Dartmoor becomes sheep rustling ‘Wild West'
Many farmers are said to be considering quitting the profession or bringing their flocks off the moors in Devon, where livestock has roamed for centuries, because rising thefts are costing them thousands of pounds.
Colin Abel said more than 400 of his ewes had disappeared this winter and estimated he has lost nearly £500,000 worth of livestock from his west Dartmoor farmland over the past decade.
He told the BBC: 'It's beginning to feel like the Wild West up here when it comes to sheep crime – it's soul-destroying.'
The national park is among the five worst areas in the country for sheep rustling.
Last year more than 1,300 sheep were reported stolen in Devon and Cornwall. Nearly 800 of the thefts – or 62 per cent – happened in west Dartmoor.
Stolen sheep can end up in other farmers' flocks, sold on the black market or illegally slaughtered in uncontrolled conditions before entering the food chain.
Mr Abel's family has run Lower Godsworthy Farm in Tavistock since 1888. He keeps his flock of Scotch Blackface and Welsh mountain sheep on the moor for nine-and-a-half months of the year.
However, the remote landscape of forests, rivers and wetlands makes them hard to keep an eye on and vulnerable to theft.
He said: 'It impacts financially and on the viability of the business. I know farmers who are thinking about whether they want to continue.'
Just seven miles east across the moor in Princetown, Neil Cole claims to have lost £7,000 in just one year after thieves targeted his flock of Scottish Blackface sheep.
He said: 'We turn out 220 lambs expecting to get 160 back – at £150 a lamb we're in the lap of the gods until we gather.'
Mr Cole added: 'The economics of keeping sheep on the moor is becoming harder and harder, so the younger generation aren't taking it on as much. I've heard farmers say they are ready to give up ... the sheep are important for the ecology of the moor.
'It's not the sort of thing you can steal if you don't have the knowledge. It is causing divisions in the community.'
Martin Beck, who was appointed in 2024 as the UK's first national livestock theft specialist police officer, said that tracking stolen sheep was challenging.
In the last five years, there have been no prosecutions for sheep theft in Devon and Cornwall.
Mr Beck, who is based in Devon, called for 'more investment and training in rural policing and technology' to help tackle the issue.
Some farmers have turned to technology like satellite trackers and digital ear tags to deter thieves, but for many such costs are unaffordable alongside the existing financial challenges of farming.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Major emergency rescue operation launched in Perth
Emergency services were called to respond to an incident near Tay Street, Perth, at around 7.45pm on Thursday. The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service also received reports of an incident at Moncreiffe Island, in the River Tay. An air ambulance, special operations teams, lifeboats and firefighters were among those involved in the search. READ MORE: Bold plans to save Scottish BBC studios from 'fading into history' unveiled Police said they closed Tay Street between Marshall Place and Canal Street while the search was carried out. The nature of the rescue operation is currently unknown. A police statement read: 'Around 7.45pm on Thursday, 14 August, 2025 we received a report of a concern for a person in the water near to Tay Street, Perth. 'As a result Tay Street is closed in both directions, from Marshall Place to Canal Street, for motorists and pedestrians. 'Emergency services are in attendance and people are asked to avoid the area.' A spokesperson for the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service added: 'We received the call at 7.37pm to Moncreiffe Island. 'We have two appliances, a boat, crew, and two officers in attendance, with another appliance and boat on the way.'
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Anger and confusion as Meta overturns more Instagram account bans
Instagram users have told the BBC of their confusion, fear and anger after having their accounts suspended, often for being wrongly accused by parent company Meta of breaching the platform's child sex abuse months, tens of thousands of people around the world have been complaining Meta has been banning their Instagram and Facebook accounts in say they have been wrongly accused of breaching site rules - including around child sexual than 500 of them have contacted the BBC to say they have lost cherished photos and seen businesses upended - but some also speak of the profound personal toll it has taken on them, including concerns that the police could become acknowledged a problem with the erroneous banning of Facebook Groups in June, but has denied there is wider issue on Facebook or Instagram at has repeatedly refused to comment on the problems its users are facing - though it has frequently overturned bans when the BBC has raised individual cases with are some of the stories users have shared with BBC News. 'I put all of my trust in social media' Yassmine Boussihmed, 26, from the Netherlands, spent five years building an Instagram profile for her boutique dress shop in April, she was banned over account integrity. Over 5,000 followers, gone in an instant. She lost clients, and was devastated."I put all of my trust in social media, and social media helped me grow, but it has let me down," she told the week, after the BBC sent questions about her case to Meta's press office, her Instagram accounts were reinstated."I am so thankful," she said in a tearful voice note. Five minutes later, her personal Instagram was suspended again - but the account for the dress shop remained. Lucia, not her real name, is a 21-year-old woman from Austin, Texas. She was suspended from Instagram for just over two weeks for breaching Meta's policy on child sexual exploitation (CSE), abuse and with all the other cases, she was not told what post breached the platform's has left wondering if a picture she posted of herself and her 21-year-old friend wearing bikini tops somehow triggered the artificial intelligence (AI) moderation tools, as she thinks they "look a little bit younger".She also uses her account to interact with under 18s, such as sending Reels to her younger sister."It is deeply troubling to have an accusation as disgusting as this one," she told BBC News."Given that I have a desire to work in juvenile justice as an attorney and advocate on behalf of children, I am appalled to have been suspended for something I know I did not do and would never do."She appealed, and then about seven hours after the BBC highlighted Lucia's case to Meta's press office, her account was restored with no explanation. Over 36,000 people have signed a petition accusing Meta of falsely banning accounts; thousands more are in Reddit forums or on social media posting about central accusation - Meta's AI is unfairly banning people, with the tech also being used to deal with the appeals. The only way to speak to a human is to pay for Meta Verified, and even then many are has not commented on these claims. Instagram states AI is central to its "content review process" and Meta has outlined how technology and humans enforce its policies. A community torn away Duncan Edmonstone, from Cheshire, has stage four ALK+ lung cancer. The 55-year-old finds solace in the support network he has on private Facebook 12 days at the end of June, he was banned for breaking cybersecurity guidelines before being reinstated."The support groups are my lifeline, and there are actual examples of where advice from group members has made a difference to other patient's treatment," he said."I draw satisfaction and meaning, in a life that is probably going to be cut short, from helping other people in that group." Banned, unbanned - then banned again Ryan - not his real name - has been banned, reinstated, and banned again from Instagram over the past few former teacher from London was thrown off the platform in May after he was accused of breaching the CSE spent a month appealing. In June, the BBC understands a human moderator double checked and concluded Ryan had breached the his account was abruptly restored at the end of July."We're sorry we've got this wrong," Instagram said in an email to him, adding that he had done nothing was left flabbergasted. "'Sorry we called you a paedophile for two months - here is your account back,'" is how he characterised the tone of the that wasn't the end of the story. Hours after the BBC contacted Meta's press office to ask questions about his experience, he was banned again on Instagram and, for the first time, Facebook."I am devastated and I don't know what to do," he told the BBC."I can't believe it has happened twice."His Facebook account was back two days later - but he was still blocked from Instagram. Ryan says he has been left feeling deeply isolated - and worried the police are going to "knock on the door".His experiences mirrors those of other Instagram users who told the BBC of the "extreme stress" of having their accounts banned after being wrongly accused of breaching the platform's rules on CSE. What has Meta said? Despite taking action on Yassmine, Lucia and Ryan's accounts, Meta has not made any comment to the common with all big technology firms, it has come under pressure from authorities to make its platforms July, Meta said it was taking "aggressive action" on accounts breaking its rules - including the removal of 635,000 Instagram and Facebook accounts over sexualised comments and imagery in relation to wide-ranging policy on child sexual exploitation has changed three times since Boxing Day last year, with all amendments occurring since 17 July. It has not said what impact, if any, these changes had on the cases the BBC has raised with it. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
Death row killer gouges out both his own eyes and eats them in bid to avoid execution
Death row killer gouges out both his own eyes and eats them in bid to avoid execution Andre Thomas, 39, was sentenced to death in 2005 for the murders of his estranged wife and her two children. His execution was postponed after he gouged out his eyes The father removed the hearts of his kids (Image: Harold Democrat) A man sentenced to death for the brutal murder of his wife and children, in a horrific act of self-mutilation, gouged out both of his eyes and ate them in an attempt to avoid execution. Andre Thomas was handed the death sentence in 2005, but his execution was delayed after he removed his own eyeballs. He was discovered in his cell, covered in blood, prior to his court appearance in 2004, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune. In another shocking incident, Thomas gouged out his remaining eye and consumed it, leaving him completely blind. His legal team stated that he believed this act of self-harm would prevent the government from hearing his thoughts. The news comes as police hunt a killer on the run as family of 'horrific' Welsh murder victim say they are 'terrified'. The 39 year old is currently incarcerated in Texas for a triple murder to which he has confessed. He admitted to killing his estranged wife, Laura Christine Boren, their four year old son, and Boren's 13-month-old daughter. Thomas told authorities that he believed God had instructed him to commit the murders, claiming he thought his victims were demons. He also removed the hearts of both children, as reported by the Associated Press, reports the Mirror. Thomas gouged out his remaining eye and consumed it (Image: Texas Execution) Article continues below He was found guilty in 2005 and automatically received the death penalty. His execution is scheduled for 5 April 2023. Jason Clark, an agency spokesperson, confirmed: "Thomas said he pulled out his eye and subsequently ingested it." In March 2023, Judge Jim Fallon granted an order suspending Thomas' execution warrant, following a request from his legal team for extra time to assess his mental condition and determine whether he met the competency requirements for capital punishment. According to the Supreme Court, whilst the death penalty isn't prohibited for individuals with serious mental disorders, it mandates that a person must be deemed competent. Marie Levin, Thomas' solicitor, stated: "We are confident that when we present the evidence of Mr. Thomas's incompetence, the court will agree that executing him would violate the Constitution. Andre Thomas before and after each of his self-inflicted attacks (Image: AP) "Guiding this blind psychotic man to the gurney for execution offends our sense of humanity and serves no legitimate purpose." Levin described Thomas as "one of the most mentally ill prisoners in Texas history ... not competent to be executed, lacking a rational understanding of the state's reason for his execution." After consuming his first eyeball, Thomas received treatment at a medical facility before being moved to a prison psychiatric unit. His trial barrister, Bobbie Peterson-Cate, remarked that he would "finally be able to receive the mental health care that we had wanted and begged for from day 1." In March 2023, over 100 faith leaders and others issued a plea for mercy to halt his execution. However, J. Kerye Ashmore from the Grayson County District Attorney's Office, who prosecuted the case, stated they knew "nothing about the case" and had not read any reports or evaluations concerning his mental state. Article continues below Thomas continues to be on death row.
