logo
Anwar, govt succeed in removing names from Mukhriz's RM5m tax case

Anwar, govt succeed in removing names from Mukhriz's RM5m tax case

The Sun24-07-2025
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and the government succeeded today in having their names removed from a judicial review application filed by Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir.
Mukhriz is challenging the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) issuance of additional tax assessment notices for the years 2017 to 2019, demanding payment of over RM5 million.
High Court Judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh allowed the application by Anwar, in his capacity as Finance Minister, and the government to strike out their names as respondents in the judicial review proceedings.
However, the court dismissed their bid to expunge several paragraphs in Mukhriz's affidavit that made reference to both respondents, and fixed Dec 16 for the hearing of the substantive judicial review application.
On Jan 2, Judge Amarjeet granted leave for Mukhriz to commence judicial review proceedings, having found that the case raised arguable grounds.
Earlier, senior federal counsel Nur Irmawatie Daud, representing both the second and third respondents, argued that the additional assessment notices were issued by the first respondent, the Inland Revenue's chief executive officer or director-general.
'The judicial review application is scandalous, frivolous and an abuse of court process,' she submitted.
However, Mukhriz's counsel, Syed Afiq Syed Albakri, contended that the second respondent had influenced the first respondent in the issuance of the said notices against his client.
Mukhriz, 60, filed the judicial review application on Dec 20 last year, naming the IRB's CEO or Director-General, Anwar and the government as the first to third respondents respectively.
The businessman sought an order to quash the decision of the first respondent to issue additional assessment notices for the years 2017 to 2019, amounting to RM5,020,707.18, on the grounds that the decision was unlawful and unreasonable.
The Pejuang president also sought a declaration that the imposition of penalties under Section 113(2) of the Income Tax Act 1967 was null and void, as well as ultra vires.
The former Kedah Menteri Besar further sought a declaration that the second respondent (Anwar) had abused his powers in causing the first respondent (the government) to issue the said notices.
Finally, he sought a declaration that the second respondent had similarly abused his powers in directing the issuance of a certificate under subsection 104(1) of the Income Tax Act 1967. - Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anwar's statesmanship shines brightly in resolving regional conflicts and defending economy
Anwar's statesmanship shines brightly in resolving regional conflicts and defending economy

The Sun

time8 hours ago

  • The Sun

Anwar's statesmanship shines brightly in resolving regional conflicts and defending economy

KUALA LUMPUR: Within five days, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has achieved much more than what many leaders can only aspire to do in the field of international politics and global trade. Today was pivotal for the domestic economy as the United States lowered tariffs on Malaysian exports to the country from 25 per cent to 19 per cent after what was surely tough negotiations. A day earlier, he received a phone call from President Donald Trump confirming the latter's attendance at the 47th ASEAN summit in October. This is indeed a feather in the cap not only for Anwar but also for Malaysia as host for the ASEAN summit and related meetings with leaders of dialogue partners. Trump's presence in Kuala Lumpur will add more weight to the series of meetings among the world's leaders, including other superpowers such as China. But of course, what stands out globally was when he brokered a ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand on Monday following border clashes between the two ASEAN members. After 35 people were killed, there was imminent fear the conflict could degenerate into a full-fledged war if others did not intervene. Fortunately, Anwar's fortitude managed to sway the two neighbours to return to the path of peace, for there are no victors in a war, but only casualties. This would have been be a sad state of affairs for ASEAN which was in the first place formed in 1967 to promote peace amid a volatile geopolitical environment. Credit goes to Anwar who within five days managed to do the unthinkable for regional peace and security and keep Malaysia's economy afloat after Washington had earlier announced debilitating tariffs of 25 per cent. His clarification that his sole focus in the recent Thai-Cambodian conflict was on finding a peaceful resolution to ensure ASEAN's continued stability and security was understating his magnanimity. He also dismissed claims that there was external pressure from global powers, reaffirming that the major breakthrough came through direct regional diplomacy. Which means a lot rested on the Prime Minister's shoulders in delicately bringing the parties embroiled in the conflict to the negotiating table and carving out a ceasefire. Previous Malaysian leaders can lay claim to having done many things but definitely not resolving a conflict between two nations embroiled in deadly clashes. Kudos should also go to the team from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs led by Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan. Their diplomatic and regional political success in brokering peace between Cambodia and Thailand is something other regional economies would want to learn more about. No less important is the tireless efforts of Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz and his ministry's negotiating team for their success in lowering tariffs. Of course, the lower tariffs of 19 per cent as compared to 25 per cent would mean substantial savings for Malaysian exporters. A further plus point for Malaysia is that semiconductors – a major export revenue earner for Malaysia and pharmaceuticals – are exempted from any tariffs. Against such positive credentials, the protest march organised by mainly opposition politicians to bring down Anwar held in downturn KL last weekend was misplaced. No doubt there are domestic issues such as high costs to resolve. And within these few eventful days, Anwar unveiled the people-centric 13th Malaysia Plan, calling for value creation and upholding the people's welfare in the next five years and beyond without any grand plans but practical and doable measures with a tight rein on finances. Undoubtedly, based on his performance so far and especially the last few eventful days, Anwar can be counted upon to deliver for Malaysia while confronting unexpected obstacles. As Prime Minister, Finance Minister and as chair of ASEAN, he has steered Malaysia on the right upward path despite the shocking tariffs announcement in April and the unexpected conflict in ASEAN between two neighbours. The least we as the rakyat can do is to give him that space and support to do what is best for Malaysia. - Bernama

30-Year-Old Malaysian With Less Than RM10K Savings: The Post That Got Everyone Talking
30-Year-Old Malaysian With Less Than RM10K Savings: The Post That Got Everyone Talking

Rakyat Post

time9 hours ago

  • Rakyat Post

30-Year-Old Malaysian With Less Than RM10K Savings: The Post That Got Everyone Talking

Subscribe to our FREE A Malaysian's social media post questioning whether 30-year-olds without RM10,000 in savings have 'something wrong' has created a massive online conversation that shows no signs of slowing down. The person claimed that 30-year-olds should have at least RM30,000 in savings, arguing that after years of working, those who can't even save RM10K 'definitely have something wrong with them.' This bold statement quickly divided the online community into two camps. Those who agreed with the original post made compelling arguments. They pointed out that someone earning RM5,000 monthly, who remains unmarried and lives with their parents, should reasonably be able to save RM10,000 by age 30. They also calculated that this would require averaging just RM2,000 in savings per year since graduation, which breaks down to approximately RM180 monthly. These supporters emphasised that emergency funds are essential for financial security. The Reality Check from Critics However, many Malaysians quickly shared their personal struggles that painted a very different picture. A 24-year-old confessed, 'Too many expenses, only RM20 left at month-end,' detailing monthly expenses that include utilities costing RM280, rent exceeding RM400, and food expenses around RM300. This young adult's situation resonated with countless others facing similar financial pressures. The discussion took on a more sobering tone when a 50-year-old admitted, 'Never had more than RM10K savings, but grateful Allah provides enough for my family.' This middle-aged perspective highlighted how even decades of working don't guarantee substantial savings for everyone. Real-World Financial Challenges As the conversation evolved, the public began sharing the genuine obstacles they face in building savings. Family obligations emerged as a major factor, with many explaining their responsibilities in caring for parents and supporting family members. The rising cost of living became another recurring theme, with people expressing frustration that 'everything is expensive, impossible to save.' Unexpected expenses, particularly medical bills and family emergencies, were also frequently mentioned as savings destroyers. Balanced Voices Emerge Fortunately, some provided more nuanced perspectives that helped balance the discussion. They reminded others that age 30 typically comes with additional commitments and responsibilities that younger people might not fully understand. These voices emphasised that caring for elderly parents shouldn't be viewed as 'problematic' but rather as prioritising family needs. Most importantly, they emphasised that individual circumstances vary significantly, rendering blanket financial judgments unfair and unrealistic. On the other hand, it is also worth noting that the person could have assets, investments, or other forms of wealth beyond liquid cash savings, which could easily explain why the immediate cash reserves appeared limited. READ MORE : Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store