youth employment immediately arises. Some fear that raising the retirement age would further limit opportunities for the youth, making the job market even tougher than it already is amid economic hardship and limited vacancies, in which over 65% of degree holders earn less than RM3,000 per month, and as much as 36.8% of graduates are underemployed. This suggests that the job market is so rough that the graduates are willing to work for less and accept jobs that do not match their skills. However, in reality, some older workers have faced age discrimination in their workplace. While people from all age groups could experience ageism, it most commonly affects those in their 50s and above, with 57% of respondents reporting experiencing age discrimination in their workplace. Furthermore, one study found that many employers are reluctant to hire older workers, with some actively excluding candidates over 40 years old. Hence, it is not entirely correct to say that raising the retirement age would further restrict opportunities for youth to secure better jobs and positions. In fact, data show that there is a positive correlation between employment rates of older workers and younger workers in Malaysia. Obviously, this matter requires many more studies to determine whether raising the retirement age is indeed viable, or if there are any other methods that can be implemented to negate the impact of becoming a super-aged society. Other than raising the minimum retirement age, the government needs to consider giving workers the flexibility to choose when they wish to retire. It is important for the government to recognise that while some senior workers wish to continue working past their 60s, others might want to retire earlier due to personal issues such as medical complications that prevent them from working comfortably. Allowing workers to choose not only when but also how they want to retire would certainly be beneficial for the future retirees, and the positive impact would most likely spill over to the younger generation of employees. While some may argue that flexible retirement would be ineffective in maintaining the working population, evidence from Singapore suggests a different result, as the flexible retirement scheme there effectively increased the likelihood of senior workers continuing in their longest-held jobs by 11.4%, delaying pension claims among elders, and had a general positive effect on Singapore's labour supply. In addition, although an increase of pension-eligibility age by one year would increase the full-time working rate by 8.2%, there was also had a negative impact on well-being of less-educated elders, many of whom work in physically demanding jobs. Raising the retirement age may seem like the simplest solution to an impending crisis, but giving people a choice could lead to a better outcome rather than forcing everyone to work longer than they want. In today's highly competitive job market, offering flexibility in retirement age would be a desirable action for both retirees and the youth. ‒ June 12, 2025 Chia Chu Hang is a Research Assistant at EMIR Research, an independent think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Independent Spore News
