SC declines urgent listing for clarification plea by Bhima Koregaon accused Hany Babu
New Delhi, June 23 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Monday refused to grant an urgent hearing to a plea filed by former Delhi University professor Hany Babu, an accused in the Bhima Koregaon case, seeking a clarification that he could approach the High Court for bail after withdrawing his earlier plea in the top court.
A vacation bench comprising justices KV Viswanathan and NK Singh directed that the matter be listed after the court reopens following the summer break, and declined to entertain the application during the limited working days of the vacation.
During the mentioning, the counsel for Babu argued that several co-accused in the case had been granted bail by the Supreme Court either on merits or due to prolonged incarceration.
The application was filed seeking a clarification following a May 2 observation by the Bombay High Court, which stated that Babu should seek clarity from the Supreme Court about his liberty to approach the High Court for bail after withdrawing his special leave petition.
Justice Viswanathan questioned the delay in filing the application. 'The order was passed on May 2. The court was fully functional till May 23. Why was the application not moved earlier?' he asked.
In response, the counsel submitted that obtaining certified copies of the court's orders took time. However, Justice Viswanathan remarked, 'Even in urgent matters, we have filed and got cases listed without certified copies.'
Babu was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in July 2020 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for alleged Maoist links in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence. His bail plea was rejected by the Bombay High Court in September 2022.
In May 2024, he withdrew his bail petition from the Supreme Court stating a change in circumstances, intending to move the High Court afresh.
However, the High Court noted that the Supreme Court's order did not explicitly grant him liberty to re-approach the lower court, prompting the present application for clarification.
The Supreme Court's refusal to list the matter urgently means the issue will now be heard only after the court's summer recess concludes.
UNI SNG PRS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
No relief for Doon builder from HC in land fraud case
Dehradun: Uttarakhand high court on Monday declined to grant immediate relief to Dehradun-based builder and industrialist Sudhir Kumar Windlass and his three associates, who are facing fraud charges. A single bench of Justice Pankaj Purohit scheduled the next hearing on Windlass's third bail application for the first week of July. Windlass's counsel said the 72-year-old was undergoing treatment for health complications at Himalayan Hospital in Dehradun, as per court directions. "We told the court that the chargesheet is under cloud before the Supreme Court, and since the trial is unlikely to conclude soon, he cannot be incarcerated indefinitely. There is no justification for keeping him in judicial custody without a conviction," said Sanjeev Agarwal, Windlass's lawyer. He was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in Dec 2023. Windlass is accused of defrauding individuals by persuading them to sell land, which he then allegedly transferred to another businessman. After complaints from victims, the state govt launched a probe, later handing the case over to CBI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar The CBI investigation implicated Windlass and three associates in the alleged scam. A special CBI court refused to grant any relief to Windlass and his bail plea was rejected 12 months ago, after which he and others sought bail from the high court. The defence argued that the "actual perpetrators," now in prison, "tarnished Windlass's reputation by fabricating documents, despite his standing as a respected businessman in Dehradun." They maintained that Windlass had no role in the fraud and that others misused his name to illegally execute a land sale deed.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bag containing bullets create flutter in Srisailam
The recovery of live bullets and empty shells from near a guest house in the temple town of Srisailam created a flutter on Monday. Srisailam Circle Inspector G. Prasada Rao said workers, while cleaning the town, found a red bag lying adjacent to the road divider in front of Vasavi Guest House. When they opened it, they found live bullets in it. Terrified, they alerted the police. Bomb Disposal Squad and police rushed to the spot and took the bag into their possession. They found six live 303 calibre bullets, five SLR bullets, four 9 mm bullets and four empty SLR shells. The bag was handed over to Sunnipenta police station for investigation. Police are verifying CCTV footage to ascertain who had left the bag. Senior officials ruled out the involvement of Maoists and said the Nallamala forest ranges were free of Maoist movement from the past decade or even more. Sources said that the bullets belonged to special party police and handed over to the officials concerned.
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Hate Speech Won't...": Top Court On Man Arrested Over Social Media Posts
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday took a strong exception to communal tweets by Wajahat Khan, the complainant in Sharmistha Panoli's case, who is now himself under arrest over social media posts. The top court said that hate speech won't take us anywhere. In a relief to Mr Khan, the top court today said that barring the current proceedings in which he is under police custody in West Bengal in two FIRs, no coercive action should be taken against him in FIRs filed in other states. Mr Khan had recently filed a complaint against social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli over her communal videos on social media on Operation Sindoor. However, he was arrested by Kolkata police after his past communal tweets surfaced. He approached the Supreme Court seeking quashing or clubbing of FIRs registered against him across 6 states, including Assam, Bengal, Maharashtra, Haryana and Delhi. The top court issued notice to 6 states returnable by July 14. These FIRs in other states have been stayed till the next hearing. The bench also ordered that no coercive action be taken against him on any FIR that may be registered in future over the same allegations. Senior Advocate Dama Seshadri Naidu appeared for the Khan in the top court today. At the outset of the hearing, the bench questioned the counsel over his tweets. "You have not annexed the tweets? The bench of Justice KV Vishwanathan and NK Singh at the outset questioned the counsel appearing for Wajahat Khan. "My tweets are deleted and I have posted an apology", his counsel told the court. Terming these posts as "hate tweets", the top court expressed concern and also quoted a Tamil proverb which roughly translates to "wounds inflicted by fire may heal, but not the wounds inflicted by tongue." Mr Naidu, appearing for Mr Khan, told the court that FIRs are registered across multiple states; he can't be expected to go to those states. The counsel also read out the apology tweet written by him to "Hindu brothers". Mr Naidu further argued that the complaints were filed in retaliation for his complaints against social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli, who is out on bail. FIRs have been filed against Wajahat Khan in several states for inciting religious sentiments and posting hate-mongering material. Wajahat Khan is currently in police custody after being arrested by Kolkata Police on June 10.
