
Ejected from US, rejected by Bhutan and Nepal: Himalayan refugees face statelessness
United States
this spring, in a move that stunned resettled communities across America, have found themselves in devastating legal limbo after
Bhutan
refused to accept them upon arrival. Instead of a homecoming, the deportees were rejected at the border, leaving them stateless and adrift—most now confined once again to refugee camps in
Nepal
.
Nepal has said it cannot grant these refugees legal status and is in negotiations with the US government for a possible solution, but so far, no country has agreed to offer citizenship or permanent refuge.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Public Policy
Design Thinking
Cybersecurity
Artificial Intelligence
MCA
Degree
Others
Data Science
healthcare
Leadership
CXO
Finance
Product Management
Digital Marketing
PGDM
Operations Management
others
Management
Data Analytics
Data Science
MBA
Project Management
Healthcare
Technology
Skills you'll gain:
Economics for Public Policy Making
Quantitative Techniques
Public & Project Finance
Law, Health & Urban Development Policy
Duration:
12 Months
IIM Kozhikode
Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management
Starts on
Mar 3, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Months
IIM Calcutta
Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Who are the refugees?
The affected are primarily
Lhotshampa
, a Nepali-speaking ethnic minority forcibly driven out of Bhutan in the 1990s. Over 100,000 were housed in sprawling camps in eastern Nepal, and beginning in 2007, many resettled in the US, Canada, Australia, and the UK as part of a UN-led solution.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Smart Indians use these 5 WhatsApp tricks
Learn More
Undo
Ramesh Sanyasi, 24 was born in the Beldangi refugee camp in Nepal and migrated legally to the United States at age 10, becoming part of Pennsylvania's vibrant Bhutanese resettled community. He worked at an Amazon warehouse, hoping to build a stable future.
Everything changed after a night out with friends led to his arrest for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and providing false identification, according to court records. After serving an eight-month sentence, he was abruptly deported in April 2025: first to New Delhi, and then flown to Paro, Bhutan.
Live Events
Upon arrival in Bhutan, Sanyasi and two others were not welcomed—they were instead transported to the border with India. Bhutanese authorities handed each of them 30,000 Indian rupees (about $350) and arranged for someone to ferry them to Panitanki, a town on the India-Nepal border. There, the deportees paid smugglers to secretly cross the Mechi River back into Nepal, returning to the very refugee camp Ramesh had left more than a decade earlier.
'Life here is tough. I'm living without any identification documents, which makes everything challenging. I can't even withdraw money sent by relatives because I lack proper ID,' he told
CNN
. 'For now, I'm surviving on money sent from the US, but once that runs out, I don't know what will happen.'
Why were they deported?
Most, like Sanyasi, were not undocumented but lost their visas due to criminal convictions—sometimes minor, sometimes more severe—under US law. Many completed their sentences before deportation, but once expelled, found themselves returned to countries that neither recognize their citizenship nor accept their return.
At least 30 Bhutanese refugees have been deported by the US to Bhutan so far, all legally admitted to the US as children under a UN-led resettlement program. All deportees so far have been expelled again at the Bhutan border, given cash, and left to fend for themselves in India and, for most, eventually smuggled into Nepal.
According to
Gopal Krishna Siwakoti
, president of the International Institute for Human Rights, Environment and Development, many deportees are in hiding; some in Nepal, some still lost in India.
Four deportees have now been threatened with a second deportation—this time from Nepal, where they were arrested for illegally crossing the border. However, Nepal's Department of Immigration admits there is nowhere for them to go:
'We are in a dilemma: the US is unlikely to accept them back, and deporting them to Bhutan is not straightforward either,' said department director Tikaram Dhakal.
Life in limbo: The camps of eastern Nepal
For those who remain or have returned to the camps, mostly the elderly or infirm, conditions have evolved: electricity and running water are now present in places like Beldangi Camp, but the end of international aid has led to increased vulnerability, exploitation, and fear of detention. Informal work is the norm, but for many, legal protections are non-existent.
Political stalemate
Efforts for repatriation have repeatedly stalled. Neither Bhutan nor Nepal is party to the 1951
UN Refugee Convention
, complicating formal policy frameworks. Bhutan continues to resist accepting its former citizens, and recent years have seen the exposure of a fraudulent refugee registration scandal, further eroding trust and muddying advocacy efforts.
Diplomatic conversations have inched forward—Nepal announced renewed talks with Bhutan in 2023, but significant progress remains elusive. India, a key regional power, remains a reluctant participant in mediation, and international pressure on Bhutan has waned.
Q. What allowed thousands of Bhutanese refugees to move to the United States?
Most Bhutanese refugees moved to the US through a
UNHCR
and IOM-backed Third Country Resettlement Programme launched in 2007. The US first pledged to take up to 60,000 refugees from Nepali camps, later increasing to more than 80,000, the largest single-country intake. Resettlement was based on refugee status and need, not skills, and included other partner countries—over 100,000 Bhutanese were resettled globally by 2015.
Q. What is the UN Refugee Convention, and why is it important?
The 1951 UN Refugee Convention is a major international treaty that defines refugee rights and the duties of signatory nations. It guarantees non-refoulement (protection from forced return), and the rights to legal status, work, education, and due process. This Convention sets a standard for how refugees are to be protected and integrated by member countries, ensuring basic security and legal recognition.
Q. How does Nepal and Bhutan not joining the Convention affect refugees?
Because Nepal and Bhutan are not signatories, refugees there lack international legal protections—such as the right to residency, documents, protection from deportation, or legal employment. There's no obligation for local integration or citizenship, keeping refugees in prolonged limbo. Legal rights and policies are governed solely by domestic law, leaving refugees vulnerable to changing policies and without international recourse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rahul Gandhi's 'vote theft' claim an afterthought, says EC
NEW DELHI: Election Commission of India on Thursday said leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi 's allegations of "vote theft" during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka appear to be an afterthought, given that Congress neither filed a single appeal with election officials after publication of the state's final electoral roll in Jan 2024 nor did it challenge the results in state high court through an election petition. Talking to reporters in Parliament complex, Rahul claimed that Congress has "concrete 100% proof" of "cheating in an LS seat" in Karnataka and warned that "if you (EC) think you are going to get away with this... you are mistaken... we are going to come for you". The Congress MP said opposition would ensure that EC is held accountable. Dismissing his charges as "baseless" in a statement, EC said: "It is highly unfortunate that rather than filing an election petition as per section 80 of Representation of the People (RP)Act, 1951, or if filed, awaiting verdict of HC, he has not only made baseless allegations but also chosen to threaten EC, which is a constitutional body." With his allegations coming more than a year after the LS polls result, EC said it was wondering why "such baseless and threatening claims were being made against it and the CEC, and that too now." It added that the losing Congress candidates did not file a single election petition to challenge the result, despite Representation of the People Act, 1951 allowing this within 45 days of declaration of result. Others, however, did file 10 election petitions in HC. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Countering Rahul's "unwarranted threatening statements", the Karnataka chief electoral officer (CEO) on X said copies of the draft and final electoral roll for the state's 224 assembly seats were provided to recognised parties, including Congress, on Oct 27, 2023, and Jan 22, 2024, respectively. Between publication of the draft and final roll, around 9.2 lakh claims and objections were received and settled across 34 districts. Neither Congress nor any other entity avail the two-stage appeal option available under Representation of the People Act, 1951, the post said. Meanwhile, backing RJD functionary Tejashwi Yadav suggested possibility of boycotting Bihar elections over the special revision of electoral rolls issue, Congress' K C Venugopal said a political party's biggest weapon in a democracy is the voters' list and if that is compromised, with names being deleted and lists not being clean, then you are challenging democracy. "Let there not be an election and there be one party. Let Election Commission rule that. That is what Yadav meant by his comment about boycotting," Venugopal said.


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka smart meter case: Court orders registration of complaint against minister George, officials
Bengaluru: The simmering controversy over the tendering process of smart meters in Karnataka took an interesting turn with the special court for elected representatives on Wednesday directing enforcement agencies to register a private complaint report (PCR) against energy minister KJ George and others. Based on a complaint filed by BJP functionaries CN Ashwath Narayan, SR Vishwanath, and Dheeraj Muniraj, special court judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat directed officials to submit a status report on the complaint filed with the Lokayukta in April 2025 pertaining to the same issue, besides registering a PCR. The complaint also named additional chief secretary (energy) Gaurav Gupta, previous Bescom MD Mahantesh Bilagi, and Bescom technical director SG Ramesh as accused in the case. The complainants alleged that all the accused did not comply with the tender rules while rolling out the smart meter tender. "A tender was floated in Sept 2024 to provide smart meter services, and it was allotted to one of the bidders, a Davanagere-based shell company. Rather than floating separate tenders for each of the Escoms (electricity supply companies), tenders were floated only for Bescom. The entire process not only violated provisions under the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, but also went against the guidelines laid down by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission," the complaint read. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Pieces of Clothing Older Women should Avoid Learn More Undo by Taboola by Taboola You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Seeking the special court's intervention, the complainants sought registration of an FIR under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhit and the Prevention of Corruption Act. BJP legislators have been hitting out at the state govt and accusing George, who also holds the position of Bescom chairman, of misappropriation in the smart meter tender ever since the issue snowballed into a major controversy during the budget session of legislature. Nothing illegal: George Reacting sharply to the development, the minister retorted: "Is there a court order? If so, give a copy to me and I will react to that." Hitting out at the BJP, he added: "There is a group comprising Ashwath Narayan and others. They have already filed a petition in the high court and have also complained to the governor. Now, a case has also been filed in the people's representatives court. There is nothing illegal and the tender process has been done according to the law. I'm ready to explain everything if needed. Rather than indulging in hit-and-run methods, let them produce documents to the court and our advocates will also argue. Eventually, I will bow to whatever the court orders." BJP demands George's ouster BJP legislator CN Ashwath Narayan on Thursday demanded the dismissal of energy minister KJ George. "There is no malice — this is in public interest," he said, alleging that contracts were given to blacklisted firms, regulations were flouted, and inflated rates were imposed. Narayan questioned whether George would resign, before urging chief minister Siddaramaiah to act immediately to uphold justice and govt accountability


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Now, BJP deploys Mithun to deny Bengali-bashing charge
Kolkata: A day after BJP's Malda North MP Khagen Murmu expressed "concern" over migrant workers from Bengal "facing questions in other states", its party functionary and actor said on Thursday that the claim that Bengali-speaking migrants were being detained was "a lie". Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While BJP's Tathagata Roy, a former governor, said that "Bengali Hindus are not in danger", the party's Bengal minder, Amit Malviya, said only "illegal Bangladeshis were being questioned". It was, however, Chakraborty's comments that came in for sharp criticism by Trinamool. Chakraborty said: "It is a lie that is being spread. Which Bengali is being roughed up? It is nothing but an instigation to create trouble before the assembly polls. During my career, I never saw Bengalis being discriminated against in other states." Pointing fingers at "fake voters", he added: "If we start segregating genuine voters from illegal ones, Trinamool will not even get 70 seats in the state." TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said: "It is understood that he may have sold his spine to BJP for legal and personal reasons, but why is he blind to what is happening countrywide? If he removes his dark glasses, he will get to see that even Parliament is in turmoil over this issue, courts are stepping in, detention camps are being set up in BJP-governed states." Chakraborty is a "good abhineta (actor), but a failed neta (political leader)" Ghosh said. "He campaigned for BJP in 2021 and again in 2024, the results are there for all to see," he added, bringing up that when Chakraborty was made an MP by CM Mamata Banerjee, he had referred to her as his "sister" and felt gratitude that he would "not forget in a lifetime". Chakraborty has started marathon organisational meetings with workers from a dozen assembly segments. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Once the meetings — scheduled over the next three days — end, he will submit a report to the BJP brass on July 27. The actor is scheduled to conduct meetings at Jorasanko, Shyambazar, Rashbehari, Bhowanipore, Maniktala and Kashipur-Belgachhia, among others. "Mithun-da tried to motivate workers. TMC is afraid of BJP and talking about identities rather than economic issues and corruption," said Tamaghna Ghosh, president of BJP's north Kolkata organisational district. Former Meghalaya and Tripura governor Roy, who asserted that Bengal is not the only state to have a Bengali population, posted on X: "Bengali Hindus anywhere in India are in no danger… there are bound to be isolated exceptions that will be set right in due course." Malviya said on X: "Those being questioned are illegal Bangladeshis, who speak Bangla but are not Indian citizens."